Say what you will about how he appears. I’m just correcting the record for people who believe he admitted to being a pedo on Twitter. I’m familiar with the tweet the user is referring to, and it was a very obvious photoshop

Dunno. I know you don’t.

No, they’re very very different things. Comparing the two to just different people doesn’t work.

chevrolet equinox.

No they literally by definition are different things

Transvestites and transgender are different, just FYI

No, that tweet was fake

Lol bud that's a reach

Sorry, two people responding in the same thread got me mixed up. No biggie.

So if IQ has no bearing on the situation, why use it in your original argument at all?

I don't agree that a democracy can only work in a racially homogenous population, and you seem to imply the reason is due to IQ. That's the part I'm currently questioning. If IQ has no bearing on it, then why can't a democracy work in a society that is not racially/culturally homogenous?

Okay so then if an immigrant were to move here, support themselves, learn the way of our politics, what would be the problem with them voting and being part of this country?

My mistake, I suppose I did misread it originally.

So let's go back to my first point and go from there:

In a homogenous state a native with an iq of 120 has the same power as a native with an iq of 80. Is that justice?

I did read your post. I was responding to the point that addressed IQ.

But if 50iq is braindead and thus makes my argument nonsense, why would you use those figures for your original talking point?

So why did you include IQ in your original point if it's irrelevant to the quality of society?

Your original point only focused on IQ, so that's where I was building from.

But for this exercise we'll say yes, since we'll have everyone on the same playing field.

Well, to that point, in a homogenous state a native with an iq of 120 has the same power as a native with an iq of 50. Is that justice?

Is sex not between a man and a woman?

There was a famous case where a guy got head and the woman used the semen to impregnate, guy was forced to pay child support by judge

I'm not familiar with this case. Do you have any more details? I'd like to read about it

Yes it’s the guys fault a woman let them nut repeatedly in them

No, his point is that the man who did the nutting is often one who is pressuring the woman to abort, so he can avoid his responsibilities. It's not the fault of alll men.

It’s easier said than done my friend. People less fortunate don’t have the luxury to just “think about it later.”

They have to charge you my guy. Healthcare is expensive.

Getting an ambulance costs the average person about $1K a pop in a lot of places in the US

Sorry Mr Moneybags that we can't all afford that.

I didn't get the same results.

For me, I got:

Sort by: Relevance Your search - kyle rittenhouse shirt - did not match any shopping results.

Suggestions:

Make sure all words are spelled correctly. Try different keywords. Try more general keywords. Try fewer keywords.

With one actual working link. With the gibberish, I didn't get any links. Maybe that's just your computer.

1. Yes.
2. April 16th was my 2nd jab
3. Pfizer
4. Haven't received it, currently not making any plans to. May get one down the road but it's not a priority

Arizona audit proved fraud

Fraud to give trump the win or just some instances of fraud? Because if the suggestion is that Arizona found evidence of fraud that would overturn the election results I think I missed that. Can you link me someplace that confirms that?

If ti's just "some instances of fraud," there are cases of that all the time. Here and there, people voting for their parents/relatives/whoever. It happens, and they're often caught. But did Arizona find an instance of widespread fraud enough to overturn the results?