Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left. Surely, no government can be expected to foster its own subversion, but in a democracy such a right is vested in the people (i.e. in the majority of the people). This means that the ways should not be blocked on which a subversive majority could develop, and if they are blocked by organized repression and indoctrination, their reopening may require apparently undemocratic means. They would include the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements which promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion, or which oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc.
This is the MO of globohomo. Absolute and arbitrary enforcement of rules against anyone who pushes back, absolute encouragement of support of anyone who supports the agenda - regardless of their actions up to and including violence. Claim "thats different" and "whataboutism" whenever this is pointed out. Anyone who points out the hypocrisy is added to the enemies list for future targeting.
I don't like Putin nor the Russian government, but what is with the MSM's obsession with trying to shut out the other side?
When we hear North Korea spew its propaganda about the US do we shut them out? No, we let them run their mouths and fucking mock them. Fuck, even Trump mocked Rocket Man during his term of office and he still managed to convince them to let us talk to them.
Suddenly the shit we put up with from Russia is being cleaned from the Internet, just like how China does it with their Internet, now it's state-sponsored censorship.
To be fair Russia is fairly unique in that its state-controlled news media has a significant presence in direct non-Russian-language broadcasts, regardless of whether it's actually being used for propaganda. RT is one of the foreign news outlets I see the most of, other than British ones. I could probably go find some news media from North Korea, Iran, or even China, but I've never naturally encountered it (other than the South China Morning Post, a Hong Kong paper that China recently co-opted to push more propaganda).
I know they're not doing it "unprovoked". The West has been retards poking the belly of the beast and constantly pissing Russia off. Previous leaders didn't have balls, Putin does.
Globohomo is trying to protect their interests. Russia and China are the only people with guns and money that is not controlled by Globohomo. Ukraine was useful to passively-aggressively start shit with Russia, pressure them, just all around fuck with them right on their border.
Globohomo wants an all out war and they want someone else to start it.
personally i think it would be quite entertaining and why shouldn’t russians have a sub? It’s not like russian citizens are making the decisions regarding ukraine. The quarantining of that sub on reddit is just theater for virtue points, super gay.
This is the MO of globohomo. Absolute and arbitrary enforcement of rules against anyone who pushes back, absolute encouragement of support of anyone who supports the agenda - regardless of their actions up to and including violence. Claim "thats different" and "whataboutism" whenever this is pointed out. Anyone who points out the hypocrisy is added to the enemies list for future targeting.
It sounds like Fabian socialism.
That's cuz it is
Nah, it's just slacktivism from people who need to virtue signal.
"Not supported by credible sources"
"Only western propaganda is credible, mmmmkay"
My propaganda is the truth. Your truth is propaganda.
Get in room 101 komrad.
Sovereign is he who decides the credible sources.
Verifiable facts.
If only that were true
You can decide what is credible if you have verifiable facts.
Credible sources have already verified it.
The dictators decide who has credibility, you stupid pleb.
The people with power, with guns, with money. Exclusively.
I don't like Putin nor the Russian government, but what is with the MSM's obsession with trying to shut out the other side?
When we hear North Korea spew its propaganda about the US do we shut them out? No, we let them run their mouths and fucking mock them. Fuck, even Trump mocked Rocket Man during his term of office and he still managed to convince them to let us talk to them.
Suddenly the shit we put up with from Russia is being cleaned from the Internet, just like how China does it with their Internet, now it's state-sponsored censorship.
Fuck.
To be fair Russia is fairly unique in that its state-controlled news media has a significant presence in direct non-Russian-language broadcasts, regardless of whether it's actually being used for propaganda. RT is one of the foreign news outlets I see the most of, other than British ones. I could probably go find some news media from North Korea, Iran, or even China, but I've never naturally encountered it (other than the South China Morning Post, a Hong Kong paper that China recently co-opted to push more propaganda).
Right, it bugs the fuck out of me any state-sponsored media is considered a legitimate source, that includes the BBC.
State-controlled or not, the BBC is not appreciably worse than media outlets not controlled by the state.
That's not exactly comforting....
Which media outlets aren't controlled by the state?
RT, CBC, BBC, all cut from the same cloth.
because Russia isnt doing this "unprovoked" like they want you to believe
I know they're not doing it "unprovoked". The West has been retards poking the belly of the beast and constantly pissing Russia off. Previous leaders didn't have balls, Putin does.
Globohomo is trying to protect their interests. Russia and China are the only people with guns and money that is not controlled by Globohomo. Ukraine was useful to passively-aggressively start shit with Russia, pressure them, just all around fuck with them right on their border.
Globohomo wants an all out war and they want someone else to start it.
You seem to be very reddity. Maybe just stop going there and you won't be so befuddled.
Are "credible sources" better than "reliable sources", and how are they related to "trusted sources"?
Sources familiar with their thinking
I think we all know that Credible™ > reliable
How long until all Russians eat Ukrainian babies and must be exterminated?
may a bear riden by putin himself come to your home and rape you to death through your eyesockets.
The best evidence I have that it is credible is that reddit quarantined it.
Ah, retarddit, more racist that rdrama.
Hahahahahaha
Russia subreddit quarantines rest of reddit.
"The janny of Kiev"
russia.win when?
здравствуйте и доброе пожаловать, друзей!
just imagine the pr that would get
personally i think it would be quite entertaining and why shouldn’t russians have a sub? It’s not like russian citizens are making the decisions regarding ukraine. The quarantining of that sub on reddit is just theater for virtue points, super gay.
EXPERTS DISAGREE
Current Year made me develop a gag reflex everytime people start mentioning "experts", "credible sources" and "fact-chekers"
"We did it, reddit."
“We will tell you who is reliable!”
lol, how is this different from the great firewall of china?
See no evil, hear no evil!
ALL INFORMATION HAS TO BE SUPPORTED BY "CREDIBLE SOURCES"
wow, they went to full totalitarian pretty quick!