I'm just curious as to who the left think-
Let me stop you right there buddy... The left does NOT think. They are programmed and follow instructions.
It's actually really easy to confirm when a revolution is an establishment operation. All you need to do is pay attention to how it is framed by media.
It can never be too big for them to contain, because the more civil conflict they can create, the easier it becomes for them to justify authoritarian measures.
As long as the two sides never get a chance to let up, they will forever be focused on each other and never become a threat to those in power.
I said he was allowed to go viral everywhere BEFORE the assassination.
In case you missed it, last month he was suddenly all over peoples feeds on YouTube (even though his own channel is still banned there) and other social media, everyone all over the internet were talking about him, and loads of people who wouldn't go near him were suddenly posting interviews with him.
After so many years of being debanked, banned, cancelled and completely suppressed everywhere, he was suddenly viral and popular.
It was obvious, to those of us who were paying attention, that something was up, the question was why... and now, a month later, this assassination? The timing is too convenient.
Nick's Rumble stream is almost at 2 million views already. He had over 200k live viewers.
They're like this because it's an effective strategy.
- Media spreads FUD propaganda before anything can be confirmed.
- The hive mind eats it up and repeats it everywhere all over social media, leaves comments on every youtube video, etc.
- By the time it gets debunked and retracted by media, it's already everywhere and has convinced most people of the lie.
- Decades later, most of them still believe the lie.
I didn't mean that it was a bad thing.
This is literally what good parents have to do in 2025, because if they don't, the institutions will indoctrinate their kids instead.
Sure, a conspiracy theory being popular could mean that there's some truth to it, but ONLY if it's harmless to the world's power structure, else it would never have been allowed to reach that level of popularity.
The most successful psyops in the history are those which have conditioned almost everyone to reject any possibility of certain conspiracies no matter how much supporting evidence there may be.
Once he hears that the stream isn't live on YouTube and only Rumble, he completely stops holding back and goes FULL savage.
Student: Hi, I don't know your name... What's your name?
Myron: Hitler
After that there's a black student which makes him go off about black culture
Myron: Who's that black congress women? She practices a lot of niggerism...
And the last student is a Jew, who ends up visibly shaking after he's done with him.
The customers don't have a choice. In almost all countries worldwide, bank debit cards support Visa or Mastercard, and most customers can only pay you with their bank card.
I refuse to support PayPal for my business on principle, even though it means I lose many customers who are only willing/able to pay via PayPal.
I support a range of alternative payment methods for the majority of my customers, but over 95% of all transactions are made with Visa/Mastercard enabled bank cards.
If stopped supporting Visa/Mastercard bank cards, I'd go out of business.
The problem is they have a monopoly in most parts of the world and once you do that, you can't receive payments from most customers.
Most people have a Visa/Mastercard card and/or PayPal account, and won't pay for your services if you can't accept those options.
Two birds with one stone? Also, one bird with 1000 stones?
The polar shift apocalypse will wipe out most of the human population and provide humanity with a fresh start, but it's still probably 20 - 25 years away.
Both parts are more relevant than you realize. The primary reason for the control is to prevent the masses from reaching a level of awareness that is needed to approach subject matter covered in the first half without simply dismissing it as "spooky nonsense".
Most people aren't ready to consider such things, and that's ok.
Everyone is on their own journey in life, and no one can force knowledge on you that you aren't ready to take in. Any attempt to do so is futile.
I know how long it took and how much I had to learn before reaching the point where I could seriously consider the possibility of such things, despite always being open minded.
One day, if/when you reach that point, you'll revisit material like this on your own.
I read Itzhak Bentov's book "Stalking the Wild Pendulum" some years back, and it aligns with the model of reality that I find most compelling after many years of research into physics and many other related fields.
The clips about his work in this video come from this full presentation which goes into more detail: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMbeK_6ATxQ
I don't even see how using AI to upscale the video could possibly save them any money.
It will still use the same amount of storage and bandwidth, actually more since the AI adds fake detail to lower quality source material, and now they have to spend an enormous amount of energy on the upscaling process.
They're also not increasing quality since most uploads are high quality and they're upscaling even the highest quality footage which is actually losing detail due to the shitty AI upscaling.
Given that it makes no sense from a quality, money, or energy perspective... you have to ask yourself, why exactly would they decide to do this?
YouTube introduced AI dubbing a couple months ago. It's only available to large enough channels and seems like the channel owner has to manually opt into it for specific videos.
I've seen a bunch of non-English channels in my recommended feed taking advantage of the feature to reach a much wider audience so far. Those channels would never be recommended to English viewers without it.
The first time I noticed a dubbed recommendation, it was actually a good video on an obscure topic not covered by any English channels and worth watching.
The ADL handbook is designed so that far-right dog-whistles can be found anywhere that is convenient for the commies agenda, so the AI isn't doing anything wrong here. Show me the man and I'll show you the crime.
As impressive as the approximation done by modern AI may be, the underlying mechanism for human thought isn't actually based on computation, so it will never be able to be replicated by computation. Human consciousness is fundamental, and a non-physical phenomenon which is external to the physical body.
Blockstream (and by proxy Bilderberg) has control of Blockstream's mining pool, they host colocation for a considerable portion of miners (which they could decide to seize and take control of if they needed to), and Blockstream's leadership has strategic private meetings with other large pool operators.
While it may not be as obvious as what Qubic is doing with their pool here, it does mean that not only can they pick exactly which transactions get recorded if they really wanted to, but they can also have their devs make any protocol change (even literally taking away someones BTC) and the only ones who could stop them are the majority of the miners, which they control either directly or indirectly.
It actually has happened before, with the original Bitcoin. Blockstream (funded by Bilderberg) forked BTC with SegWit and stole the BTC ticker with a hostile takeover before BTC became mainstream.
Henri de Castries, who chaired the Bilderberg Group beginning in 2012, also served as CEO of AXA around the time AXA Strategic Ventures co-led Blockstream's $55 million Series A in early 2016.
They got most exchanges, miners, and wallet providers to support Blockstream. Media and influential figures framed the SegWit hard fork as a "soft fork". Opposing voices that supported the original Bitcoin protocol (Bitcoin Cash and BSV) were marginalized and labeled as "altcoins" making their framing seem fringe.
The SegWit fork was an abomination that favors large financial institutions (scaling off-chain, enabling fee markets, custodial growth) instead of small sovereign node operators which the original Bitcoin protocol was designed for.
Since their hostile takeover succeeded, they control both the dev team and the majority of the miners, and can therefore make any change (censorship, taking away peoples BTC, etc) and no one can stop them.
Re-org has already succeeded, less than half a month after the attack started.
The attack is estimated to have cost $1 billion so far ($75 per day).
Sustaining this attack is estimated to cost $75 million per day.
Based on that estimate, the attack has already cost around $1 billion since it started.
Sure sounds like they have government-scale funding.
If the outcome of it's actions it performs based on the "reasoning" it claims to have done aligns with the actions that you would have performed having actually done the same reasoning, then does it matter if the reasoning was actually done or if it just claimed to have done them? As long as it gives you enough key details along the way, along with the findings based on the actions it took due to the reasoning, then you can confirm it for yourself.
I'm not one of the people who believes that LLMs are magic. They may not be anywhere near as good or capable as most people think they are, but Grok 4's reasoning capability combined with the access it has to Twitters API is still more than good enough for a simple, well-specified analysis task like this.
It's reasoning-based model broke down the task into a bunch of steps, explained what it was doing as it performed each step, including the reasoning behind it's search strategy and how it adapted the strategy as it went due to the amount of recent results which hit limits. After performing each step, and doing simple analysis of each batch of results that it found and processed, it then aggregated it's findings from each batch over time to confirm this.
This is a big one that went unnoticed.
He wasn't just convicted, he given what is essentially a death sentence.