I wanna believe, but this is the opinion of a "YouTube financial analyst". Can anyone confirm that this person is actually legit?
Expecting populations that are welfare-dependent to suddenly walk away from the left is a fantasy.
and now the response is "why do you care that was 3 years ago"
I just just find it extremely sad that a person who is almost 70 years old would do this. A state senator, no less.
just in case it needs to be said - the "minor inconvenience" clause exists solely so they can pick and choose who deserves to be prosecuted
haven't you learned by now? it's very funny/based to make everything about jews and very weird/deranged to make everything about women.
if people here haven't noticed the irony after all those years that you've been posting, why do you think they'll notice it this time?
next time someone breaks into your house, don't bother calling the police. it would be much more effective to fedpost on twitter.
it would be much easier if this was true.
it is. you can hear it in the way he speaks - he's simultaneously trying to convince his students and himself.
this is a vital point to understand. most of these activists/teachers are ignorant about the full extent of what's going on and what they're supporting. and you have no chance in hell to enlighten them about their ignorance, because they've been conditioned to reject such explanations as conspiracy theories. this is all by design.
and remember that gays have been fed propaganda for much longer - the narrative of the gay victim has been mainstream since at least the late 80s, but few are talking about how much more accepting everyone has become to gays in the years since. and so these people have cultivated a massive chip on their shoulder and an insatiable need to exact revenge against some bigoted society that by-and-large doesn't actually exist.
don't give them an inch, or they'll just cut if off
playing The Great Ace Attorney Chronicles for the first time, just reached the trial in 1-5.
I don't like the quirky idiot/genius Sholmes and I really don't like the forced loli mary sue Iris. the jury is really tedious and wore out its charm by the end of the first case they were introduced in. The Clouded Kokoro was one of my least favorite cases in the entire series (only game I haven't played yet is SoJ)
but... Ryunosuke and Sasuto are great characters and I definitely enjoyed cases 1, 2 and 3. so despite some things that really irritate me, I'm enjoying this. I'm trying to speed through it because supposedly Great Ace Attorney 2 is a really good game that rivals AAI2, and this game is setup for that game.
this is going to be the zoomers' version of "remember the 90s", isn't it?
"remember the 2010s when trans people were just like everybody else and didn't bother anyone?"
>But you make a good point just because something isn’t woke doesn’t make it good. I’m guilty of overhyping something simply for not being woke
I'm actually going to claim the opposite - stuff that advertises itself as "anti-woke" tends to be on the range of mediocre to absolute garbage. I'm sure this post will be unpopular with people who see themselves as cheerleaders in a culture war, but the reality is that mixing politics and escapism is just inherently cringe.
"I had my orange juice daughter go through this expensive fermentation surgery, now he's a beer"
we need to get Perry Bible Fellowship on this one
reminder that this is a TERF who has had an unprecedented amount of exposure to the absolute worst trannies out there, yet this is their opinion of them. now consider the average TERF, a spoiled, usually wealthy person who doesn't actually know many trans people and is easily convinced by leftist narratives. you think a person like that could ever become your ally?
that's because you're not a casual "fan" trying to find outrage where there is none.
well these are trannies. by the time you read that article, it may be considered deadnaming.
>not much of a stretch
...thanks for that visual
not gonna participate in this particular debate but fyi, I've recently heard that the whole "Greeks were gay" idea is mostly bunk. just leftist revisionism, like many other things you think you know.
> they'll solve the open border problem for us when they realise accepting Islam means getting rid of gays and trannies
that's not going to work. Muslims create enclaves and will drive out surrounding non-Muslims. they'll simply expand into more enclaves. the gays won't stop them because they're just crybullies. the state won't stop them, because they brought them here to be a voter bloc and because they (the state) are genuinely afraid of the Muslims.
not too long ago, maybe as late as 6 years ago, a liberal wouldn't have dared talk back to a Muslim. Muslims used to rank very high in the oppression pyramid, so "my faith doesn't allow it" would have been interpreted as "shut up, whitey" in the NPC's brain and that would have been the end of it.
I strongly suspect that Muslims were allowed to rank so high in the pyramid in order to make it easier to flood the west with Muslim migrants.
now the next step in the agenda seems to be putting LGB and especially T above pretty much everyone else, even black people. and since the tranny community is an unstable cesspool of victim complexes, borderline personalities and general egocentrism they will no longer accept the Muslim excuse for not embracing LGBT. furthermore, zoomers are the first generation in the west to be born and raised on oppression politics and with discord and social networks instead of offline communities. it's much easier for them to accept the idea of going on a holy war for the GAE agenda.
thanks, that seems very relevant to this conversation
actually according to my math that's 800 twitch boobs
people who follow him, how does Pedro reconcile his opinion that "every minority" is problematic ("...not every Jew is problematic, but the sad fact is that most are [...] it's like with any other minority") with defining himself as a minority ("Minorities like me see America for what it is...")?