A 'sexologist' named Dr. John Money (we should probably put Dr in quotes too) was convinced that sex roles were entirely a result of behavior, and not the reverse. He took the word gender, which had previously only been applied to parts of language, or used as a polite way to avoid saying sex, and decided it represented these sex roles. He wrote the papers used to make the claim that sex changes should be done early, because its impossible to change these behaviors by adulthood.
Twin studies are the gold standard for any of the bullshit surrounding humans, and Dr. John Money got his golden ticket in 1965 from a botched circumcision on one of a pair of twin boys, one David Reimer (born Bruce). Dr Money convinced the parents that this tragic accident had only one path to happiness; raise Bruce as Brenda and everything would be just fine. In documents he referred to the child as John/Joan, because you kind of have to be a megalomaniacal shithead to do any of this so of course you'd stick your name on the victim too. Why not?
Dr Money wrote paper after paper on this kid, always telling the parents it was going great and never telling them that this was entirely theoretical. The child continuously rejected the forced identity, and as part of his attempts to fix the problem Dr Money forced the child to practice sex acts with his twin brother, as well as solo masturbation, while Dr Money filmed. For science, of course.*
Both brothers committed suicide. David by shotgun at 38, two years after his brother Brian at 36 from an overdose of anti-depressants.
The sick deranged pedophile went entirely unchallenged, because his pile of twin papers made him a paragon of science. Until he died, of course, as it is with most pedophiles. Then people are willing to stand up to 'em.
Currently all of this is easily verifiable fact, and modern 'gender studies' does everything it can to distance itself from its diseased father. Except, of course, for ceasing to mutilate and sexualize children. For that, we're gonna need to <you're all creative folks, picture something rule 2 related here and insert it yourself>.
Edit *: Find me another job where you can chop the dick off one kid and then force him to pretend to fuck his brother while you film it, and then you can go write a paper bragging about all of this right out in public and not only not get executed, but get paid and receive accolades from your peers? <Picture something rule 2 related again. Try for different imagery this time, variety is the spice of life.>
And this is why everyone needs to stop using the word "gender" when you mean "sex". Sex is a noun and not just a verb.
The first time I noticed "gender" being swapped for "sex" was in a small article near the funny pages in the newspaper around 1990 or so (Bush Sr era), where the US federal government decided to replace "sex" with "gender" on all federal forms so as to not offend evangelical/fundamentalist Christians with the word. I remember it for this long because it was such a stupid move.
I'd do it, but you seem to know more about it all. I just know how feminists covered for him because they wanted to prove men really were defective women.
A 'sexologist' named Dr. John Money (we should probably put Dr in quotes too) was convinced that sex roles were entirely a result of behavior, and not the reverse. He took the word gender, which had previously only been applied to parts of language, or used as a polite way to avoid saying sex, and decided it represented these sex roles. He wrote the papers used to make the claim that sex changes should be done early, because its impossible to change these behaviors by adulthood.
Twin studies are the gold standard for any of the bullshit surrounding humans, and Dr. John Money got his golden ticket in 1965 from a botched circumcision on one of a pair of twin boys, one David Reimer (born Bruce). Dr Money convinced the parents that this tragic accident had only one path to happiness; raise Bruce as Brenda and everything would be just fine. In documents he referred to the child as John/Joan, because you kind of have to be a megalomaniacal shithead to do any of this so of course you'd stick your name on the victim too. Why not?
Dr Money wrote paper after paper on this kid, always telling the parents it was going great and never telling them that this was entirely theoretical. The child continuously rejected the forced identity, and as part of his attempts to fix the problem Dr Money forced the child to practice sex acts with his twin brother, as well as solo masturbation, while Dr Money filmed. For science, of course.*
Both brothers committed suicide. David by shotgun at 38, two years after his brother Brian at 36 from an overdose of anti-depressants.
The sick deranged pedophile went entirely unchallenged, because his pile of twin papers made him a paragon of science. Until he died, of course, as it is with most pedophiles. Then people are willing to stand up to 'em.
Currently all of this is easily verifiable fact, and modern 'gender studies' does everything it can to distance itself from its diseased father. Except, of course, for ceasing to mutilate and sexualize children. For that, we're gonna need to <you're all creative folks, picture something rule 2 related here and insert it yourself>.
Edit *: Find me another job where you can chop the dick off one kid and then force him to pretend to fuck his brother while you film it, and then you can go write a paper bragging about all of this right out in public and not only not get executed, but get paid and receive accolades from your peers? <Picture something rule 2 related again. Try for different imagery this time, variety is the spice of life.>
And this is why everyone needs to stop using the word "gender" when you mean "sex". Sex is a noun and not just a verb.
The first time I noticed "gender" being swapped for "sex" was in a small article near the funny pages in the newspaper around 1990 or so (Bush Sr era), where the US federal government decided to replace "sex" with "gender" on all federal forms so as to not offend evangelical/fundamentalist Christians with the word. I remember it for this long because it was such a stupid move.
Keep in mind, this was during the heyday of the shady televangelists ....
Historical sleight of hand?
https://archive.is/wTif9
You should post this here with your own insight.
I'd do it, but you seem to know more about it all. I just know how feminists covered for him because they wanted to prove men really were defective women.