This just reminded me of a time when my sister called into a radio show with the answer to a question. "What do you get when you combine flour, water, eggs, soda, and oil?"
She said Pancakes. The answer they wanted was Waffles. Fuck those assholes.
I mean it's technically true from an embryological point of view (the undifferentiated reproductive organ precursors start from a common origin before exposure to hormones in utero send it down one path or another), but I agree with you that it's just a bad faith argument in this case from about 10 weeks gestation and onwards.
A lot of normies are duped into believing that puberty can be "paused" without health consequences. Sadly, most people have very little scientific knowledge and will parrot whatever an authority figure says.
Frankly I wish some heroes would perform a wavejacking of all the mainstream tv networks and just bombard normies with pictures of the gruesome results of tranny mutilation.
Sometimes the only way to wake someone up is a bucket of cold water.
That's my dream as well, even though it would only have limited impact. Broadcast TV is all but a dead medium and you'd still need a large group of very knowledgeable and high connected undercover units to pull it off.
But if a "far-right" regime ever takes power and intends to keep it, they'll need to shut down or coopt all media including TV channels and popular web domains.
What is this even referring to? What is better about twitter vs nitter? Twitter is literally twitter- no right winger should feel much different than an actual, sexual cuckold for using it
Yeah exactly. Most Nitter mirrors are less stable and slower than Twitter, but I still use it over Twitter any day.
Sometimes it's even better, because it stops me from watching any worthless trash I normally would (if a video will take a few seconds to load, I'll just skip it if it's not really interesting).
Nitter is an ugly interface over Twitter that uses the twitter API to pull tweets and replies and likes and other shit. Twitter, for all its fault, at least isn't black and orange and is actually somewhat navigable.
For some reason, people around here think it's better, probably to "deny twitter ad revenue", but they fail to understand Twitter doesn't prevent ad block. So using Nitter is just forcing yourself to use an ugly Troon site that still pulls everything from Twitter, without any benefit.
You can't scroll down on nitter? The website you're talking about navigating is Twitter, it's like saying that satan has better functionality than a book about satan.
I agree the color scheme is "bad" but I don't care personally. I just hate twitter so much I get a physical sensation of concern when people post screenshots from it or say they use it. Like, haven't you paid attention, don't you care? Look at how the valuation of twitter is going- it's up in the air, dependent on a fraudulent user count
I just hate twitter so much I get a physical sensation of concern when people post screenshots from it or say they use it.
So you're a Troon who thinks "using twitter" is a microaggression.
Fragile much ? Honestly, this sounds no different than people whining about being misgendered, and is concerning for your mental health that you're getting physical reactions over the use of a website by others.
If this was tongue in cheek, well played. If it wasn't, get help.
Like, haven't you paid attention, don't you care?
When you use Nitter, you're essentially using something like Tweetdeck. You're using Twitter still, through the API.
Nitter has the enormous advantage of, you know, actually allowing me to read tweets and their replies. Twitter itself will shit out a giant popup asking me to log in the moment I start scrolling down. So yeah, Nitter it is, even if it's slow.
For anyone reading, you can change the theme by clicking the gear icon in the upper right corner.
Good to know, but I'll never bother. You'd think the sensible thing would be to make the default theme something palatable. Waste of time when Twitter is just fine as is.
You can also click the twitter icon in the upper right corner to go directly to the tweet.
Yes, the best feature, it's how I quickly get links to Twitter to post here for everyone else that wants to bypass nitter and go directly to the source.
The reason why OP used Nitter is because it pulls shit from the Twitter API but doesn't use Javascript to render a majority of the page.
When Nitter actually does load (I can't get it to load right now, massive keks) those of us who are on browsers that are not chrome based (anything based off of the Firefox browser) won't have to deal with the massive amounts of slowdown the JavaScript spam on Twitter uses.
Nitter is great if all you want to do is read tweets and not have to install a program to do it. I have an old machine from 13 years ago that I still play most modern games on - anything that heavily uses JavaScript (Fecesbook, Twitter, etc) lags the shit out of me when I use my Firefox-forked browser Pale Moon.
Nitter lets me navigate the site without making me want to Minecraft myself.
The reason why OP used Nitter is because it pulls shit from the Twitter API but doesn't use Javascript to render a majority of the page.
Javascript is not a naughty word. I like when my web client doesn't pull 500000 lines of HTML in one go if I don't feel like scrolling through all of it. Makes the browser more responsive.
Nitter is great if all you want to do is read tweets
Nah, the color scheme alone is a big turn off. The navigation is a big 2nd strike.
Look, you're allowed to like Nitter, I think it's a shit website.
I have an old machine from 13 years ago that I still play most modern games on - anything that heavily uses JavaScript (Fecesbook, Twitter, etc) lags the shit out
I have a 1st generation iPad mini that by all accounts and purposes is far inferior to 13 year old PCs. Javascript doesn't lag shit.
Use an ad blocker, Twitter doesn't have ad blocking prevention. I said so already you dimwit.
and I don't think it counts as an interaction for the user either.
API call is a an interaction. Twitter is quite used to 3rd party clients and people interacting with it through the API rather than the Web browser interface.
Its because white women have been so thoroughly corrupted that they can only find purpose in internet points. And then the algorithms are adjusted so the pictures and posts about how great it is having tranny kids get the most points and you have a recipe for women destroying their children and convincing themselves it is a good thing.
You can't call people retard when you fail to read. I'm literally telling the guy that I'm not you. Referring to you in the 3rd person implies I'm not talking directly to you.
It's really horrible what they are doing to young boys. Makes me the most sick of all of the nonsense. Ruin my games, movies, whatever but leave the kids alone. They've sold a ton of parents on it too so there's damn near nothing that can be done. It's going to be really bad in 20 years when these boys start hitting their 30s.
the percentage of fathers that are supporting this is minuscule compared to the number of mid-30s white mothers who are posting about it every day
but fathers know they have no leverage because of the sword of damocles hanging over their head.... one phone call to the county cops fake crying saying "he is threatening me and I think he is touching the kids" and he is in lockup, probably beaten, possibly shanked, and days away from losing everything including access to his children
Jesus christ. Off-label uses are off-label for a reason... fucking horrific that they're giving this to children.
Same thing with masectomies - mentally ill women who want to "transition" to get a man get them but for purely cosmetic reasons. Whereas the only reason why normal women get them is for cancer treatment.
I still don't get how leftists are totally fucking okay with allowing "doctors" and groomers to use all this shit that we NORMALLY use as a last resort to treat shit that can actually kill you on people who are physically perfectly fucking healthy but just fucked in the head from online and school grooming.
You know, when we say leftist are trying to trans the gay away (ie, every effeminate man is being transed instead of just recognized as gay), they're basically Iran.
I think they were invented to help adults with hormone imbalances and cancers, but big pharma are absolute ghouls and decided to peddle them to the mentally unwell and children.
Can we avoid baking the batter and get a cake?
Just crumble up a pie crust into a cake shape; same ingredients.
This just reminded me of a time when my sister called into a radio show with the answer to a question. "What do you get when you combine flour, water, eggs, soda, and oil?"
She said Pancakes. The answer they wanted was Waffles. Fuck those assholes.
All a clitoris is - is a tiny penis
All women have small dick energy.
Honestly, the world makes a lot more sense if you view it through this angle.
That's why I never eat pussy. I'm not gay.
Women pee out of their clitoris.
FACT
But if pee is stored in the balls, then women simply cant pee.
I KNEW IT
I mean it's technically true from an embryological point of view (the undifferentiated reproductive organ precursors start from a common origin before exposure to hormones in utero send it down one path or another), but I agree with you that it's just a bad faith argument in this case from about 10 weeks gestation and onwards.
Wouldn't ever happen. We're all WAY too old for them.
Thats the same level of logic as saying a heart and a tongue are the same organ because theyre both muscles.
A lot of normies are duped into believing that puberty can be "paused" without health consequences. Sadly, most people have very little scientific knowledge and will parrot whatever an authority figure says.
It’s the same people who don’t understand that obesity causes lasting, irreversible damage.
Frankly I wish some heroes would perform a wavejacking of all the mainstream tv networks and just bombard normies with pictures of the gruesome results of tranny mutilation.
Sometimes the only way to wake someone up is a bucket of cold water.
That's my dream as well, even though it would only have limited impact. Broadcast TV is all but a dead medium and you'd still need a large group of very knowledgeable and high connected undercover units to pull it off.
But if a "far-right" regime ever takes power and intends to keep it, they'll need to shut down or coopt all media including TV channels and popular web domains.
Growth plates of long bones fuse permanently at a certain point of development, resulting in permanent adult height.
Otherwise humans would just grow forever, as is somewhat the case with gigantism.
Maybe that's why trannies are pissed off at the world. No amount of being worshiped by a deranged society is going to make up for that.
Crossposted from The Donald, but with a Nitter link instead of a Twitter one.
For anyone wanting to skip over the shitty nitter stuff : https://twitter.com/WomenReadWomen/status/1521692875242688512
What is this even referring to? What is better about twitter vs nitter? Twitter is literally twitter- no right winger should feel much different than an actual, sexual cuckold for using it
Yeah exactly. Most Nitter mirrors are less stable and slower than Twitter, but I still use it over Twitter any day. Sometimes it's even better, because it stops me from watching any worthless trash I normally would (if a video will take a few seconds to load, I'll just skip it if it's not really interesting).
Twitter doesn't auto play video on mobile so it's no issue for me.
Nitter is an ugly interface over Twitter that uses the twitter API to pull tweets and replies and likes and other shit. Twitter, for all its fault, at least isn't black and orange and is actually somewhat navigable.
For some reason, people around here think it's better, probably to "deny twitter ad revenue", but they fail to understand Twitter doesn't prevent ad block. So using Nitter is just forcing yourself to use an ugly Troon site that still pulls everything from Twitter, without any benefit.
You can't scroll down on nitter? The website you're talking about navigating is Twitter, it's like saying that satan has better functionality than a book about satan.
Not as easily as I can Twitter no. Plus the Black/Orange literally hurts my soul.
Since there's no tangible advantage to using Nitter, and Twitter is more functional to me, I use Twitter directly.
I agree the color scheme is "bad" but I don't care personally. I just hate twitter so much I get a physical sensation of concern when people post screenshots from it or say they use it. Like, haven't you paid attention, don't you care? Look at how the valuation of twitter is going- it's up in the air, dependent on a fraudulent user count
So you're a Troon who thinks "using twitter" is a microaggression.
Fragile much ? Honestly, this sounds no different than people whining about being misgendered, and is concerning for your mental health that you're getting physical reactions over the use of a website by others.
If this was tongue in cheek, well played. If it wasn't, get help.
When you use Nitter, you're essentially using something like Tweetdeck. You're using Twitter still, through the API.
Nitter has the enormous advantage of, you know, actually allowing me to read tweets and their replies. Twitter itself will shit out a giant popup asking me to log in the moment I start scrolling down. So yeah, Nitter it is, even if it's slow.
I can read them just fine on Twitter.
It's fine you like Nitter, some people just think it's ugly and poor web design. To each their own.
For anyone reading, you can change the theme by clicking the gear icon in the upper right corner.
You can also click the twitter icon in the upper right corner to go directly to the tweet.
Good to know, but I'll never bother. You'd think the sensible thing would be to make the default theme something palatable. Waste of time when Twitter is just fine as is.
Yes, the best feature, it's how I quickly get links to Twitter to post here for everyone else that wants to bypass nitter and go directly to the source.
I figured, that's why I prefaced it with "For anyone reading."
Obviously, I knew I wasn't gonna change your mind, but I figured someone could benefit from the solutions to the issues you posed.
For fucks sake.
The reason why OP used Nitter is because it pulls shit from the Twitter API but doesn't use Javascript to render a majority of the page.
When Nitter actually does load (I can't get it to load right now, massive keks) those of us who are on browsers that are not chrome based (anything based off of the Firefox browser) won't have to deal with the massive amounts of slowdown the JavaScript spam on Twitter uses.
Nitter is great if all you want to do is read tweets and not have to install a program to do it. I have an old machine from 13 years ago that I still play most modern games on - anything that heavily uses JavaScript (Fecesbook, Twitter, etc) lags the shit out of me when I use my Firefox-forked browser Pale Moon.
Nitter lets me navigate the site without making me want to Minecraft myself.
Javascript is not a naughty word. I like when my web client doesn't pull 500000 lines of HTML in one go if I don't feel like scrolling through all of it. Makes the browser more responsive.
Nah, the color scheme alone is a big turn off. The navigation is a big 2nd strike.
Look, you're allowed to like Nitter, I think it's a shit website.
I have a 1st generation iPad mini that by all accounts and purposes is far inferior to 13 year old PCs. Javascript doesn't lag shit.
We had Javascript back in 1998.
Twitter gets the clicks, regardless if you use Nitter or Twitter directly, since Nitter pulls from Twitter.
For all you know, Nitter is owned and operated by radfems.
Use an ad blocker, Twitter doesn't have ad blocking prevention. I said so already you dimwit.
API call is a an interaction. Twitter is quite used to 3rd party clients and people interacting with it through the API rather than the Web browser interface.
Yes. Yes it does.
Pretty sure Twitter knows Interaction =/= popular. Because they're not retarded and they know their platform is just a battleground.
I'd be more worried if they were perfectly fine, as that would enable the people who want to force this perversion of human nature on people.
Look at what people do with pets, horses and cattle. A neutered male is so much more docile and controllable.
Now consider that the globalist fucks pulling the strings see people as cattle or pets.
We were the fur-babies all along.
hehe, downvotes from tradcons who still think snipping that shit is ok.
So many kids gotta suffer because a few quote John Money without having read John Money.
Its because white women have been so thoroughly corrupted that they can only find purpose in internet points. And then the algorithms are adjusted so the pictures and posts about how great it is having tranny kids get the most points and you have a recipe for women destroying their children and convincing themselves it is a good thing.
I know many white women and none of them are for this stuff.
I'm not your buddy TheImp, I don't just swallow your Incel shit.
she still wont sleep with you no matter how many times you defend her against the mean old internet people
Of course one of them does. That's how we had a child together.
Like I said : I'm not really buying your Incel bullshit.
You can't call people retard when you fail to read. I'm literally telling the guy that I'm not you. Referring to you in the 3rd person implies I'm not talking directly to you.
Retard.
Gotta up those suicide numbers.
The official tranny anthem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDK9QqIzhwk&t=92s
I thought it was this: https://youtu.be/1ceVpDjYd4k
It's really horrible what they are doing to young boys. Makes me the most sick of all of the nonsense. Ruin my games, movies, whatever but leave the kids alone. They've sold a ton of parents on it too so there's damn near nothing that can be done. It's going to be really bad in 20 years when these boys start hitting their 30s.
the percentage of fathers that are supporting this is minuscule compared to the number of mid-30s white mothers who are posting about it every day
but fathers know they have no leverage because of the sword of damocles hanging over their head.... one phone call to the county cops fake crying saying "he is threatening me and I think he is touching the kids" and he is in lockup, probably beaten, possibly shanked, and days away from losing everything including access to his children
Depopulation intensifies
Yeah, in America it never was against the law. Just saying.
How do they supposedly undo it? Doesn't seem possible.
They were invented as an anti-cancer drugs, and are apparently effective for some cancers. Their use for trans children is off label.
Jesus christ. Off-label uses are off-label for a reason... fucking horrific that they're giving this to children.
Same thing with masectomies - mentally ill women who want to "transition" to get a man get them but for purely cosmetic reasons. Whereas the only reason why normal women get them is for cancer treatment.
I still don't get how leftists are totally fucking okay with allowing "doctors" and groomers to use all this shit that we NORMALLY use as a last resort to treat shit that can actually kill you on people who are physically perfectly fucking healthy but just fucked in the head from online and school grooming.
Chemical castration of sexual predators.
It goes at least as far back as post-WW2 and Alan Turing.
These days, they just trans them into heterosexuals women (in Iran).
What do they do with a gay couple? Do they turn them both into women or just the sub and let the dom stay a man?
Transition both so they both become heterosexual.
You know, when we say leftist are trying to trans the gay away (ie, every effeminate man is being transed instead of just recognized as gay), they're basically Iran.
I think they were invented to help adults with hormone imbalances and cancers, but big pharma are absolute ghouls and decided to peddle them to the mentally unwell and children.