“LGB drop the T” trending on Twitter
(notthebee.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
T is the only one that insists you engage in their sexual role play.
You could work with an L, G, or B and never know. T you’ll know. You’ll know right away.
Did you forget about al the pride parades, rainbow flag days, constant virtue signalling, the "gaying" of characters after-the-fact for woke points, etc. that all happened before the T's took the spotlight?
The L's and G's aren't as bad as the T's -- at least they don't want to do surgery on your kids or pump them full of drugs -- but they're definitely still bad.
John Doyle has this whole hilarious bit about being a "George Floyd Conservative"
As in, 20 years from now, "conservatives" will say things like "George Floyd wouldn't have wanted this!" like they do about MLK now. He made some pretty funny merch to go with it too.
100％
You don't know about the ones who aren't leftists because they aren't screaming it into a loudspeaker. Lots of gay people who aren't flaunting it and want to be left alone. They'll fight with you against this pride/trans/pedo nonsense. Don't forget that LGBT, BLM, and Antifa are organized propaganda and terrorism made to divide people. They're not organic movements made up of the people they claim to represent, but rather gateways designed to manipulate the poorest and most useful idiots.
Motte, meet Bailey.
A fallacy alone does not make an argument invalid. I would suggest you try reasoning.
I don't know any LG's who aren't outspoken. They may not all be insane fanatics, but all the LG's I know at minimum participated in gay pride parades and celebrated when Obergefell v. Hodges was passed. Several of them like Dave Rubin have adopted kids, which shouldn't be acceptable in a moral society.
People keep saying there are LG's who are normal people who just want to be left alone, but I'm not convinced. If they do exist, they're very rare.
Must be different worlds, because I know quite a few regular people that are lesbian or gay. You wouldn't know they are gay in normal conversation, you could probably work with them for years before it came up naturally. I know exactly zero trans people where that isn't their WHOLE identity and personality as well. I know quite a few lesbian and gay people that it's just one aspect of them as a person.
Well, now you do. I could introduce you to my friends, too. They're not rare, but you have fallen for the propaganda of the minority, friend.
B doesn't exist, its just women being attention whores and fags who want occasional variety.
Some L and G are able to keep it in private like you said. But a lot of them can't and have to advertise their mental illnesses through their appearance and behavior, even if they don't explicitly shout "I'm a degenerate" all the time like trannies do.
The point is that "bisexuality" is not compelled by some sort of genetically determined "irresistible impulse" (Thanx, **Anatomy of a Murder). It is a choice, conscious or not.
And homosexuality isn't "genetic" either, but the result of something going wrong in a child's sexual development.
Homosexuality is not "normal," but it is in the interest of community and social cohesion that their sexual habits be tolerated, as long as these habits don't include pedophilia, just as we don't tolerate hetero pedophilia.
That said, their public exhibitions of "pride" only serve to antagonize those of us willing to leave them alone. They ought to tone it down a bit, to speak with restraint.
This is very important: do your thing in private, as long as it doesn't harm anyone else, but do not taunt us or berate us heteros for having an aversion to homosex. Such public goading and preening only antagonizes people with genuinely malign hatred of homosexuals.
Heteros would do well to resist name-calling and bullying of homos who just want to have a private sex life and limit their public orgies to well-established gay bars and other exclusively homosex public spaces.
Most credible hypothesis on male homosexuality is that it originates and multiplies through molestation. If true, you can't tolerate homosexual behaviors without the children suffering for it.
B is bisexual, and it does exist and in men more than women.
No it doesn't. Men are hard-wired one way or the other. Women's sexual appetites are much more variable, but either a man is straight or he's gay, and either way there is no changing it. A gay man can spend his whole life pretending to be attracted to women. He might even genuinely fall in love with a woman. But he will always be alienated from himself.
There is no "straight" only normal. And there is no "gay" only degenerate.
The concept of "sexuality" is fake and made up by perverts to justify their degeneracy.
How do you know this?
I don't know. Maybe gay people who step outside of a coomer mindset would find themselves more sexually normal. Your assertions that sexuality can't change are your own.
Says "B doesn't exist", proceeds to give examples of Bs.
What a fine little leftist SJW you make redefining words as you go.
Odd because lots of gay men constantly sexually harrass straight men
You can sometimes tell G by the voice
I used to think that but later noticed several times straight men raised by gays (figure that out) or who lived around that "community" and apparently picked up that manner of speaking.
Indeed and they get really mad when you call them out on how its a bad Capote impression at best. Bonus when they don't even know who Truman Capote is.