Ah, so I looked her up in that (bloody 1986), and she was pretty cute back then, as you say, hotdamn! That just makes me sad… 🤦🏻♂️
Then again, Kim Cattrall = incredibly hot (better than Cynthia, even then) in Little China, Mannequin and (less so) Undiscovered Country, and still pretty fine now, IMHO (last I checked, at least!), so… Cattrall wins again, lol!
I suppose this is only news to men that actually believe women care about men at all, in any way. They don't. You are a tool that outputs protection and provision and you are disposed of once you are not useful.
Here's the original hit piece. The accusations are from years ago, and I guess the circumstantial evidence could in theory be checked, but they're not directly proveable either way. There's also the usual issue: the accusers stay anonymous and don't make an actual politice report, so the accused can not defend himself except by generalized denials.
When she went to his apartment to return the book, Zoe says, he kissed her as she stepped through the door. She tentatively kissed back but then said, “Thank you, I’m going back to my friend.” The kiss itself didn’t alarm her; she thought a kiss from Mr. Big would be a fun story to tell her friends. But she says he then pulled her toward him, moved her toward the bed, pulled off her shorts and bikini bottom, and began to rape her from behind. She was facing a mirror. “It was very painful and I yelled out, ‘Stop!’” she says. “And he didn’t. I said, ‘Can you at least get a condom?’ and he laughed at me.
We're rapidly reaching a point where all false/belated accusations are going to sound the same, because they're consuming each others' fantasies. A meta-meme accusation is forming.
Everyone will be wearing a swimsuit under her clothes, everyone will be at a party, everyone will be initially game for it...
Every one of their narratives is self projection. Objectifying him isn't overly concerning to me, that's how it is, but the reality of their complaints is that they're not about stopping the thing they just want to do it themselves.
"Objectification Bad" -> "Wait I meant when someone else was doing it, it's my turn! Woooo! Objectification train all aboard!". It would just be kinda funny if wasn't accompanied by such serious nutcases.
The finale revealed his name as "John" at the very end from a text message Carrie reads. So after all that "raa raa grrl powah" from however many series, the main character settles for an investment banker named John. Couldn't be more traditional if you tried.
No, "Mr Big" was a nickname/inference about how he was a "big catch" because he was rich and Carrie was literally a liberal arts/literature major whose job was writing a shitty blog/column yet somehow affording to live in New York and socializing however many times a week with her 3 friends and bald, bespectacled gay tagalong.
Lol, right on schedule. What a coincidence this news is released right after HBO premieres their new Sex and the City spin-off/ continuation/ whatever show. It's so predictable.
"I am deeply gladdened to hear the lies and unsubstantiated slander laid at Chris Noth's feet. It hides the fact that we used him to slander a company and are trying to help their shitty stock rebound at the cost of his livelihood and dignity. What is one man compared to all this fucking money?"
Get the fuck out of here with that 18th century mentality, if we haven't won the dignity to earn a days pay without further and further encroachment of our personal lives and choices then as detestable as I've always found it, maybe the national razor should've shaved a little closer to Frances cheek when this all started.
In somewhat honour of this, I recommend going out and watching some of Kim Catrall’s old movies. Some of them are hilarious, some are fairly… Hot, and some are just… Good. Like The Undiscovered Country.
Chris Noth… I haven’t seen play anything that isn just a riff on his “Mr Big” character…
That sounds like something that would appear in the same biology book that would claim men can get pregnant and women can have a penis. Don’t be like those who just make up something and claim it a biological fact to support your delusions.
Women will side with men when they are no women around. When the man is gone they tear him down.
Women switch allegiances in seconds. They are completely disloyal. In my time working with women I've seen woman turn their backs on their lifetime friends and a few days later they are inseparable. Another day or two they are stabbing them in the back again and the cycle repeats constantly.
Have you ever known a woman that had a lot of female friends? I haven't. All the women I've known have had, at best, one or two. They might know, and act friendly with, other females, but they're not friends.
An in-group preference is not the same as friendship. In a non-sexually competitive environment women prefer to be around women because of their natural inclination to submissiveness in the presence of a strong male. A women naturally defers to a strong male. They want to and in some situations they prefer to, but years of feminist indoctrination has conditioned them to avoid it. So, professionally groups of women will prefer effeminate men over masculine men. Consciously or subconsciously they'll work to eliminate masculine professional competition in their groups.
Women are never in a non-sexually competitive environment. Even in a group of all females, women see each other as sexual threats and constantly try to compete with, and one-up each other. If one woman in a group is gorgeous and the rest are all frumpy, they will team up to get rid of the gorgeous gal to ensure a more level playing field. Once the threat has passed, they go back to back-stabbing each other.
So what about presumption of innocence? Waiting for the facts before drawing a conclusion? Has the guy responded to the accusation?
BeLiEvE aLl WoMeN!!1!
Kim Cattrall best girl
She helped take down Lo Pan! Lets see footface do that
I see you too are a man of Kurt Russell!
She’s also kind of the only… Serious actress, of the three. Or she was for a while, at least.
Cynthia Nixon, eh…
The other two are just typecast one-noters…
Cynthia was nerdy cute in the Manhattan Project.
Didn’t take long to turn into a shrew though.
...and a dyke...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynthia_Nixon#Personal_life
Also has a tranny child, apparently (not sure of “what” to “what)…
Fuck me, you couldn’t MAKE this shit up… 😂
Social dyke - she was married for 15 years and had several children and then had her epiphany.
It’s interesting because she is the main name on this, not SJP… Y’know, the main character??!
And she is the “wokest” of the three, now, as it turns out, which makes me think this might be her little “pet project”/shitty idea… 🙄
Noth probably “misgendered” her tranny freak offspring, or some shit…
Ah, so I looked her up in that (bloody 1986), and she was pretty cute back then, as you say, hotdamn! That just makes me sad… 🤦🏻♂️
Then again, Kim Cattrall = incredibly hot (better than Cynthia, even then) in Little China, Mannequin and (less so) Undiscovered Country, and still pretty fine now, IMHO (last I checked, at least!), so… Cattrall wins again, lol!
It's all in the reflexes.
I suppose this is only news to men that actually believe women care about men at all, in any way. They don't. You are a tool that outputs protection and provision and you are disposed of once you are not useful.
You're posting cringe again.
Lol bud that's a reach
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/chris-noth-accused-of-sexual-assault-1235063596/
Here's the original hit piece. The accusations are from years ago, and I guess the circumstantial evidence could in theory be checked, but they're not directly proveable either way. There's also the usual issue: the accusers stay anonymous and don't make an actual politice report, so the accused can not defend himself except by generalized denials.
Riiight...
We're rapidly reaching a point where all false/belated accusations are going to sound the same, because they're consuming each others' fantasies. A meta-meme accusation is forming.
Everyone will be wearing a swimsuit under her clothes, everyone will be at a party, everyone will be initially game for it...
But gee, in the 70s and early 80s they were telling us we could do BOTH equally well, at the same time, that it wasn't a this-or-that choice .....
The Superwoman died hard of burnout.
Whores then; whores now.
Based Kim Cattral (again)…
No wonder they didn’t feature her on the “new” show, lol…
I don’t even LIKE the bloke, but yeh…
It's kinda funny that they didn't give him a name in the show. Carrie is Carrie Bradshaw. He's Mr. Big with no name beyond that.
I'll bet he has a big penis, too.
I have no fucking clue because I've never watched that trash.
Spot on description!
Every one of their narratives is self projection. Objectifying him isn't overly concerning to me, that's how it is, but the reality of their complaints is that they're not about stopping the thing they just want to do it themselves.
"Objectification Bad" -> "Wait I meant when someone else was doing it, it's my turn! Woooo! Objectification train all aboard!". It would just be kinda funny if wasn't accompanied by such serious nutcases.
The finale revealed his name as "John" at the very end from a text message Carrie reads. So after all that "raa raa grrl powah" from however many series, the main character settles for an investment banker named John. Couldn't be more traditional if you tried.
Wait a minute... his name was John Big? Or was it Big John?
Either way, the name isn't just on the nose... it IS the nose.
No, "Mr Big" was a nickname/inference about how he was a "big catch" because he was rich and Carrie was literally a liberal arts/literature major whose job was writing a shitty blog/column yet somehow affording to live in New York and socializing however many times a week with her 3 friends and bald, bespectacled gay tagalong.
Lol, right on schedule. What a coincidence this news is released right after HBO premieres their new Sex and the City spin-off/ continuation/ whatever show. It's so predictable.
Sex in the City reboot, does anyone truly care what anyone involved thinks/does/says?
I hope Noth grabbed a big handful too.
This seems low.
Literally throwing the guy under the bus to promote their film.
Allegations? i hope he sues their wall smashed asses for defamation and hurting his feelings.
In other news nothing to see here, we in the manosphere are incel idiots :D
"I am deeply gladdened to hear the lies and unsubstantiated slander laid at Chris Noth's feet. It hides the fact that we used him to slander a company and are trying to help their shitty stock rebound at the cost of his livelihood and dignity. What is one man compared to all this fucking money?"
Get the fuck out of here with that 18th century mentality, if we haven't won the dignity to earn a days pay without further and further encroachment of our personal lives and choices then as detestable as I've always found it, maybe the national razor should've shaved a little closer to Frances cheek when this all started.
In somewhat honour of this, I recommend going out and watching some of Kim Catrall’s old movies. Some of them are hilarious, some are fairly… Hot, and some are just… Good. Like The Undiscovered Country.
Chris Noth… I haven’t seen play anything that isn just a riff on his “Mr Big” character…
To be fair - you’ll note Kim Catrall isn’t on that post.
That’s because the sisterhood excoriated and excommunicated her too.
(Not sure of Kim’s thoughts here)
What happened with her? I had a big crush on her when Big Trouble came out.
No one really knows what the actual issue is.
https://www.glamour.com/story/why-isnt-kim-cattrall-in-the-sex-and-the-city-revival
That sounds like something that would appear in the same biology book that would claim men can get pregnant and women can have a penis. Don’t be like those who just make up something and claim it a biological fact to support your delusions.
Imp's always like that.
I know. You would think man who yells at cloud would eventually move on though.
Is on internet.
Something is off here. Anyone spot it?
Oh so SJW agenda in games isn't real? Wrong website retard.
Could you elaborate on what your comment references? I don't see the correlation to my question.
The people that don't understand the message are going to reply with hate because they are fucking dumb!
You seem to completely missed the context, and then call people retarded.
You projectith too much!
Can I show my cock to clients?
I have a feeling they do leave you alone.
I’m sure there are men pushing that on you too.
You can work without becoming someones servant.
Have you ever been around a group of women before? There is a ton of tearing each other down behind each other’s backs.
Women will side with men when they are no women around. When the man is gone they tear him down.
Women switch allegiances in seconds. They are completely disloyal. In my time working with women I've seen woman turn their backs on their lifetime friends and a few days later they are inseparable. Another day or two they are stabbing them in the back again and the cycle repeats constantly.
"These hoes ain't loyal"
I feel like you are pulling from your limited sample size to push your junk biology above
Yeah, evidently he's not familiar with women who cite with their rapist husband/brother/father/etc. over victims who can prove their claim.
if you think Women aren't disloyal than you're just revealing that the only limited sample size is the number of Women you've met in real life.
Some are. Some aren’t. Same with men
It's also literally in women's biology to backstab each other.
Have you ever known a woman that had a lot of female friends? I haven't. All the women I've known have had, at best, one or two. They might know, and act friendly with, other females, but they're not friends.
An in-group preference is not the same as friendship. In a non-sexually competitive environment women prefer to be around women because of their natural inclination to submissiveness in the presence of a strong male. A women naturally defers to a strong male. They want to and in some situations they prefer to, but years of feminist indoctrination has conditioned them to avoid it. So, professionally groups of women will prefer effeminate men over masculine men. Consciously or subconsciously they'll work to eliminate masculine professional competition in their groups.
Women are never in a non-sexually competitive environment. Even in a group of all females, women see each other as sexual threats and constantly try to compete with, and one-up each other. If one woman in a group is gorgeous and the rest are all frumpy, they will team up to get rid of the gorgeous gal to ensure a more level playing field. Once the threat has passed, they go back to back-stabbing each other.
I'm sure you're the expert on that.