How in the shit is XBX_X a "brigand?" Like him, hate him, or think he's a retard, but he's been here for months.
Dom's moderation has been getting even worse, and even sloppier. At least he used to actually come up with halfway plausible reasons for a ban. Now there's a ton of "brigands" and lack of reasons posted.
He did his monthly check in to ban Telia again, too, for "Assertion of Judeo-Capitalist Conspiracy."
theaustrianpainter was banned for saying "Accelerate."
Theunpopular1 was also banned as a "Brigand" despite being here months.
AbleistSL was banned for spreging out and telling people to die...yet again.
Dom's moderation has been getting even worse, and even sloppier. At least he used to actually come up with halfway plausible reasons for a ban. Now there's a ton of "brigands" and lack of reasons posted.
First Dom implements rules nobody asked for (which there were several blowups over across several periods), then starts treating Rule 16 like it's the only rule on the oversized list post-10/7, and neglected his duties while the pedo pajeet ran unopposed (while simultaneously refusing to hire/appoint additional help).
Now he got rid of the pedo pajeet, but it came at the cost of ramping up the community filter to where it is strangling the board, and for the cherry on top, he still comes back now and then to ban all the regulars.
I never once saw someone who was obviously the pedojeet get caught in the filters, either. Maybe they were there and slow playing it, but no one identified as that fucker was ever caught by the new filters Dom set up.
Basically, new people can't post here, even in good faith, and the regulars will get banned or driven away from the annoyance at some point.
On that topic, I'm surprised I didn't catch a ban from him for butting heads on the topic of Jews vis-a-vis matriarchal societies (context was talking about our favorite misogynist, The Imp). It's probably the closest I ever flew to the sun since being here.
I feel like I understand Dom's moderation philosophy more than most people here. What he really doesn't like is agitation or incitement. Combine that with unthoughtful extrapolation and you may be catching a ban.
For example, Telia keeps posting about how the demons in Frieren are Jews and implies we need to treat them as such, which makes Dom extremely uncomfortable.
XBX_X is also fond of pooping on other users for not being sufficiently monotonally motivated in his crusade du jour. *However, I don't think his post was against the rules.
On the other hand, a more neutral discussion of facts or inference, like you posted, will not get you banned. I've said many times that a Jewish elite bears huge responsibility for the degradation of the US, but never caught a mod action. I'm not going to imply that every last Jew is a shard of Doomsday, though.
I guess I am partially justifying Dom. I'll own it. I think he needs to be more understanding of tempers flaring, though, in these times.
Telia never actually posted that Frieren's demons are jews. Its just the description of Frieren's demons that Telia posts about tends to sound like jews to people when its brought up
Yeah, I get that. As far as his first posts about the controversy sure, but then it became "gee, I wonder why people would think that a soulless race of parasites blending in with the larger population would be Jews."
I have no idea what post he got whacked for though. I'm just saying those posts were stoking it.
It sounds like some janitorial tyranny, halfway or more to Reddit. Go over to Gaming, at least there are no overly censorial mods, and you can be open about what you say.
If I had to guess, its because he had been posting all caps
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT WHITE MAN
type things a lot recently, which sounded like call to violence. Which is one of those rules that most of us have gotten banned for doing less on.
You can disagree with his conclusion but him and Telia do post like brigaders trying to manipulate the place instead of "legitimate community members." They almost only talk about Jews, hit the spam cap constantly talking about Jews, and often only post anything else to get mad at you for pointing these things out or trying to "call to action" about it. XBX is more varied in that regard, but usually its to post actual incitements like previously mentioned.
I'm not here to justify him doing it, I'm just pointing out where the logic might be in response to your question.
Scratch antifa, reveals a jew, scratch a jew, reveals a sexual harasser or pedo. Sure there are exceptions but physiognomy and pattern recognition never betray your expectation.
So your argument is that we know for a fact that each person he shot was jewish, because "I saw a surname" and "The Daily Kos once said something one time and provided literally no evidence whatsoever."
This is what I'm talking about. You know you have literally nothing here. It was never a topic of discussion even at the time. Then you decided to revise history. And now, we know without question that every single person that was shot was jewish. Bullshit.
You might as well have said:
"Benjamin is a jewish surname. Therefore, Carl Benjamin is unquestionably a jew. It was proven beyond any doubt because it came to me in a fucking dream and no evidence to the contrary, like genetics or his religious affiliation, could show otherwise.
Can you prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that said people weren’t Jewish? You yourself made an “identity attack” saying they were all white. Do you have a full DNA profile those three? What if they’re mixed race?
They made a claim using the standard set for millennia, which is the surname dictating descent. DoM most assuredly claimed they were all white, of which he had shown zero evidence. That in itself is a bannable identity attack according to his own subjective interpretations.
It's not an identity attack to call them white, that's the race they are. Even if I were to call them black, it wouldn't be an identity attack. It be disinformation though, since it's fairly clear that they are all white, and was never in dispute. It would be particularly suspicious if I pulled some "we were always at war with East Asia" bullshit, and told you that we've always known that they were black, and that you should kill a black person. That would be me acting in an incredibly malicious manner.
It's not an identity attack to call them white, that's the race they are.
Prove it. Also define race since you’re clearly not using the standard definition of genetic lineage.
Even if I were to call them black, it wouldn't be an identity attack
Just Jewish right?
It be disinformation though, since it's fairly clear that they are all white, and was never in dispute.
Clear how? If they are Jewish it makes them of Levantine descent which is quite literally “not white”. Unless you’re now rewriting the definition of race to say whatever you want it to?
would be particularly suspicious if I pulled some "we were always at war with East Asia" bullshit, and told you that we've always known that they were black, and that you should kill a black person. That would be me acting in an incredibly malicious manner.
You did the first two, not the third. Still disinformation, still subjective gatekeeping. Just like when you denied slave was a racial slur, it’s funny how often you commit identity attacks you ban others for huh?
Slave isn't a racial slur, it's not even used in such a way within English.
It literally is and has been, it is the oldest racial slur in the English language, no historian denies that the word slave comes from the Slavic people or that the definition of an owned person changed to be Slavic people. Thats is by every definition a racial slur. Why are you blatantly lying after you have been repeatedly proven wrong on this? You’re now intentionally spreading misinformation, why do this?
I seriously doubt it's the oldest slur, even in the event that it was a slur.
You are reframing a word into being a slur when it isn't one. You're adding moral weight to a word that wasn't carrying it. No one called black slaves, slaves, because they thought of them as almost as worthless as Slavs. They called them slaves because they were held in bondage without consent for the purposes of utilizing their labor.
People didn't go from using the roman term "servus" and change it to slave because they thought Slavs were inferior.
It was never a topic of discussion even at the time. Then you decided to revise history.
Ironic. Despite your attempt at gaslighting, I remember quite a bit of discussion on multiple boards and sites at the time about one or two of the failed assailants having been from the tribe as well as speculation that they were trying to make an example of Kyle to discourage the other tax cattle.
Are those boards and sites in the room with us? Or was it just conpro?
I don't even understand what this is supposed to convey. Do you even understand that the "is X in the room with you now" means, specifically, that you are skeptical that X exists at all?
Are you trying to imply that there weren't discussions of Jewish subversion on any message boards on the Internet about the demographic makeup of the BLM riots? In other words, that the stormfags that you complain about all the time don't actually exist?
You fucking idiot. You scream stormfag at anyone who dares disagree with your idiotic takes, then wonder why there are so many stormfags. Lemme tell you something, you stupid furry, it's the ideology of the bolshevik that causes this. The very nature of marxist teachings. Not simply because they are left-leaning. Try again when you have a little more reading comprehension, worm.
No, I understand tons of people seethe about the jews constantly everywhere. The point is that I don't enjoy this board getting forum slid into the same shit by retards.
In other words, please go back to the jew cope containment board of conpro and whine there.
Next time Dom is on one of his hiatuses, everyone should report every comments as a rule 16 violation so when he comes back he has to comb through thousands of reports.
"he shot a bunch of jews, who I am not surprised to learn are murderous pedophiles."
that's an attack on an identity group.
simply identifying members of an actual physical group is not an attack on that identity group unless the clear implication is that all members of that class would be a part of this group.
which the deleted post does not do in any way. because the identity group is "people Kyle Rittenhouse shot in Kenosha." they just maybe happen to share a common characteristic. which is a notable statistical oddity, not an attack on jews.
Yoisi is a sockpuppet of telia, that’s why the account was inactive for over 3 months until you recently banned telia, which instantly prompted Yoisi to return and start frieren-posting
i find it funny that someone can make up bullshit claims about other users without evidence but apparently we are not allowed to say someone is jewish even with substantial evidence backing it whilst the mod is allowed to say they are White even without proof (it they are jews then they are not White, so if someone cannot 100% say they are not jews then they can't 100% say they are White either)
So someone can make up bullshit claims about other users without evidence and this doesn't count as harrassment , but apparently we are not allowed to say someone is jewish even with substantial evidence backing it whilst you can say they are White even without proof (if they are jews then they are not White, so if someone cannot 100% say they are not jews then they can't 100% say they are White either)
You are not allowed to engage in disinformation via historical revisionism so you can push people for race war. That's not the same thing as 'saying someone is jewish'.
Everything is a possible Jewish surname, to be fair.
But yeah, Rosenbaum is almost certainly a Jew, Grosskreutz possible, and Huber also possibly. "Jewish Antifa" or some such actually tried to claim Huber, as they cheered him beating Kyle with a skateboard. I'd also seen that debunked, and it being referred to that he and his family weren't practicing (take that, bigots), which is a fucking ton of wiggle room. If I had to guess, I'd say at least two of the three were Jewish.
You really shouldn't be so trusting of AI. Considering the fact israeli schools have their own alternative plus sign because + looks too close to a cross, I really doubt anyone from that group would use a name that means "big cross".
How in the shit is XBX_X a "brigand?" Like him, hate him, or think he's a retard, but he's been here for months.
Dom's moderation has been getting even worse, and even sloppier. At least he used to actually come up with halfway plausible reasons for a ban. Now there's a ton of "brigands" and lack of reasons posted.
He did his monthly check in to ban Telia again, too, for "Assertion of Judeo-Capitalist Conspiracy."
theaustrianpainter was banned for saying "Accelerate."
Theunpopular1 was also banned as a "Brigand" despite being here months.
AbleistSL was banned for spreging out and telling people to die...yet again.
First Dom implements rules nobody asked for (which there were several blowups over across several periods), then starts treating Rule 16 like it's the only rule on the oversized list post-10/7, and neglected his duties while the pedo pajeet ran unopposed (while simultaneously refusing to hire/appoint additional help).
Now he got rid of the pedo pajeet, but it came at the cost of ramping up the community filter to where it is strangling the board, and for the cherry on top, he still comes back now and then to ban all the regulars.
This truly is ridiculous.
I never once saw someone who was obviously the pedojeet get caught in the filters, either. Maybe they were there and slow playing it, but no one identified as that fucker was ever caught by the new filters Dom set up.
Basically, new people can't post here, even in good faith, and the regulars will get banned or driven away from the annoyance at some point.
Seems like that may be the purpose. It's the logical inevitable outcome.
Good, the sooner this board falls the sooner the regulars will congregate at one of the many alts made here.
On that topic, I'm surprised I didn't catch a ban from him for butting heads on the topic of Jews vis-a-vis matriarchal societies (context was talking about our favorite misogynist, The Imp). It's probably the closest I ever flew to the sun since being here.
I feel like I understand Dom's moderation philosophy more than most people here. What he really doesn't like is agitation or incitement. Combine that with unthoughtful extrapolation and you may be catching a ban.
For example, Telia keeps posting about how the demons in Frieren are Jews and implies we need to treat them as such, which makes Dom extremely uncomfortable.
XBX_X is also fond of pooping on other users for not being sufficiently monotonally motivated in his crusade du jour. *However, I don't think his post was against the rules.
On the other hand, a more neutral discussion of facts or inference, like you posted, will not get you banned. I've said many times that a Jewish elite bears huge responsibility for the degradation of the US, but never caught a mod action. I'm not going to imply that every last Jew is a shard of Doomsday, though.
I guess I am partially justifying Dom. I'll own it. I think he needs to be more understanding of tempers flaring, though, in these times.
Telia never actually posted that Frieren's demons are jews. Its just the description of Frieren's demons that Telia posts about tends to sound like jews to people when its brought up
Yeah, I get that. As far as his first posts about the controversy sure, but then it became "gee, I wonder why people would think that a soulless race of parasites blending in with the larger population would be Jews."
I have no idea what post he got whacked for though. I'm just saying those posts were stoking it.
He got whacked for posting the Hitler quote about America being half judaised and the other half negified .. https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/19AxC4vxhh/cant-say-that-hitler-didnt-predi/c/
And actually Telia made posts about how jewish people were the ones going around saying that Frieren's demons are White people.
Everyone knows what he means. Hiding behind "well, he didn't outright say it" is retarded.
Dom suspended me for saying Jews control Hollywood lol
I'm not sure if it's still there, but on the Wikipedia article for Hollywood, it was openly admitted to.
Everyone openly admits to it. That shit's not even an open secret at this point.
That eurotard probably didn't get the memo. Y'know, like the clot-shot pushers STILL demanding booster mandates even now.
You can use a lot less words by just calling him a retard.
It's not all new users. The obvious Hasbara account gets to stay because of course it does.
Just the usual pruning of the Overton window by our local moderator.
It sounds like some janitorial tyranny, halfway or more to Reddit. Go over to Gaming, at least there are no overly censorial mods, and you can be open about what you say.
You too?
If I had to guess, its because he had been posting all caps
type things a lot recently, which sounded like call to violence. Which is one of those rules that most of us have gotten banned for doing less on.
You can disagree with his conclusion but him and Telia do post like brigaders trying to manipulate the place instead of "legitimate community members." They almost only talk about Jews, hit the spam cap constantly talking about Jews, and often only post anything else to get mad at you for pointing these things out or trying to "call to action" about it. XBX is more varied in that regard, but usually its to post actual incitements like previously mentioned.
I'm not here to justify him doing it, I'm just pointing out where the logic might be in response to your question.
XBX_X is for sure a retard, at least conditionally. Some of the other names are the same. Nobody said the canaries had to be smart, I guess.
Yeah, I included the option for a reason.
He's one of those guys who doesn't do his research, and flies off the handle under any criticism.
Not really a fan of the guy, more than half the time, but he's no "brigand."
Scratch antifa, reveals a jew, scratch a jew, reveals a sexual harasser or pedo. Sure there are exceptions but physiognomy and pattern recognition never betray your expectation.
Dom gets red with rage once you mention jews are not European (even by their own admission)
its like an inferiority complex that the N*ggers have but taken to whole another level
Here's the article https://archive.md/90iIO
this is the thread the above pic came from https://unscored.arete.network/c/KotakuInAction/p/19AxC3plJ7/
So your argument is that we know for a fact that each person he shot was jewish, because "I saw a surname" and "The Daily Kos once said something one time and provided literally no evidence whatsoever."
This is what I'm talking about. You know you have literally nothing here. It was never a topic of discussion even at the time. Then you decided to revise history. And now, we know without question that every single person that was shot was jewish. Bullshit.
You might as well have said:
"Benjamin is a jewish surname. Therefore, Carl Benjamin is unquestionably a jew. It was proven beyond any doubt because it came to me in a fucking dream and no evidence to the contrary, like genetics or his religious affiliation, could show otherwise.
Can you prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that said people weren’t Jewish? You yourself made an “identity attack” saying they were all white. Do you have a full DNA profile those three? What if they’re mixed race?
It's on the people claiming they're all jewish to prove it, which... Didn't happen. That's how claims work.
They made a claim using the standard set for millennia, which is the surname dictating descent. DoM most assuredly claimed they were all white, of which he had shown zero evidence. That in itself is a bannable identity attack according to his own subjective interpretations.
It's not an identity attack to call them white, that's the race they are. Even if I were to call them black, it wouldn't be an identity attack. It be disinformation though, since it's fairly clear that they are all white, and was never in dispute. It would be particularly suspicious if I pulled some "we were always at war with East Asia" bullshit, and told you that we've always known that they were black, and that you should kill a black person. That would be me acting in an incredibly malicious manner.
Prove it. Also define race since you’re clearly not using the standard definition of genetic lineage.
Just Jewish right?
Clear how? If they are Jewish it makes them of Levantine descent which is quite literally “not white”. Unless you’re now rewriting the definition of race to say whatever you want it to?
You did the first two, not the third. Still disinformation, still subjective gatekeeping. Just like when you denied slave was a racial slur, it’s funny how often you commit identity attacks you ban others for huh?
It is never a violation of Rule 16 to mis-identify someone's race, even intentionally, it never has been.
Slave isn't a racial slur, it's not even used in such a way within English.
It literally is and has been, it is the oldest racial slur in the English language, no historian denies that the word slave comes from the Slavic people or that the definition of an owned person changed to be Slavic people. Thats is by every definition a racial slur. Why are you blatantly lying after you have been repeatedly proven wrong on this? You’re now intentionally spreading misinformation, why do this?
I seriously doubt it's the oldest slur, even in the event that it was a slur.
You are reframing a word into being a slur when it isn't one. You're adding moral weight to a word that wasn't carrying it. No one called black slaves, slaves, because they thought of them as almost as worthless as Slavs. They called them slaves because they were held in bondage without consent for the purposes of utilizing their labor.
People didn't go from using the roman term "servus" and change it to slave because they thought Slavs were inferior.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Disinformation
Calling people who are not black black as part of an analogy is not disinformation.
nobody asked you
quit
Ironic. Despite your attempt at gaslighting, I remember quite a bit of discussion on multiple boards and sites at the time about one or two of the failed assailants having been from the tribe as well as speculation that they were trying to make an example of Kyle to discourage the other tax cattle.
Are those boards and sites in the room with us? Or was it just conpro?
Oh look, more gaslighting. Among other places, I saw this discussed on PDW.
I don't even understand what this is supposed to convey. Do you even understand that the "is X in the room with you now" means, specifically, that you are skeptical that X exists at all?
Are you trying to imply that there weren't discussions of Jewish subversion on any message boards on the Internet about the demographic makeup of the BLM riots? In other words, that the stormfags that you complain about all the time don't actually exist?
Remember, the left cant meme.
Funny how stormfags call anyone else leftists.
You fucking idiot. You scream stormfag at anyone who dares disagree with your idiotic takes, then wonder why there are so many stormfags. Lemme tell you something, you stupid furry, it's the ideology of the bolshevik that causes this. The very nature of marxist teachings. Not simply because they are left-leaning. Try again when you have a little more reading comprehension, worm.
No, I understand tons of people seethe about the jews constantly everywhere. The point is that I don't enjoy this board getting forum slid into the same shit by retards.
In other words, please go back to the jew cope containment board of conpro and whine there.
So you don't actually understand the phrase. Gotcha.
Jesus Christ is King! 👑 And he is Risen!
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Do not call for "Total Kike Death"
Next time Dom is on one of his hiatuses, everyone should report every comments as a rule 16 violation so when he comes back he has to comb through thousands of reports.
"he shot a bunch of jews, who I am not surprised to learn are murderous pedophiles."
that's an attack on an identity group.
simply identifying members of an actual physical group is not an attack on that identity group unless the clear implication is that all members of that class would be a part of this group.
which the deleted post does not do in any way. because the identity group is "people Kyle Rittenhouse shot in Kenosha." they just maybe happen to share a common characteristic. which is a notable statistical oddity, not an attack on jews.
Not an attack when the claim is OBJECTIVELY correct.
Rittenhouse didn't shoot at a pack of anything. He shot at individuals actively trying to kill him.
XBX_X makes it sound like he was shooting haphazardly into a crowd of antifa.
I swear I thought this was a Reddit post and one of their jannies. Then I looked a tad closer.
3 blacks in the back 😆 🤣 😂 that attorney couldn't be more incorrect.
I'm really sorry I didn't just say he didn't shoot any black people
Post Reported for:
Fundamentally, this post is about a disagreement with a moderation decision.
Yoisi is a sockpuppet of telia, that’s why the account was inactive for over 3 months until you recently banned telia, which instantly prompted Yoisi to return and start frieren-posting
i find it funny that someone can make up bullshit claims about other users without evidence but apparently we are not allowed to say someone is jewish even with substantial evidence backing it whilst the mod is allowed to say they are White even without proof (it they are jews then they are not White, so if someone cannot 100% say they are not jews then they can't 100% say they are White either)
Im explaining why I reported your post for spam, sockpuppet
I think a few of them are.
So someone can make up bullshit claims about other users without evidence and this doesn't count as harrassment , but apparently we are not allowed to say someone is jewish even with substantial evidence backing it whilst you can say they are White even without proof (if they are jews then they are not White, so if someone cannot 100% say they are not jews then they can't 100% say they are White either)
You are not allowed to engage in disinformation via historical revisionism so you can push people for race war. That's not the same thing as 'saying someone is jewish'.
You are doing it currently, just not to push for a race war… so why haven’t you banned yourself again?
No
correct about Rosenbaum
Google told me that Grosskreuz is still a possible jewish surname
https://files.catbox.moe/w7gsve.jpg
Everything is a possible Jewish surname, to be fair.
But yeah, Rosenbaum is almost certainly a Jew, Grosskreutz possible, and Huber also possibly. "Jewish Antifa" or some such actually tried to claim Huber, as they cheered him beating Kyle with a skateboard. I'd also seen that debunked, and it being referred to that he and his family weren't practicing (take that, bigots), which is a fucking ton of wiggle room. If I had to guess, I'd say at least two of the three were Jewish.
You really shouldn't be so trusting of AI. Considering the fact israeli schools have their own alternative plus sign because + looks too close to a cross, I really doubt anyone from that group would use a name that means "big cross".