This is a real article, from a Jewish magazine
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (58)
sorted by:
Pit bulls aren't Jews, they are orcs.
They're literal demon dogs.
No they're literally the blacks of the dog world.
There's nothing wrong with pit bulls. Rat dogs like chihuahuas are much more aggressive breeds. Pits are some the most loving pets you could have as long as you raise them properly.
When a chihuahua flips its shit you get scratched. When a pit bull flips its shit you get a funeral.
Thanks for pointing this out. Although it's been argued to pit owners for years. I can't believe they still use the chihuahua defense. It's like talking to literal NPCs.
The same can be said of any big dog. Pits don't have a more violent disposition than most others.
lol, now you're just lying. But pit bulls are one of those things like circumcision or well done steak that's completely a waste of energy to argue about online.
Whatever you say. I've had three. They're the most loyal companions anyone could ask for.
Despite being 20% of the dog population pit bulls commit 60% of fatal dog attacks. Funny enough these statistics are actually real.
If you look, the pit bull attacks track pretty closely with a different ~20% in the ownership of the dog.
It's more like 6/66.
Stats don’t care.
THEN ALL OF SUDDEN
https://youtube.com/watch?v=O5UwA5y32Ew
2 days ago:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=2maa00Rr1C0
Anecdotal examples don't disprove statistics about per capita behaviors. You're using the NAxALT fallacy (not all X are like that). It's identical to saying "I have peaceful black friends" when someone brings up the 13/60 crime stats about black people in the U.S, or about welfare usage, or IQ, or about voting habits, dileneated by race, sex, or other causal factor.
Look at this retard lol
You literally think the Jews are embroiled in a massive conspiracy against you. I couldn't give less of a fuck what you think is retarded.
Pattern recognition is a sign of intelligence, and a necessary requirement for survival of all lifeforms in this universe, which naturally weeds out stupidity. The better a person/animal is at recognizing various other people, animals, plants, behaviors, weather, etc. as safe, dangerous, or otherwise, the better they'll be able to succeed and survive. Lack of pattern recognition achieves the antithesis of that outcome: failure, injury, and death.
Cases of German Sheppards going crazy are much less prevelent than pitbulls going apeshit. It is both parts training but also blood.
Yeah, just responsible for only 67% of all lethal dog attacks in America 2005-2020.
I got attacked by a dog twice the size of a pitbull. The big fucker didn't even break my skin.
A pitbull won't stop until either you or it is dead, because it is a mutant monster bred specially to fight to the death.
Like, https://youtube.com/watch?v=b33R9h508Ps You think it would end once multiple people arrived with help and armed (literal halberds wtf, a gun) and chased them away from eating this man? Of course fucking not. (The man died of his injuries anyway.)
They also usually devour little children. And won't let go too, unless you kill the hellspawn:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=O5UwA5y32Ew
https://youtube.com/watch?v=K52oWrPV6sg
https://youtube.com/watch?v=SEqTg2Mz-BQ
I think those 'halberds' are tree trimmers.. it's basically a big pair of garden shears on a stick, for trimming loose branches high up.
I've got a dope pit bull but the deal with pits is they go super intense sometimes and shut off their brains. That can be dangerous
All you really need to do is socialize them a lot when they're puppies and they'll be fine. The online pitbull hate cult is completely irrational. It's just a bunch of reddit Karens who get wet at the idea of banning things.
We don't want to ban pit bulls, we just want common sense pit bull control!
We seriously need to just get rid of them.
They can't be even used as military dogs.
Why cant they be used as military dogs?
Not trainable, just as likely to attack their handlers as anyone else. And I assume no interest in anything related to finding contraband or search and rescue. Although you might be able to get them to do search and rescue, they would probably maul whoever they rescued. I don't think they have particularly keen senses anyway.
Wikipedia links to a few articles about pit bulls being used as drug dogs. I don't know if they're suitable to be trained as passive response dogs, but if you don't mind them scratching or gnawing on the suspect container they're evidently usable for finding contraband.
Fellow Golden Retrievers
https://twitter.com/pandasandvidya has been pitposting for hours.
https://twitter.com/PandasAndVidya/status/1579031934168023040/photo/1
And here we see the classic Alinsky tactic; 'Accuse your opponents of that which you are guilty of'.
It's an uno reverse.
Is that new? Never seen that on Twitter before.
Edit: Also: yup, the article is actually real (always good to check random screenshots): https://archive.ph/IQAM6
Despite making up 20% of the canine population,
6 percent in America.
LMAO LMAO
This is a really weird stance to take. Have other humans been intentionally, selectively bred for certain characteristics to the extent dogs, cats, farm animals etc have?
Even on the flip side, this charged language isn't going to help. If you only say "This X is Y and Z" and don't offer solutions, people are going to act on your rhetoric in a similar manner. And in response, people ARE going to circle wagons if they feel as though you just want blood for crimes they had no direct involvement in.
the german dog
Pitbulls are cute pets SO LONG as you train them and raise them as such, I'm much more disapproving over pugs as they literally can't breathe properly but I just want to stop breeding them than culling them that some have tried to pitbulls.
It's not worth the risk.
Joe public cannot be trusted to train a pitbull to override the instincts that were bred into it. One slip is all it takes and someone is scarred for life, mutilated, or dead. That's not a worthwhile risk for the very minor payoff of having a dog that looks a certain way.
Siegfried and Roy couldn't keep the best trained tiger in the world from eventually ripping one of their throats out. Why the hell do we trust room temperature IQ Becky the 'pit mommy' to train a pitbull?
In fact in America, Jermaine Public CAN be trusted to train pitbulls to lean on those instincts and become even more dangerous killing machines.
I heard Siegfried and Roy's tiger wasn't actually trying to be aggressive, but with teeth that big does it even matter?
A dog where you need to have perfect and exact training and behavior at all times or else it has a solid chance to murder you or your children isn't worth it in any circumstances. Especially if you judge worth as "its a cute pet."
Even if you train it perfectly, there is always a risk it will suddenly decide it wants to kill someone. They were bred to be murder machines.
The scariest thing is how any other pitbulls in the home will join in the attack.
They can also randomly eat their own puppies for no reason.
Yeah, I'm totally sure every single putbull attack was the result of "untrainted" pets.
Then would you prefer we cull them all? I'm more of a 'so long as we haven't genetically bred them to suffer, the animal shouldn't be denied life' kind of guy.
Farm animals, all fine as so long as you aren't stacking them on top of each other they live relatively well. But a lot of these 'designer pets' have too many conditions they are eternally suffering.
I'm just tired as someone who likes dogs hearing everytime how people breed these dogs, owners buy them that can't manage it and an incident happens. If public can't do it fine, quit breeding them to stop them suffering being abandoned or put down in the future.
You can't train out instinct. Pits were bred as fighting dogs, it is in their blood.
Women have killed more than pitbulls, but nobody's advocating to not let them near children.
Just sounds like making excuses for people who can't raise their dogs, like "race realism" makes excuses for shitty single mothers.
If you follow his arguments enough, despite thinking that most women are bad, he doesn't actually think they are "rotten by nature". That's a "tradcuck" point of view. He would say that women over all generations have chosen to be evil because they are evil but it's not nature it's a willful choice and if only we'd punish them they will stop.
I don't think he believes this. He seems to be of the Lockean "blank slate" mentality. All humans are equal and have the same capabilities and flaws. Women are only universally evil because we've allowed them to be so. But when he says women he doesn't mean all women. His mother was a saint.
(don't attribute this weirdo philosophy to me, I'm just interpreting!)
I have more sympathy for the dogs. The women should know better.
No, what's annoying is that he can't resist the temptation to post his offtopic psychosis of "I hate all women (actually just feminists (no I mean really all women))" in EVERY GODDAMN THREAD.
I'm not sure what you mean? Are you claiming women are less intelligent than pitbulls?
They have average human intelligence, they don't act the way they do because they don't know better, they do it because they want to.
The idea that they are stupid is just a weird way of deflecting blame from them.