I said he was allowed to go viral everywhere BEFORE the assassination.
In case you missed it, last month he was suddenly all over peoples feeds on YouTube (even though his own channel is still banned there) and other social media, everyone all over the internet were talking about him, and loads of people who wouldn't go near him were suddenly posting interviews with him.
After so many years of being debanked, banned, cancelled and completely suppressed everywhere, he was suddenly viral and popular.
It was obvious, to those of us who were paying attention, that something was up, the question was why... and now, a month later, this assassination? The timing is too convenient.
They do their best to forget the tranny porn part, because then they have to answer uncomfortable questions about why they support a tranny loving furry fag
He was never debunked. The feds just didn't give him a $250,000 crypto donation from a foreign country by a man he'd never met. They halted the transaction because it's wildly suspicious.
He just likes to lie about that to make him seem more sympathetic.
Stealing, or withheld the transfer until after the investigation?
Sorry, dummy, but I can't go to the back and withdraw 10k from my own checking account in cash without a federal investigation. Guarantee if I walk up and take out $5,000 I'm going to be interrogated by the bank manager at the very least, probably for at least an hour. And that's actually my money, not someone else's that is going to be gifted to me.
You want to cry about the basic-bitch regulations on banking that have existed for the past 100 years, cool. Don't call it "debanking" because that term is used explicitly for political actions by the bank. He got caught up in an extremely suspicious transaction that anyone would have been investigated for. It's like saying saying the Left/Jews tried to disarm you and have you killed because you brought a loaded gun into the airport.
Jesus, there are actual White Nationalists who have actually been debanked that you could be talking about; but their not feds.
You said they didn't give him the donation. Now you say they did give it after investigating. Which is it?
Regardless the government has no right to seize your property, even temporarily, without due process just because its suspicious. Of what? Suspicious isn't a crime.
It can never be too big for them to contain, because the more civil conflict they can create, the easier it becomes for them to justify authoritarian measures.
As long as the two sides never get a chance to let up, they will forever be focused on each other and never become a threat to those in power.
I 100% disagree. The people in power know that if violence kicks off, their entire house of cards collapses. They want to stave off violent conflict for as long as possible. They don't want to fan the flames of political division. It's just that they're hypocrites, liars, and idiots, so everything they do eventually comes to ruin, so they've painted themselves into a corner with no way out.
It's not convenient at all. Fuentes has been gaining popularity for a while now and with there now being a vacuum in a sense, that void will be filled. And the right was always going to veer more right to counteract the insanity of the left.
Youre wrong. The pendulum swings naturally. The farther left it goes the farther right. The people who need conflict only kick the hive when the pendulum slows to the middle.
This is a natural response. We have been here telling you all for years that WE DIDNT WIN WW2. Now its time to wake up and pick a side. Your ancestors, your people, and your culture? Or the enemies of all of that?
I've been saying for weeks I've been getting constant recommendations, not for his videos, but anyone speaking with him, clipping him, or reacitng positively to him. One Sam Hyde & Nick Fuentes video has been recommended to me every day for 2 weeks. It just now stopped for me.
Seems weird for the most censored person on the internet to have all his reach re-established.
You (and some others) may be onto something, but it's going to be nearly impossible to prove a connection to 'the powers that be'. Presently, I think some of the new attention is really coming from people who want to connect the shooter to Nick. See a couple of short tweet threads linked here and here.
Though, to add to your argument, the New York Times put out an article about Nick on the 9th. https://archive.is/pJzGz Subtle as an elephant, as it may be.
Rumble is not “everywhere”
The far left control of our social media is likely what radicalized charlie kirk’s murderer.
I’m so old I remember when conservatives and liberals were both allowed on social media and debated things with words.
I said he was allowed to go viral everywhere BEFORE the assassination.
In case you missed it, last month he was suddenly all over peoples feeds on YouTube (even though his own channel is still banned there) and other social media, everyone all over the internet were talking about him, and loads of people who wouldn't go near him were suddenly posting interviews with him.
After so many years of being debanked, banned, cancelled and completely suppressed everywhere, he was suddenly viral and popular.
It was obvious, to those of us who were paying attention, that something was up, the question was why... and now, a month later, this assassination? The timing is too convenient.
He admitted to not being debanked btw. Also don't forget the tranny porn
AFAIK, Fuentes is Josh Moon/KiwiFarms-level debanked in terms of being unable to accept credit cards to process merch payments.
The last time I checked, it was impossible for a groyper to buy one of Nick's America First hats without using crypto.
They do their best to forget the tranny porn part, because then they have to answer uncomfortable questions about why they support a tranny loving furry fag
He was never debunked. The feds just didn't give him a $250,000 crypto donation from a foreign country by a man he'd never met. They halted the transaction because it's wildly suspicious.
He just likes to lie about that to make him seem more sympathetic.
You're literally fine with the feds stealing 250k because its "wildly suspicious". Is that a misdemeanor or felony crime?
Isn't that the crap excuse the state uses to civil asset forfeiture people's cash?
Stealing, or withheld the transfer until after the investigation?
Sorry, dummy, but I can't go to the back and withdraw 10k from my own checking account in cash without a federal investigation. Guarantee if I walk up and take out $5,000 I'm going to be interrogated by the bank manager at the very least, probably for at least an hour. And that's actually my money, not someone else's that is going to be gifted to me.
You want to cry about the basic-bitch regulations on banking that have existed for the past 100 years, cool. Don't call it "debanking" because that term is used explicitly for political actions by the bank. He got caught up in an extremely suspicious transaction that anyone would have been investigated for. It's like saying saying the Left/Jews tried to disarm you and have you killed because you brought a loaded gun into the airport.
Jesus, there are actual White Nationalists who have actually been debanked that you could be talking about; but their not feds.
You said they didn't give him the donation. Now you say they did give it after investigating. Which is it?
Regardless the government has no right to seize your property, even temporarily, without due process just because its suspicious. Of what? Suspicious isn't a crime.
The Jew lover complaining about foreign donations and influence is peak irony, or is it rage bait?
Look at this dumb faggot pretending I haven't called for AIPAC to be physically removed.
"AKSHULLY, if I just make shit up, it confirms by biases and then I win the argument. Ironic, isn't it?"
Yet he was pushed on YouTube as well
Sounds risky if the division gets too big for establishment to contain
Fuentes is absolutely 100% controlled and contained.
That clown has endorsed every single democrat candidate in every single meaningful race.
It can never be too big for them to contain, because the more civil conflict they can create, the easier it becomes for them to justify authoritarian measures.
As long as the two sides never get a chance to let up, they will forever be focused on each other and never become a threat to those in power.
I 100% disagree. The people in power know that if violence kicks off, their entire house of cards collapses. They want to stave off violent conflict for as long as possible. They don't want to fan the flames of political division. It's just that they're hypocrites, liars, and idiots, so everything they do eventually comes to ruin, so they've painted themselves into a corner with no way out.
It's not convenient at all. Fuentes has been gaining popularity for a while now and with there now being a vacuum in a sense, that void will be filled. And the right was always going to veer more right to counteract the insanity of the left.
Nick's Rumble stream is almost at 2 million views already. He had over 200k live viewers.
Youre wrong. The pendulum swings naturally. The farther left it goes the farther right. The people who need conflict only kick the hive when the pendulum slows to the middle.
This is a natural response. We have been here telling you all for years that WE DIDNT WIN WW2. Now its time to wake up and pick a side. Your ancestors, your people, and your culture? Or the enemies of all of that?
I've been saying for weeks I've been getting constant recommendations, not for his videos, but anyone speaking with him, clipping him, or reacitng positively to him. One Sam Hyde & Nick Fuentes video has been recommended to me every day for 2 weeks. It just now stopped for me.
Seems weird for the most censored person on the internet to have all his reach re-established.
Well he is a fed
You (and some others) may be onto something, but it's going to be nearly impossible to prove a connection to 'the powers that be'. Presently, I think some of the new attention is really coming from people who want to connect the shooter to Nick. See a couple of short tweet threads linked here and here. Though, to add to your argument, the New York Times put out an article about Nick on the 9th. https://archive.is/pJzGz Subtle as an elephant, as it may be.
This will be another told you so in my belt