It's common knowledge, backed by statistics, that the majority of pedophiles were abused as children. They are not born, they're made.
I don't give a shit about their feelings; you come near my kids and you're losing a body part. If you were actually a "non-offending" pedophile, if you actually were acting in good faith, you'd be staying the hell away from kids on your own.
You don’t get it, the gay rights movement was to take down the barrier for pedophilia. When they could push sodomy as “biological” they could push sodomy with kids as “biological”. There is no age of puberty for anal rape. THERE IS STILL NO EVIDENCE THAT BEING GAY IS INHERENTLY GENETIC OR BIOLOGICAL. We pretended the gay community “dropped” nambla in the 70s, it was a lie.
I have never met a sodomite who didn't have a past of abuse. Those that say they haven't will later admit that it was a "consenting" relationship with someone much older than them....
you are aware that being exposed to extreme hardcore pornography at a young age and having it drilled into your head throughout your childhood is abuse, right?
The 'born this way' argument works for gays because being gay was accepted as not inherently evil, just deviant. That's where the "live and let live" gets used.
But for pedos, doesn't being 'born that way' just make a case for euthenasia?
You’re taking it a different direction, they want pedophilia to be considered biological so they can rush in and grant fake rights to fuck kids. Just as they did with gays and trans and now gay /trans kids.
THERE IS STILL NO EVIDENCE THAT BEING GAY IS INHERENTLY GENETIC OR BIOLOGICAL
I wouldn't say that. The two stats I've seen that would suggest a biological component was that the likelihood of son growing up and becoming gay looked something like this:
1st born son: less than 1% chance
2nd born son: less than 1% chance
1st born son with a sister: less than 1% chance
1st born son with 2 sisters: less than 1% chance
2nd born son with a brother and a sister: less than 1% chance
3rd born son: 30% chance
The fact that it's not a linear jump suggests that something might have activated in these kids by the time they were hitting puberty. It does make me think that there is something about homosexuality that functions as a kind of natural population control, because you see it emerge in populations that are heavily gender segregated, like in prisons. It's also pretty obvious that it happens in the Muslim world, even if they deny it. I have a longer hypothesis that it's actually a way of removing low-status men and women from potential breeding pools without resorting to the inevitable social violence that would occur if the disproportionality of men-to-women, or women-to-men got too extreme.
You realize you just posted two social components not biological right? What gene causes gay? What hormonal imbalances cause gayness? There is no biological proof that gayness exists… even the AMA, WHO, APA won’t make that claim. They just pretend it’s true.
Genetics doesn't typically work like that in any case. Particularly for behaviors. There's no "angry" gene. There's no "violence" gene. There's no "inquisitive" gene.
You realize you just posted two social components not biological right?
Why would you think that that the reaction to an environmental condition is purely social?
Put it like this: there is a specific species of lizard that has evolved to swim from one island to another in order to find more territory. However, due to the difficulties of these swims, many lizards may die. What's been discovered is that a certain percentage of these lizards are capable of actually changing their sex enough to create fertile offspring. I believe this case it was the females of the species that were larger and did the swimming. If only 3 of 20 lizards survived the trip and they were all female, sometimes they would die out on the island, but other times one of the females would actually partly change sex including producing sperm and inseminating other females. This cause the population to have male and female offspring, allowing the population to grow.
That's fucking weird and not human, and we know that the animals themselves don't have a "social construct" to talk about. However, there's no question that the environment caused a biological reaction. Specifically the lack of suitable males.
Obviously, genetics can create behaviors that modify your environment. However, environmental pressures can absolutely effect your genes.
I don't think it would be beyond reason to imagine that environmental stressors could cause a biological reaction in people that were predisposed to react in a certain way. If those stressors were a significant lack of potential mates of the opposite sex, it wouldn't surprise me that some small percentage of the male population would be predisposed to sexual activity with the male population, removing lower status males from the breeding pool of potential suitors for the few females, and creating a less violent and lethal environment for males fighting for breeding rights.
You do know aggression and most extremes of emotional disturbances are actually tied to genes? Kinda like schizophrenia, bpd, depression, anxiety. Family lineage is the largest indicator for mental illness. Arguing environmental factors as a biological factor is insane. No one would say nuclear radiation is a biological factor. Again the environment of humans is controlled, gay sex has preceded all controlled human environments. So your argument makes no sense. Unless you’re saying that we have had the same environment since Greek antiquity or earlier…
I'm not saying the fact that gay sex exists means it's the same environment.
I'm saying that I think that disproportionality of one gender or the other causes homosexuality to emerge in that group. It's reactive to an environmental pressure, which is going to be different depending on place and time.
The writing was on the wall with the tranny stuff in particular. They had been saying for years that trannies are better off the younger they transition. Once they normalize child transitions, childhood itself is effectively abolished. If people accept that a kid can decide to mutilate their body, there is no longer a coherent basis for saying they can't decide to bang an adult.
Pedophilia is not a sexual preference, it is a dysfunction of sexual attraction that is highly-correlated to fetishes such as autogynephilia ( the ''trans lesbians'' ).
The only point these groomers have is that you cannot fix a pedo.
There are pedos that have self-control and are not devoured by their sexual urges. You'll never hear about them.
The ones that molest kids lack self-control and will molest kids again. They either don't have conscience, or don't listen to it. This kind rape kids again when given the opportunity. They will swear up and down they will never diddle kids again. It's a lie.
These ''academics'' are groomers. They want to normalize pedophilia by putting on display select individuals who would never molest kids.
The result will inevitably child molesters use this new Politically Correct bullshit as a shield to get access to children and accuse people who object of being intolerant bigots.
And soon enough the ''akshually childre have sexual agency'' rapists will make another push.
I think it's an important point that the non-offending pedos will never be heard from. They'll go their whole lives thinking that they're different, that a great evil lurks within them that needs to be contained, and that they can't live as others do. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.
All these "support" groups do nothing but affirm them and encourage them to offend by downplaying the seriousness of their situation.
I still think the correct approach is to make it known that pedos get the rope, and if a person has urges they can share it with their therapist. There is no need to "accept" these people. Any more than there is a need to "accept" people who are homicidal or rape-inclined.
The notion that something is acceptable because it is biological and/or immutable is beyond retarded.
Psychopathy has its biological origins. Something tells me these disingenuous twats wouldn't volunteer as victims for the BTK killer. They just expect you to be fine with someone's kids, potentially your own, having their lives destroyed.
Mohammad had sex with his nine year old wife, but is considered the morally perfect prophet of God. Islam is firmly on the pro-pedophile side of this argument, both on paper and in practice.
It's true but like most laws in corrupt states, theocratic regimes are no different, it's mainly applied selectively against those deemed an enemy of the state.
Waiting for the "Will and Grace" of the Pedophile community to get pushed on a major TV network, with NPCs being programmed that it's bad to be pedo-phobic.
I always thought pedophiles (edit: who haven't done anything yet) should be able to admit what they are and get help without having their lives destroyed, but fuck this "accept it as a sexuality" bullshit. The answer is: No.
I would "accept" it as far as a mental illness that needs to be rectified, but that's no good either in clown world, because we all know how it treats destructive mental illnesses and we all know the slippery slope is real.
"Overcome our negative feelings about pedophiles?" Again, I repeat: no.
I always thought pedophiles should be able to admit what they are and get help without having their lives destroyed
And as for the genuinely tragic cases of good people who have desires they can't control, I'm sorry, they should not be alone with children. Their comfort is not more important than society's right to protect its children.
"Won't somebody please think of the rapists?"
You mean while loading the magazines or something?
What you do with your clip magazines is nobody's business but your own, sir...
I would recommend sterilization through a C5 vertebrae fracture.
I accept that pedophiles exist.
I also accept that woodchippers exist.
I accept that rule two exists.
And that sometimes violence is a question, and the answer is 'yes!'
I think there needs to be a plan for this. A solution even. One might call it an Endlösung or perhaps a Final Solution to the pedo question.
Really? Going with the 'born that way' argument?
It's common knowledge, backed by statistics, that the majority of pedophiles were abused as children. They are not born, they're made.
I don't give a shit about their feelings; you come near my kids and you're losing a body part. If you were actually a "non-offending" pedophile, if you actually were acting in good faith, you'd be staying the hell away from kids on your own.
You don’t get it, the gay rights movement was to take down the barrier for pedophilia. When they could push sodomy as “biological” they could push sodomy with kids as “biological”. There is no age of puberty for anal rape. THERE IS STILL NO EVIDENCE THAT BEING GAY IS INHERENTLY GENETIC OR BIOLOGICAL. We pretended the gay community “dropped” nambla in the 70s, it was a lie.
I have never met a sodomite who didn't have a past of abuse. Those that say they haven't will later admit that it was a "consenting" relationship with someone much older than them....
Guess I don't exist, according to this person.
you are aware that being exposed to extreme hardcore pornography at a young age and having it drilled into your head throughout your childhood is abuse, right?
For anyone playing along, we've gone from "gay people are the product of rape" to "found daddy's Playboy collection".
Quick question: how you do explain older women who molest young boys?
i think you found a little more than some chicks with muff and torpedo tits, brother.
The 'born this way' argument works for gays because being gay was accepted as not inherently evil, just deviant. That's where the "live and let live" gets used.
But for pedos, doesn't being 'born that way' just make a case for euthenasia?
and look where that got us
quite possibly the 2nd worst mistake we made as a civilization after allowing women to choose who to marry, but I'm not sure which was worse
You’re taking it a different direction, they want pedophilia to be considered biological so they can rush in and grant fake rights to fuck kids. Just as they did with gays and trans and now gay /trans kids.
I wouldn't say that. The two stats I've seen that would suggest a biological component was that the likelihood of son growing up and becoming gay looked something like this:
The fact that it's not a linear jump suggests that something might have activated in these kids by the time they were hitting puberty. It does make me think that there is something about homosexuality that functions as a kind of natural population control, because you see it emerge in populations that are heavily gender segregated, like in prisons. It's also pretty obvious that it happens in the Muslim world, even if they deny it. I have a longer hypothesis that it's actually a way of removing low-status men and women from potential breeding pools without resorting to the inevitable social violence that would occur if the disproportionality of men-to-women, or women-to-men got too extreme.
You realize you just posted two social components not biological right? What gene causes gay? What hormonal imbalances cause gayness? There is no biological proof that gayness exists… even the AMA, WHO, APA won’t make that claim. They just pretend it’s true.
Genetics doesn't typically work like that in any case. Particularly for behaviors. There's no "angry" gene. There's no "violence" gene. There's no "inquisitive" gene.
Why would you think that that the reaction to an environmental condition is purely social?
Put it like this: there is a specific species of lizard that has evolved to swim from one island to another in order to find more territory. However, due to the difficulties of these swims, many lizards may die. What's been discovered is that a certain percentage of these lizards are capable of actually changing their sex enough to create fertile offspring. I believe this case it was the females of the species that were larger and did the swimming. If only 3 of 20 lizards survived the trip and they were all female, sometimes they would die out on the island, but other times one of the females would actually partly change sex including producing sperm and inseminating other females. This cause the population to have male and female offspring, allowing the population to grow.
That's fucking weird and not human, and we know that the animals themselves don't have a "social construct" to talk about. However, there's no question that the environment caused a biological reaction. Specifically the lack of suitable males.
Obviously, genetics can create behaviors that modify your environment. However, environmental pressures can absolutely effect your genes.
I don't think it would be beyond reason to imagine that environmental stressors could cause a biological reaction in people that were predisposed to react in a certain way. If those stressors were a significant lack of potential mates of the opposite sex, it wouldn't surprise me that some small percentage of the male population would be predisposed to sexual activity with the male population, removing lower status males from the breeding pool of potential suitors for the few females, and creating a less violent and lethal environment for males fighting for breeding rights.
You do know aggression and most extremes of emotional disturbances are actually tied to genes? Kinda like schizophrenia, bpd, depression, anxiety. Family lineage is the largest indicator for mental illness. Arguing environmental factors as a biological factor is insane. No one would say nuclear radiation is a biological factor. Again the environment of humans is controlled, gay sex has preceded all controlled human environments. So your argument makes no sense. Unless you’re saying that we have had the same environment since Greek antiquity or earlier…
I'm not saying the fact that gay sex exists means it's the same environment.
I'm saying that I think that disproportionality of one gender or the other causes homosexuality to emerge in that group. It's reactive to an environmental pressure, which is going to be different depending on place and time.
Even if they are born with it, I don't care. Sucks to be them. Lock 'em up.
I don't know that that's the case. The only statistic that I've seen is that 30% of abuse victims became abusers.
Children cannot consent to sex. All sex with children is rape.
Is rapist now a sexual orientation? Should we accept it as such?
Bill Clinton has entered the chat
I hope I’m wrong but I fear this is the next push and the media shills will go along with it
I knew this was the next step but still seems crazy that we are reaching this point
The writing was on the wall with the tranny stuff in particular. They had been saying for years that trannies are better off the younger they transition. Once they normalize child transitions, childhood itself is effectively abolished. If people accept that a kid can decide to mutilate their body, there is no longer a coherent basis for saying they can't decide to bang an adult.
The media shills can be lined up against the wall along with the pedos.
Pedophilia is not a sexual preference, it is a dysfunction of sexual attraction that is highly-correlated to fetishes such as autogynephilia ( the ''trans lesbians'' ).
The only point these groomers have is that you cannot fix a pedo.
There are pedos that have self-control and are not devoured by their sexual urges. You'll never hear about them.
The ones that molest kids lack self-control and will molest kids again. They either don't have conscience, or don't listen to it. This kind rape kids again when given the opportunity. They will swear up and down they will never diddle kids again. It's a lie.
These ''academics'' are groomers. They want to normalize pedophilia by putting on display select individuals who would never molest kids.
The result will inevitably child molesters use this new Politically Correct bullshit as a shield to get access to children and accuse people who object of being intolerant bigots.
And soon enough the ''akshually childre have sexual agency'' rapists will make another push.
The cure is well known and comes in a wide variety of calibers.
I think it's an important point that the non-offending pedos will never be heard from. They'll go their whole lives thinking that they're different, that a great evil lurks within them that needs to be contained, and that they can't live as others do. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.
All these "support" groups do nothing but affirm them and encourage them to offend by downplaying the seriousness of their situation.
I still think the correct approach is to make it known that pedos get the rope, and if a person has urges they can share it with their therapist. There is no need to "accept" these people. Any more than there is a need to "accept" people who are homicidal or rape-inclined.
Even snopes isn't denying it: https://archive.ph/AaXPl
https://nitter.net/America1Scotty/status/1551395280939106304
The notion that something is acceptable because it is biological and/or immutable is beyond retarded.
Psychopathy has its biological origins. Something tells me these disingenuous twats wouldn't volunteer as victims for the BTK killer. They just expect you to be fine with someone's kids, potentially your own, having their lives destroyed.
Um...
Dear Islam.... please save us.
Mohammad had sex with his nine year old wife, but is considered the morally perfect prophet of God. Islam is firmly on the pro-pedophile side of this argument, both on paper and in practice.
Islamic culture includes the regular molestation of boys as well
Supposedly the Taliban actually executes the people who practice bacha bazi, but that’s just something I heard on plebbit
It's true but like most laws in corrupt states, theocratic regimes are no different, it's mainly applied selectively against those deemed an enemy of the state.
Islams love fucking kids lmao, anyone who spent time overseas can arrest to that
Like I said before, stop falling for psyops.
Waiting for the "Will and Grace" of the Pedophile community to get pushed on a major TV network, with NPCs being programmed that it's bad to be pedo-phobic.
'Cuties' already exists.
I was about to say they are still working on the trannies but then remembered some government ministers.
Imo:
Drawn/CG depictions legal.
Death penalty for raping kids.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/15HvUZQF6c/x/c/4OYYmOxvQ3k
I always thought pedophiles (edit: who haven't done anything yet) should be able to admit what they are and get help without having their lives destroyed, but fuck this "accept it as a sexuality" bullshit. The answer is: No.
I would "accept" it as far as a mental illness that needs to be rectified, but that's no good either in clown world, because we all know how it treats destructive mental illnesses and we all know the slippery slope is real.
"Overcome our negative feelings about pedophiles?" Again, I repeat: no.
And as for the genuinely tragic cases of good people who have desires they can't control, I'm sorry, they should not be alone with children. Their comfort is not more important than society's right to protect its children.
I guess kero the wolf is going to use this as an excuse to bash his enemies with pro-zoo rants.
Edit: that is the infamous tedx video that youtube allowed false dmca's of.