Fuentes is not only gay but also manic, many such cases among Catholic schoolboys. He's extremely smart but self-sabotages because he's a raging faggot.
There's a lot of evidence the dude is gay for anyone wondering. Hence his complete lack of discomfort when attacking women. Makes you wonder about Imp.
edit: apparently some people missed the Catboy Kami meetup. And all the other stuff lol
My wording was confusing, that's not the evidence he's gay or at least bi. That would be dating a catboy and having an tab of gay porn on his browser.
As far as attacking women though, I didn't have time to explain but gay men often have the real kind of misogyny, not the "just being a man" kind. They can be nasty with women in a different way than straight men because women don't really have a lot of utility to a gay dude. Nick absolutely rips women without a care in the world, it's like a bloodsport to him.
Another good example of this is Bret Easton Ellis, a gay man, writing the sickest torture porn scenes ever in American Psycho. A lot of characters are killed, but women get the worst deaths. It's a satirical book obviously but a straight man, even Clive Barker, would never go that far.
There's a lot of evidence the dude is gay for anyone wondering. Hence his complete lack of discomfort when attacking women. Makes you wonder about Imp.
What is that supposed to mean? I have no problem attacking women and I'm not gay. (Or so I thought. Should I be worried?)
I explained in another post. I don't consider posting truth about women to be attacking them though, more like "all women are whores" or tearing up women you know.
Pathetic website and pathetic to see Trump influencers: Bruesewitz, Kassam and the entire clown brigade of the New York Young Republican Club push this hitpiece because they are mad Pedro Gonzales won't shill for Trump like they do.
The difference between conservatives and liberals is liberals cynically lie and manipulate racial grievances for power and profit, conservatives actually believe it.
people who follow him, how does Pedro reconcile his opinion that "every minority" is problematic ("...not every Jew is problematic, but the sad fact is that most are [...] it's like with any other minority") with defining himself as a minority ("Minorities like me see America for what it is...")?
if he is of the opinion that minorities are an inherent problem, then what makes him acceptable as a non-white living in the USA and especially as one advocating for white's rights? or is it just lip-service?
I'm just playing devil's advocate here. I have no problem with Pedro doing what he does.
It lies in the "not every"-part, obviously. I mean, if one doesn't partake in the behaviour that is deemed the problem, I see no reason to not consider them part of the group they call out.
If they are partaking in the behaviour AND calling it out, they are hypocrits, part of the group and deserve a paddling
If they aren't partaking in the behaviour and REFUSE to call it out, when asked to, they are part of the group and deserve a paddling.
If they are partaking in the behaviour and DEFEND it, they deserve worse than a paddling
I'm just playing devil's advocate here
I'm aware. I just didn't find anything objectionable in that quote.
It seems like every few months rightists throw their own under the bus to score good boy points with mainstream media. Can we please save the inevitable fracturing and infighting until after we deal with the leftists? Unlike us, they have the institutional power and resources to weather their infighting without damaging their long-term goals.
Pedro is based. No enemies to the right.
Based
Lol is this the naturally conservative Latino gop promised us? Gop doesn't actually like that?
Fucking Donald Jr. pushed this article because Pedro Gonzales called out some of the Trump grifters.
https://twitter.com/SwissWatchGuy/status/1673875790520369154
Don't see much wrong with what he said asides endorsing Funtes TBH (He's not great IMO)
Fuentes is not only gay but also manic, many such cases among Catholic schoolboys. He's extremely smart but self-sabotages because he's a raging faggot.
There's a lot of evidence the dude is gay for anyone wondering. Hence his complete lack of discomfort when attacking women. Makes you wonder about Imp.
edit: apparently some people missed the Catboy Kami meetup. And all the other stuff lol
I'm not even saying you're wrong overall, I don't know...but that's terrible logic.
My wording was confusing, that's not the evidence he's gay or at least bi. That would be dating a catboy and having an tab of gay porn on his browser.
As far as attacking women though, I didn't have time to explain but gay men often have the real kind of misogyny, not the "just being a man" kind. They can be nasty with women in a different way than straight men because women don't really have a lot of utility to a gay dude. Nick absolutely rips women without a care in the world, it's like a bloodsport to him.
Another good example of this is Bret Easton Ellis, a gay man, writing the sickest torture porn scenes ever in American Psycho. A lot of characters are killed, but women get the worst deaths. It's a satirical book obviously but a straight man, even Clive Barker, would never go that far.
What is that supposed to mean? I have no problem attacking women and I'm not gay. (Or so I thought. Should I be worried?)
I explained in another post. I don't consider posting truth about women to be attacking them though, more like "all women are whores" or tearing up women you know.
as i said on the other post, what conservative cares about the faggot noise that these buzzwords are?
Breitbart is just the new SPLC and ADL.
Pathetic website and pathetic to see Trump influencers: Bruesewitz, Kassam and the entire clown brigade of the New York Young Republican Club push this hitpiece because they are mad Pedro Gonzales won't shill for Trump like they do.
The difference between conservatives and liberals is liberals cynically lie and manipulate racial grievances for power and profit, conservatives actually believe it.
Controlled opposition in full force
people who follow him, how does Pedro reconcile his opinion that "every minority" is problematic ("...not every Jew is problematic, but the sad fact is that most are [...] it's like with any other minority") with defining himself as a minority ("Minorities like me see America for what it is...")?
I don't follow him, but what exactly would there be to reconcile.
if he is of the opinion that minorities are an inherent problem, then what makes him acceptable as a non-white living in the USA and especially as one advocating for white's rights? or is it just lip-service?
I'm just playing devil's advocate here. I have no problem with Pedro doing what he does.
It lies in the "not every"-part, obviously. I mean, if one doesn't partake in the behaviour that is deemed the problem, I see no reason to not consider them part of the group they call out.
If they are partaking in the behaviour AND calling it out, they are hypocrits, part of the group and deserve a paddling
If they aren't partaking in the behaviour and REFUSE to call it out, when asked to, they are part of the group and deserve a paddling.
If they
are partaking in the behaviour andDEFEND it, they deserve worse than a paddlingI'm aware. I just didn't find anything objectionable in that quote.
I agree with everything you said, nicely put.
It seems like every few months rightists throw their own under the bus to score good boy points with mainstream media. Can we please save the inevitable fracturing and infighting until after we deal with the leftists? Unlike us, they have the institutional power and resources to weather their infighting without damaging their long-term goals.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity attacks
Comment Approved: Nothing here does that.