We Must Destroy The Constitution To Save Our Democracy!
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
Well, to that point, in a homogenous state a native with an iq of 120 has the same power as a native with an iq of 50. Is that justice?
Your stupid thought experiment inadvertently touched upon a critical concept: IQ thresholds. The quality of your society does not scale linearly with the IQ of your citizens. There exists a clear threshold beyond which functional and prosperous civilization is possible - and below which it is basically impossible to sustain such a nation.
Look at Asian nations. Are they proportionally “better” than white nations because Asians have an higher average IQ? No. But every nation with an average IQ of 90 is guaranteed to be a shithole.
So why did you include IQ in your original point if it's irrelevant to the quality of society?
It wasn’t my original point. You are responding to my first post in this thread.
IQ absolutely does matter to a point. That’s what a threshold is. That was the entire point of my post. Retard.
Sorry, two people responding in the same thread got me mixed up. No biggie.
Would the 50iq monkey own land and have a family?
Your original point only focused on IQ, so that's where I was building from.
But for this exercise we'll say yes, since we'll have everyone on the same playing field.
Did you even read my post?
Obviously not.
Then you're a liar. 50iq is braindead. Almost cannot exist.
A more realistic would be 70iq, which for a white is pretty much downes syndrome.
Let's go back to 1776.
That individual cannot take care of themselves. There is no way they're taking care of a property and working to support themselves, and especially not another person.
On top of that, what woman would date a retard and what father would allow their daughter to marry said retard? They wouldn't.
It is only in this modern society where the retard and their wrangler would ever be able to survive alone and only as glorified wards of the state. Already this breaches the original purpose and setup of democracy by the founders.
I did read your post. I was responding to the point that addressed IQ.
But if 50iq is braindead and thus makes my argument nonsense, why would you use those figures for your original talking point?