I hate this zog war, but this is a big mischaracterization of the Trump platform on the Strait
It's consistently been a "lmao not our problem" stance, because even if we started the war, it helps us if China can't ship cheap shit to Europe through it or get cheap raw materials.
- Don't need help because it doesn't effect us
- You guys should probably go fix it since it impacts you
- Lmao, why aren't you dealing with it?
- Ok, some people said they'd deal with it
- IDK bro not my job
- Oh, lmao they aren't aren't dealing with it
- Anyways we're gonna head out, good luck
Generally, a couple ways.
- AI has different modes and you can prompt it to work in lower error modes.
- You can also use AI to cross check it. If the other AI detects an error, it sends it back to start.
- You can use AI to break down problems and then work on them piecemeal, basically how human problemsolving works.
Agentic AI is normally all 3 bundled up along with and some other tricks. And it ranges from very powerful and error free to... less so depending on company. But people will copy past emails from chatGPT and pretend it's basically the same as AI assisted Claude coding or whatever.
They should have just fessed up, and also gotten someone to run through several passes making sure they got the details right.
But honestly if this art came out with the original feast for crows, everyone would think it would have looked great and been awesome.
It's for everything. Anything where entrenched interests have made the easy solution impossible.
- Crime in general
- Just killing criminals, old west style
- Deportations
- Nuclear Power
- Stopping foreign aid
- Getting Rid of the homeless
- Education system
- Foreign policy
- Housing/Zoning
...
In just about every domain, there's an easy and obvious solution that would fix everything, and then for some bullshit reason we can't do it.
We would likely deal with it the same way we did with nuclear proliferation.
For countries that don't have nukes and try to get them, we use economic pressure, then sabotage (Stuxnet), then assassinations, then actual bombs. And we have done all of those steps several times.
We almost bombed China to stop them from getting nukes, and arguably the only reason they have nukes today is because they had Jewish support and espionage feeding them support while stopping our response.
That being said, anyone who wants to stop all development is living in fantasy land. If we don't develop it, other countries will.
AI is easy to stop on a technical level.
Data Centers for training have to be huge, and have to pull huge amounts of power, and generate huge amounts of waste heat. They can be spread out for usage, but can't be distributed for training, since you run into speed of communication limitations. It requires huge amounts of specific computer components that sit at the peak of what humanity can develop, and it takes decades to build the facilities to start building the chips you need. There's only a handful of countries in contention to make AI, and bombing people into the stone age actually stops it.
AI far easier to stop than Nuclear Weapons. The US announcing (and following through) that it'll go to war and be willing to drop cruise missiles or nukes on anyone trying to develop AI would easily hold back AI development indefinitely. We just don't have the political will to do it, because nobody in power seriously thinks that the Singularity is going to kill everyone.
When AI actually has to demonstrate ROI, there may be a future where each generation costs $5, or worse.
The cost for AI to generate a long ~500 word response is currently 0.0003 kWh. And I assume it will only continue to get cheaper. This is roughly about the cost for youtube or netflix to send you about 30sec to 1min of 1080p video. Costs aren't directly comparable yet, but I think the "margin cost" will converge basically on electricity/datacenter prices.
Considering both services are happy to take $15-$20 a month and play you unlimited videos, we're not going to run into any price issue for chatting with AI. That said, we'll almost certainly find new high-cost things to invent for AI that will be pricey, like on-demand porn or whatever.
The German government wouldn't have had these issues if they didn't poison their own people...
The German government haven't been the "own people" of the german populace since the 1940s. They've been an occupied nation, with foreigners that hate them in positions of power who've been forcing down this poison.
This isn't some accident or miscalculation. They aren't trying to make the world a better place. They know they're making it worse and they know it's a genocide. It is exactly what they've been hoping to achieve for 100+ years.
The Stanford Prison Experiment was a sham made by a jew (Zimbardo) to push prison reform.
The 'most brutal guard' was an actor literally putting on a play and petending, and they were all getting coached on their performances by Zimbardo.
It's just as fake as any capeshit Marvel movie. Using it as a reference for human nature is like using Iron Man as an engineering reference.
People here will never be happy enough. This is a great change.
Would I prefer it went further and yeeted every jeet in the tech industry? Sure. Do I want him to change policy on lots of other things too? Also yes.
But goddamn guys, this will cause a huge reduction in foreign workers stealing high paying jobs for pennies. So just be happy and take the win for once.
Yeah, it's hard to trust the banned.
Youtube is getting flooded with low tier AI spam and deceptive stolen slop from other people's content, so they really aught to be banning more.
And none of the people banned will admit it publicly when they're calling on youtube to reverse the policy.
Humanity did not evolve a mechanism to handle this, so we need protections against this ravaging our civilization. It's similar to how humanity achieved the end of food scarcity, then hit 50% obesity rates two generations later.
We could just blame the idiots that get tricked, but the more useful to start thinking about how to avoid these problems, especially since AI will only get smarter and more realistic over time.
The old laws should still be in force. Jesus didn't change them. Those dictates are all based, barring some translation errors like 'Hebrews' instead of the actual followers of God or Cursing currently meaning bad words.
The world would be a better place if we followed them.
I think it's simpler than that. DDT is a water soluble neurotoxin that kills bugs by fucking up their nervous system enough until it kills them by paralyzing them.
Kids who would swim in and drink DDT water would get paralyzed. No need for heavy metal in the hypothesis.
Eisenhorn was good in the 00s, because it was the first well written novel that showed the Imperium outside of war. IMO they don't stand the test of time.
Commissar Cain novels are much better books and fun to read.
Also recently 'Assassinorum Kingmaker' and 'The Infinite and The Divine' are better.
Can you give me one example of a 2FA implementation that would work? Where nobody in the login chain can know your identity, but you can still prove you're 18?
Every commercial 2FA app I know is intrinsically linked to verifying a known identity, so they do not provide anonymous verification.
Or they're hardware or secret key based, and their results can be shared and don't actually verify that the holder is 18+ (eg, physical authenticator). That works when your user wants to keep people out of their bank account, but doesn't work when they want to share their account online so everyone can login with it.
Edit: I forgot the third vitar requirement, that it needs to be sufficiently foolproof that the government can cheaply and efficiently implement and administrate it.
You're just inventing a story. You can go to the supreme court website and view who supported which side in the Amicus Curae.
Spoiler: a bunch of jewed and woke organizations on the opposition side (free speech), and a bunch of christian and right wing organizations on the support side (ban porn for children).
Your narrative is demonstrably false. Here's a counter-narrative that actually aligns with the facts: "The jews oppose ID on the internet, because they're the by far biggest users of astrturf and bots to push propaganda. With only real users online, everyone will get j-pilled really fast." It's far more in-line with the facts than this being some 5D chess to secretly support it while opposing it (though, I think they just want to push porn, no extra explanation required).
They'll fuck up Medieval III by not actually making it, or if it comes out then not putting in much effort.
CA is basically the Total War: Warhammer company now. It's been 10 years and it's their only significantly profitable title. Everything else barely breaks even or loses money. Maybe 3K was profitable but probably not. Their non-TW projects also were disastrous.
I think the next decade of CA's focus is going to be doing the same. Total Warhammer 40k + DLCs. They need a new cash cow after 10 years of milking TW:W. So now they're pivoting, and no other projects matter including Medieval III. So if it comes out, it will have the B-team.
That said, Total War Warhammer is a fantastic game. Huge variety, big map, fun gameplay, totally on theme. Yeah there's some shit that gets exploitable after 1000 hours but that's just CA. I'd suggest picking it up on a sale and giving it a spin. I'm also on a hair trigger for Woke shit, and there's basically none of that. The sales model is kind of shitty, but it feels hard to blame them when it's the only reason the studio is still open.