What kind of statement is that even? Who made it? There is no race war.
Adolf Hitler.
Huh? Do you mean Oligarchy?
No, I mean Judeo-Capitalism, see above.
That's a natural outcome of their rule
Oligarchy is not a natural outcome of rulers being jews. That's actually sillier than I anticipated.
I wouldn't be a "DEI hire" if I'd only hire Whites as the same role.
No, you'd be a DEI officer.
All based on an ideology that is openly anti-White.
Leftism is not inherently anti-white. It shifts it's position to what is most tactically beneficial. It used to be heavily pro-white. Leftism was invented by whites.
Oligarchy is not a natural outcome of rulers being jews. That's actually sillier than I anticipated.
Weird how it always happens though. In the Soviet Union corruption was rampant, and there were "party members" who were filthy rich and powerful. Today, well, is that even in question? With a plethora of international big corporations and Rothschild central banks installed everywhere? Plus Blackrock and Vanguard? And ESG?
No, you'd be a DEI officer.
Oh, I thought I'd be a "white supremacist" then? But to clarify, DEI doesn't work like you think it works. Anybody can be a DEI hire, and the point is to seek racial and gender quotas, prioritizing that over competence and the well-being of the business. If you hire your own race, it's just natural behavior. You could argue that an Indian hiring only Indians qualifies as a DEI agenda, because being anti-White is part of it, but that violates even DEI principles of forced diversity. They may tolerate it though, because being anti-White is their highest priority.
Leftism is not inherently anti-white.
Weird, let me reiterate some agendas:
They promote degeneracy, weakening the cultural-societal foundation of our people
They promote the mass importation of foreigners, which effectively is a genetic genocide
They promote the resource transfer from Whites to foreigners (welfare)
They promote race mixing ("cultural melting pot")
They promote acts of violence against Whites
They accuse Whites of "racism" whenever possible, but ignore things like racial groups that discriminate against Whites
They enact injustice directed against Whites
They have Antifa as "civil" troops to target White dissidents
Oh, or do you mean they are not blatantly explicit about it? Well, they are...
In a 2021 lecture at Yale University titled “The Psychopathic Problem of the White Mind,” psychiatrist Aruna Khilanani described her “fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any white person that got in my way, burying their body and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step, like I did the world a favor.”
Is that blatant and obvious enough?
Leftism was invented by whites.
"Invented" is a weird term. But let's see: Feminism was spearheaded by jews. The term "cultural melting pot" was coined by a jew (Israel Zangwill). Bolshevism was a predominantly controlled by jews (70% in the Russian congress were literal jews masquerading as Russians). Mass immigration is predominantly lead by jews (listen to one tell it herself).
No, hierarchies in society form naturally regardless of race or ethnic group. Again, this is purely Leftist thinking. The Bourgeoise cabal is the cause of all hierarchy from the Capitalist system they invented in order to control society which would be inherently equal in outcome in all other cases. You're thinking that evidence of one jew in a hierarchy means evidence of a jewish racially controlled hierarchy.
Oh, I thought I'd be a "white supremacist" then?
There isn't a difference.
Anybody can be a DEI hire, and the point is to seek racial and gender quotas, prioritizing that over competence and the well-being of the business. If you hire your own race, it's just natural behavior.
Yeah, those are the same thing, and it's not 'natural' behavior. It's ideological behavior.
Weird, let me reiterate some agendas
Allow me to counter with all Progressive Racialist narratives prior to 1940. You're cryiing about anti-white policies conducted by political parties that espoused "White Supremacy" in previous decades, and in some cases, you have Leftist political parties that were either founded by, or affiliated with, members of the NSDAP, who are championing the anti-white rhetoric they have now.
No, hierarchies in society form naturally regardless of race or ethnic group.
Oligarchy is not the result of mere hierarchy. And it also matters if it's merit that lands you there or pure exploitative-amoral behavior. You could argue it's normal that it's the latter.
You're thinking that evidence of one jew in a hierarchy means evidence of a jewish racially controlled hierarchy.
One? Well, someone did some research and calculation. If the Rothschild wouldn't be artificially excluded from these lists, they'd all occupy the top 9. Of the "official" top 9, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, Michael Bloomberg are jewish. So of the top 18 there are 12 jews, which makes it 66%. That's a little more than "one", isn't it?
There isn't a difference.
So you think discriminating against all races except your own, and discriminating against Whites only is practically the same? We are entering 2+2=5 area here. They are not the same, you just pretend it is out of ideological reasons. Maybe you believe the only relevant distinction is "racist" vs "non-racist"?
Yeah, those are the same thing, and it's not 'natural' behavior.
Preferring your own species, race and tribe is natural for humanity for its entire existence minus the past century for Whites, and natural for ALL other humans and animals. So what "ideology" are you talking about? "Common sense?"
or affiliated with, members of the NSDAP, who are championing the anti-white rhetoric they have now.
So do we have to talk about the very concept of "change"? This is just some wild, baseline nonsense in a desperate attempt to make a point. You know it's nonsense, but you will play it in hopes it lands.
Leftists of the past were "racist" by your definition, and it's quite plausible to assume they had interactions with the NSDAP, as they likely shared agendas. After WWII, things started to change. The Marxists have taken over the US Democrat party, and it slowly turned into the neo-Marxist mess it is today. Not a single person would vote for both, the US Democrats of the past and today.
So you think discriminating against all races except your own, and discriminating against Whites only is practically the same?
No, you're intentionally assuming things.
Preferring your own species, race and tribe is natural for humanity for its entire existence minus the past century for Whites, and natural for ALL other humans and animals.
No, you're intentionally conflating preference and "I will exclusively hire people of my race". That is ideological.
So what "ideology" are you talking about?
National Socialism.
Leftists of the past were "racist" by your definition, and it's quite plausible to assume they had interactions with the NSDAP, as they likely shared agendas.
Yes, because National Socialists are Leftists. Most of their agenda is the same.
After WWII, things started to change.
Yes, Leftism seeks to alter topical issues to push for Socialist revolution. Same reason why the Left is both for and against the working class today. They are against the anti-Left working class, while claiming that the pro-Left working class are the "real" working class.
Adolf Hitler.
No, I mean Judeo-Capitalism, see above.
Oligarchy is not a natural outcome of rulers being jews. That's actually sillier than I anticipated.
No, you'd be a DEI officer.
Leftism is not inherently anti-white. It shifts it's position to what is most tactically beneficial. It used to be heavily pro-white. Leftism was invented by whites.
Weird how it always happens though. In the Soviet Union corruption was rampant, and there were "party members" who were filthy rich and powerful. Today, well, is that even in question? With a plethora of international big corporations and Rothschild central banks installed everywhere? Plus Blackrock and Vanguard? And ESG?
Oh, I thought I'd be a "white supremacist" then? But to clarify, DEI doesn't work like you think it works. Anybody can be a DEI hire, and the point is to seek racial and gender quotas, prioritizing that over competence and the well-being of the business. If you hire your own race, it's just natural behavior. You could argue that an Indian hiring only Indians qualifies as a DEI agenda, because being anti-White is part of it, but that violates even DEI principles of forced diversity. They may tolerate it though, because being anti-White is their highest priority.
Weird, let me reiterate some agendas:
Oh, or do you mean they are not blatantly explicit about it? Well, they are...
Is that blatant and obvious enough?
"Invented" is a weird term. But let's see: Feminism was spearheaded by jews. The term "cultural melting pot" was coined by a jew (Israel Zangwill). Bolshevism was a predominantly controlled by jews (70% in the Russian congress were literal jews masquerading as Russians). Mass immigration is predominantly lead by jews (listen to one tell it herself).
No, hierarchies in society form naturally regardless of race or ethnic group. Again, this is purely Leftist thinking. The Bourgeoise cabal is the cause of all hierarchy from the Capitalist system they invented in order to control society which would be inherently equal in outcome in all other cases. You're thinking that evidence of one jew in a hierarchy means evidence of a jewish racially controlled hierarchy.
There isn't a difference.
Yeah, those are the same thing, and it's not 'natural' behavior. It's ideological behavior.
Allow me to counter with all Progressive Racialist narratives prior to 1940. You're cryiing about anti-white policies conducted by political parties that espoused "White Supremacy" in previous decades, and in some cases, you have Leftist political parties that were either founded by, or affiliated with, members of the NSDAP, who are championing the anti-white rhetoric they have now.
Leftism, never, has to be anti-white.
Oligarchy is not the result of mere hierarchy. And it also matters if it's merit that lands you there or pure exploitative-amoral behavior. You could argue it's normal that it's the latter.
One? Well, someone did some research and calculation. If the Rothschild wouldn't be artificially excluded from these lists, they'd all occupy the top 9. Of the "official" top 9, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, Michael Bloomberg are jewish. So of the top 18 there are 12 jews, which makes it 66%. That's a little more than "one", isn't it?
So you think discriminating against all races except your own, and discriminating against Whites only is practically the same? We are entering 2+2=5 area here. They are not the same, you just pretend it is out of ideological reasons. Maybe you believe the only relevant distinction is "racist" vs "non-racist"?
Preferring your own species, race and tribe is natural for humanity for its entire existence minus the past century for Whites, and natural for ALL other humans and animals. So what "ideology" are you talking about? "Common sense?"
So do we have to talk about the very concept of "change"? This is just some wild, baseline nonsense in a desperate attempt to make a point. You know it's nonsense, but you will play it in hopes it lands.
Leftists of the past were "racist" by your definition, and it's quite plausible to assume they had interactions with the NSDAP, as they likely shared agendas. After WWII, things started to change. The Marxists have taken over the US Democrat party, and it slowly turned into the neo-Marxist mess it is today. Not a single person would vote for both, the US Democrats of the past and today.
Oligarchies are not inherently immoral nor amoral
No, you're intentionally assuming things.
No, you're intentionally conflating preference and "I will exclusively hire people of my race". That is ideological.
National Socialism.
Yes, because National Socialists are Leftists. Most of their agenda is the same.
Yes, Leftism seeks to alter topical issues to push for Socialist revolution. Same reason why the Left is both for and against the working class today. They are against the anti-Left working class, while claiming that the pro-Left working class are the "real" working class.