Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

47
Twitch has new guidelines that basically amount to allowing softcore porn after all the topless streams happened, but more explanation soon apparently. (twitter.com)
posted 2 years ago by redman012 2 years ago by redman012 +47 / -0
40 comments share
40 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (40)
sorted by:
▲ 37 ▼
– TheStupidPrizeWinner 37 points 2 years ago +37 / -0

Twitch also admitted that its previous outlook on this content “was out of line with industry standards and resulted in female-presenting streamers being disproportionately penalized.”

"We looked at the money, the views, and the screen caps that were sent to us, had a good wank, and decided that we could do better."

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– current_horror 19 points 2 years ago +19 / -0

Nah. They applied disparate impact theory, which is just backdoor communism.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– censorthisss 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

female-presenting streamers

How do they know they're "female-presenting"? Doesn't that imply that females have a certain look?

What a stupid fucking term anyways. Tbh I can barely even bring myself to point this crap out anymore.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– undecidedmask2 26 points 2 years ago +26 / -0

Is Twitch officially a cam site now?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– deleted 23 points 2 years ago +23 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Lurker404 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Do these simps not know that sites like Chaturbate exist?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 12 points 2 years ago +12 / -0

Hook em' while they're young...

There are a number of cam-whores who do non-porn streams where they do gaming or whatever (while still using their porn name of course). This just makes it easier to hook kids into subscribing to their Chaturbate when they're old enough, and lets the cam-whores distinguish themselves a bit in a saturated market.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

The Twitch to Chaturbate pipeline is real. It's against the rules to promote your adult stuff on Twitch, so instead they post linktrees or whatever they're called, with no age verification. Kids have to click TWO links to get to the hardcore porn instead of just one and supposedly that one extra click makes it a-ok.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– AnotherSchwarzesMark 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

I thought it was the twitch to onlyfans pipeline. Honestly more profitable for the whores to go that route. I wish it wasn't so though.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– undecidedmask2 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Onlyfans is definitely the better move right now. It's much "cleaner" than your standard cam site (probably safer for users too). In theory its a great idea to allow people to share stuff to paying customers, but without strict guidelines and enforcement, pornography naturally takes over (or maybe the site was always intended to be this way, judging off the fact that we still don't know who the owners are, it probably was).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Or you just do what we did back in the day: search "<name of celeb> nude" and see if anything comes up. Which it will if they themselves are putting it on the internet.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– TeeBP 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Simps are effectively what enable this shit. If talentless whores didn't make millions from donations, then this would be a problem.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Erithal 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

The thots go to twich to fish for simps, because that's where the lonely/impressionable men are. These camwhores push the boundary with risque streams, get slapped on the wrist with a suspension, then immediately return to do it again and again and again. They're driving traffic to other sites like OnlyFans where they can monetize the audience they're pulling off of Twitch. If the bans had teeth, or the simps weren't on twitch, then the endless parade of 'Twitch Metas' would stop. As it stands, the degeneration of the site into a frontend for adult modeling will continue.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 22 points 2 years ago +22 / -0

They'll still lose to vtubers because their tits will eventually sag, digital tits are forever

I was tempted to put /s at the end of that sentence but it more the truth than being snide, if the only thing that can bring in your audience is tits then what's the fucking point, be a call girl instead as at least you whoring yourself for money isn't forever archived on the Internet then

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Indipendepede 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

Somewhat true. The smart ones will use AI to make their tits digital. The smartest will be dudes who generate 1000's of digital AI waifu girlfriends. Hoeflation is gonna be nothing compared to the thot-holocost that's coming.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

I can't wait for the pussy-pocalypse going by your naming trend if sex robots become a thing in my lifetime. A perfect woman body programmed by a man so it KNOWS how to keep him pleased, it'll be the end for all bitchy women, leaving all normal women (because feminism isn't fucking normal) as the only ones still getting into relationships.

Hell it might even cripple prostitution and trafficking depending on how much they cost..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– RipleywasRightLV426 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

I don't think even normal woman will be getting into relationships. Almost every guy I know has that "one that got away", imagine having that person in sex robot form without whatever baggage it was that ended that relationship. You could just chase that high til you died.

It would upset a lot of things but I personally believe we'll be involved in several shattering wars before it gets to that point technologically.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Call me an optimist, but if 'the one that got away' cane back into a man's life, I'd like to think he would choose the woman over the bot.

Unless he actually dodged a landmine.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Indipendepede 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

I would agree with you, but if the "one that got away" left to go "find herself" in a mountain of dicks, the only men taking her back are SIMPs.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– RipleywasRightLV426 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I disagree here only because usually "the one who got away" was pushed away was because of a character fault of the man. Drank too much, partied too much, other women, laziness in the relationship/life.

Even if that person came back into a man's life, they would still carry that baggage or the man could still be doing whatever it was that pushed them away in the first place. A sex robot though wouldn't care though you drink too much or spend all your time playing xbox.

The Futurama episode years back dealt with the subject and came to a similar conclusion even though it was played for laughs.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– censorthisss 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

The UK and many others are going to go wild passing new laws to try to save the thots

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– anonymous570861 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

thot-holocaust

thotlocaust

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Indipendepede 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Thought that, but doesn't really roll off the tongue. Following from u/SocraticMethod1 's comment, Thot-pocalypse is better.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

News around the 4chans is that vtubers have already been banned under the so-called more permissive policy while legacy women have not.

It's a roastie support scheme that seeks to encourage women to sacrificing their IRL bodies and reputations for less than $500 a year income, while those smart enough to hide their identity will not be allowed.

I'd call it satanic, but it's only a small slice of how people are taught to ruin their own lives forever: presumably to be amenable to voting for papa government to take care of them and cover for their bad choices.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

That's great....for YouTube then, Twitch already lost South Korea due to rule changes there (I'm betting Google is big enough to just go 'no fuck you' with their money in court to keep running) and their biggest streamers aren't the titty ones, it's males with talent and charisma and a female vtuber.

At this point, I think management on Twitch is seeing how long they can fuck up till daddy Amazon pulls a Hasbro and fires a lot of them to clean house.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– Vivs3rdSock 17 points 2 years ago +17 / -0

"Do we ban all porn from our platform?"

"No, we make far too much money from it, come up with some weaselword rules so we can still ban people we don't like or want."

NEW RULE

No uggos or fat chicks

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Chillin_in_PNW 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0

Would legit be hilarious if you had to be below a certain BMI in order to qualify for streaming topless, all the cows would be raging.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– zakat 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0

No uggos or fat chicks

If only...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– bloodguard 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0

Not surprised they're making a desperate swerve towards pron and being OnlyFans Lite. A lot of the "gaming" streams are just 304s vamping for donations with a [current_year] popular game loading screen in a tiny window.

It's going to be interesting to see how Google, Apple and all the TV manufacturers that ship with the Twitch app preinstalled handle this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– redman012 [S] 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/twitch-updates-sexual-content-guidelines-amid-topless-meta-backlash-2430357/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– LauriThorne 20 points 2 years ago +20 / -0

The hoops these shitlibs have to jump through to talk about breasts is just astounding

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– RoulerBleu 14 points 2 years ago +14 / -0

"Tits"

Them : "female-presenting cleavage or nipples on a person of any of the infinity genders, or a-gender".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– RondoOBlongo 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0

What happens if a woman (no breast surgery) goes "lol i'm actually a man and have male presenting breasts" then goes topless. Is that for the meta to decide?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Piroko 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

I can see it now:

Twitch makes Page 1 of the Sunday Sport... and also Page 3.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– IamM 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I'm just happy they're finally opening up about their true intentions instead of being in the closet about them. 40% of their site's "streamers" have onlyfans as their side-gig, including quite a lot of their supposed gaming ones which is usually just a butterfaced woman in her mid-30s wearing a bikini while playing candy crush. This entire twitch story reminds me of when the league of legends people, when criticized by their community for making countless high-cost skins, doubled down on it by making ones that cost on average $200 to get.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– nuggetpatrol 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I'm impressed that it was better back when it was justin.tv

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– realerfunction 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

all of this over that extremely mid (generous) woman?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– undecidedmask2 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I bet it brought them a lot of money and they realized how much more profitable it is for them (also keeps Amazon from shutting them down lol)

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy