I'm A-OK with lefties and muslims going at each others throats. But there's no need to prop either of them up. Any support given now will be used against the supporters after they are done with their current target.
This still under an assumption that an entire demographic of people is at war with you as part of an oppositional-dialectic. You can rephrase this by saying that Islam is incompatible with your traditions and values.
Sure. I didn't say you shouldn't. I only said you should not forget who you want to side with. They may be allies out of convinience but it'd be foolish to believe that they have the same or even compatible goals to you.
You are the frog. I am the scorpion. I sting because it is my nature.
This descent into gender confusion cannot even be imagined in the Muslim world
Iran makes gay people undergo sex resignment surgery so that they are no longer "gay". Apparently they consider this more merciful than killing them. just saying.
I'm not sure that can work. What the left wants (fagottry, trannies, child-grooming) goes against everything almost every muslim values (for his people and children, they don't care if christian children get raped, hell, they'll do it themselves without remorse). So calling these people 'bad Muslims' for being against trannies trying to get their children will not go unopposed by the 'good Muslims'
We don’t need you to pretend to like Islam; disliking Islam is not Islamophobia.
Uh, yes it is, according to shifting muslim and lefty definitions. 'Homophobia' is a word used for any expression of dislike against gay shit and 'Islamophobia' has been used as exactly the same kind of cudgel. They don't get to say 'we've graciously decided to allow you to disagree with us temporarily, as long as you help us deal with one thing'. I wouldn't assume them to be dumb enough to accept that deal if offered in the other direction.
Just because trannies have raped the concept of free expression to include pornography shown to minors in schools while shutting down dissent, doesn't mean I have to pretend I've forgotten that muzzies were the ones shitting on free speech first. I WILL draw mohammed with a bomb on his head whenever I like. Promise that none of you will chimp out when I show up to an anti-trans rally with that on my shirt, then we'll be allies... ...Yeah, didn't think so.
Back in the day Québec voted to ban religious symbols for work hours of civil servants in position of authority, a muslim family explained their country of origin banned it too. You just do it because it has no place there.
Muslims can be cool as long as you're A) up front with them and B) make it absolutely clear who is in charge. You would think that invading two countries would accomplish that, but no. Bush's approach was a weird mix of belligerence and deference that achieved the worst of both worlds. He killed a bunch of Muslim foot soldiers, which basically doesn't accomplish anything, but opened up immigration and gave the ones who made it here the keys to the kingdom. Muslims are highly attuned to weakness, and it was child's play for them to game that policy.
Trump, on the other hand, made it clear that he understood the dangers of Islam. However, he also gave them a carrot if they got along with him (stability in the Middle East) and never asked more than they could give (such as demanding they adopt democracy). As a result, his presidency was one of the most peaceful in history.
Just don't forget: They're still muslims. They still hate you, your friends, your relatives, your kids, your traditions and your values.
This is correct and anybody falling for this is insane. I'm not interested in living in a caliphate to own the libs
I'm A-OK with lefties and muslims going at each others throats. But there's no need to prop either of them up. Any support given now will be used against the supporters after they are done with their current target.
In fact, this is the exact strategy the Muslim community has adopted for years.
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Advocating genocide.
I'd rather be a Muslim than lose.
Atleast if the Muslims win we'll get some entertainment watching them chuck all the pedos off roofs.
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Do not glorify throwing people off roofs.
That's still losing.
Comment Reported for: Rule 11 - Spam
Comment Approved: Not spam
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
This still under an assumption that an entire demographic of people is at war with you as part of an oppositional-dialectic. You can rephrase this by saying that Islam is incompatible with your traditions and values.
As I am not american I do not care what US-conservatives like or who they ally with.
My post is stands for itself.
The thread is about 'muh based muslims' and the delusion you entertain that these people do not hate you.
Sure. I didn't say you shouldn't. I only said you should not forget who you want to side with. They may be allies out of convinience but it'd be foolish to believe that they have the same or even compatible goals to you.
You are a Stormfag?
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This is not an identity group. It's like saying Feminazi.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Groups
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Groups
Same as reason above. Declaration of entire population as an enemy.
Iran makes gay people undergo sex resignment surgery so that they are no longer "gay". Apparently they consider this more merciful than killing them. just saying.
you can say nigger on .win
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Comment Approved: You can say nigger on .win
Let's see how much the Left continues to love Muslims after they all join the Republican Party over faggotry.
Will be interesting times ahead.
Dems only like minorities who submit to their subversive progressive ideology.
Dems will rushing to institute an actual Muslim ban if they start voting for the GOP.
I'm not sure that can work. What the left wants (fagottry, trannies, child-grooming) goes against everything almost every muslim values (for his people and children, they don't care if christian children get raped, hell, they'll do it themselves without remorse). So calling these people 'bad Muslims' for being against trannies trying to get their children will not go unopposed by the 'good Muslims'
Uh, yes it is, according to shifting muslim and lefty definitions. 'Homophobia' is a word used for any expression of dislike against gay shit and 'Islamophobia' has been used as exactly the same kind of cudgel. They don't get to say 'we've graciously decided to allow you to disagree with us temporarily, as long as you help us deal with one thing'. I wouldn't assume them to be dumb enough to accept that deal if offered in the other direction.
Just because trannies have raped the concept of free expression to include pornography shown to minors in schools while shutting down dissent, doesn't mean I have to pretend I've forgotten that muzzies were the ones shitting on free speech first. I WILL draw mohammed with a bomb on his head whenever I like. Promise that none of you will chimp out when I show up to an anti-trans rally with that on my shirt, then we'll be allies... ...Yeah, didn't think so.
Who'd have guessed that a theology that's lasted centuries and is militaristic and tribal bears out a death cult, who'd thunk? /s
Back in the day Québec voted to ban religious symbols for work hours of civil servants in position of authority, a muslim family explained their country of origin banned it too. You just do it because it has no place there.
They still voted for leftists though.
Expecting populations that are welfare-dependent to suddenly walk away from the left is a fantasy.
Muslims can be cool as long as you're A) up front with them and B) make it absolutely clear who is in charge. You would think that invading two countries would accomplish that, but no. Bush's approach was a weird mix of belligerence and deference that achieved the worst of both worlds. He killed a bunch of Muslim foot soldiers, which basically doesn't accomplish anything, but opened up immigration and gave the ones who made it here the keys to the kingdom. Muslims are highly attuned to weakness, and it was child's play for them to game that policy.
Trump, on the other hand, made it clear that he understood the dangers of Islam. However, he also gave them a carrot if they got along with him (stability in the Middle East) and never asked more than they could give (such as demanding they adopt democracy). As a result, his presidency was one of the most peaceful in history.
Trump was surprisingly popular in the Muslim world, even though he had no business being popular there given his comments on Islam.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
Comment Approved: This is still opinion.
This is just like 'Blexit', I think, much exaggerated. Great if true, but very unlikely.
If Asians are not siding with Republicans, I don't see why Muslims would.