So your argument is that we know for a fact that each person he shot was jewish, because "I saw a surname" and "The Daily Kos once said something one time and provided literally no evidence whatsoever."
This is what I'm talking about. You know you have literally nothing here. It was never a topic of discussion even at the time. Then you decided to revise history. And now, we know without question that every single person that was shot was jewish. Bullshit.
You might as well have said:
"Benjamin is a jewish surname. Therefore, Carl Benjamin is unquestionably a jew. It was proven beyond any doubt because it came to me in a fucking dream and no evidence to the contrary, like genetics or his religious affiliation, could show otherwise.
Can you prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that said people weren’t Jewish? You yourself made an “identity attack” saying they were all white. Do you have a full DNA profile those three? What if they’re mixed race?
They made a claim using the standard set for millennia, which is the surname dictating descent. DoM most assuredly claimed they were all white, of which he had shown zero evidence. That in itself is a bannable identity attack according to his own subjective interpretations.
It's not an identity attack to call them white, that's the race they are. Even if I were to call them black, it wouldn't be an identity attack. It be disinformation though, since it's fairly clear that they are all white, and was never in dispute. It would be particularly suspicious if I pulled some "we were always at war with East Asia" bullshit, and told you that we've always known that they were black, and that you should kill a black person. That would be me acting in an incredibly malicious manner.
It's not an identity attack to call them white, that's the race they are.
Prove it. Also define race since you’re clearly not using the standard definition of genetic lineage.
Even if I were to call them black, it wouldn't be an identity attack
Just Jewish right?
It be disinformation though, since it's fairly clear that they are all white, and was never in dispute.
Clear how? If they are Jewish it makes them of Levantine descent which is quite literally “not white”. Unless you’re now rewriting the definition of race to say whatever you want it to?
would be particularly suspicious if I pulled some "we were always at war with East Asia" bullshit, and told you that we've always known that they were black, and that you should kill a black person. That would be me acting in an incredibly malicious manner.
You did the first two, not the third. Still disinformation, still subjective gatekeeping. Just like when you denied slave was a racial slur, it’s funny how often you commit identity attacks you ban others for huh?
It was never a topic of discussion even at the time. Then you decided to revise history.
Ironic. Despite your attempt at gaslighting, I remember quite a bit of discussion on multiple boards and sites at the time about one or two of the failed assailants having been from the tribe as well as speculation that they were trying to make an example of Kyle to discourage the other tax cattle.
Are those boards and sites in the room with us? Or was it just conpro?
I don't even understand what this is supposed to convey. Do you even understand that the "is X in the room with you now" means, specifically, that you are skeptical that X exists at all?
Are you trying to imply that there weren't discussions of Jewish subversion on any message boards on the Internet about the demographic makeup of the BLM riots? In other words, that the stormfags that you complain about all the time don't actually exist?
No, I understand tons of people seethe about the jews constantly everywhere. The point is that I don't enjoy this board getting forum slid into the same shit by retards.
In other words, please go back to the jew cope containment board of conpro and whine there.
So your argument is that we know for a fact that each person he shot was jewish, because "I saw a surname" and "The Daily Kos once said something one time and provided literally no evidence whatsoever."
This is what I'm talking about. You know you have literally nothing here. It was never a topic of discussion even at the time. Then you decided to revise history. And now, we know without question that every single person that was shot was jewish. Bullshit.
You might as well have said:
"Benjamin is a jewish surname. Therefore, Carl Benjamin is unquestionably a jew. It was proven beyond any doubt because it came to me in a fucking dream and no evidence to the contrary, like genetics or his religious affiliation, could show otherwise.
Can you prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that said people weren’t Jewish? You yourself made an “identity attack” saying they were all white. Do you have a full DNA profile those three? What if they’re mixed race?
It's on the people claiming they're all jewish to prove it, which... Didn't happen. That's how claims work.
They made a claim using the standard set for millennia, which is the surname dictating descent. DoM most assuredly claimed they were all white, of which he had shown zero evidence. That in itself is a bannable identity attack according to his own subjective interpretations.
It's not an identity attack to call them white, that's the race they are. Even if I were to call them black, it wouldn't be an identity attack. It be disinformation though, since it's fairly clear that they are all white, and was never in dispute. It would be particularly suspicious if I pulled some "we were always at war with East Asia" bullshit, and told you that we've always known that they were black, and that you should kill a black person. That would be me acting in an incredibly malicious manner.
Prove it. Also define race since you’re clearly not using the standard definition of genetic lineage.
Just Jewish right?
Clear how? If they are Jewish it makes them of Levantine descent which is quite literally “not white”. Unless you’re now rewriting the definition of race to say whatever you want it to?
You did the first two, not the third. Still disinformation, still subjective gatekeeping. Just like when you denied slave was a racial slur, it’s funny how often you commit identity attacks you ban others for huh?
It is never a violation of Rule 16 to mis-identify someone's race, even intentionally, it never has been.
Slave isn't a racial slur, it's not even used in such a way within English.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Disinformation
Calling people who are not black black as part of an analogy is not disinformation.
Ironic. Despite your attempt at gaslighting, I remember quite a bit of discussion on multiple boards and sites at the time about one or two of the failed assailants having been from the tribe as well as speculation that they were trying to make an example of Kyle to discourage the other tax cattle.
Are those boards and sites in the room with us? Or was it just conpro?
Oh look, more gaslighting. Among other places, I saw this discussed on PDW.
I don't even understand what this is supposed to convey. Do you even understand that the "is X in the room with you now" means, specifically, that you are skeptical that X exists at all?
Are you trying to imply that there weren't discussions of Jewish subversion on any message boards on the Internet about the demographic makeup of the BLM riots? In other words, that the stormfags that you complain about all the time don't actually exist?
Remember, the left cant meme.
No, I understand tons of people seethe about the jews constantly everywhere. The point is that I don't enjoy this board getting forum slid into the same shit by retards.
In other words, please go back to the jew cope containment board of conpro and whine there.
nobody asked you
quit