The difference in gen Z men and women
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (73)
sorted by:
I like "Having Emotional Stability" being Top 3 on the Gen Z women's side.
First off, impossible task foids, kek.
Second of all, it's really the only New Age empty buzzwords on the rest of the list full of mostly tangible goals.
I love the implication that emotional stability is something external that society and the government has the power and duty to provide. Everything wrong with letting women vote is pretty much summed up by that alone.
Women are stuck in the extreme External Loci of Control mindset, so to their self-serving mind it absolutely is. Nothing is their fault, everything that happens is the world acting upon them and thereby the world needs to be fixed.
Even their flaws are someone else's fault. She is crazy because her ex was "abusive." She is poor because "gender gap." Etc.
I see no implication of that. It's all under personal definition of success. 24% of men consider being spiritually grounded as part of success; that's not an externality that should be offered by government either.
That isn't implied here at all lol.
All it asks is what the personal definition of success is. It doesn't say anything about whether a government should provide that
45% of white women have a diagnosed mental illness.
This is not a joke, it's a national security threat. Getting women's emotional stability down is actually a categorical imperative.
Unironically, wife em, put a baby in them, and keep them out of the workforce/voting would likely fix all that. They won't like that very much initially, but it's for their and our own good.
Until she wakes up one morning, decides she's "unhappy", doesn't want to be married anymore and divorces you to "find herself".
Keep her off the internet too.
Wildly, unfortunately, correct. But then we have to worry about Family court.
You achieve this by effectively making them property again.
Women were literally never property at any time in Western history. That's feminist nonsense.
Doesn't that include something as minor as anxiety? Someone with anxiety isn't a national security threat
It's a national security threat due to the scope of the problem. Same thing with sexlessness.
How do you suppose anxiety is a threat to national security?
How do you suppose sexlessness is a threat to national security?
Soooo is your argument that mental illness and a collapsing birth rate is necessary and beneficial to national security?
No, I wouldn't say that.
Then you answered your own question
It's not "anxiety" in and of itself in one person that is the national security threat. Not that "anxiety" is a diagnosable illness. Again, it is the scope of the problem is that we have the equivalent of a Mental Health Black Plague which is ravaging our populations and threatening civilization in the way that we understand it, to the same degree as the Black Plague threatened Feudalism.
Sexlessness has already caused a major problem of collapsing demographics. The fact that Millennials remained low in births, and now Zoomers and Alpha are too, we are not just looking at a demographic collapse, but a full blown demographic catastrophe. Every single economy on Earth is going to shrink, all at the same time, and to a severe extent for likely decades; and that means the political cohesion of every state will be set in jeopardy. Given that most of the sexlessness is coming from mate suppression tactics that are institutionalized at a societal level, we are not only giving ourselves a demographic collapse, but we are agitating young men well past the historical point where they normally violently rise up and start killing people. The feminization of young men seems to be the only reason why this hasn't happened yet. Then we're gonna take all that agitation, and add economic collapse on top of it, and you're asking me how it's a national security threat? How is it not?
One person diagnosed with anxiety is part of this 45% statistic that you mentioned. How many women of that 45% are only diagnosed with anxiety, and otherwise live normal lives? I'm betting for certain that you can't answer that, and it should be acknowledged.
Fucking lol
Sexlessness (and childlessness) also stems from the fact that people are living in a society that doesn't give a shit about them. Happy couples are opting not to have children because they can't afford it.
If men are agitated by not having sex, they can easily become the type of man that other women (or men) want to have sex with. Every single man (every single man) I've ever met who has had trouble getting sex has had tangible, fixable issues (well within reason, not like surgery or anything) that can help him significantly. I've yet to meet an exception.
You're blaming the wrong thing
Women: having children would interfere with my career and my interests
Civilization: I guess I’ll just die
Don't worry, she's going to have a few mistakes with Tyrone.
Mistakes? That's a family, prepared, hot, and ready to go. Why won't you man up?
And the "career" is an HR hen or a Junior Account Manager whose only work output is slide decks and Slack conversations in a Jewish daycare.
When I used to work in an office every woman's desk was covered with toys and stickers. They're really just overgrown children.
Remember, it's men's societal responsibility to take care of and protect women so that they can fulfil their societal responsibilities.
Women's societal responsibility is to Eat, Pray, Love.
You mean give birth and raise the next generation?
Well, we aren’t going to be able to do any of that until we remove the bagel demographic from our society
Emotional stability is a huge indicator of why women should not be allowed to participate in society without a male escort.
I think the participation with a male escort behind closed doors.
Aren't "Having money to do things you want" + "Having No Debt" + "Financial Independence" = pretty much the same thing? I know there's subtle differences but still.
Being Grounded Spiritually is kind of important for most folks to achieve "Fulfilling Job" and "Emotional Stability", eh?
How most (intelligent) women get Emotional Stability:
Grounded Spiritually
Get Married
Have Children.
These girls have it all backwards. Sure there's "superwomen" who can "do it all" with career, family, social life. But those usually marry a rich guy :/
They are taught to have it backwards by resentful, child hating, leftists that are their public school teachers.
You mean Jews
The distinction is meaningless. Everyone who is propagating the ideas that end our civilization needs to be viciously persecuted regardless of demographics.
Agreed
No, because I know what I'm talking about and aren't a reductive idiot seeking to fight a strawman.
Women are conditioned from childhood to believe they must work for a corporation to prove gender differences wrong, that consumerism is the key to happiness, that men are all evil, and that the misery of not being happily married with children is the result of not enough therapy or positive reinforcement. This insanity is reinforced biologically by birth control at puberty to kill the bond pairing ability and handing out anxiety/ depression pills like candy as a coping mechanism.
Was gonna comment the same thing. These things are basically interchangeable.
Statistics like this vindicates my thought on the western women, even your so-called trad right wing women would share some common values as the right side of the populace on that stat. I think the constant indoctrination of feminism did an absurdly huge damage on one side of gender.
it did damage to both, but the damage to women was more subversive.
Number one for "Trump voting women" is "financial independence".
The top ranking principle for supposedly conservative women is having money to not depend on men.
The amount of young men literally wanting marriage as a goal is shockingly high. It shows just how wildly things have changed, and how bad the male-female divide is.
This is Trump men versus Kamala women to be fair. The truth is young men are more idealistic about marriage because it’s something they don’t have but saw their grandparents were married at their age. They have no clue about the legal ramifications, it’s like the difference between telling someone about heat burns and experiencing them.
The lack of marriageable women is a genuine catastrophe for our civilization that no one is willing to even mention, much less act upon.
Unfortunately, part of that is men's fault for not being stronger fathers.
Mate Suppression is a disaster that has befallen mankind.
It doesn't help when the legal apparatus has been steadily engineered to punish any man who attempts to correct the problem. A lone man cannot stand against the state and we've seen how abysmal the efforts of MRA's have been for generations now. A lone wolf can't fix it and organized efforts have made zero progress in correcting it from within the bounds of the law. What options does that leave? Extremely destructive ones.
No, non-political solutions don't have to be violent. That's the whole point behind Civic Society structures. That's why Orenia hasn't been genocided, and why it works. Violence is a poor answer for large scale social change. You sure as shit can't murder your way into a high-trust society.
I said destructive, not violent. But please, do tell me how you propose that things can be changed without completely overturning the existing society and the legal system that actively disincentivizes healthy male behaviors that would prevent these problems from arising in the first place. The male patriarch has been legally stripped of his authority over his family but you still expect him to wield that authority in order to steer society back on course while doing so will lose him his family and his freedom, thus accomplishing precisely zero.
Honestly, genuinely, most of our problems can be resolved by saying "no". Almost everything that is being done to us, is being done to us with our own money and because we tolerate it. That's at a societal level. Immigration to Sweeden dropped 80% because they required a language test, suspended welfare for immigrants, and cut checks to have people leave. No ICE raids necessary. That's what happens when a country stops hitting itself in the face with a brick.
For people personally, the truth is women are shockingly mailable to their husbands. Genuinely, being a patriarch at home with a family can basically de-radicalize women. After that, it's just the work of building a community locally.
I genuinely want to believe that, but there's a lot of broken dudes out there who took that path and got destroyed for their naivete.
I wonder what the gen Z men would score highly on as a group. Maybe some stuff like “national sovereignty,” or “immigration control,” but in terms of things that are not directly political, is there anything they’d get near 50% on?
only women would be so stupid as to believe the propaganda that a job/career is fulfilling in of itself. That type of shit doesnt work on men or normal people and they know it. its only pushed on women.
Imagine being able to create life and considering that the most boring thing possible. So instead you try to emulate the group of people that die younger and are considered expendable by society.
Repeal the 19th.
Bring back Coverture also
Surprising one.
Desiring it means they lack it.
Work as a necessary means to an end vs the spoiled selfish luxury class?