“LGB drop the T” trending on Twitter
(notthebee.com)
Comments (73)
sorted by:
T is the only one that insists you engage in their sexual role play.
You could work with an L, G, or B and never know. T you’ll know. You’ll know right away.
Did you forget about al the pride parades, rainbow flag days, constant virtue signalling, the "gaying" of characters after-the-fact for woke points, etc. that all happened before the T's took the spotlight?
The L's and G's aren't as bad as the T's -- at least they don't want to do surgery on your kids or pump them full of drugs -- but they're definitely still bad.
John Doyle has this whole hilarious bit about being a "George Floyd Conservative"
As in, 20 years from now, "conservatives" will say things like "George Floyd wouldn't have wanted this!" like they do about MLK now. He made some pretty funny merch to go with it too.
100％
You don't know about the ones who aren't leftists because they aren't screaming it into a loudspeaker. Lots of gay people who aren't flaunting it and want to be left alone. They'll fight with you against this pride/trans/pedo nonsense. Don't forget that LGBT, BLM, and Antifa are organized propaganda and terrorism made to divide people. They're not organic movements made up of the people they claim to represent, but rather gateways designed to manipulate the poorest and most useful idiots.
Motte, meet Bailey.
A fallacy alone does not make an argument invalid. I would suggest you try reasoning.
Maybe you should attempt to figure out the point being made by way of calling attention to the fallacious argument being presented? Just for funsies. What I'm saying is that a wrinkled-nose "nuh-UH" brings even less to the table than someone pointing out that an argument made resembles a basic fallacy.
I don't know any LG's who aren't outspoken. They may not all be insane fanatics, but all the LG's I know at minimum participated in gay pride parades and celebrated when Obergefell v. Hodges was passed. Several of them like Dave Rubin have adopted kids, which shouldn't be acceptable in a moral society.
People keep saying there are LG's who are normal people who just want to be left alone, but I'm not convinced. If they do exist, they're very rare.
Must be different worlds, because I know quite a few regular people that are lesbian or gay. You wouldn't know they are gay in normal conversation, you could probably work with them for years before it came up naturally. I know exactly zero trans people where that isn't their WHOLE identity and personality as well. I know quite a few lesbian and gay people that it's just one aspect of them as a person.
Well, now you do. I could introduce you to my friends, too. They're not rare, but you have fallen for the propaganda of the minority, friend.
B doesn't exist, its just women being attention whores and fags who want occasional variety.
Some L and G are able to keep it in private like you said. But a lot of them can't and have to advertise their mental illnesses through their appearance and behavior, even if they don't explicitly shout "I'm a degenerate" all the time like trannies do.
The point is that "bisexuality" is not compelled by some sort of genetically determined "irresistible impulse" (Thanx, **Anatomy of a Murder). It is a choice, conscious or not.
And homosexuality isn't "genetic" either, but the result of something going wrong in a child's sexual development.
Homosexuality is not "normal," but it is in the interest of community and social cohesion that their sexual habits be tolerated, as long as these habits don't include pedophilia, just as we don't tolerate hetero pedophilia.
That said, their public exhibitions of "pride" only serve to antagonize those of us willing to leave them alone. They ought to tone it down a bit, to speak with restraint.
This is very important: do your thing in private, as long as it doesn't harm anyone else, but do not taunt us or berate us heteros for having an aversion to homosex. Such public goading and preening only antagonizes people with genuinely malign hatred of homosexuals.
Heteros would do well to resist name-calling and bullying of homos who just want to have a private sex life and limit their public orgies to well-established gay bars and other exclusively homosex public spaces.
Depends what you mean by "real."
I'd put the alphabet salad on a continuum of delusion, with homosexuality being the most deeply conditioned behavior owing to some sort of early trauma during sexual maturation and trans-sexuality being a purely social disease or "choice," many times coerced in vulnerable adolescents by the tranny political lobby and their accomplices in medicine and psychology.
I don't know. I'd say a "bisexual" is a hetero who likes the occasional homo encounter, or a homo who makes an exception once in a while out of politeness or compassion or curiosity.
Which is to say that I think homosexuality is a more deeply held drive than bisexuality,
Overall, what determines one's sexual preference is a mystery to me, but I am obviously not beyond guessing for the sake of argument.
Most credible hypothesis on male homosexuality is that it originates and multiplies through molestation. If true, you can't tolerate homosexual behaviors without the children suffering for it.
The best-established correlate of male homosexuality is how many boys occupied your mother's womb before you, whether you were raised together or not.
Which leads to the alternative hypothesis that it is an malign adaptation to insufficient maternal/paternal attention, or trauma as a result of negligence. The quickest way to check the validity of this hypothesis would be to examine children known to come from negligent homes, regardless of sibling count, and compare homosexuality rates with a control population of non-negligent homes.
I've also read something related to motherhood.
What are ya gonna do, put homos in re-conditioning camps? They must be tolerated simply because there's so damn many of them. And if every homosexual is the result of being sexually abused as a child, there must be an awful lot of molestation going on.
I'm skeptical of the hypothesis.
It's fair to be skeptical of the hypothesis, it's just a hypothesis. As for molestation rates, it's bad.
And no, gay camps wouldn't be productive. I meant cultural tolerance.
B is bisexual, and it does exist and in men more than women.
No it doesn't. Men are hard-wired one way or the other. Women's sexual appetites are much more variable, but either a man is straight or he's gay, and either way there is no changing it. A gay man can spend his whole life pretending to be attracted to women. He might even genuinely fall in love with a woman. But he will always be alienated from himself.
There is no "straight" only normal. And there is no "gay" only degenerate.
The concept of "sexuality" is fake and made up by perverts to justify their degeneracy.
OK your original comment was just confusing and looked like you were giving more credibility to Gays and Lesbians than Bisexual people.
I don't get this.
Are you saying you think that all men desire to have sex with men, but your moral fortitude is why you don't?
I think he means that "degeneracy" means something like "mutated away from the norm" or "mutated away from the gens" since "gens" means "kind" or "type". So any move away from the type is degenerate. Dwarfism, for example, is an example of physical degeneracy brought about by genetic abnormality.
How do you know this?
It's pretty well-established in cognitive and behavioral science. Every study I've seen of both social trends and neurological analysis shows that women will change their sexual behaviour based on any number of social and material factors. With men, though, it's pretty much unchangeable.
Unless you send them to prison.
Or enroll them in the navy.
Or send them back to Ancient Greece.
Yeah, not having women around will do that. Doesn't change anything I've said.
Also there wasn't anywhere near as much of that kind of thing in Classical Greece as most people these days seem to believe.
I don't know. Maybe gay people who step outside of a coomer mindset would find themselves more sexually normal. Your assertions that sexuality can't change are your own.
I'm curious, why do you spend your time enforcing the female monopoly on male sexual satisfaction?
lol.
I'm serious.
Says "B doesn't exist", proceeds to give examples of Bs.
What a fine little leftist SJW you make redefining words as you go.
Odd because lots of gay men constantly sexually harrass straight men
You can sometimes tell G by the voice
I used to think that but later noticed several times straight men raised by gays (figure that out) or who lived around that "community" and apparently picked up that manner of speaking.
Indeed and they get really mad when you call them out on how its a bad Capote impression at best. Bonus when they don't even know who Truman Capote is.
I used to be a firm pro freedom type of guy - you know let the gays do whatever - now I realize why our ancestors shamed faggotry. Its influence on society leads only to degeneration and destruction.
There are people here who still hold a "live and let live" mentality. We are far, far past that point now. We do not live in the same world as we did 20 years ago.
"Live and let live" mentality is fine, So long as you have a comprehensive knowledge of who is, in turn, letting YOU live as you will and prefer.
Are you sure it wasn't letting straight people kill babies, decades before homosexuality gained any mainstream acceptance? It wasn't spending trillions of dollars on useless counterproductive wars? Sending America's manufacturing base to China? Mass drug addiction?
Everything would have been fine with the government corruption and incompetence and heterosexual baby killing, if there weren't any faggotry?
You guys are so retarded, lol. And you sure think about gay sex a lot.
It's a combination of things not just faggots. The topic of this post just happens to be about LGBT.
You sure get upset every time someone blames fags for their degeneracy. You must be one.
Too late.
Once you start questioning then you realize it is all part of the same continuum. People who define themselves by genital stimulation. People who make giving in to their urges as a principle of their existence.
They are all degenerates and all of them should be banished from "polite" society.
You have urges to have sex with men, but you don't give in so you're not a degenerate?
"You disagree with the modern religion of worshiping niggers and faggots and women so you must be a faggot"
How is the monkeypox going?
Next go for the people who openly show their degeneracy. I have 0 issues with gays who're not doing the whole pride parade running around in dog costumes, I do however have issues with none of them pointing out how degenerate this shit is and that it should stay in the bedroom.
Hopefully this all escalates into a purity spiral and the LGBs kick out all the degenerate filth. If you have issues like some outright state in their posts with the grooming of kids you should also police your own(and not just the T's).
There is a majority who want nothing to do with the degeneracy of corporatized "gay culture," but wanting to be left alone means they generally keep quiet about it just to make things easier.
That sounds awfully like "Silence is violence" the left espouses.
When did you guys turn into full blown leftist faggots ?
I wasn't making a value judgement. Although the cultural backlash against the corporate-driven "queer culture" phenomenon is growing. The silent majority of just-want-to-be-left-alone gays should be aware that their silence will not save them if the pendulum swings too far the other way.
But they shouldn't be coerced into taking a position if they don't want to. "Silence is violence" is the stupidest McCarthy shit that's ever been said.
McCarthy did nothing wrong.
Pull out game was too strong
There's some that call this shit out, I am happy they exist, we just need more of them in general.
They do point it out but they are silenced just as much as anyone else who points out their horseshit. Society is being used to push people into this attitude of "If you're not willing to die on every hill, you support every evil." If things are that black and white, everyone here deserves to be strung up for fighting in the dark alleyways on the internet instead of picking up arms and taking out the government and news media executives and employees.
Yes, there are evil gay people. There are also evil straight people. Evil jews, whites, blacks, Christians, Muslims, and atheists. Know what the truly evil ones have in common? They are rich, powerful, and have a global mouthpiece. Cut off the head of the Dragon and a lot of these problems go away as society becomes free to once again normalize and discourage the extremes of cultural degeneracy by once again being free to speak
I'm for dropping all of them... off a roof.
Not to mention, there seems to be massively more activism from the T, which is bringing unwanted attention on the LGB. Heck, we were getting to a point where there was backlash against pride from their camp and most just wanted to be left alone.
No. You fostered this rotting pile of shit.
Now, you will suck "lesbian" tranny dick and like it, or you are a nazi adjacent transphobe.
There used to be a community that I frequented on Reddit called LGBDroptheT several years back. Naturally, it was banned a few yeara ago.
Supersexuality had funny memes with Supergays and Superstraights.
the closet was a kindness.
I mean, I don't agree with homesexuality or trans, but at least homos aren't forcing me to participate in a delusion.
I know this might be a good occasion for popcorn, but if this escalates then would be good cover to reclaim as much as possible as they beat the crap out of each other.
Go in their bases with hazmat suits and disinfectant it all while they are busy fighting about pronouns.
When this was first a thing about 20 years ago, I was against it. It was mainly the bitter cunts who hated anything and everyone, especially themselves. The gay guy who couldn't even be friends with other gay guys and hated lesbians because he was such a bitch. Now that those are the mainstream gay guys and the friendly ones are no longer part of the community, I can agree trannies need to be sliced off the alphabet. They're no longer a rare subset, they've been coopted and taken over by pedos. The same might happen to the rest of the community if they don't mend their ways.