This is a real article, from a Jewish magazine
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
Women have killed more than pitbulls, but nobody's advocating to not let them near children.
Just sounds like making excuses for people who can't raise their dogs, like "race realism" makes excuses for shitty single mothers.
If you follow his arguments enough, despite thinking that most women are bad, he doesn't actually think they are "rotten by nature". That's a "tradcuck" point of view. He would say that women over all generations have chosen to be evil because they are evil but it's not nature it's a willful choice and if only we'd punish them they will stop.
I don't think he believes this. He seems to be of the Lockean "blank slate" mentality. All humans are equal and have the same capabilities and flaws. Women are only universally evil because we've allowed them to be so. But when he says women he doesn't mean all women. His mother was a saint.
(don't attribute this weirdo philosophy to me, I'm just interpreting!)
I have more sympathy for the dogs. The women should know better.
No, what's annoying is that he can't resist the temptation to post his offtopic psychosis of "I hate all women (actually just feminists (no I mean really all women))" in EVERY GODDAMN THREAD.
I'm not sure what you mean? Are you claiming women are less intelligent than pitbulls?
They have average human intelligence, they don't act the way they do because they don't know better, they do it because they want to.
The idea that they are stupid is just a weird way of deflecting blame from them.