My dog just lays around all day while I work, is always costing me money, crashes the car every time I let it take it for a drive, and voted Democrat in the last election. Is it a woman?
This may be a shitpost thread, but I'm starting to wonder if you actually are a biologist. It's not often someone namedrops SRY, even though in today's fucked discourse it should be a household name.
My concerns are primarily heart-inflammation and crossing the blood-brain barrier along with the fact that these drugs could never hope to prevent infection or transmission. Mandates are immoral, and they should have never been accepted for any injection in the past. The child-series of vaccines being considered routine and normal led mankind to this point.
Public health disaster to an incredible degree in terms of the response to this virus, but this has always seemed to be more about the money or resource supply than anything else. Financial shenanigans seem to be plentiful.
It took 2-3 years into the phase III of the dengue fever vaccine trials before ADE was seen in a specific cohort (only those who were yet to be exposed to any variant of dengue). And that's in a disease (dengue) where ADE was known to play a role, so they'd be on high alert for it. And it was still only found late into a phase III of normal timescales. With a bias against looking into ADE/VDE and antigenic original sin effects in this treatment, but with coronovirus vaccines having shown ADE in cats back in the day, I'm unwilling to take it until at least 7 years have gone by. And even then, it will be a protein subunit like novavax, never getting the mRNA shite
Have you taken it? And do you see these as longer term risks that are being properly investigated?
A 'sexologist' named Dr. John Money (we should probably put Dr in quotes too) was convinced that sex roles were entirely a result of behavior, and not the reverse. He took the word gender, which had previously only been applied to parts of language, or used as a polite way to avoid saying sex, and decided it represented these sex roles. He wrote the papers used to make the claim that sex changes should be done early, because its impossible to change these behaviors by adulthood.
Twin studies are the gold standard for any of the bullshit surrounding humans, and Dr. John Money got his golden ticket in 1965 from a botched circumcision on one of a pair of twin boys, one David Reimer (born Bruce). Dr Money convinced the parents that this tragic accident had only one path to happiness; raise Bruce as Brenda and everything would be just fine. In documents he referred to the child as John/Joan, because you kind of have to be a megalomaniacal shithead to do any of this so of course you'd stick your name on the victim too. Why not?
Dr Money wrote paper after paper on this kid, always telling the parents it was going great and never telling them that this was entirely theoretical. The child continuously rejected the forced identity, and as part of his attempts to fix the problem Dr Money forced the child to practice sex acts with his twin brother, as well as solo masturbation, while Dr Money filmed. For science, of course.*
Both brothers committed suicide. David by shotgun at 38, two years after his brother Brian at 36 from an overdose of anti-depressants.
The sick deranged pedophile went entirely unchallenged, because his pile of twin papers made him a paragon of science. Until he died, of course, as it is with most pedophiles. Then people are willing to stand up to 'em.
Currently all of this is easily verifiable fact, and modern 'gender studies' does everything it can to distance itself from its diseased father. Except, of course, for ceasing to mutilate and sexualize children. For that, we're gonna need to <you're all creative folks, picture something rule 2 related here and insert it yourself>.
Edit *: Find me another job where you can chop the dick off one kid and then force him to pretend to fuck his brother while you film it, and then you can go write a paper bragging about all of this right out in public and not only not get executed, but get paid and receive accolades from your peers? <Picture something rule 2 related again. Try for different imagery this time, variety is the spice of life.>
And this is why everyone needs to stop using the word "gender" when you mean "sex". Sex is a noun and not just a verb.
The first time I noticed "gender" being swapped for "sex" was in a small article near the funny pages in the newspaper around 1990 or so (Bush Sr era), where the US federal government decided to replace "sex" with "gender" on all federal forms so as to not offend evangelical/fundamentalist Christians with the word. I remember it for this long because it was such a stupid move.
It was Tipper Gore and her rock and roll "backmasking" hysteria that got us lyrics on album covers. (That wasn't necessarily a bad thing, though. Lyrics were hard to understand, which is why everyone used to get them so very wrong. "Yes, I'd like to hear I Ain't Jay by the Rolling Stones, please ..." Crap equipment as much as anything else. Before that, it was considered special if you got lyrics with your record. And sometimes the record album would have them, but not the cassette version. 2112, looking at you for most disappointing tape version.)
FIrst time I remember "political correctness" being mentioned was around about 1984/85 (when cable was new to my area, and I was ~16) and comedians were talking about how "they" wanted the names of things like manhole covers changed; no one had been asking that, but the next thing you know, you're not supposed to say -ess on the ends of occupational words. Before that, you had those Norman Lear shows.
It crept up on little cat's paws while all eyes were on Reagan and Swaggart and the Moral Majority.
I'd do it, but you seem to know more about it all. I just know how feminists covered for him because they wanted to prove men really were defective women.
My dog just lays around all day while I work, is always costing me money, crashes the car every time I let it take it for a drive, and voted Democrat in the last election. Is it a woman?
Sounds like a bitch.
I'm not a carpenter. Am I allowed to define a chair or not?
How many vaginas can a man have as long as he has a penis?
Are women kangaroos? 🤔 Because you just described one with your answer.
7 vaganias. Maybe more. Imagine.
Octopussy?
How do you define Big Mike?
If Ted Cruz identifies as a woman, does he have standing to bring a gender discrimination lawsuit?
This may be a shitpost thread, but I'm starting to wonder if you actually are a biologist. It's not often someone namedrops SRY, even though in today's fucked discourse it should be a household name.
Are pop-tarts sandwiches?
As a followup, are hot dogs sandwiches?
What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?
He got you there Artemis. Where's the sassy comeback? Oh that's right you ain't got none! SCIENCE BITCH!
*flies off screaming*
Is it true that Kim Jong Il invented the catchphrase "Science, bitch!" along with the mitochondria?
Ah, yes, the powerhouse of the cell. You know, I'm something of a biologist myself.
How many generations can I safely inbreed my chocobos?
What percentage of the population that took the clot shots is doomed to a life of death or long-term disability?
My concerns are primarily heart-inflammation and crossing the blood-brain barrier along with the fact that these drugs could never hope to prevent infection or transmission. Mandates are immoral, and they should have never been accepted for any injection in the past. The child-series of vaccines being considered routine and normal led mankind to this point.
Public health disaster to an incredible degree in terms of the response to this virus, but this has always seemed to be more about the money or resource supply than anything else. Financial shenanigans seem to be plentiful.
It took 2-3 years into the phase III of the dengue fever vaccine trials before ADE was seen in a specific cohort (only those who were yet to be exposed to any variant of dengue). And that's in a disease (dengue) where ADE was known to play a role, so they'd be on high alert for it. And it was still only found late into a phase III of normal timescales. With a bias against looking into ADE/VDE and antigenic original sin effects in this treatment, but with coronovirus vaccines having shown ADE in cats back in the day, I'm unwilling to take it until at least 7 years have gone by. And even then, it will be a protein subunit like novavax, never getting the mRNA shite
Have you taken it? And do you see these as longer term risks that are being properly investigated?
Can I unpinapple a pizza, or do I just need to light the thing on fire to get rid of it.
Is a woman still a woman if she votes republican?
How does one know for sure when the science has been settled?
What gender is XX, and which is XY?
In Scale, Geoffrey West makes the case against BMI because it contradicts the square-cube law. Thoughts?
Did Kim Jong Il really invent the mitochondria? Edit: If it wasn't him, who invented it, then?
If I see someone kill someone else in a game of GTA4 or Overwatch, do I need to report to the police that I saw a murder?
Not OP but this one is very easy.
Depends on the color of the victim and who did the crime.
Was Leelah swimming suit in Futureama really that bad?
What’s the difference between a jackdaw and a crow?
Who makes the best shotgun silencer, and is it available with a QD attachment?
What is your favorite color?
Is it possible for a vaccine to be engineered to harm a specific gender?
Can you elaborate more?
I think Moderna has already done it, but it's nice to know it isn't a fully tinfoil theory.
A 'sexologist' named Dr. John Money (we should probably put Dr in quotes too) was convinced that sex roles were entirely a result of behavior, and not the reverse. He took the word gender, which had previously only been applied to parts of language, or used as a polite way to avoid saying sex, and decided it represented these sex roles. He wrote the papers used to make the claim that sex changes should be done early, because its impossible to change these behaviors by adulthood.
Twin studies are the gold standard for any of the bullshit surrounding humans, and Dr. John Money got his golden ticket in 1965 from a botched circumcision on one of a pair of twin boys, one David Reimer (born Bruce). Dr Money convinced the parents that this tragic accident had only one path to happiness; raise Bruce as Brenda and everything would be just fine. In documents he referred to the child as John/Joan, because you kind of have to be a megalomaniacal shithead to do any of this so of course you'd stick your name on the victim too. Why not?
Dr Money wrote paper after paper on this kid, always telling the parents it was going great and never telling them that this was entirely theoretical. The child continuously rejected the forced identity, and as part of his attempts to fix the problem Dr Money forced the child to practice sex acts with his twin brother, as well as solo masturbation, while Dr Money filmed. For science, of course.*
Both brothers committed suicide. David by shotgun at 38, two years after his brother Brian at 36 from an overdose of anti-depressants.
The sick deranged pedophile went entirely unchallenged, because his pile of twin papers made him a paragon of science. Until he died, of course, as it is with most pedophiles. Then people are willing to stand up to 'em.
Currently all of this is easily verifiable fact, and modern 'gender studies' does everything it can to distance itself from its diseased father. Except, of course, for ceasing to mutilate and sexualize children. For that, we're gonna need to <you're all creative folks, picture something rule 2 related here and insert it yourself>.
Edit *: Find me another job where you can chop the dick off one kid and then force him to pretend to fuck his brother while you film it, and then you can go write a paper bragging about all of this right out in public and not only not get executed, but get paid and receive accolades from your peers? <Picture something rule 2 related again. Try for different imagery this time, variety is the spice of life.>
And this is why everyone needs to stop using the word "gender" when you mean "sex". Sex is a noun and not just a verb.
The first time I noticed "gender" being swapped for "sex" was in a small article near the funny pages in the newspaper around 1990 or so (Bush Sr era), where the US federal government decided to replace "sex" with "gender" on all federal forms so as to not offend evangelical/fundamentalist Christians with the word. I remember it for this long because it was such a stupid move.
Keep in mind, this was during the heyday of the shady televangelists ....
Historical sleight of hand?
It was Tipper Gore and her rock and roll "backmasking" hysteria that got us lyrics on album covers. (That wasn't necessarily a bad thing, though. Lyrics were hard to understand, which is why everyone used to get them so very wrong. "Yes, I'd like to hear I Ain't Jay by the Rolling Stones, please ..." Crap equipment as much as anything else. Before that, it was considered special if you got lyrics with your record. And sometimes the record album would have them, but not the cassette version. 2112, looking at you for most disappointing tape version.)
FIrst time I remember "political correctness" being mentioned was around about 1984/85 (when cable was new to my area, and I was ~16) and comedians were talking about how "they" wanted the names of things like manhole covers changed; no one had been asking that, but the next thing you know, you're not supposed to say -ess on the ends of occupational words. Before that, you had those Norman Lear shows.
It crept up on little cat's paws while all eyes were on Reagan and Swaggart and the Moral Majority.
https://archive.is/wTif9
You should post this here with your own insight.
I'd do it, but you seem to know more about it all. I just know how feminists covered for him because they wanted to prove men really were defective women.
"Scientists" should be in quotes too.