Imma sound like Imp here, but it seems all shit went downhill when western nations started giving women more power and influence. Is like giving the sex that makes decision based on emotions and feels wasn't such a good idea.
That doesn’t really sound like Imp at all. I think most of this board is fine with—or at least willing to engage with—the “women are, on average, more emotional than men, more herd-based than men, less logical than men, and probably shouldn’t vote” line.
What Imp says is more like “women are all misandrists who all knowingly participate in a global conspiracy, and should be treated as chattel slaves lest they knowingly and willingly destroy us all.” Which is a totally different argument.
Also, he steadfastly refuses to see race. He’d never throw in that bit about niggers. That’s just a womanly ploy to turn men against each other.
He's also in the past refused to tar his mother with the same brush as other women.
Which is the most important test of any misogynist, and one he fails. Meaning literally nothing else he says matters, because he already sees his group as the "elite, above consequences" in whatever end game he is preaching that day.
Not that I should expect logical consistency from Imp, but isn’t that completely retarded? Women in office/admin jobs is a prime opportunity for them to manipulate men and play office politics/HR harpy (both in his mindset and in more realistic versions of what that actually looks like).
Chattel slavery, or some sort of sci-fi cloning and gene manipulation thing to get rid of women completely are pretty much the only solutions that should follow out of his view of female nature, right?
Imma sound like Imp here, but it seems all shit went downhill when western nations started giving women more power and influence. Is like giving the sex that makes decision based on emotions and feels wasn't such a good idea.
And also of course, importing niggers.
That doesn’t really sound like Imp at all. I think most of this board is fine with—or at least willing to engage with—the “women are, on average, more emotional than men, more herd-based than men, less logical than men, and probably shouldn’t vote” line.
What Imp says is more like “women are all misandrists who all knowingly participate in a global conspiracy, and should be treated as chattel slaves lest they knowingly and willingly destroy us all.” Which is a totally different argument.
Also, he steadfastly refuses to see race. He’d never throw in that bit about niggers. That’s just a womanly ploy to turn men against each other.
He's also in the past refused to tar his mother with the same brush as other women.
Which is the most important test of any misogynist, and one he fails. Meaning literally nothing else he says matters, because he already sees his group as the "elite, above consequences" in whatever end game he is preaching that day.
He says they should be forced to continue to work office jobs so they have to pay taxes. As long as there are Nuremburg 2.0 trials against women.
Not that I should expect logical consistency from Imp, but isn’t that completely retarded? Women in office/admin jobs is a prime opportunity for them to manipulate men and play office politics/HR harpy (both in his mindset and in more realistic versions of what that actually looks like).
Chattel slavery, or some sort of sci-fi cloning and gene manipulation thing to get rid of women completely are pretty much the only solutions that should follow out of his view of female nature, right?