JK Rowling thinks tranactivists are MRAs
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (53)
sorted by:
“Outright denial of reality”, this is adorable coming from the feminists who have been parroting the phrase “my truth” for decades.
Your facts and statistics have nothing on my lived experience.
J.K. Rowling is a feminist bigot. This is nothing new from her.
reminder that this is a TERF who has had an unprecedented amount of exposure to the absolute worst trannies out there, yet this is their opinion of them. now consider the average TERF, a spoiled, usually wealthy person who doesn't actually know many trans people and is easily convinced by leftist narratives. you think a person like that could ever become your ally?
"Women have become used to lies, threats of violence, and denial of reality..."
She's 100% correct, but not in the way that she thinks.
Decades of feminism.
Islam is right about women
Technically trans rights are men's rights.
The men's right to "be a woman".
kek
Which, as it happens, is what most MRA's want. Not in the sense that they want wear a dress, get fake tits and become a sex freak, but in the sense that they want the freedom of choice that women have. They want to be able to be stay at home parents, they want to be able to choose whether they have any responsibility for their offspring, they want to be able to be welfare queens, they want women's rights in divorce courts.
The MRA ttherefore wants to be able to assume the role of a woman where advantageous.
Of course, this isn't what Rowling means. Rowling is just using the phrase 'Mens Rights Activists' because to a female supremacist like her, that term is basically the same 'Nazi' is to your average leftoid. A term she can fling at anyone with a penis who disagrees with her.
Plenty of MRAs simply want the rights that men were traditionally given, such as being considered fairly for jobs that they are capable of performing (instead of being discriminated against in favour of women with less ability) and being guaranteed rights to see and bring up their children (instead of being assumed by default to be unfit parents or worse). Yet, even so-called "traditionalists" do not support men having these rights if it would be a detriment to women.
That was always a big schism in the MRA type groups. One portion wanted things to just go back to grandpappy's time and have men be men again. The other wanted all the cool stuff feminism and women had, but for men too.
That's why as a grouping MRAs never could agree enough to get much done. They were often fighting on what they even wanted.
That's why I stopped following them nearly a decade ago. Too many pussies
Same. That and the fact that most of them seemed content to bitch and whine, but then went right back to simping and "wait but that's evil/immoral" if a possible action or solution was available.
These are all very bad things - the first one bad for men.
Show me a stay at home dad and I'll show you a future divorcee.
Agreed. Both parents are responsible for their children. Welfare poisons the soul. No-fault divorce is cultural cancer.
I agree, which is why I continue to call MGTOWs a bunch of degenerates. They want the worst of female privileges for themselves, to act like degenerate women in a way.
Another classic excerpt from the children's classic J.K Rowling & The Pointless Echo Chamber of Wokery
The one where Voldemort and Gandalf kiss. Sadly I can see JK approving that one as cannon.
This is exactly why I can't support her or other TERFs. They blame men for women/feminists getting themselves into the trans mess in the first place. This is their Frankenstein's monster. Just more anti-male gaslighting. Fuck 'em all.
You can eat your popcorn, I'll flick the lights on and off shouting "fight, fight, fight"
She reminds me of the feminists back at r/gendercritical before it got banned. In some ways, those women were very perceptive about the trans menace. They were unafraid to call out its perversion at a time when many right-wingers were either unaware of or afraid to speak of the issue. But as feminists often do, they completely screwed up their understanding of the cause.
She is right in some ways. The forcing of men into women's bathrooms and sports is an attack on women. The grooming of young girls into poisoning their bodies, cutting off their breasts, and rejecting their womanhood is an attack on women.
But the transgender movement also attacks men, and most importantly, it attacks children. It attacks them in every way that attacks women. It attacks humanity itself and it attacks the God who made humanity in His image. To make this solely a women's (or any other group's) issue is to fragment in the face of an enemy that will never be satisfied until you are humiliated, broken, and preferably dead.
Not that I'm using Reddit anymore but the /MensRights sub perma banned me after I referenced a story of a man having boiling syrup thrown over him by his wife/partner. The sugar meant it stuck to him like napalm.
The reason given was "violent speech" or "inciting violence".
For referencing a story.
That was previously posted to the same subreddit.
🙄
I even included a url to the previous thread.
To be honest, I didn't quite see that level of extremism the many times that I lurked in /gendercritical, but it doesn't really surprise me that they would go that far.
Wow. That's absolutely nuts.
That's how Rowling ended up on the shitlist in the first place, funnily enough. Her original "transphobic comments" basically boiled down to "Transwomen can't share our space because transwomen are men, and men are bad."
Now I'm going to go play the pozzed wizard game to show her my support! /s
On second thought, fuck them. They deserve eachother
I'm pretty sure it's a snarky way of calling 'trans women' men, so...
She's not going to fuck you, bro.
Aren't you just a little bit embarrassed?
OK, and? What's your point?
No need to specify.
JKR is a fantasy author: aka, skilled at making crap up. It may - just maybe - mess with one's abilities to See Reality As Is...
Anyway, MRAs tend to like men as men: being dads, mating women, raising families, conquering goals, bringing home Bacon$, ensuring peace thru overwhelming victory, Standing Up... And otherwise winning, on the way. None of that is self-mutilating, dilating, whining, subbing, bottoming, shooting up kids in Christian schools, or commanding a Navy boat full of buggers.
Inasmuch as JKR TERFs against transvestite anti-humanism, go grrl! Inasmuch as she yammers on about her inadequate understanding of JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE: get stuft! These are not incompatible sentiments.
England: your king is a pedophile, father of pedophiles. Perhaps Take Care Of Your National Character, just now. The Lord knows we Americans must do so too; for just about the same reason.
Strictly speaking, more trans are incels, not MRAs. There can be trans MRAs, they are not mutually exclusive, but in the circle of internet hatred group names, they're MUCH more likely to be involuntarily celibate.
That seems like a logical consequence of cutting off your genitalia.
Literally "the enemy of my enemy is still my enemy".
Let them fight.
As a MRA I take offense to this. The catfighting of TERFs and trans's are none of our concern. We stay out of woman business
How to beg for cis straight white male help without admitting fault as a feminist.
It helps when you keep your spaghetti in your pocket in the title.
I chuckle because I believe that you genuinely believe that there are people who refresh "your page".
I mean, realistically, if anybody actually cared that much, they'd write a script to do it.
He's just parroting what another user recently said at this point.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16amYiTxB7/x/c/4TsZ3Jzabru
Almost like people just don't like you, no nefarious conspiracy needed. You are the "I'd have to go double check if they said the sky was blue" for many.