5
SnapCrackleNPop 5 points ago +5 / -0

TiA has gone to shit lately anyway, ever since admins banned the Gendercritical subs it's been infested by radfems who screech that everything is misogyny.

6
SnapCrackleNPop 6 points ago +6 / -0

Y The Last Man (the comic not that god awful FX series) did it better

6
SnapCrackleNPop 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah but then it's followed by "bad thing happening is actually bad but here's why it's all your fault!"

12
SnapCrackleNPop 12 points ago +12 / -0

This is why trying to force real world issues into fantasy/sci-fi settings is mind-numbingly retarded

there's no planet b bitch do you know how many fucking different alien species there are? There's literally alien empires spanning multiple planets as well as an intergalactic police force made up of multiple species, not only is there a planet b you have planets c-INFINITY

But y'know if Superman's kid is so concerned about the ice caps melting why doesn't he, I dunno... freeze them again with his ice breath? Or why doesn't he ask one of his superhero friends that can manipulate fucking reality simply remove the excess carbon from the atmosphere. Why not use Kryptonian technology to try and fix the environment? All of that would probably work a lot better than just skipping fucking school

This is the equivalent of every single champagne socialist who lives in a luxurious mansion and preaches about how wealth needs to be distributed while hoarding their own wealth.

5
SnapCrackleNPop 5 points ago +5 / -0

I know right? Somehow the bigger issue than Chris raping his dementia addled 80 year old mother is that people aren't using the right pronouns.

And fuck it, Chris didn't even say he was trans at first. Originally it was that whole "tomgirl" bullshit, which I think he only started doing because he thought acting like a woman would get him laid (because he figured men find tomboys attractive it works the other way too). Then tumblr came along and convinced him he's trans.

Chris doesn't have dysphoria he just fetishizes being a woman.

2
SnapCrackleNPop 2 points ago +2 / -0

Will they put Chris in a men's prison or a woman's prison?

If he's in a woman's prison how long before he ends up raping the other inmates?

If he's in a men's prison over under on Chris joining the 41%?

1
SnapCrackleNPop 1 point ago +1 / -0

I read the complaint, while the allegations in the complaint are bad, at this point that's really all they are, allegations.

That's not to say that California doesn't have evidence to back up these allegations and it's very likely that they do. However, like all lawsuits, there's going to be a discovery period where Blizzard's lawyers can examine the evidence and present their own. Witnesses will likely deposed for testimony and there will likely be pretrial hearings about evidentiary issues, it's possible that some of the evidence won't be admissible because it's hearsay, speculation, etc.

It's possible, hell I'd say probable, that this whole thing ends in a settlement agreement where the State of California and the people who claimed to have been victimized will end up getting an undisclosed amount of money, that Blizzard will be forced to pay some type of fine to the state of California or be required to implement/publish policy changes in order to demonstrate that this type of incident won't happen again.

Or it could be that the allegations against Blizzard can be disputed/disproven and that going to trial is the best option. It could be that Blizzard wins the lawsuit and doesn't have to pay anything.

The thing about most trials/lawsuits is that unless you were there in the courtroom you probably have no idea what is actually going on. But unfortunately news media and social media is full of armchair "legal experts" who do more harm than good.

2
SnapCrackleNPop 2 points ago +2 / -0

From a legal prospective there's clear evidence of reasonable doubt. You have conflicting autopsy reports and the one that indicates that Chauvin's actions resulted in Floyd's death was done by a Medical Examiner that didn't actually examine the body.

I think the DA is going to have a hard time proving murder since there really wasn't any intent to kill him and the point where Chauvin had his knee on Floyd was after Floyd had been continuously resisting.

Now it's possible that Chauvin could go down for the 3rd degree murder since there's no intent requirement, but that autopsy report that says Floyd died of a heart attack from a meth overdose hurts their chances since it makes it harder to argue that kneeling on Floyd constituted an "eminently dangerous" act.

From a political standpoint I can see why people would be skeptical about this trial being adjudicated fairly. You have people scared that there's going to be more riots and there's a lot more anti-police bias now, however, I think that the judge won't dismiss anything but the jury will ultimately acquit Chauvin. I mostly think this because now that the "Big Bad Orange Man" is gone BLM aren't useful to the DNC right now. The DNC knows damn well that the ACAB "defund the police" crap cost them seats in the house and probably prevented them from actually getting a real majority in the senate. This doesn't mean that leftists are going to denounce BLM or anything like that but they won't be as vocal in supporting the violence as they were previously.

It's still gonna be a shitshow regardless of the outcome

12
SnapCrackleNPop 12 points ago +12 / -0

Narrative won't last, despite this incident, the overwhelming attacks are still done by black people. Once Asians start defending themselves they'll go back to being oppressors.

If there's one thing that's certain about most social justice movements is that they're really just black supremacy movements with REALLY good PR. Anytime a minority group is seen as an obstacle to black supremacists they instantly become "white".

5
SnapCrackleNPop 5 points ago +5 / -0

I gotta hand it to the trans groups, they found a way to make it socially acceptable to be a creep.

It'd be funny if it weren't so sad

11
SnapCrackleNPop 11 points ago +11 / -0

I think there's only one thing that can be done to fix this shit. We need to have an actual honest discussion about race, and the only way we're going to get an actual honest discussion is by taking all the black hood types and the illegal hispanic immigrants and move them into the rich liberal communities.

Move Harlem into the upper east side of NYC and start building housing projects in Beverley Hills, start bussing kids into these affluent public schools where the types that screech about diversity send their kids. If they protest just call them racist. Make these people have to live with the populations they "advocate" so strongly for.

Oh and decrease police budgets drastically in those areas too. ACAB right? Can't have cops around because it would make it dangerous for the poor disenfranchised Pee Oh Cee's. If anyone tries to leave they should be shamed endlessly as racist and not wanting "diversity"

2
SnapCrackleNPop 2 points ago +2 / -0

The more I listen the more I understand that the concept of personal responsibility and personal agency are incompatible with modern leftist dogma.

Firstly it's incompatible because it undermines their whole "oppression" narrative, if you look at almost every issue that the left says is oppressing someone it is undermined if you point out that the group being "oppressed" does things that contribute to their bad situation.

I mean the reason the whole 13/50 statistic became a meme was because pointing out the fact that black people are disproportionately committing violent crimes may have some relevance as to why blacks have a higher rate of arrests/police encounters/incarceration was considered a "hate fact". No one disputes that the statistic is false, they just refuse to consider it. And it goes back to personal responsibility, because now what was previously a conversation about police "oppressing" "helpless" black people raises questions about whether or not this individual black person's actions were the main reason for his/her situation.

The second reason is that it also undermines their "solution" which is always "more government" if we accept that people have the ability and capacity to fix/improve their situation then there's no need to expand the size of the government. Leftists will say that we NEED to have more govt committees and more institutions and more regulations to fix the problem, which means more bureaucracy and a more bloated government that not only fails consistently at "fixing" the problem but makes it harder for people to fix it themselves, thus creating a greater need for even more government.

2
SnapCrackleNPop 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can thank teacher's unions for this shit. Teachers are basically happy because either they get to now basically half ass their jobs or, they don't have to work at all because the school is completely closed. All the while collecting a full salary and benefits.

Now if schools were to reopen all those teachers would have to actually go back to work, thereby cancelling their year long sabbatical. They don't want to do that so they will help fearmonger to keep schools closed indefinitely (I remember the Chicago's Teacher's Union said that the push to reopen schools was rooted in "white supremacism"). Really it's a trend you notice in that the people who are most likely to be pro-lockdown are either people who are in comfy WFH jobs, Govt. Employees who are stoked that they get money for nothing now, and lazy ass NEETS who don't have to feel like their total lack of social interaction is a problem anymore.

I do want to say that it's mostly public school teachers unions pushing for this. Private school teachers (who are often higher skilled/more passionate) absolutely want schools to reopen. They want to reopen because they understand that these lockdowns are hurting the kids the most. Kids are going to fall behind both academically and socially. The poorer kids are going to be screwed over by zoom learning, and all kids, need to have social interaction.

The result of these lockdowns is going to be a generation of kids who will be less developed than prior generations, and believe me when I say that when those chickens come home to roost we are going to be FUCKED. Because these kids are going to one day take over, and it's unclear if they're going to be able to handle adulthood as well as prior generations.

9
SnapCrackleNPop 9 points ago +9 / -0

Wow EA acting like dumb pieces of shit? Must be a day ending in Y

I'm surprised these idiots didn't learn their lesson from Battlefield 5. Seriously that franchise was practically a license to print money but when they had cheeky one armed British lady as the poster child, and then doubled down on the bullshit by calling their audience bigots, they had a flop.

They want to enforce this kind of crap in games? Fine, they can explain to the shareholders why their games aren't selling.

37
SnapCrackleNPop 37 points ago +37 / -0

Shoe and Chris Ray Gun basically got to where they are by making videos mocking the idpol SJW culture that has been permeating society lately, now both of them want to abandon their old audience in order to join the Breadtube commie crowd.

They're both the kids who abandoned their friends for a chance to sit at the cool kids table. Shoe is a dumbass NEET who never actually held a real job and Ray Gun is just a dumbass coomer. And they both act like it's SO HARD to make a video every other month (at best) with the same lukewarm takes everyone else made but with "I want to kill myself" jokes

Honestly I feel sorry for them. Because their new friends are never really going to accept them. They'll always be branded as Gamergaters and they'll carry that with them no matter how many videos they make about how we all need to check our privilege. And then when Shoe hits the wall and no one wants to be with a 30+ year old bald lady and Ray Gun just becomes the creepy dude hitting on girls half his age they can both look back and realize that all they have left is an audience that hates them and friends who would sell them out the minute it would benefit them.

12
SnapCrackleNPop 12 points ago +13 / -1

Not gonna lie if you need "influencers" to reinforce your political beliefs then you've clearly got major insecurity issues.

"Logan Paul said Trans Rights guys, homophobia is now officially over"

3
SnapCrackleNPop 3 points ago +3 / -0

Honestly it has to suck being a moderate democrat, it seems you're stuck with either a milquetoast career politician who doesn't have any real policy ideas or anything besides "I'm not as bad as the other guy" (which is debatable); or you get a radical socialist who does have policy ideas, however, they'll turn the US into a third world shithole where there's more equality, in that more of us will be starving and poor, but EQUALLY starving and poor.

Also the first guy is probably going to bend over backwards to appease the second guy which means you get watered down versions of shit policies.

12
SnapCrackleNPop 12 points ago +14 / -2

The whole situation is fucked. I'm somewhat optimistic that Coco and Haato will come back after the three weeks, however, the Mano Aloe situation really soured me on that. To be fair it doesn't seem as though people are trying to doxx them so maybe they won't end up retiring after the three weeks.

I also understand the argument that Hololive wants to protect their Chinese streamers, if Hololive told China to fuck off then not only are they banned from Bilibili but Hololive CN is essentially shut down and all the people who work there are likely going to have their social credit scores fucked, thus making it harder for them to find work elsewhere.

The real bad guy here is the CCP, they act like a 12 year old who refuses to accept that Santa Claus isn't real. The irony is that most of these antis use VPN's set to Taiwan to watch these videos on youtube.

16
SnapCrackleNPop 16 points ago +17 / -1

Y'know even if the movie was supposed to be a critique on modern culture and how society sexualizes children or whatever it was they were saying, the fact that it sexualizes children to this degree pretty much destroys any credibility for that.

It'd be like if I decided to do a movie on why animal abuse is bad but it was just two straight hours of me torturing animals. No one wants to see that, you don't need to show that to get your point across, and the only people who would enjoy something like that are the people you are trying to demonize.

4
SnapCrackleNPop 4 points ago +4 / -0

The left doesn't really believe in personal responsibility. Seriously if you look at their martyrs the vast majority would still be alive if they just didn't act like idiots

Trayvon Martin - would still be alive if he just went home and called the cops about a dude stalking him

Michael Brown - would still be alive if he didn't rob a convenience store and didn't try to take a cop's gun

Rayshard Brooks - would still be alive if he didn't decide to drive drunk to wendy's, didn't resist when he was arrested, and didn't grab the cop's taser

George Floyd - would probably still be alive if he didn't take meth or just complied with the officers when he was being arrested

Jacob Blake - Probably wouldn't be paralyzed if he didn't go to a house he wasn't supposed to be at, or just complied with the cops when they arrested him

All of them would not be where they are if they made smarter choices. And if these guys were white and this happened no one would care, because if a white person did the things they did and got shot by cops no one would think that they were shot b/c of their race.

Honestly a lot of leftist movements are mostly about hate. Socialists don't love the poor they just hate the "rich" (aka anyone richer than them) BLM doesn't care about black lives they just hate cops/white people.

4
SnapCrackleNPop 4 points ago +4 / -0

YES, I loved how when confronted with the fact that the dude made several posts saying he was depressed and wanted to kill himself, even proof that the rope used matched a rope he bought at a hardware store people were still saying BLACK PEOPLE DON'T HANG THEMSELVES, REEEEEEEEEE

hilarious

8
SnapCrackleNPop 8 points ago +8 / -0

Honestly if you're against the trans movement or you're skeptical about the trans movement in any way Yaniv is a fucking godsend. Yaniv is pretty much every negative trans stereotype rolled into one

  1. Disgusting pervert who is clearly making women uncomfortable for sexual gratification
  2. Pedophile
  3. Cries victim when people don't immediately acquiesce to demands

I honestly can't wait until Yaniv tries to sign up for a lesbian only dating service so we get "suck my dick or you're a bigot"

3
SnapCrackleNPop 3 points ago +3 / -0

Meh, I think everyone with a brain knew that Shaun King was a massive piece of shit when he insinuated that his mother was a slut who cheated on his father with a "light-skinned black man". All so he can keep up his delusion that he's a totally legit black guy.

view more: Next ›