See, if you were a jew, you'd have the excuse of deceptiveness, of playing dumb. But this way, you are just unable to comprehend satire. But a low intelligence is genetic, there is no advice I could give that could ever help. So is being a jew btw. Like an incurable disease.
Did you notice how I lowercase jew and israel? I noticed that you capitalize those. See, combine it with the unresolved "Like I said originally" attempt, the abrasive behavior, the capitalization of these words... it's quite a self-reveal.
And is "fauxgnaws" a play on Fox News? Your very name is dedicated to denounce a jewish media corporation. Quite funny, isn't it?
So is that a subtle yes?
Isn't it fascinating how good I am at detecting your kind?
I can see you're triggered by this.
So? Stupidity is quite bothersome to me. You should contemplate how you manage to provoke me if that's the requirement. Totally unrelated to this - do you happen to be a jew?
It's not a real quote
Are you a jew? Because this is some impressive, genius level revelation.
he didn't mention anything about Israel
The parody is about him not spending a second to criticize israel, who are the ones who actively sabotage any peace attempt. They proceeded with their little genocide program in Lebanon, which Iran insisted they ceased to do. And then Trump pretends like Iran is just irrational and doing things FOR NO REASON at all.
What does that remind you of? How Hitler and Germans hated jews FOR NO REASON at all? How they were oh-so persecuted by evil Christians for 2 millennia FOR NO REASON at all? And Trump is renown among various people to lick the boot of Netanyahu passionately... he isn't particularly doing well to disprove the allegations.
Got the pattern, Mr. Genius?
and there's every indication he's incredibly frustrated with Israel.
That was a little theater, to show how Trump is totally the one who is the boss, and Netanyahu is the one subordinate to the USA. Clearly that's not the case.
Like I said originally
What? Where? You said nothing about Trump and Netanyahu. Or is this some grammatically false use of "them"?
Wait, what is the problem? He made a parody quote. The fact is that Trump is completely unreliable and unhinged. Because he gleefully serves Netanyahu, and that demon wants "greater israel", peace is detrimental to his plans. Therefore they will do their best to sabotage any peace attempts, and Trump plays along like an obedient lapdog as his master expects of him.
This game is played for months now.
will result in the officer’s death at minimum
It's not about that. It all has an ideological basis. They are anti-White, anti-Christian, pro-non-White, pro-degeneracy. That's the simple version.
The reason they do nothing is not fear, but intentional.
while the state feigns ignorance
Britain is a tyranny. And I'm not saying that to disparage them - they are a tyrannical regime. Not just one person, but a whole system of them.
Why am I blocked? Even with a private window... is Hungary blocked?
Yeah. I'd consider israel to be a MASSIVE net negative.
Their culture is degenerate and corrosive, their economic contributions are a massive drain on others (namely Germany and USA), their philosophy is vile kikery, absolutely reprehensible. They argue about the concept of raping 3- year old babies - what the FUCK does that contribute to philosophy?
Given this, they'd rank even below countries like Somalia.
Can you name one country that has contributed more to art, science, philosophy, or economically than Israel?
Sure. Germany, Britain, France, Austria, USA, Russia, Sweden, Norway, Spain, Greece, Italy, Hungary, Japan, Korea. Is that enough? israel comes way down on the list, far below White nations.
I generally can’t understand why anyone would dislike them.
Uh, because 96% of US media is owned by jews (what you call the "Mainstream Media" is literally the jewish media), the entire finance system is owned by jews, the jews ran the Transatlantic Slave Trade, the jews spearheaded Bolshevism (and killed 20-50 million Russians plus the Holodomor), they spearheaded feminism and mass 3rd world importation, the jews brought a world war upon Hitler because he overthrew their finance system and arrested a Rothschild, the jews were kicked out 1030+ times out of 109+ countries and the biggest reason was treason by siding with the host country's enemies, usury, human sacrifice rituals, coin clipping, oh and the jews also own almost all politician in the US including Trump via things like AIPAC, zionist subversion of Christians, Epstein (he ran kind of a reward system for proven traitors by handing them children to fuck, cannibalism and torture videos, etc).
Your actual president is Netanyahu, which is why your country started a war with Iran on behalf of the jews. YOU filthy goyim will get NOTHING out of it, your life will only get worse.
And no, God won't embrace your beloved jewish overlords - they believe Jesus is rotting in hell in feces, and they literally worship Moloch (known as Satan) and believe they are tricking God with things like the Eruv.
until the day i die
Be careful what you wish for, that day may be sooner than later!
Khan, a student at the University of Delaware
Ah, so it's the upper echelon of the enrichment!
Fascinating. Still not going to watch pedowood goyslop.
Well, it's worse than that, but essentially, yes.
Well, the AfD is not ready to be in power as the Republicans are. Yet. They will be ready when all they ask for is a minor decrease in immigration of ~10%, or demanding loyalty to jews and israel as an immigration requirement, as the AfD will be THE zionist party loving israel unconditionally.
All their cultures, traditions, values, and everything else come from their religion.
Well, ok. That's quite a big claim, and it's also big matter of criticism, along with the idea that the deity they worship is Moloch, known as the Christian Satan, which represents essentially evil ("Synagogue of Satan"). Given that, the culture that emerges from that would be... not particularly nice.
Most of the genetic differences between human groups are too mild to account for most cultural differences
Here's a map of the average IQ by country. This is actually by far the biggest factor where genetics (particularly intelligence) determine culture.
For example blacks in Africa (IQ 60-65): Cannibalism, high brutality, a culture of rape being normal, never having invented the wheel or written language, having tribal wars, culture of near-zero work ethics, no planning into the future, shamanistic or plain insane belief systems.
Gypsies in Hungary (IQ ~71): Education generally stops around 8th class, common thievery and fraud, extreme littering, their yards look like shitholes, basically nowhere near sophisticated professions or jobs (lawyers, judges, bookkeeping, banking, healthcare). I haven't even seen a single gypsy cashier even.
In India (IQ ~77) there are practices which involve feces, like eating it, bathing in it, throwing it around in festivals. And notorious defecating in the open, and absolutely nauseating practices in food creation. Then there are the scam centers, the incompetent programmers ("foreign talent"), Bollywood.
In Japan (IQ ~106) work ethics are extraordinary and the code of honor valued to an extreme, unhealthy extent, even in corporate areas which makes it hard for employees to quit their jobs. Crime rate is also extremely low, and it's clearly distinct from the rest.
In Mexico (IQ ~87) gang violence occurs, drug and human trafficking, quite some corruption, but none of the crazy things.
So clearly average intelligence by country (aka race) is the underlying pattern. Some variance exists (the Chinese are quite weird for IQ ~104), but there are no Whites or Orientals who gang rape or rape babies to cure AIDS for example. Calling these differences "mild" is quite an understatement, if the right word would be "extreme."
such as the cultural differences between the east and west Germans is clearly coming from decades of Communist rule on one side and not the other.
Sure. So are all countries in Europe different from each other to varying degrees. The difference between any European country and India however are still extreme.
African Christians and Europeans Christians actually have similar cultures due to Christianity making their cultures similar.
Essentially Christianity is a perversion of what it actually is in Africa. They simply rebound to voodoo and shamanism again, and use Christianity as a veneer. The same applies with Islam too of course. So no, minimal similarities.
it's the fastest possible form of social change.
Well, that's debatable, but not too relevant. In essence religion is an extension of a culture, and it follows the goals of that culture. The Christian God doesn't not demand human sacrifices because of luck, but because Whites do not want to have human sacrifice rituals. Christianity uncoincidentally demands its followers to do what Whites already did or know they should do. This goes for all other religions as well.
You cannot swap Christianity with Islam while keeping the cultures (and therefore populations) for example, because neither of these cultures' populations would want it. It simply goes against their collective wills.
Voodoo fits blacks in Africa, just as Christianity fits Whites, or Greek/Roman belief systems fit them 2+ millennia ago, or Hinduism fits Indians, or Judaism fits Jews. Religion has always been a reflection of the culture that inhabited it - and if it doesn't fit well enough, it could branch off and create sub-versions of it like Protestants, Evangelicals, Amish, Catholics, Orthodox, etc. Historically it's not a smooth, fluent process of course.
The people we refer to as "Assyrian Christians" have basically nothing in common with the people who worshiped Ashur, even genetically at this point
Well, that's quite reasonable. If the people cease to exist who have religion X, religion X also ceases to exist.
Culture can change quite violently, and can be heavily based on external factors.
True, communism is one example. But communism basically abolished Christianity in the Soviet Union and replaced it with a worship of "Socialism" and "Equality." Sure, that was slower, but the cultural change was so rapid (basically like a tyrannical foreign occupation) that it took time for religion to follow. That's an anomaly, and I am talking about generalities.
I am glad I figured out the misunderstanding.
The religion informs everything else.
If that were true all atheists would be the same, including a lot of Japanese, Chinese and Koreans. Clearly that's not the case. The Chinese slave laborer is different than me for example.
The reason it's an ethnic group is from the religion.
Genetics -> race -> culture <->>> religion.
While culture and religion influence each other, culture affects religion way more. Culture is an extension of the collective being of a given population, manifesting itself in tradition, behaviors, legal systems, government, economic systems, level of technology, religion, language and more. It's not about art exhibits in museums.
all of it is defined by the religion.
Then why are Europeans different even though they have similar religions? And why are Christian Africans WAY different than European Christians? Why are South Americans different than North Americans even though they share the same religion?
Religion is clearly not the reason. It's culture. And culture derives from race. And race derives from genetics.
Without Judaism, jews can not exist.
That doesn't apply to any other ethnic group on the planet though, and if true (which isn't), it would be unique to jews. Which would be weird because there were and are many atheist jews. And atheists tend towards leftist ideologies. There are atheists from all countries, and I don't see many similarities between them all over the world.
Religions come and go, culture is way more consistent and slow-changing.
Thinking about it today, I see where the confusion may come from.
"Jewish" is not a matter of religion. It has to be understood like a nationality. It is a combination of race (genetics), culture, religion, language, traditions. You can be an atheist jew (which many consider themselves to be), indicating that religion is just a factor that is optional.
Communists in general and communist Jews are notoriously atheist. Many Jews also don't speak Yiddish. However even many among those have a special loyalty towards Jews and even take part in Jewish traditions.
It appears there is wide-spread consensus about this, even Jews see it that way. So this was never about religion.
Normal people don't scream incessently about "early life" and are not paranoid of jews.
I didn't say he was "normal." I said for normal people there was sufficient evidence to substantiate a claim like that. If it's true or not is irrelevant. And it is not your prerogative to determine what claims are wrong or correct.
So, don't evoke what normal people consider to be evidence
It doesn't matter what people think about it. Those with sufficient intelligence are more likely to properly assess information, or even look it up themselves (which you still haven't btw). Only because the lowest common denominator is too bad at evaluating claims, doesn't mean you should ban people based on what a hypothetical idiot is capable to process.
As for being in court, you can not establish that someone is secretly a jew because you saw a surname and assumed their religion.
In court the rule of in dubeo pro reo exists, which has a whole lot of reasons, like preventing excess of power, ensuring legal protocol for police, requiring and properly assessing evidence, and not abusing the accused in various ways.
This is not a court. This is mere people talking. In a court you couldn't even claim 2+2=4 without an "expert" (hyperbolically speaking). And I don't think it's even secretly - it's quite obvious, but nobody is talking about it. Nobody is explicitly saying they are not jews either, as to not draw attention to it, because people would flock and debunk that claim easily.
Several. Turns out Muslims aren't a race either.
Do I really need to specify what "White" means?... Caucasians. Not Turkeys, not Arabs, not Jews, not Orientals, not Eskimos, I mean actual native Europeans whose ancestors lived in Europe for 1000+ years.
So could it be that with "several" you meant 0 then? Because all Muhammads you claim to know are NOT native Europeans, but foreigners with bright skin colors?
It's certain for at least 2 out of 3. and for the third one it's just "likely" (50%+). It doesn't matter what YOU think about that, especially if you put up unreasonable levels of scrutiny. But to normal people it is enough evidence to confidently claim that. If anything, it would be an unexpected surprise if it weren't true. It's not a court, and in dubio pro reo does not apply.
And you just ban people out of personal whim. Have you even bothered to look it up before you ban people out of your personal disagreement?
You literally do not know that they are jews
How many Whites have you ever seen who are named Muhammad? Clearly the name is a strong indicator of origin, just as skin color is a strong indicator of race, and education/profession is a strong indicator of IQ.
It sounds like some janitorial tyranny, halfway or more to Reddit. Go over to Gaming, at least there are no overly censorial mods, and you can be open about what you say.
It's easy to look up. Rittenhouse shot Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, Gaige Grosskreutz.
Joseph Rosenbaum - 100% jew. It's among the most jewiest names possible.
Gaige Grosskreutz - Quite a jewish name, and indeed has family and neighbors who are jewish.
Anthony Huber - Uncertain, but it appears to be a jewish family name.
You are fully aware that all of them were white
Wrong, jews are not White, they consider themselves something else. In fact they like to switch around as needed, but they internally they consider themselves distinct from Whites. To which we all can happily agree.
So your accusation is defamatory (accusing of lying) and based on ignorance.
I don't think it was ever identified that any of them were jews
Your ignorance is not an argument. At least 2, likely 3 out of 3 were jews.
The other two were a communist
All 3 were communists. Weren't they literally all members of Antifa anyway? Antifa was originally created as a violent arm of jewish communists in Germany, and it appears to still be that, but internationally.
Given this
Your premises are wrong. Just admit that you exert tyrannical janitorial powers all due to ideological reasons. At least don't lie and pretend you are something you are clearly not.
I am glad people start to realize the truth.
The entire Covid hysteria was the end of my tolerance for bullshit.
You're complaining that I've targeted intentional fraud
You accuse him of "lying", not fraud, because fraud is a criminal act that is intended to gain material personal advantage, and it does not necessitate the act of lying. Deception and psychological tricks can do it too.
I'm not arbitrating truth.
That's exactly what you did. Here:
To be clear, all evidence suggests that the books being burned by the French and Soviets [...]
You claimed X happened, someone else (probably) said Y happened, and you claim that you are right and he is wrong. And not only did you delete his comment (to deprive everybody from reading it), you also banned him (so that he cannot even prove his points).
He just happens to know what the truth is and is intentionally obfuscating it.
Isn't that the standard thought process of all who persecute dissidents since humanity exists, neatly summarized in the word "denial"? It suggests there is an unquestionable truth, and then some bigot asshole chooses to be evil and say the wrong thing for the lulz. Then he gets censored, jailed, burned, killed, etc.
Had he engaged in simply stating his opinion honestly, it wouldn't have been an issue, as I said.
And what if you just called it a lie (even "fraud" to make it sound scarier) so that you have a publicly legitimately appearing excuse to ban him? What if YOU were the dishonest one? You lied about it being a "fraud" after all (ignorance or an attempt to deceive?), so will you punish yourself too? Of course not, honesty, which you demand from others, is not important for you. You just want a particular narrative to prevail. And if others lie, but it's something that aligns with you, they don't face repercussions.
That is censorship. Just admit it.
The books burned by the Nazis were pseudo-science books mostly written by leftists. For example hyper-sexualization books, sexualization books meant for minors, "gender theory", and various other degenerate things. Also books that meant to lie about history.
You know, the same as today.
Oh, and you are the pinnacle of truth? Glad you know everything and are confident enough to outright ban users over it.
Do you know what I hate most? Not mere stupidity, not even arrogance, not even maliciousness. It's this pure arrogance combined with stubbornness and ignorance. You represent that perfectly.
Just think, the comment you deleted CANNOT BE SEEN and you cannot be argued with. WHO THE FUCK would take YOUR word for anything you say? Who do you even want to convince?
And what the fuck is with your post history... you are a rabid janitor who is out of control, sniffing his own farts. You are just hated by most people, and you do a terrible job... unless your job is to ruin the forum.
You are the type of person who'd fit perfectly into some censorship job as a cogwheel in the machine of the Soviet Union. You know, for example when someone requests documents, you are the one striking through large swaths of text with a black marker. Or, in a higher position, you'd be the one determining which returning Soviet soldier has to be put into gulags for witnessing things he wasn't allowed to. Pathetic.
I'm not here to entertain you, jew. I just wanted to see you expose yourself, hoping that your idiocy would lead to it. But it didn't.