Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

43
Govt recently imposed strict, burdensome anti-allergy regulations on food producers. They responded by eliminating allergy-free foods & adding allergens to all their products. (archive.is)
posted 3 years ago by dekachin 3 years ago by dekachin +43 / -0
43 comments share
43 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (43)
sorted by:
▲ 48 ▼
– dekachin [S] 48 points 3 years ago +48 / -0

Feds: "here is a complex and expensive 170-point checklist for how you must guarantee that not one atom is present in your sesame-free products, on pain of death"

Companies: "sesame-free products? what sesame-free products?"

The Fed idiot wannabe do-gooders tried to step on private companies and tell them how to do their jobs in an unreasonable & absurd way, supposedly to protect people with allergies. The predictable result was that food producers calculated that the financial gain from serving that small minority of customers wasn't justified by the enormous costs & risks of attempting to comply with the new regulations, so they eliminated all the products the regulations would apply to by - for example - adding sesame flour into products which formerly had none.

Reagan was right: "The nine most terrifying words in the English Language are: 'I'm from the government, and I'm here to help.'"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 34 ▼
– simian 34 points 3 years ago +34 / -0

As a lifelong auditor (who hates his life) I’ve always hated how regulators assume businesses exist to comply with regulation rather than, you know, be a business.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 31 ▼
– dekachin [S] 31 points 3 years ago +31 / -0

Unelected bureaucrats like to imagine themselves to be gods, and their regulations handed down like stone tablets to the pitiable Moses & his golden calf worshiping heathens, sorely in need of divine judgment.

They also love to listen to far-left academics ["experts"] & hate to listen to their victims ["evil capitalist scum who would sell their own grandma for a dollar"].

And their lesson learned from their failure here is never that they fucked up and need to re-assess. No, their response is always "we need to regulate harder".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Hullohoomans 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

We must force these companies to provide allergen-free versions of every product they make, for every potential allergy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– J_Darnley 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

If the ADA can result in free videos being removed from a university website/youtube because they don't have subtitles then you can be damn sure the feds will eventually do it for allergens.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

I love that the same government that cracks down of illegitimate anti-allergy claims also allows up to 120 insect parts in a 16 oz. jar of peanut butter.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– lapalapa 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

You'd expect corporate lobbyists would have raised objections before the draft was finished.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– dekachin [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Democrats care about academic lobbyists not corporate ones for many parts of the deep state. Regulatory capture is a problem with some agencies, but with others like the FDA it's fart sniffing academics & activists capture.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Lurker404 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Based on the company responses, or lack thereof, they're too afraid to openly stand up to the moral busybodies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 34 ▼
– deleted 34 points 3 years ago +34 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– ParadoxSepi 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Few years ago EU forbid selling some 100 watt light bulbs.

Every country complied except Poland. In a matter of a week all polish companies swapped the packaging of old lightbulbs to say '99 watt light bulbs' and EU was powerless to do anything xD

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– weezkitty 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

The wattage depends on the line voltage anyway. Seeing a "100W" lightbulb draw from 90-110W isn't at all uncommon depending on filament manufacturing a few volts +/- of line voltage.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Erithal 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Lawful Evil is best Evil.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 31 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 31 points 3 years ago +31 / -0

So the government made a problem where there wasn't really one to begin with. Sounds like their usual MO.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– TerpenoidTester 22 points 3 years ago +22 / -0

Some in the food industry say adding sesame flour is the safest path forward. They contend that they can’t sufficiently clean their equipment to guarantee it is free of sesame, as the Faster Act requires. And, under federal labeling rules, they can’t state that their products contain sesame unless the items actually contain it — so they’re adding sesame and labeling it.

The Food and Drug Administration, which regulates most food labeling, “does not support” adding sesame as a strategy to comply with the law. “Labeling is not to be used instead of current good manufacturing practices with regard to allergens,” an FDA spokesperson said.

The FDA might be the most retarded Government office, and that is a difficult thing to do. They made the rule with an obvious loophole and are now denying all responsibility despite their poor decision.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– realerfunction 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

like with the baby formula

notice how thenews just stopped talking about that one day?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– deleted 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Once being allergic was seen as a sign of weakness. The individual was meant to learn to deal with it and survive despite that weakness.

Then the mollycoddling began, and now we have Trans pedophilia being normalized.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

How many allergics were created because The Science™ told expecting mothers to avoid peanuts and sesame seeds because it could transfer allergies in utero?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

How about transforming a few basic, common sense, and actually functional vaccines into a pharmaceutical onslaught of 30 vaccines by the age of six?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– Grumman 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

under federal labeling rules, they can’t state that their products contain sesame unless the items actually contain it

Here products have a separate listing of ingredients that might have contaminated the product, which avoids this problem - nobody's getting tricked into buying a product just because it might have traces of peanut, but allergic people know that it's risky.

Refusing to make such allowances, such that the only way a producer can warn allergic customers is by deliberately adulterating their product with sesame, is insane.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– dekachin [S] 18 points 3 years ago +18 / -0
  • You need to sacrifice 30 virgins to cleanse your equipment of every molecule of peanut

"fuck that, we will just put a warning that the product might have peanut contamination"

  • NOOOOO! That's not what your overlords in govt jobs wanted! We demand you sacrifice the virgins! Therefore: we will no longer allow you to use those warnings to avoid sacrificing the virgins!

"okay then we will just put peanuts in everything"

  • angry bureaucrat face

And people wonder why smaller government is better.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Lurker404 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Same here, but the way the EU is going it's only a matter of time until they go full retard and force the same shit on us.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– bamboozler1 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

^^ This.

I don’t know where you live, but this is the same here, lol…

Much more logical…

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– Kaarous 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

Good for them. Unreasonable is unreasonable.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Canuckistani_Refugee 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

I'm sure the government response will be to create a requirement to sell food product that is free of allergens if they sell products that contain them, or some other similarly stupid shit, because they will never reflect upon the consequences of their shitty legislature and think to roll it back to something reasonable.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– dekachin [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I'm sure the government response will be to create a requirement to sell food product that is free of allergens if they sell products that contain them

There are limits to what the government can do. What you are suggesting would not be legal. Government cannot generally force people to sell certain kinds of products & if they tried, the industry would go nuclear with lobbyists. It would be unprecedented.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– almond_activator 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

It would be unprecedented.

We're in an unprecedented era of government overreach. I give it give 5 years, tops, before this happens.

Based on my past history, this really means more like 6 months.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Lurker404 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

And then the "food safety" retards will complain that their special medical-grade bread costs 10 times as much.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– realerfunction 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

The result? Foods that sesame-allergic kids and adults have eaten safely for years are now potentially life-threatening.

you're the ones with the problem, so make your own food. forcing companies to do expensive and meticulous cleaning for 1.5 million people out of 330+ is retarded and such excess government that everyone involved should be shot.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– Shill4Hire 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

So the government went "do, or do not, there is no try", and the world went "okay, do, I guess, since 'do' costs nothing and 'do not' costs a ton and generates no profit."

Somehow, this is surprising to the government.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– FatalConceit 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Survival of the Fittest - these sesame allergic fucks can just die off.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

... I'm allergic to sesame, amongst other things. I thought my allergy to garlic was tragic.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– IlhansBrother 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

How did you find out this allergy?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

For sesame seed? I took a blood test and found out I have all the allergies.

For Garlic? I was trying to prove I wasn't a vampire.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– evilmathmagician2 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Sounds like we got a vampire here, boys.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

One who really wishes he could eat Garlic.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– NoEyesNoGroin 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Leftism in a nutshell.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Lurker404 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Well, maybe the "road to hell" progressives should stop catch-22-ing companies? This is all on their overreaching regulations.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Just wait until the government bans food altogether because muh allergens.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GeneralBoobs 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Good work, men, you solved "allergic people."

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy