How would overloaded prisons cause a collapse of the criminal justice system a breakdown of law and order? The main risk of overloaded prisons is that you can't put people in prison... which is exactly what this ugly Arab is doing.
Imma sound like Imp here, but it seems all shit went downhill when western nations started giving women more power and influence. Is like giving the sex that makes decision based on emotions and feels wasn't such a good idea.
That doesn’t really sound like Imp at all. I think most of this board is fine with—or at least willing to engage with—the “women are, on average, more emotional than men, more herd-based than men, less logical than men, and probably shouldn’t vote” line.
What Imp says is more like “women are all misandrists who all knowingly participate in a global conspiracy, and should be treated as chattel slaves lest they knowingly and willingly destroy us all.” Which is a totally different argument.
Also, he steadfastly refuses to see race. He’d never throw in that bit about niggers. That’s just a womanly ploy to turn men against each other.
He's also in the past refused to tar his mother with the same brush as other women.
Which is the most important test of any misogynist, and one he fails. Meaning literally nothing else he says matters, because he already sees his group as the "elite, above consequences" in whatever end game he is preaching that day.
Not that I should expect logical consistency from Imp, but isn’t that completely retarded? Women in office/admin jobs is a prime opportunity for them to manipulate men and play office politics/HR harpy (both in his mindset and in more realistic versions of what that actually looks like).
Chattel slavery, or some sort of sci-fi cloning and gene manipulation thing to get rid of women completely are pretty much the only solutions that should follow out of his view of female nature, right?
It's just the end result of mass emigration. Between the wars and the many generations of canpaigns, nearly every man with the will to liberty has abandoned them, and left only the dregs, the weak who willingly roll over for the boot of tyrants.
Those people who would have preserved a culture of free men instead of serfs either died in the wars or left, to the US or other colonial experiments.
I BET they'll try to justify it by saying 'this only applies to non violent criminals'
But what they'll leave out is some of those non violent released will be money/logistics which FACILITATE violent criminals indirectly without having to be violent themselves so there will still be a spike in crime.
It also "forgets" like always to mention that most of them were charged with violent crimes, and just plead it down in some deal. Which means they "technically" aren't, but actually are.
I remember when everyone was telling me how bad America was because they locked up 1% of the population. Yesterday I realized that England is scared to reach that number and will do anything not to.
Listening to a commentator for the Labour Party suggesting the solution that they can make more prison places if they release women (does that include Lucy Letby?), scrap the women's prisons and convert them into men's prisons. So if this commentator gets his way, we will have a two-tier double standard justice system, women will be allowed to get away with literal murder while men continue to go to prison for much lesser crimes?
Instead of losers and jackasses with minor offences, as well as legitimate political dissidents who didn't actually do anything wrong, they are going to release sexual predators, homicidal maniacs, terrorists who aren't politically offensive to the government, dangerous gangsters, etc.
How would overloaded prisons cause a collapse of the criminal justice system a breakdown of law and order? The main risk of overloaded prisons is that you can't put people in prison... which is exactly what this ugly Arab is doing.
Uk gets what it deserves
Same playbook as blue states here.
It’s all coordinated to destroy western civ
Zero chance this is ignorance or naivety. Pure malicious intent. And right after a stolen election too.
It's gonna be a wild November.
This presumes the UK ever locked criminals up in the first place.
only the huwite Twitter shit posters
You can be sure all those horrible criminals will be kept in their maximum security sections. All the oppressed minorities will be let out first.
Does this mean the guy who was imprisoned for selling stickers saying “it is ok to be white” will get released early too?
no that's violent antisemitic hate crime
Jesus fuck. How many pajeets are in the UK government?
It’s wild, right? Of all the white nations that are totally cucked, the UK is still far and away the most cucked.
UK is a pajeet nation. Whites will be gone within a century.
They will be gone within a generation, just like the US.
It's a race to the bottom for our White countries for sure.
Imma sound like Imp here, but it seems all shit went downhill when western nations started giving women more power and influence. Is like giving the sex that makes decision based on emotions and feels wasn't such a good idea.
And also of course, importing niggers.
That doesn’t really sound like Imp at all. I think most of this board is fine with—or at least willing to engage with—the “women are, on average, more emotional than men, more herd-based than men, less logical than men, and probably shouldn’t vote” line.
What Imp says is more like “women are all misandrists who all knowingly participate in a global conspiracy, and should be treated as chattel slaves lest they knowingly and willingly destroy us all.” Which is a totally different argument.
Also, he steadfastly refuses to see race. He’d never throw in that bit about niggers. That’s just a womanly ploy to turn men against each other.
He's also in the past refused to tar his mother with the same brush as other women.
Which is the most important test of any misogynist, and one he fails. Meaning literally nothing else he says matters, because he already sees his group as the "elite, above consequences" in whatever end game he is preaching that day.
He says they should be forced to continue to work office jobs so they have to pay taxes. As long as there are Nuremburg 2.0 trials against women.
Not that I should expect logical consistency from Imp, but isn’t that completely retarded? Women in office/admin jobs is a prime opportunity for them to manipulate men and play office politics/HR harpy (both in his mindset and in more realistic versions of what that actually looks like).
Chattel slavery, or some sort of sci-fi cloning and gene manipulation thing to get rid of women completely are pretty much the only solutions that should follow out of his view of female nature, right?
It's just the end result of mass emigration. Between the wars and the many generations of canpaigns, nearly every man with the will to liberty has abandoned them, and left only the dregs, the weak who willingly roll over for the boot of tyrants.
Those people who would have preserved a culture of free men instead of serfs either died in the wars or left, to the US or other colonial experiments.
She going to have them live at her house?
Why not. They're overwhelmingly her people anyway.
So nice, all those cultural enrichers will be back on the street.
Is there an explanations on why they don't just build additional prisons?
If all else fails they could at least return to their roots and ship them off to Australia or America and just say they are all doctors and engineers.
*loicense noises intensify*
I BET they'll try to justify it by saying 'this only applies to non violent criminals'
But what they'll leave out is some of those non violent released will be money/logistics which FACILITATE violent criminals indirectly without having to be violent themselves so there will still be a spike in crime.
I want to see how many are actually English.
They'll also just lie, the same way communists here lie about people going to federal prison for weed and nothing else.
It also "forgets" like always to mention that most of them were charged with violent crimes, and just plead it down in some deal. Which means they "technically" aren't, but actually are.
So Judges just need to triple the sentences now, right?
I get it. Release the rapists and murderers to lock up the real threats to society; people who disagree with you.
How about you deport the invaders instead, which would fix the problem?
This was always the plan.
why is that foreigner allowed a government position?
Let people defend themselves. Stop protecting criminals. It will do a fuckton to help the overcrowding.
maybe if you... Idunno, stopped letting in criminals, you wouldn't have this issue?
Muslims always help their fellow criminals. Will they free up the grooming gang perps?
Starmer wasting no time, I see.
Whoever pinned that video to start at that point caught that woman in maximum smugness. Look at that face, so happy with itself
Easy prison construction:
Optional:
I remember when everyone was telling me how bad America was because they locked up 1% of the population. Yesterday I realized that England is scared to reach that number and will do anything not to.
I see labour are continuing the tory policy on being soft on criminals.
40%? So when middle aged Muslim men rape preteen girls they'll only get a two finger slap on the wrist?
Listening to a commentator for the Labour Party suggesting the solution that they can make more prison places if they release women (does that include Lucy Letby?), scrap the women's prisons and convert them into men's prisons. So if this commentator gets his way, we will have a two-tier double standard justice system, women will be allowed to get away with literal murder while men continue to go to prison for much lesser crimes?
Instead of losers and jackasses with minor offences, as well as legitimate political dissidents who didn't actually do anything wrong, they are going to release sexual predators, homicidal maniacs, terrorists who aren't politically offensive to the government, dangerous gangsters, etc.