So if IQ has no bearing on the situation, why use it in your original argument at all?
I don't agree that a democracy can only work in a racially homogenous population, and you seem to imply the reason is due to IQ. That's the part I'm currently questioning. If IQ has no bearing on it, then why can't a democracy work in a society that is not racially/culturally homogenous?
So if IQ has no bearing on the situation, why use it in your original argument at all?
I don't agree that a democracy can only work in a racially homogenous population, and you seem to imply the reason is due to IQ. That's the part I'm currently questioning. If IQ has no bearing on it, then why can't a democracy work in a society that is not racially/culturally homogenous?