At this point they NEED to be thanks to the amount of ideological indoctrination the left have given the other races that it's 'justifiable to attack your oppressors'
The only other race you might get along with is the Asians since they've been singled out too because of their academic achievements and their love of keeping traditions alive.
To be fair, when your media is full of White race traitors that only talk of privilege and how bad their ancestors are, can you blame them for getting a negative opinion from that when that's the inverse of their culture?
Also it depends on the classification of "Asian" like are they only east asians like Chinese and Japanese, or does it include Indians and middle easterners?
ACTUALLY Asian so China and most of South East Asian continent, none of this UK cuckoldry because they're scared to correctly identify rapists as Middle Eastern men.
It does, but the Asian population of the US is dominated by Chinese, with Koreans a pretty distant second. So whatever you see about "Asian" here has influence in those proportions.
Usually subcontinentals go in white, as does almost everyone from the Middle East, etc, until you get to East Asia.
You're reading the chart wrong. Us Asians actually are the only group that likes you. In fact, we're the second place race that likes you outside other whites.
Asians rating other Asians an 80 is fucking hilarious though. Here's a hint, us East Asians are notoriously racist against South Asians and Arabs. If you were to include South Asia that would skew the fuck out of this poll/survey.
I mean, if weāre taking the average āurbanā Asian as being like the guy who won ābreakingā at the Olympics for example, or, say, the Hmongs of Michigan, itās no surprise that they hate whites more than the other racesā¦
They seem to take to āghettoā culture quite easily, unfortunatelyā¦
But then so do many whites (women in particular) who donāt know better, I guessā¦
The urban political establishment, such as it is with Asians, is Democrats, and they hate white people. That doesn't necessarily reflect the opinion of the populace, but presumably these polls do. Asians are more Democrat than not. So some % must think that way. No matter what people say about the based ones.
I think on average was almost no bias and even right wing had very little bias compared to all the other. But been a while, the study was from 2015 I think. I assume relations have gotten much worse since then.
It's pretty much exactly what you said. But, what's interesting is that liberal whites are the only group with a negative in-group bias.
That is to say, it's totally normal for everyone to have some bias for people who look like them. But liberal whites are unique in that they're the only group who hates themselves.
You don't sperg out like this when we discuss Muslim rape gangs or how they go around burning churches or slitting the throats of priests in the middle of Sunday mass.
Now I'm only coming here to point out JUDAISM IS A RELIGION, NOT A RACE.
There are many genetically distinct types of Jews but they all believe the same thing; that they are superior to all other people and those people should be their slaves. God sent Jesus Christ to open the Kingdom of Heaven to all humans because he got sick of their shit.
Ironically, I didn't start Jew posting until after I got banned. So yeah, keep banning people, see how it goes.
Don't bullshit me with these lies. There's been plenty of allusions to racial IQ differences over the years but you only sperg out when the race in question getting the heat is jews. You have a specific spergery reserved for them and them alone where the same assertions or derision of any other group wouldn't even register as a blip on your radar, much less elicit a full on sperglord rage. Criticism of any other race is fine, but you lose your shit if it's ever jews being criticized.
You are unable to moderate impartially and you don't even make a convincing attempt.
Racial IQ differences don't violate Rule 16. Children have IQ differences to adults, that's not moral inferiority. In fact, one of the reasons that blacks have lower IQ than whites generally in the US is because they have a younger population, while whites have a significantly older population. None of this violates Rule 16.
I've had to remove and ban people explicitly for violating Rule 16 in regards to women, muslims, christians, blacks, whites, and indians. You can say that I don't, but the moderation log says otherwise. The reason jews are disproportionate is that despite making up only 0.2% of Earths population, screaming about jews makes up 20% of this forum.
Inferiority? What? Didn't he just claim something about how they managed to convince White people to neglect their own racial self-preference, which no other race does?
And that's provable fact btw. If politics isn't already telling, surveys have shown that ONLY Whites say they have no racial preference towards any race while Blacks, Hispanics, Indians, Orientals all prefer their own race/nation over others.
conspiracy [theory?]
Does it soothe your mind if it's just their natural behavior to do things that lead to race wars (aka being leftists up to the most extreme leftists), that doesn't require any collusion?
Just as some Indian HR lady who got newly hired on some big company ONLY hired Indians, which went on for how long... until they got ~20 new employees, all of whom were Indians? There was no collusion, therefore no "conspiracy" either.
Or there is an ESG system in place that incentivizes companies to abide by their ideological doctrines simply for monetary reasons?
Didn't he just claim something about how they managed to convince White people to neglect their own racial self-preference, which no other race does?
Once again, the issue isn't whether or not Whites have an outgroup preference. The issue is "they managed". This is part of an ongoing historical dialectic of an eternal race war, waged by the jews, against all human civilization, and specifically targeting whites... or really just "nearest decedents of the Aryan hyperborean race". Even now, you are attempting to deflect from the primary argument: "the jews are in a race war". And this is specific. You don't believe that you are in an eternal race war with the Indonesians. Only the jews, and it is because you are pushing Judeo-Capitalism.
You, and he, are not arguing preference, or even that cultural behaviors lead to wars; you're arguing that the jews are a unique threat to all human civilization, and their extermination is a necessary act, and that racial socialism is the only solution. This is the whole point, you're not even arguing as a racist, just a socialist.
Just as some Indian HR lady who got newly hired on some big company ONLY hired Indians, which went on for how long... until they got ~20 new employees, all of whom were Indians? There was no collusion, therefore no "conspiracy" either.
Yes, that actually requires a conspiracy by a specific DEI hire. I know, I've rebuked that conversation IRL. But it's not a racial conspiracy by everyone who isn't white, or by the entirety of the local idiot's race.
Or there is an ESG system in place that incentivizes companies to abide by their ideological doctrines simply for monetary reasons?
You've missed your own point again. These are actual criminal conspiracies (because they are in direct violation of labor rights laws, and civil rights laws); but they are not being done by a race. They are being done by Leftists. This is one of the reasons why white people accept it. White Leftists accept it, not because they are "hypnotized by jewish treachery", but because Leftists agree with themselves.
Even now, you are attempting to deflect from the primary argument: "the jews are in a race war".
What kind of statement is that even? Who made it? There is no race war.
You don't believe that you are in an eternal race war with the Indonesians.
Sure, the Indonesians do not control our media, promote 3rd world immigration, own the central banks, run ESG, have almost all politicians in their pockets, have spearheaded every Bolshevik coup, spearheaded feminism, promoted every degeneracy in existence.
Only the jews,
Well. Guess who didn't do any of that: Muslims, Indians, blacks, gypsies, women, men, aristocracy, monarchy.
and it is because you are pushing Judeo-Capitalism.
Huh? Do you mean Oligarchy? That's a natural outcome of their rule. It was no different in the Soviet Union, no different in the West today.
you're not even arguing as a racist, just a socialist.
Uh, I've argued only 2 points. One was about racial preferences, one was about the concept of "conspiracy" versus natural behavior, which reaches into the topic of evolution itself. For example I am not having a conspiracy with my neighbor when I mow her lawn.
I don't see any disagreement on your side btw.
Yes, that actually requires a conspiracy by a specific DEI hire.
A conspiracy requires the collusion of multiple people (she did it alone, unbeknownst to others in the company), whereas the parties have to neglect their actual interests (hire competent workers) for the sake of another agenda (only hire same race as oneself). So it was a conspiracy between her and the brick wall or what? No, it was her own doing. And it's not some rare exception to the rule - there is a noticeable pattern.
And it didn't even have to be DEI if she was Indian herself. I wouldn't be a "DEI hire" if I'd only hire Whites as the same role.
but they are not being done by a race. They are being done by Leftists. This is one of the reasons why white people accept it.
All based on an ideology that is openly anti-White. Let me introduce you to the reason for its existence, explained by a jew himself.
Sure... but how does one become a leftist? This is not the outcome of a process of aristocratic thinking. It's the result of indoctrination and propaganda.
When Indonesians are disproportionately represented in every cultural, economic, and political institution you'd have a point. Until then, you're just a kvetching faggot.
Yes, it is the foundational bedrock of your ideology.
You're argument is no different from a Feminist telling me that there is no gender war, and no gender abolition movement, and really all she wants is for "women to be treated like people".
This is a Marxian historical dialectic which is the basis of your entire worldview. I'm just skipping some worthless filler.
If anybody can use more of these peer reviewed red pills (or get them into the hands of prominent people to disseminate them) let me know. I have a bunch of them.
My favorite was a study where they showed participants one of two made-up news headlines. Headline A claimed a study had found that white people have higher IQ. Headline B claimed a study had found that black people have higher IQ.
Theyād show a participant one headline, then ask them if it was credible. Then theyād say ājust kidding, the opposite is true - do you think itās credible now?ā
Leftists were far, far more likely to believe blacks had higher IQ in both scenarios. Think about it: you show a Leftist a headline that says āwhite people are smartā and they say āI donāt believe thatā then you tell them, ājust kidding itās blacksā and they say āoh okay, well now I believe itā
It's something like only 10-20% of the population (and this was back in the 50's/60's I think) are willing to go against the consensus of the room. They did those blackboard experiments where they first train one group to accept a wrong answer. Then start rotating in new people. The first group will try to convince the noobs of the incorrect, even if some of the noobs were trained to know the actual answer, something like 75-80% of them would acquiese to the first group instead of standing up for the truth.
Incidentally this is why 2-party winner take all voting is best, because the vast majority of people are immune to facts and reason, and will vote the same way they've always voted.
You can only reach a few percent of people, so in a coalition multi-party system the government can only move slightly to the left/right and make minor corrections (a few percent more left will make a slightly more left coalition), whereas in 2-party a few percent can make substantial course corrections.
These larger changes let the frog know the water is getting hot before it's too late to do anything about it.
Aydin Paladin did a video where it proved that people with high education actually discriminated disproportionately against people with no education or high school education. Those without education or just a high school education typically are the ones who come out poorer.
The same video also pointed out more leftists are graduating from college and getting degrees.
If you connect the two together, this means that on the whole, leftists are generally the more hateful group from an education standpoint. They hate the poor. It completely goes against the values of the left that claim to be representing 'marginalized groups', but actually they don't. Because they hate the poor, that means that they hate both white AND black poor, even if they're not aware of it.
Their indoctrination from putting non-whites on a pedestal has somewhat combated it, but needless to say, they are completely unaware that their education has just made them the stuck up elite faggots that we've come to despise over the past two decades. Dare I say they've become the "bourgeois" that they complain about so much.
If we were, our nations would still be overwhelmingly white, and the other races wouldn't be in any position to complain about racism in the first place. They'd be lucky if we let any of them walk anywhere within our borders.
The huge gap in black preferences is why black people will keep electing the most corrupt mayors (or really, anyone in hey have the opportunity to vote for).
Wish he had more information on where the study was conducted and where the people being studied were from. Iād also bet these numbers heavily skew towards city slickers believing their race is better.
The part of this I don't buy is us somehow rating asians the same as blacks. That's gotta be slanted somehow. Are they including foreign nationals or are they including arabs as asian again, what's going on with that?
No, whites are just too pussy to tell the truth. Yeah I prefer whites more, but I don't immediately hate nonwhites just because I have a natural in-group preference for my own kind.
I give our my hatred when they earn it. And a lot do. But never immediately without cause
Even if I think all people are equally valid, the ones I choose are the ones I have to deal with. It's easier for me to deal with people like me. Does that mean I "like" people like me better? I guess. If it's for debating, I like people different than me. If it's for cooperation, I want people who are like me.
White peoples are the only racial demo that even accepts accusations of racism as valid. No other racial demo gives a flying fuck if they are accused of racism. Whites not only care but will massively change their own behavior in response. Whites will engage in massive feats of deference and charity just to avoid the label of āracistā. There is enormous social, financial, and political pressure coercing whites to favor other racial groups over their own. Of course today results in whites being the least racist group. There is no force pushing against the in-group racial biases of any other racial demo.
In short, so what?
A growing number from "our" side don't care about being perceived as "racist." People on the other side continually make up reasons to be evil. "Racism" is just a cudgel that they use.
This information is mostly trivial. It can inform some of the truth, but it also showcases a weakness of the demographic. Publicizing it like this tells the enemy that their cudgel is effective because "we" felt the need to defend ourselves against it.
At this point they NEED to be thanks to the amount of ideological indoctrination the left have given the other races that it's 'justifiable to attack your oppressors'
The only other race you might get along with is the Asians since they've been singled out too because of their academic achievements and their love of keeping traditions alive.
I dunno, looks like the Asians hate us more than the other races as well, according to these charts.
To be fair, when your media is full of White race traitors that only talk of privilege and how bad their ancestors are, can you blame them for getting a negative opinion from that when that's the inverse of their culture?
Also it depends on the classification of "Asian" like are they only east asians like Chinese and Japanese, or does it include Indians and middle easterners?
I think it partially depends on what kind of "Asian" we're talking about.
ACTUALLY Asian so China and most of South East Asian continent, none of this UK cuckoldry because they're scared to correctly identify rapists as Middle Eastern men.
Technically Russians are Asians
It does, but the Asian population of the US is dominated by Chinese, with Koreans a pretty distant second. So whatever you see about "Asian" here has influence in those proportions.
Usually subcontinentals go in white, as does almost everyone from the Middle East, etc, until you get to East Asia.
Wouldn't surprise me in the least. What surprises me is that they hate Hispanics more then blacks
The average asian is probably way more insulated from blacks than from hispanics.
Yea, most of this chart makes no sense.
You're reading the chart wrong. Us Asians actually are the only group that likes you. In fact, we're the second place race that likes you outside other whites.
Asians rating other Asians an 80 is fucking hilarious though. Here's a hint, us East Asians are notoriously racist against South Asians and Arabs. If you were to include South Asia that would skew the fuck out of this poll/survey.
I mean, if weāre taking the average āurbanā Asian as being like the guy who won ābreakingā at the Olympics for example, or, say, the Hmongs of Michigan, itās no surprise that they hate whites more than the other racesā¦
They seem to take to āghettoā culture quite easily, unfortunatelyā¦
But then so do many whites (women in particular) who donāt know better, I guessā¦
The urban political establishment, such as it is with Asians, is Democrats, and they hate white people. That doesn't necessarily reflect the opinion of the populace, but presumably these polls do. Asians are more Democrat than not. So some % must think that way. No matter what people say about the based ones.
I would like to see the breakdown by democrat voters (easily brainwashed/massively indoctrinated by woke propaganda at school)
Vs Republicans.
I think this was already proven with the in-group/ out-group bias with whites being the only group with an out-group bias.
Easy prey for anyone looking to genocide a group
I can link you that study if you want. It was specifically white leftists with an out-group bias. But whites in general had the lowest in-group bias.
I think on average was almost no bias and even right wing had very little bias compared to all the other. But been a while, the study was from 2015 I think. I assume relations have gotten much worse since then.
It's pretty much exactly what you said. But, what's interesting is that liberal whites are the only group with a negative in-group bias.
That is to say, it's totally normal for everyone to have some bias for people who look like them. But liberal whites are unique in that they're the only group who hates themselves.
https://files.catbox.moe/9cbo9s.jpg
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Jewish Race War conspiracy
Remove rule 16.
Jews are not above criticism.
You don't sperg out like this when we discuss Muslim rape gangs or how they go around burning churches or slitting the throats of priests in the middle of Sunday mass.
It doesn't really matter how much he bans ppl for noticing. It's just making our case stronger ie the Streisand effect.
I unsubbed.
Now I'm only coming here to point out JUDAISM IS A RELIGION, NOT A RACE.
There are many genetically distinct types of Jews but they all believe the same thing; that they are superior to all other people and those people should be their slaves. God sent Jesus Christ to open the Kingdom of Heaven to all humans because he got sick of their shit.
Ironically, I didn't start Jew posting until after I got banned. So yeah, keep banning people, see how it goes.
I got (temp) banned for saying HH, only. You have to work really hard to construe that as anything.
No one is above criticism. The issue is the claims of inherent inferiority of all jews, as well as the conspiracy of an eternal jewish race war.
IF you could maintain that, you'd be fine.
Don't bullshit me with these lies. There's been plenty of allusions to racial IQ differences over the years but you only sperg out when the race in question getting the heat is jews. You have a specific spergery reserved for them and them alone where the same assertions or derision of any other group wouldn't even register as a blip on your radar, much less elicit a full on sperglord rage. Criticism of any other race is fine, but you lose your shit if it's ever jews being criticized.
You are unable to moderate impartially and you don't even make a convincing attempt.
Racial IQ differences don't violate Rule 16. Children have IQ differences to adults, that's not moral inferiority. In fact, one of the reasons that blacks have lower IQ than whites generally in the US is because they have a younger population, while whites have a significantly older population. None of this violates Rule 16.
I've had to remove and ban people explicitly for violating Rule 16 in regards to women, muslims, christians, blacks, whites, and indians. You can say that I don't, but the moderation log says otherwise. The reason jews are disproportionate is that despite making up only 0.2% of Earths population, screaming about jews makes up 20% of this forum.
Stop applying Disparate Impact Theory.
The more you protest, the more we'll do it to spite you, faggot.
Of course they don't, they don't make jews look bad.
Your biases are entirely transparent and it's quite clear to everyone that you are emotionally invested in this topic.
Inferiority? What? Didn't he just claim something about how they managed to convince White people to neglect their own racial self-preference, which no other race does?
And that's provable fact btw. If politics isn't already telling, surveys have shown that ONLY Whites say they have no racial preference towards any race while Blacks, Hispanics, Indians, Orientals all prefer their own race/nation over others.
Does it soothe your mind if it's just their natural behavior to do things that lead to race wars (aka being leftists up to the most extreme leftists), that doesn't require any collusion?
Just as some Indian HR lady who got newly hired on some big company ONLY hired Indians, which went on for how long... until they got ~20 new employees, all of whom were Indians? There was no collusion, therefore no "conspiracy" either.
Or there is an ESG system in place that incentivizes companies to abide by their ideological doctrines simply for monetary reasons?
Once again, the issue isn't whether or not Whites have an outgroup preference. The issue is "they managed". This is part of an ongoing historical dialectic of an eternal race war, waged by the jews, against all human civilization, and specifically targeting whites... or really just "nearest decedents of the Aryan hyperborean race". Even now, you are attempting to deflect from the primary argument: "the jews are in a race war". And this is specific. You don't believe that you are in an eternal race war with the Indonesians. Only the jews, and it is because you are pushing Judeo-Capitalism.
You, and he, are not arguing preference, or even that cultural behaviors lead to wars; you're arguing that the jews are a unique threat to all human civilization, and their extermination is a necessary act, and that racial socialism is the only solution. This is the whole point, you're not even arguing as a racist, just a socialist.
Yes, that actually requires a conspiracy by a specific DEI hire. I know, I've rebuked that conversation IRL. But it's not a racial conspiracy by everyone who isn't white, or by the entirety of the local idiot's race.
You've missed your own point again. These are actual criminal conspiracies (because they are in direct violation of labor rights laws, and civil rights laws); but they are not being done by a race. They are being done by Leftists. This is one of the reasons why white people accept it. White Leftists accept it, not because they are "hypnotized by jewish treachery", but because Leftists agree with themselves.
What kind of statement is that even? Who made it? There is no race war.
Sure, the Indonesians do not control our media, promote 3rd world immigration, own the central banks, run ESG, have almost all politicians in their pockets, have spearheaded every Bolshevik coup, spearheaded feminism, promoted every degeneracy in existence.
Well. Guess who didn't do any of that: Muslims, Indians, blacks, gypsies, women, men, aristocracy, monarchy.
Huh? Do you mean Oligarchy? That's a natural outcome of their rule. It was no different in the Soviet Union, no different in the West today.
Uh, I've argued only 2 points. One was about racial preferences, one was about the concept of "conspiracy" versus natural behavior, which reaches into the topic of evolution itself. For example I am not having a conspiracy with my neighbor when I mow her lawn.
I don't see any disagreement on your side btw.
A conspiracy requires the collusion of multiple people (she did it alone, unbeknownst to others in the company), whereas the parties have to neglect their actual interests (hire competent workers) for the sake of another agenda (only hire same race as oneself). So it was a conspiracy between her and the brick wall or what? No, it was her own doing. And it's not some rare exception to the rule - there is a noticeable pattern.
And it didn't even have to be DEI if she was Indian herself. I wouldn't be a "DEI hire" if I'd only hire Whites as the same role.
All based on an ideology that is openly anti-White. Let me introduce you to the reason for its existence, explained by a jew himself.
And here's a link about who the leaders of ESG are, just in case there way any doubt.
Sure... but how does one become a leftist? This is not the outcome of a process of aristocratic thinking. It's the result of indoctrination and propaganda.
When Indonesians are disproportionately represented in every cultural, economic, and political institution you'd have a point. Until then, you're just a kvetching faggot.
You're the faggot who keeps inferring that.
Yes, it is the foundational bedrock of your ideology.
You're argument is no different from a Feminist telling me that there is no gender war, and no gender abolition movement, and really all she wants is for "women to be treated like people".
This is a Marxian historical dialectic which is the basis of your entire worldview. I'm just skipping some worthless filler.
You're putting words into people's mouths in order to excuse your censorship, faggot. Stop pretending otherwise.
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Asserting jewish race war conspiracy.
If anybody can use more of these peer reviewed red pills (or get them into the hands of prominent people to disseminate them) let me know. I have a bunch of them.
My favorite was a study where they showed participants one of two made-up news headlines. Headline A claimed a study had found that white people have higher IQ. Headline B claimed a study had found that black people have higher IQ.
Theyād show a participant one headline, then ask them if it was credible. Then theyād say ājust kidding, the opposite is true - do you think itās credible now?ā
Leftists were far, far more likely to believe blacks had higher IQ in both scenarios. Think about it: you show a Leftist a headline that says āwhite people are smartā and they say āI donāt believe thatā then you tell them, ājust kidding itās blacksā and they say āoh okay, well now I believe itā
That was just amazing to me.
They don't actually believe it. They're giving what they think is the acceptable answer.
It's something like only 10-20% of the population (and this was back in the 50's/60's I think) are willing to go against the consensus of the room. They did those blackboard experiments where they first train one group to accept a wrong answer. Then start rotating in new people. The first group will try to convince the noobs of the incorrect, even if some of the noobs were trained to know the actual answer, something like 75-80% of them would acquiese to the first group instead of standing up for the truth.
Incidentally this is why 2-party winner take all voting is best, because the vast majority of people are immune to facts and reason, and will vote the same way they've always voted.
You can only reach a few percent of people, so in a coalition multi-party system the government can only move slightly to the left/right and make minor corrections (a few percent more left will make a slightly more left coalition), whereas in 2-party a few percent can make substantial course corrections.
These larger changes let the frog know the water is getting hot before it's too late to do anything about it.
I don't know. I think that many of them are so demoralized that they actually do believe white people are uniquely evil and low IQ.
Aydin Paladin did a video where it proved that people with high education actually discriminated disproportionately against people with no education or high school education. Those without education or just a high school education typically are the ones who come out poorer.
The same video also pointed out more leftists are graduating from college and getting degrees.
If you connect the two together, this means that on the whole, leftists are generally the more hateful group from an education standpoint. They hate the poor. It completely goes against the values of the left that claim to be representing 'marginalized groups', but actually they don't. Because they hate the poor, that means that they hate both white AND black poor, even if they're not aware of it.
Their indoctrination from putting non-whites on a pedestal has somewhat combated it, but needless to say, they are completely unaware that their education has just made them the stuck up elite faggots that we've come to despise over the past two decades. Dare I say they've become the "bourgeois" that they complain about so much.
Do you have a link to the video? I agree with your conclusion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdwtbIulfI0
Here you go. Long video as always so be prepared.
Thanks. I actually managed to find it via DuckDuckGo yesterday. I should have commented something. It was long. I watched part of it.
If we were, our nations would still be overwhelmingly white, and the other races wouldn't be in any position to complain about racism in the first place. They'd be lucky if we let any of them walk anywhere within our borders.
The huge gap in black preferences is why black people will keep electing the most corrupt mayors (or really, anyone in hey have the opportunity to vote for).
Wish he had more information on where the study was conducted and where the people being studied were from. Iād also bet these numbers heavily skew towards city slickers believing their race is better.
The part of this I don't buy is us somehow rating asians the same as blacks. That's gotta be slanted somehow. Are they including foreign nationals or are they including arabs as asian again, what's going on with that?
š
The data used has to be a bit squinty. Perhaps they sloped it incorrectly.
If they were subjected to generations of guilt and projection like whites have been they'd be just as emotionally abused.
Canāt say this surprises me. My observations over the course of my life yield the same results
No, whites are just too pussy to tell the truth. Yeah I prefer whites more, but I don't immediately hate nonwhites just because I have a natural in-group preference for my own kind.
I give our my hatred when they earn it. And a lot do. But never immediately without cause
Even if I think all people are equally valid, the ones I choose are the ones I have to deal with. It's easier for me to deal with people like me. Does that mean I "like" people like me better? I guess. If it's for debating, I like people different than me. If it's for cooperation, I want people who are like me.
White lives matter
White people think of everyone the way blacks think of hispanics.
White peoples are the only racial demo that even accepts accusations of racism as valid. No other racial demo gives a flying fuck if they are accused of racism. Whites not only care but will massively change their own behavior in response. Whites will engage in massive feats of deference and charity just to avoid the label of āracistā. There is enormous social, financial, and political pressure coercing whites to favor other racial groups over their own. Of course today results in whites being the least racist group. There is no force pushing against the in-group racial biases of any other racial demo.
You'll notice that every other group hates whites the most. The propaganda machines have done their work well.
https://youtu.be/fbebvCmmKzM
unfortunately
Blacks are disproportionately racist to us East/Southeast Asians.
Not surprised they're racist to Hispanics - crabs in a basket mentality.
You could probably stop after "Blacks are disproportionately racist". They have a different flavor for everyone.
In short, so what?
A growing number from "our" side don't care about being perceived as "racist." People on the other side continually make up reasons to be evil. "Racism" is just a cudgel that they use.
This information is mostly trivial. It can inform some of the truth, but it also showcases a weakness of the demographic. Publicizing it like this tells the enemy that their cudgel is effective because "we" felt the need to defend ourselves against it.
I think what the stats indicate is we got guys that are extremely super sigma status racist like myself and it pulls up the averages
Wonder who owns the media that can influence all those people.