Don't bullshit me with these lies. There's been plenty of allusions to racial IQ differences over the years but you only sperg out when the race in question getting the heat is jews. You have a specific spergery reserved for them and them alone where the same assertions or derision of any other group wouldn't even register as a blip on your radar, much less elicit a full on sperglord rage. Criticism of any other race is fine, but you lose your shit if it's ever jews being criticized.
You are unable to moderate impartially and you don't even make a convincing attempt.
Racial IQ differences don't violate Rule 16. Children have IQ differences to adults, that's not moral inferiority. In fact, one of the reasons that blacks have lower IQ than whites generally in the US is because they have a younger population, while whites have a significantly older population. None of this violates Rule 16.
I've had to remove and ban people explicitly for violating Rule 16 in regards to women, muslims, christians, blacks, whites, and indians. You can say that I don't, but the moderation log says otherwise. The reason jews are disproportionate is that despite making up only 0.2% of Earths population, screaming about jews makes up 20% of this forum.
I don't think you understand that I've behaved objectively.
Also, speaking of emotional investment, you can tell the ConPro users who screen-shotted our chat that it is wholly inappropriate for me to go over to their forum and bicker with their users. I'm not going to even allow for the appearance of a flame war, forum war, or brigade.
One of the primary benefits of going over there is that they don't have to engage with me at all.
Inferiority? What? Didn't he just claim something about how they managed to convince White people to neglect their own racial self-preference, which no other race does?
And that's provable fact btw. If politics isn't already telling, surveys have shown that ONLY Whites say they have no racial preference towards any race while Blacks, Hispanics, Indians, Orientals all prefer their own race/nation over others.
conspiracy [theory?]
Does it soothe your mind if it's just their natural behavior to do things that lead to race wars (aka being leftists up to the most extreme leftists), that doesn't require any collusion?
Just as some Indian HR lady who got newly hired on some big company ONLY hired Indians, which went on for how long... until they got ~20 new employees, all of whom were Indians? There was no collusion, therefore no "conspiracy" either.
Or there is an ESG system in place that incentivizes companies to abide by their ideological doctrines simply for monetary reasons?
Didn't he just claim something about how they managed to convince White people to neglect their own racial self-preference, which no other race does?
Once again, the issue isn't whether or not Whites have an outgroup preference. The issue is "they managed". This is part of an ongoing historical dialectic of an eternal race war, waged by the jews, against all human civilization, and specifically targeting whites... or really just "nearest decedents of the Aryan hyperborean race". Even now, you are attempting to deflect from the primary argument: "the jews are in a race war". And this is specific. You don't believe that you are in an eternal race war with the Indonesians. Only the jews, and it is because you are pushing Judeo-Capitalism.
You, and he, are not arguing preference, or even that cultural behaviors lead to wars; you're arguing that the jews are a unique threat to all human civilization, and their extermination is a necessary act, and that racial socialism is the only solution. This is the whole point, you're not even arguing as a racist, just a socialist.
Just as some Indian HR lady who got newly hired on some big company ONLY hired Indians, which went on for how long... until they got ~20 new employees, all of whom were Indians? There was no collusion, therefore no "conspiracy" either.
Yes, that actually requires a conspiracy by a specific DEI hire. I know, I've rebuked that conversation IRL. But it's not a racial conspiracy by everyone who isn't white, or by the entirety of the local idiot's race.
Or there is an ESG system in place that incentivizes companies to abide by their ideological doctrines simply for monetary reasons?
You've missed your own point again. These are actual criminal conspiracies (because they are in direct violation of labor rights laws, and civil rights laws); but they are not being done by a race. They are being done by Leftists. This is one of the reasons why white people accept it. White Leftists accept it, not because they are "hypnotized by jewish treachery", but because Leftists agree with themselves.
Even now, you are attempting to deflect from the primary argument: "the jews are in a race war".
What kind of statement is that even? Who made it? There is no race war.
You don't believe that you are in an eternal race war with the Indonesians.
Sure, the Indonesians do not control our media, promote 3rd world immigration, own the central banks, run ESG, have almost all politicians in their pockets, have spearheaded every Bolshevik coup, spearheaded feminism, promoted every degeneracy in existence.
Only the jews,
Well. Guess who didn't do any of that: Muslims, Indians, blacks, gypsies, women, men, aristocracy, monarchy.
and it is because you are pushing Judeo-Capitalism.
Huh? Do you mean Oligarchy? That's a natural outcome of their rule. It was no different in the Soviet Union, no different in the West today.
you're not even arguing as a racist, just a socialist.
Uh, I've argued only 2 points. One was about racial preferences, one was about the concept of "conspiracy" versus natural behavior, which reaches into the topic of evolution itself. For example I am not having a conspiracy with my neighbor when I mow her lawn.
I don't see any disagreement on your side btw.
Yes, that actually requires a conspiracy by a specific DEI hire.
A conspiracy requires the collusion of multiple people (she did it alone, unbeknownst to others in the company), whereas the parties have to neglect their actual interests (hire competent workers) for the sake of another agenda (only hire same race as oneself). So it was a conspiracy between her and the brick wall or what? No, it was her own doing. And it's not some rare exception to the rule - there is a noticeable pattern.
And it didn't even have to be DEI if she was Indian herself. I wouldn't be a "DEI hire" if I'd only hire Whites as the same role.
but they are not being done by a race. They are being done by Leftists. This is one of the reasons why white people accept it.
All based on an ideology that is openly anti-White. Let me introduce you to the reason for its existence, explained by a jew himself.
Sure... but how does one become a leftist? This is not the outcome of a process of aristocratic thinking. It's the result of indoctrination and propaganda.
What kind of statement is that even? Who made it? There is no race war.
Adolf Hitler.
Huh? Do you mean Oligarchy?
No, I mean Judeo-Capitalism, see above.
That's a natural outcome of their rule
Oligarchy is not a natural outcome of rulers being jews. That's actually sillier than I anticipated.
I wouldn't be a "DEI hire" if I'd only hire Whites as the same role.
No, you'd be a DEI officer.
All based on an ideology that is openly anti-White.
Leftism is not inherently anti-white. It shifts it's position to what is most tactically beneficial. It used to be heavily pro-white. Leftism was invented by whites.
When Indonesians are disproportionately represented in every cultural, economic, and political institution you'd have a point. Until then, you're just a kvetching faggot.
Yes, it is the foundational bedrock of your ideology.
You're argument is no different from a Feminist telling me that there is no gender war, and no gender abolition movement, and really all she wants is for "women to be treated like people".
This is a Marxian historical dialectic which is the basis of your entire worldview. I'm just skipping some worthless filler.
No one is above criticism. The issue is the claims of inherent inferiority of all jews, as well as the conspiracy of an eternal jewish race war.
IF you could maintain that, you'd be fine.
Don't bullshit me with these lies. There's been plenty of allusions to racial IQ differences over the years but you only sperg out when the race in question getting the heat is jews. You have a specific spergery reserved for them and them alone where the same assertions or derision of any other group wouldn't even register as a blip on your radar, much less elicit a full on sperglord rage. Criticism of any other race is fine, but you lose your shit if it's ever jews being criticized.
You are unable to moderate impartially and you don't even make a convincing attempt.
Racial IQ differences don't violate Rule 16. Children have IQ differences to adults, that's not moral inferiority. In fact, one of the reasons that blacks have lower IQ than whites generally in the US is because they have a younger population, while whites have a significantly older population. None of this violates Rule 16.
I've had to remove and ban people explicitly for violating Rule 16 in regards to women, muslims, christians, blacks, whites, and indians. You can say that I don't, but the moderation log says otherwise. The reason jews are disproportionate is that despite making up only 0.2% of Earths population, screaming about jews makes up 20% of this forum.
Stop applying Disparate Impact Theory.
The more you protest, the more we'll do it to spite you, faggot.
You realize that Disparate Impact Theory proves Leftists correct, and justified in what they are doing, right?
Okay, well, so be it.
Of course they don't, they don't make jews look bad.
Your biases are entirely transparent and it's quite clear to everyone that you are emotionally invested in this topic.
I don't think you understand that I've behaved objectively.
Also, speaking of emotional investment, you can tell the ConPro users who screen-shotted our chat that it is wholly inappropriate for me to go over to their forum and bicker with their users. I'm not going to even allow for the appearance of a flame war, forum war, or brigade.
One of the primary benefits of going over there is that they don't have to engage with me at all.
Inferiority? What? Didn't he just claim something about how they managed to convince White people to neglect their own racial self-preference, which no other race does?
And that's provable fact btw. If politics isn't already telling, surveys have shown that ONLY Whites say they have no racial preference towards any race while Blacks, Hispanics, Indians, Orientals all prefer their own race/nation over others.
Does it soothe your mind if it's just their natural behavior to do things that lead to race wars (aka being leftists up to the most extreme leftists), that doesn't require any collusion?
Just as some Indian HR lady who got newly hired on some big company ONLY hired Indians, which went on for how long... until they got ~20 new employees, all of whom were Indians? There was no collusion, therefore no "conspiracy" either.
Or there is an ESG system in place that incentivizes companies to abide by their ideological doctrines simply for monetary reasons?
Once again, the issue isn't whether or not Whites have an outgroup preference. The issue is "they managed". This is part of an ongoing historical dialectic of an eternal race war, waged by the jews, against all human civilization, and specifically targeting whites... or really just "nearest decedents of the Aryan hyperborean race". Even now, you are attempting to deflect from the primary argument: "the jews are in a race war". And this is specific. You don't believe that you are in an eternal race war with the Indonesians. Only the jews, and it is because you are pushing Judeo-Capitalism.
You, and he, are not arguing preference, or even that cultural behaviors lead to wars; you're arguing that the jews are a unique threat to all human civilization, and their extermination is a necessary act, and that racial socialism is the only solution. This is the whole point, you're not even arguing as a racist, just a socialist.
Yes, that actually requires a conspiracy by a specific DEI hire. I know, I've rebuked that conversation IRL. But it's not a racial conspiracy by everyone who isn't white, or by the entirety of the local idiot's race.
You've missed your own point again. These are actual criminal conspiracies (because they are in direct violation of labor rights laws, and civil rights laws); but they are not being done by a race. They are being done by Leftists. This is one of the reasons why white people accept it. White Leftists accept it, not because they are "hypnotized by jewish treachery", but because Leftists agree with themselves.
What kind of statement is that even? Who made it? There is no race war.
Sure, the Indonesians do not control our media, promote 3rd world immigration, own the central banks, run ESG, have almost all politicians in their pockets, have spearheaded every Bolshevik coup, spearheaded feminism, promoted every degeneracy in existence.
Well. Guess who didn't do any of that: Muslims, Indians, blacks, gypsies, women, men, aristocracy, monarchy.
Huh? Do you mean Oligarchy? That's a natural outcome of their rule. It was no different in the Soviet Union, no different in the West today.
Uh, I've argued only 2 points. One was about racial preferences, one was about the concept of "conspiracy" versus natural behavior, which reaches into the topic of evolution itself. For example I am not having a conspiracy with my neighbor when I mow her lawn.
I don't see any disagreement on your side btw.
A conspiracy requires the collusion of multiple people (she did it alone, unbeknownst to others in the company), whereas the parties have to neglect their actual interests (hire competent workers) for the sake of another agenda (only hire same race as oneself). So it was a conspiracy between her and the brick wall or what? No, it was her own doing. And it's not some rare exception to the rule - there is a noticeable pattern.
And it didn't even have to be DEI if she was Indian herself. I wouldn't be a "DEI hire" if I'd only hire Whites as the same role.
All based on an ideology that is openly anti-White. Let me introduce you to the reason for its existence, explained by a jew himself.
And here's a link about who the leaders of ESG are, just in case there way any doubt.
Sure... but how does one become a leftist? This is not the outcome of a process of aristocratic thinking. It's the result of indoctrination and propaganda.
Adolf Hitler.
No, I mean Judeo-Capitalism, see above.
Oligarchy is not a natural outcome of rulers being jews. That's actually sillier than I anticipated.
No, you'd be a DEI officer.
Leftism is not inherently anti-white. It shifts it's position to what is most tactically beneficial. It used to be heavily pro-white. Leftism was invented by whites.
When Indonesians are disproportionately represented in every cultural, economic, and political institution you'd have a point. Until then, you're just a kvetching faggot.
"The only reason blacks allegedly commit more crimes according to police reports is because white people are targeting them for racist reasons."
Just because there is a disparate outcome, it doesn't mean it's caused by racism.
You're the faggot who keeps inferring that.
Yes, it is the foundational bedrock of your ideology.
You're argument is no different from a Feminist telling me that there is no gender war, and no gender abolition movement, and really all she wants is for "women to be treated like people".
This is a Marxian historical dialectic which is the basis of your entire worldview. I'm just skipping some worthless filler.
You're putting words into people's mouths in order to excuse your censorship, faggot. Stop pretending otherwise.