Inferiority? What? Didn't he just claim something about how they managed to convince White people to neglect their own racial self-preference, which no other race does?
And that's provable fact btw. If politics isn't already telling, surveys have shown that ONLY Whites say they have no racial preference towards any race while Blacks, Hispanics, Indians, Orientals all prefer their own race/nation over others.
conspiracy [theory?]
Does it soothe your mind if it's just their natural behavior to do things that lead to race wars (aka being leftists up to the most extreme leftists), that doesn't require any collusion?
Just as some Indian HR lady who got newly hired on some big company ONLY hired Indians, which went on for how long... until they got ~20 new employees, all of whom were Indians? There was no collusion, therefore no "conspiracy" either.
Or there is an ESG system in place that incentivizes companies to abide by their ideological doctrines simply for monetary reasons?
Didn't he just claim something about how they managed to convince White people to neglect their own racial self-preference, which no other race does?
Once again, the issue isn't whether or not Whites have an outgroup preference. The issue is "they managed". This is part of an ongoing historical dialectic of an eternal race war, waged by the jews, against all human civilization, and specifically targeting whites... or really just "nearest decedents of the Aryan hyperborean race". Even now, you are attempting to deflect from the primary argument: "the jews are in a race war". And this is specific. You don't believe that you are in an eternal race war with the Indonesians. Only the jews, and it is because you are pushing Judeo-Capitalism.
You, and he, are not arguing preference, or even that cultural behaviors lead to wars; you're arguing that the jews are a unique threat to all human civilization, and their extermination is a necessary act, and that racial socialism is the only solution. This is the whole point, you're not even arguing as a racist, just a socialist.
Just as some Indian HR lady who got newly hired on some big company ONLY hired Indians, which went on for how long... until they got ~20 new employees, all of whom were Indians? There was no collusion, therefore no "conspiracy" either.
Yes, that actually requires a conspiracy by a specific DEI hire. I know, I've rebuked that conversation IRL. But it's not a racial conspiracy by everyone who isn't white, or by the entirety of the local idiot's race.
Or there is an ESG system in place that incentivizes companies to abide by their ideological doctrines simply for monetary reasons?
You've missed your own point again. These are actual criminal conspiracies (because they are in direct violation of labor rights laws, and civil rights laws); but they are not being done by a race. They are being done by Leftists. This is one of the reasons why white people accept it. White Leftists accept it, not because they are "hypnotized by jewish treachery", but because Leftists agree with themselves.
Even now, you are attempting to deflect from the primary argument: "the jews are in a race war".
What kind of statement is that even? Who made it? There is no race war.
You don't believe that you are in an eternal race war with the Indonesians.
Sure, the Indonesians do not control our media, promote 3rd world immigration, own the central banks, run ESG, have almost all politicians in their pockets, have spearheaded every Bolshevik coup, spearheaded feminism, promoted every degeneracy in existence.
Only the jews,
Well. Guess who didn't do any of that: Muslims, Indians, blacks, gypsies, women, men, aristocracy, monarchy.
and it is because you are pushing Judeo-Capitalism.
Huh? Do you mean Oligarchy? That's a natural outcome of their rule. It was no different in the Soviet Union, no different in the West today.
you're not even arguing as a racist, just a socialist.
Uh, I've argued only 2 points. One was about racial preferences, one was about the concept of "conspiracy" versus natural behavior, which reaches into the topic of evolution itself. For example I am not having a conspiracy with my neighbor when I mow her lawn.
I don't see any disagreement on your side btw.
Yes, that actually requires a conspiracy by a specific DEI hire.
A conspiracy requires the collusion of multiple people (she did it alone, unbeknownst to others in the company), whereas the parties have to neglect their actual interests (hire competent workers) for the sake of another agenda (only hire same race as oneself). So it was a conspiracy between her and the brick wall or what? No, it was her own doing. And it's not some rare exception to the rule - there is a noticeable pattern.
And it didn't even have to be DEI if she was Indian herself. I wouldn't be a "DEI hire" if I'd only hire Whites as the same role.
but they are not being done by a race. They are being done by Leftists. This is one of the reasons why white people accept it.
All based on an ideology that is openly anti-White. Let me introduce you to the reason for its existence, explained by a jew himself.
Sure... but how does one become a leftist? This is not the outcome of a process of aristocratic thinking. It's the result of indoctrination and propaganda.
What kind of statement is that even? Who made it? There is no race war.
Adolf Hitler.
Huh? Do you mean Oligarchy?
No, I mean Judeo-Capitalism, see above.
That's a natural outcome of their rule
Oligarchy is not a natural outcome of rulers being jews. That's actually sillier than I anticipated.
I wouldn't be a "DEI hire" if I'd only hire Whites as the same role.
No, you'd be a DEI officer.
All based on an ideology that is openly anti-White.
Leftism is not inherently anti-white. It shifts it's position to what is most tactically beneficial. It used to be heavily pro-white. Leftism was invented by whites.
Oligarchy is not a natural outcome of rulers being jews. That's actually sillier than I anticipated.
Weird how it always happens though. In the Soviet Union corruption was rampant, and there were "party members" who were filthy rich and powerful. Today, well, is that even in question? With a plethora of international big corporations and Rothschild central banks installed everywhere? Plus Blackrock and Vanguard? And ESG?
No, you'd be a DEI officer.
Oh, I thought I'd be a "white supremacist" then? But to clarify, DEI doesn't work like you think it works. Anybody can be a DEI hire, and the point is to seek racial and gender quotas, prioritizing that over competence and the well-being of the business. If you hire your own race, it's just natural behavior. You could argue that an Indian hiring only Indians qualifies as a DEI agenda, because being anti-White is part of it, but that violates even DEI principles of forced diversity. They may tolerate it though, because being anti-White is their highest priority.
Leftism is not inherently anti-white.
Weird, let me reiterate some agendas:
They promote degeneracy, weakening the cultural-societal foundation of our people
They promote the mass importation of foreigners, which effectively is a genetic genocide
They promote the resource transfer from Whites to foreigners (welfare)
They promote race mixing ("cultural melting pot")
They promote acts of violence against Whites
They accuse Whites of "racism" whenever possible, but ignore things like racial groups that discriminate against Whites
They enact injustice directed against Whites
They have Antifa as "civil" troops to target White dissidents
Oh, or do you mean they are not blatantly explicit about it? Well, they are...
In a 2021 lecture at Yale University titled “The Psychopathic Problem of the White Mind,” psychiatrist Aruna Khilanani described her “fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any white person that got in my way, burying their body and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step, like I did the world a favor.”
Is that blatant and obvious enough?
Leftism was invented by whites.
"Invented" is a weird term. But let's see: Feminism was spearheaded by jews. The term "cultural melting pot" was coined by a jew (Israel Zangwill). Bolshevism was a predominantly controlled by jews (70% in the Russian congress were literal jews masquerading as Russians). Mass immigration is predominantly lead by jews (listen to one tell it herself).
When Indonesians are disproportionately represented in every cultural, economic, and political institution you'd have a point. Until then, you're just a kvetching faggot.
Now, were I to say "more blacks commit more crimes because their dogshit culture encourages it", you'd be fine. But if I were to say "jews use their power to subvert white civilization because their dogshit culture encourages it", you'd ban me. Because you're a kike.
Inferiority? What? Didn't he just claim something about how they managed to convince White people to neglect their own racial self-preference, which no other race does?
And that's provable fact btw. If politics isn't already telling, surveys have shown that ONLY Whites say they have no racial preference towards any race while Blacks, Hispanics, Indians, Orientals all prefer their own race/nation over others.
Does it soothe your mind if it's just their natural behavior to do things that lead to race wars (aka being leftists up to the most extreme leftists), that doesn't require any collusion?
Just as some Indian HR lady who got newly hired on some big company ONLY hired Indians, which went on for how long... until they got ~20 new employees, all of whom were Indians? There was no collusion, therefore no "conspiracy" either.
Or there is an ESG system in place that incentivizes companies to abide by their ideological doctrines simply for monetary reasons?
Once again, the issue isn't whether or not Whites have an outgroup preference. The issue is "they managed". This is part of an ongoing historical dialectic of an eternal race war, waged by the jews, against all human civilization, and specifically targeting whites... or really just "nearest decedents of the Aryan hyperborean race". Even now, you are attempting to deflect from the primary argument: "the jews are in a race war". And this is specific. You don't believe that you are in an eternal race war with the Indonesians. Only the jews, and it is because you are pushing Judeo-Capitalism.
You, and he, are not arguing preference, or even that cultural behaviors lead to wars; you're arguing that the jews are a unique threat to all human civilization, and their extermination is a necessary act, and that racial socialism is the only solution. This is the whole point, you're not even arguing as a racist, just a socialist.
Yes, that actually requires a conspiracy by a specific DEI hire. I know, I've rebuked that conversation IRL. But it's not a racial conspiracy by everyone who isn't white, or by the entirety of the local idiot's race.
You've missed your own point again. These are actual criminal conspiracies (because they are in direct violation of labor rights laws, and civil rights laws); but they are not being done by a race. They are being done by Leftists. This is one of the reasons why white people accept it. White Leftists accept it, not because they are "hypnotized by jewish treachery", but because Leftists agree with themselves.
What kind of statement is that even? Who made it? There is no race war.
Sure, the Indonesians do not control our media, promote 3rd world immigration, own the central banks, run ESG, have almost all politicians in their pockets, have spearheaded every Bolshevik coup, spearheaded feminism, promoted every degeneracy in existence.
Well. Guess who didn't do any of that: Muslims, Indians, blacks, gypsies, women, men, aristocracy, monarchy.
Huh? Do you mean Oligarchy? That's a natural outcome of their rule. It was no different in the Soviet Union, no different in the West today.
Uh, I've argued only 2 points. One was about racial preferences, one was about the concept of "conspiracy" versus natural behavior, which reaches into the topic of evolution itself. For example I am not having a conspiracy with my neighbor when I mow her lawn.
I don't see any disagreement on your side btw.
A conspiracy requires the collusion of multiple people (she did it alone, unbeknownst to others in the company), whereas the parties have to neglect their actual interests (hire competent workers) for the sake of another agenda (only hire same race as oneself). So it was a conspiracy between her and the brick wall or what? No, it was her own doing. And it's not some rare exception to the rule - there is a noticeable pattern.
And it didn't even have to be DEI if she was Indian herself. I wouldn't be a "DEI hire" if I'd only hire Whites as the same role.
All based on an ideology that is openly anti-White. Let me introduce you to the reason for its existence, explained by a jew himself.
And here's a link about who the leaders of ESG are, just in case there way any doubt.
Sure... but how does one become a leftist? This is not the outcome of a process of aristocratic thinking. It's the result of indoctrination and propaganda.
Adolf Hitler.
No, I mean Judeo-Capitalism, see above.
Oligarchy is not a natural outcome of rulers being jews. That's actually sillier than I anticipated.
No, you'd be a DEI officer.
Leftism is not inherently anti-white. It shifts it's position to what is most tactically beneficial. It used to be heavily pro-white. Leftism was invented by whites.
Weird how it always happens though. In the Soviet Union corruption was rampant, and there were "party members" who were filthy rich and powerful. Today, well, is that even in question? With a plethora of international big corporations and Rothschild central banks installed everywhere? Plus Blackrock and Vanguard? And ESG?
Oh, I thought I'd be a "white supremacist" then? But to clarify, DEI doesn't work like you think it works. Anybody can be a DEI hire, and the point is to seek racial and gender quotas, prioritizing that over competence and the well-being of the business. If you hire your own race, it's just natural behavior. You could argue that an Indian hiring only Indians qualifies as a DEI agenda, because being anti-White is part of it, but that violates even DEI principles of forced diversity. They may tolerate it though, because being anti-White is their highest priority.
Weird, let me reiterate some agendas:
Oh, or do you mean they are not blatantly explicit about it? Well, they are...
Is that blatant and obvious enough?
"Invented" is a weird term. But let's see: Feminism was spearheaded by jews. The term "cultural melting pot" was coined by a jew (Israel Zangwill). Bolshevism was a predominantly controlled by jews (70% in the Russian congress were literal jews masquerading as Russians). Mass immigration is predominantly lead by jews (listen to one tell it herself).
When Indonesians are disproportionately represented in every cultural, economic, and political institution you'd have a point. Until then, you're just a kvetching faggot.
"The only reason blacks allegedly commit more crimes according to police reports is because white people are targeting them for racist reasons."
Just because there is a disparate outcome, it doesn't mean it's caused by racism.
Now, were I to say "more blacks commit more crimes because their dogshit culture encourages it", you'd be fine. But if I were to say "jews use their power to subvert white civilization because their dogshit culture encourages it", you'd ban me. Because you're a kike.