Again this is for one purpose. They want a baby to be able to decide gender because it means they can consent to sexual activity. This has always been the end goal of these “scientists” who want to destroy heteronormativity.
It's not even hidden, but we are called the bad guys when we point out their own statements because of the multi-generational herd instinct fear mechanism conditioning through the media and educational system.
Because gender roles are social construct but a "transgender" baby instinctively wants to wear a dress or not wear hair clips- real consistent ideology they've got there.
I'm just glad the literal infants know the difference between a skirt and a kilt so they don't go accidentally identifying as trans when in reality they're trans-Scottish.
Which proves the whole thing is utter bullshit since babies have zero object permanence let alone a concept of self when that young so they can't possibly make a claim or decision about their identity as they don't even have the capability to comprehend language yet.
They stick their hand in poop and then they put it in their mouth but I'm to believe it knows the concept of skirt?
Skirts for girls is in fact a social construct, unlike gender.
That's due to the mouth/taste being the most developed sense at the time so is understandable from a developmental POV. Ideally such a behavior should result in disgust and a learning experience to not do that again. This can cause issues at times since nuance between things like grapes and olives for example will potentially cause false positives in later identication since I've never seen a baby enjoy an olive and then being confronted with something of a similar appearance, despite sweet, generally results in them rejecting it.
To a similar degree this occurs with animals that exhibit Batesian mimicry like hoverflies appearing similar to wasps and bees [as opposed to Müllerian mimicry which would be comparing the wasps to the bees since both are actually dangerous unlike the hoverfly]. Something has a bad experience with a wasp/bee and when later encountering a hoverfly it associates with the previous negative experience. We as humans place far greater cognitive study into these things however and eventually can distinguish between an olive and grape or even a hoverfly and wasp/bee [most of the time, since sudden encounters in cars don't often permit the best environment for determining if you have just a hoverfly near you or possibly something you might be allergic to].
We get disgusted by things because our parents, siblings and friends react in a disgusted manner when we do something disgusting. (Unless the individual finds they really don't like the taste/look/smell of whatever disgusting thing it is.)
It's the same with the mirror test, I doubt there's ANY human alive who wasn't with their parent or someone when they were confronted by mirrors when they were young, who said "who's that? That's YOU!" over and over again until they were too old to talk like a ninny to.
Leftists only fall upwards. Look at the current VP. She failed at every job she had and she has been moving only up, she may become the next president of the US.
Or you know baby’s like to take their clothes off. When you are easily entertained and quickly bored by everything with very limited motor skills picking at your clothes or long hair is a constant source of entertainment. I find it hard to believe that a baby of onesie wearing age understands the concept of what a dress is, and if they undo these 2 snaps that they then have a dress.
some condition... that causes the brain to develop in a way that clashes against the body's natural sex
That condition was known long before the current transgender craze, and people with it hate the LGBTQs for appropriating their illness. Regardless, it was always treated as a mental problem and not proven to be genetic or from birth.
This has nothing to do with transgenderism anymore (hasn't been about that since almost the beginning honestly) - this has to do with wanting to fuck babies, period.
Have they not realized from the recent school board uprisings that when you threaten parents' children, that's usually the forbidden line to cross?
So, gender is a social construct. BUUUUUUUUT a baby who has had zero socialization, that makes its onesie into a "dress" (a social, not biologically inherent, marker of gender) is communicating its gender.
So, we are born with the inherent association that an open bottomed garment is for females? This isn't a societal construction?
Transgenderism cannot exist without the person having an inner representation of self for it to conflict with biological reality and social conventions.
A doctor ( nevermind, "gender therapist", so a scammer ) should know that. Unless brainwashed and just parroting politically-correct pseudoscience.
So, conversely, if a baby doesn't do these things, they're obviously comfortable in their gender roles. If they say they're transgender later on, as a teenager say, it's simply lying to get attention.
I believe it.. with all the parents and outside bullshit brainwashing their kid as soon as its born. Lil timmy wants to play with fire truck???? Nope. No son of mine is gonna conform to gender constructs! He gotta play with this totally bratz doll.
Again this is for one purpose. They want a baby to be able to decide gender because it means they can consent to sexual activity. This has always been the end goal of these “scientists” who want to destroy heteronormativity.
Gender has always been about sexual presentation and fetishes.
It's never been biology.
It's an ideological Trojan horse that has long since passed the gates of our cultural institutions as part of the 'long march' by the Left.
dont give the enemy the language
just use "normalcy" or "normality"
Yes.
It started when people started letting the Edomite jews in America who had a stated plan to subvert and destroy all nations in their own religious texts (Talmud) in order to alchemically rebuild it into their ideal utopia.
This is all on their official websites. and on Youtube video's.
It's not even hidden, but we are called the bad guys when we point out their own statements because of the multi-generational herd instinct fear mechanism conditioning through the media and educational system.
Hey you changed names. Did you get banned?
oh look let's attack his character to distract from the facts!
stop noticing things goy!
?
Bloody witch trials had more scientific method.
Because gender roles are social construct but a "transgender" baby instinctively wants to wear a dress or not wear hair clips- real consistent ideology they've got there.
I'm just glad the literal infants know the difference between a skirt and a kilt so they don't go accidentally identifying as trans when in reality they're trans-Scottish.
These “people” are psychopaths who need to be locked away and never allowed to interact with society.
I completely agree.
Which proves the whole thing is utter bullshit since babies have zero object permanence let alone a concept of self when that young so they can't possibly make a claim or decision about their identity as they don't even have the capability to comprehend language yet.
They stick their hand in poop and then they put it in their mouth but I'm to believe it knows the concept of skirt? Skirts for girls is in fact a social construct, unlike gender.
That's due to the mouth/taste being the most developed sense at the time so is understandable from a developmental POV. Ideally such a behavior should result in disgust and a learning experience to not do that again. This can cause issues at times since nuance between things like grapes and olives for example will potentially cause false positives in later identication since I've never seen a baby enjoy an olive and then being confronted with something of a similar appearance, despite sweet, generally results in them rejecting it.
To a similar degree this occurs with animals that exhibit Batesian mimicry like hoverflies appearing similar to wasps and bees [as opposed to Müllerian mimicry which would be comparing the wasps to the bees since both are actually dangerous unlike the hoverfly]. Something has a bad experience with a wasp/bee and when later encountering a hoverfly it associates with the previous negative experience. We as humans place far greater cognitive study into these things however and eventually can distinguish between an olive and grape or even a hoverfly and wasp/bee [most of the time, since sudden encounters in cars don't often permit the best environment for determining if you have just a hoverfly near you or possibly something you might be allergic to].
We get disgusted by things because our parents, siblings and friends react in a disgusted manner when we do something disgusting. (Unless the individual finds they really don't like the taste/look/smell of whatever disgusting thing it is.)
It's the same with the mirror test, I doubt there's ANY human alive who wasn't with their parent or someone when they were confronted by mirrors when they were young, who said "who's that? That's YOU!" over and over again until they were too old to talk like a ninny to.
You should lose your license for this.
Leftists only fall upwards. Look at the current VP. She failed at every job she had and she has been moving only up, she may become the next president of the US.
Technically kneeling is moving down >.>
What she does has both an up and a down motion.
They call her the Wonkavator - she goes up and down, left and right, even diagonally!
God help us all.
Your license to live.
Or you know baby’s like to take their clothes off. When you are easily entertained and quickly bored by everything with very limited motor skills picking at your clothes or long hair is a constant source of entertainment. I find it hard to believe that a baby of onesie wearing age understands the concept of what a dress is, and if they undo these 2 snaps that they then have a dress.
My daughter likes to picks up sticks on a walk and likes to chew on everything. She's 2. Does this make her a puppy now?
There are those within the movement pushing for trans babies who would probably make that argument.
That condition was known long before the current transgender craze, and people with it hate the LGBTQs for appropriating their illness. Regardless, it was always treated as a mental problem and not proven to be genetic or from birth.
Bitch, a baby doesn't know it's own foot from its hands and you expect them to know what a dress is?
This has nothing to do with transgenderism anymore (hasn't been about that since almost the beginning honestly) - this has to do with wanting to fuck babies, period.
Have they not realized from the recent school board uprisings that when you threaten parents' children, that's usually the forbidden line to cross?
What a wicked woman. What sort of society has a demand for “gender therapy?”
So, gender is a social construct. BUUUUUUUUT a baby who has had zero socialization, that makes its onesie into a "dress" (a social, not biologically inherent, marker of gender) is communicating its gender.
So, we are born with the inherent association that an open bottomed garment is for females? This isn't a societal construction?
Yeah, so does shitting yourself and eating strained carrots, but then you grow out of it.
Does this cunt even have children?
Not that it really matters but I hope she doesn't.
These psycho women are almost always barren and childless.
Are your clothes uncomfortable?
Yep, you're a tranny
Can't write therapist without the rapist.
therapists are enemy combatants.
Transgenderism cannot exist without the person having an inner representation of self for it to conflict with biological reality and social conventions.
A doctor ( nevermind, "gender therapist", so a scammer ) should know that. Unless brainwashed and just parroting politically-correct pseudoscience.
So young kids can't suffer from that.
It was time to exterminate these people years ago, we waited too long and now it's too late
So, conversely, if a baby doesn't do these things, they're obviously comfortable in their gender roles. If they say they're transgender later on, as a teenager say, it's simply lying to get attention.
Imagine telling a babies penis "3 strikes and your out"
I believe it.. with all the parents and outside bullshit brainwashing their kid as soon as its born. Lil timmy wants to play with fire truck???? Nope. No son of mine is gonna conform to gender constructs! He gotta play with this totally bratz doll.
Is touching 3 year olds no longer enough to get their micro dicks hard?