Cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks
(twitter.com)
Comments (92)
sorted by:
Even- if- That's not how it works. That's not how it ever worked. Islam explicitly states that beating your wife is a right. That does not mean freedom of religion protects wife beating.
Not even just a right, but an obligation (in certain circumstances).
Freedom of religion protects religious belief but not necessarily religious practice. It has been noted.
Islam is right about women
Islam is wrong about everything.
Not being able to draw the child rapist mohammed is pretty gay
Allahu alam.
Judaism does not say that abortion is a right, the sects of Judaism that progressives wear as a skinsuit do. Same as every other sect controlled by progressives.
This claim is so stupid that I feel I lose IQ points by refuting it. I'll just point out that even accepting all these premises, that would only allow abortion for Jews. Of course, a religion regarding something as a 'right' does not mean the state cannot prohibit that though. Beyond absurd.
At this point only the Khanists types would survive a political cleansing of the Jewish population.
Guess what Dr. Jester isn't.
Kahanism you mean? That is politics, not religion.
Orthodox and ultra-Orthodox are fine. It's just the Reconstructionist, Reform and even the misnamed Conservatives who have been subverted.
Fortunately, they tend not to have kids, which is why the proportion of real Jews in Israel for example has increased drastically in the past decades.
orthodox and ultra orthodox are not fine if they follow the Talmud which is full of trash in it.
Hi!
I suck at guessing, can you tell me what I am not, in reference to your message...
Comment Reported for: User is being a regressive leaning ween
Do not use me as a downvote button
jews are not the real jews?
Reform 'Jews' are not Jews, yeah, like Congregationalists today are not Christians.
You're not white then, right?
What's white got to do with it?
"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
Adding the incorporation clause to this, it simply means the government cannot create a state religion, nor create laws for the purpose of hindering or discriminating against a particular religion. Nothing to do with banning something that might be practiced by some religion somewhere.
In my opinion, the plain language of the first amendment means that it cannot be incorporated by the 14th amendment, without further explicit language in a future amendment. Furthermore, it’s a limitation on congress only, and not a limit on the courts or the president.
I know that my personal opinion is a legally fringe idea, but since SCOTUS is keen to review the independent state legislature theory, maybe it will gain traction.
You're not wrong. Every state had an established religion at the time of the bill of rights, many officially declared it in their state constitution. The reason there are so many little states in New England is because groups kept marking off territory for their particular flavor of Protestantism. The point of that clause was to stop the feds from imposing a different religion on the states as it is doing now with progressivism.
Should I convert to Islam and engage in the practice of honor killings? Will he defend that?
Bad example. He probably would defend that. Rape gangs as well. Better ask if you can execute homosexuals if you convert to Islam.
To that, Imam Young would probably say that those dumb sandniggers are too stupid to know what their own religion says, and that 'true Islam' is actually very tolerant of homosexuality - like Muhammad was the first feminist.
Well he did rape a little girl. That's very male Feminist.
Damn.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/over-1000-jews-rally-outside-us-capitol-in-support-of-abortion-rights/
You can easily get radicalized by reading the Times of Israel. LOL
It gained me common sense.
Yes, one becomes even more pro-Israel and stand with these wonderful people. Obviously those idiots who only read titles and want to use it as a weapon against Jews will think it is negative. But I am sure there were even more Christians, hardcore at that, doing the same thing about abortion rights. Only an idiot thinks that Jews think the same thing and the lefty jew represents all Jews.
That would be the same thing if I classed all Christians as pro-abortion based on the behavior of a few thousand lefty Christians who are pro-abortion.
Unless you are suggest all Christians are bad based on this news https://notthebee.com/article/when-you-didnt-read-the-first-chapter-of-the-book-but-still-try-to-pass-the-test-
I thought you were being sarcastic. It turns out you actually are cucked and retarded.
Those "wonderful" people don't consider you to be one of their own and will not hesitate to treat you worse because of it. Your affection will not be returned. You are being cucked.
Where did I say all Jews think the same? You retarded faggots always trot out this strawman in your feeble attempts at refuting counter-semitism. You can't win the argument on the merits, as usual.
Interesting, you "people" don't consider me part of your side anymore for marrying a Jewish woman. It is very interesting.
If you did not mean all Jews, then why did you write your previous post. As it clearly alludes to "all".
Correct. I don't. It's not because you married a Jew, either. That's far too personal, and I'm more of a structuralist. Some guy marrying a Jew is statistical noise on the margins.
The reason I don't consider you on my side is that you will risk the future of white people by insisting we treat outsiders as though they are our own people. As I just pointed out, they have no intention of reciprocating that so when we open doors for them, allow them into our countries, to amass wealth and power without bounds within our countries, they will leverage that to advantage their own people at our expense. It doesn't matter whether all Jews/blacks/whatever will behave this way. Enough do, and more importantly, enough of the powerful ones, that this a gauranteed outcome of white people embracing liberal universalism, "colorblindness" if you will. I don't believe in value systems that are harmful and destructive to my own people.
Now take a step back and look at your own behavior. I presented clear evidence of Israel treating white people as outsiders, as lesser than Jews. This bounced right off of you. You don't care. You just casually accept that they will do this, yet you blow a gasket at me for saying white people should take that to heart and treat them like the outsiders they consider themselves to be. Why? Why do you think this way? Who told you Jewish ethnocentrism is acceptable? Who told you white ethnocentrism is unacceptable? Or are the Khazar milkers really that good?
Jews are white people. Seethe.
Your system has failed in the past and in the present with the current identity politics you leftists are enacting.
Just like all the other nations treating whites(jews, scandinavians etc), blacks, asians the same way. Let's not pretend you care about Ukrainians either. You think they are not white people, as neonazis like you do not consider slavs whites.
What the fuck are you talking about that failed? A majority of Americans were against interracial marriage all the way into the fucking 1990s. Was America a failed state for over 200 years?
But you condemn treating Jews as outsiders. You don't condemn Jews treating others as outsiders. You instead overtly declared support for that. Why? Please answer the question this time :)
Any Christians protesting in support of abortion rights?
specifically as a religious right? I don't think so, you're welcome to find it rabbi
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-commentary/think-christianity-is-anti-abortion-think-again-1374697/
OK rabbi
Ok groomer
I'm not Jewish
Which makes you an even greater groomer
He says it’s explicitly stated in Judaism then neglects to recite where or how this is so.
Are you standing up for judaism?
I'm not sure I get the gist of your question.
He claims that Judaism allows abortion then fails to state where or why this is. That could apply to anything.
"The U.S. Constitution claims I get a free house by 30 and a bank account with $3 million in cash" is a claim I can make. I don't have to cite where or how this is true thus making it a very dubious and suspicious claim.
So you are.
Any person with half a brain would stand for Judaism.
Why? All I found so far about judaism has been horrible.
Horrible how?
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
And where did you read that?
I'm living it.
Judaism doesn't say that... Mr. Jonathan.
Judaism is free to be wrong; and remains free, just so. They managed that ..freedom.. with Christ, they can do it with their own children too: in their individual states as permitted therein.
Damn, I actually listen to a lot of his songs :(
I'm just going to assume every big artist on YouTube is a massive leftist or is at least putting a facade to be one
Get better taste in music. His shit is not that good
I want a refund on the thirty seconds I spent verifying this.
Thank you for your service.
I don't know who he is, but you can still listen to his songs. All I need from musicians is to them to be coked-out, suicidal, or whatever it is that makes great music, not their fucking moral lectures.
Be sure to pirate his stuff or, as a general, ensure ad-blocking is fully enabled and functional for all of YouTube.
Pretty much every creator on YouTube that doesn't do political commentary is a lefty.
Because only lefty's consoom unchecked, since they lack any self control or standards.
Preach as is your audience.
This is true. I have a lot of online friends from gaming. The overtly leftist ones are those that can't control their consooming. For example, they don't see a problem with porn consumption or the negative effects it entails.
Owning slaves is a right according to Christianity, Islam, Judaism, zoroastrinism, and several other religions. Not one cherry-picked line from one book of one religion that you need a liberal arts and gymnastics degree to twist and turn it into maybe kinda supporting it, it's really wide-spread, because the barbaric practice in question was commonplace when the works were written.
So... If that's how he wants to set precedent...
https://nitter.eu/JonathanYMusic/status/1540578392734461952
Honestly, who tells them these things? I think all of the abrahamic religions are opposed to abortion.
The Progressive Priest/Rabbi/Imam they follow on twitter that is totally a legit representation of the religion and not an imbecile in a smock twisting the words to fit their conclusions, instead of the other way around as its meant to be.
Same people probably say that Joe Biden is a devout & practicing catholic.
I’m not an expert on Judaism, but I’ve read the Old Testament of the Bible which is also apart of Judaism and I’m pretty sure do not murder is part in of the 10 commandments.
jews mainly follow the talmud not the old testament
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
I don't think this qualifies as explicit disinformation. It may just be ignorance. I've actually heard some jews complain that most jews not only don't follow the Talmud, but also aren't religious.
They don't. Talmud is a simple recollection of rabbinical edicts throughout the ages based on the context of the time they happened.
This is an old conspiracy theory that people who does not understand Judaism and wants to discriminate against them(like leftists against whites) do.
Nope. It protects the life of the mother. Fortunately for judaism, there is no situation where the legal definition of "abortion" is prevented in cases of health. For ectopic pregnancies, the solution is not defined as abortion. It's keyhole surgery. For incomplete miscarriages or the case of a septic uterus, the solution is also not an abortion, but a D&C.
Banning of abortion would ban none of these situations. Pro-aborts love to fearmonger because their points cannot stand on their own.
No it doesn't. Freedom of religion only means that the government can't say "We are banning abortion just to fuck with the Jews." The government is allowed to ban child rape despite Islam, ban mass murder despite the Aztecs and Mayans, or ban mutilating the genitals of children despite the Jews.
Good to know 'freedom of religion' guarantees my right to extrajudicial killing of faggots.
Someone's reply to that post https://nitter.unixfox.eu/PandasAndVidya/status/1546391664108896256