Incidentally this is why 2-party winner take all voting is best, because the vast majority of people are immune to facts and reason, and will vote the same way they've always voted.
You can only reach a few percent of people, so in a coalition multi-party system the government can only move slightly to the left/right and make minor corrections (a few percent more left will make a slightly more left coalition), whereas in 2-party a few percent can make substantial course corrections.
These larger changes let the frog know the water is getting hot before it's too late to do anything about it.
Incidentally this is why 2-party winner take all voting is best, because the vast majority of people are immune to facts and reason, and will vote the same way they've always voted.
You can only reach a few percent of people, so in a coalition multi-party system the government can only move slightly to the left/right and make minor corrections (a few percent more left will make a slightly more left coalition), whereas in 2-party a few percent can make substantial course corrections.
These larger changes let the frog know the water is getting hot before it's too late to do anything about it.