The difference in gen Z men and women
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
I like "Having Emotional Stability" being Top 3 on the Gen Z women's side.
First off, impossible task foids, kek.
Second of all, it's really the only New Age empty buzzwords on the rest of the list full of mostly tangible goals.
I love the implication that emotional stability is something external that society and the government has the power and duty to provide. Everything wrong with letting women vote is pretty much summed up by that alone.
Women are stuck in the extreme External Loci of Control mindset, so to their self-serving mind it absolutely is. Nothing is their fault, everything that happens is the world acting upon them and thereby the world needs to be fixed.
Even their flaws are someone else's fault. She is crazy because her ex was "abusive." She is poor because "gender gap." Etc.
I see no implication of that. It's all under personal definition of success. 24% of men consider being spiritually grounded as part of success; that's not an externality that should be offered by government either.
That isn't implied here at all lol.
All it asks is what the personal definition of success is. It doesn't say anything about whether a government should provide that
45% of white women have a diagnosed mental illness.
This is not a joke, it's a national security threat. Getting women's emotional stability down is actually a categorical imperative.
Unironically, wife em, put a baby in them, and keep them out of the workforce/voting would likely fix all that. They won't like that very much initially, but it's for their and our own good.
Until she wakes up one morning, decides she's "unhappy", doesn't want to be married anymore and divorces you to "find herself".
Keep her off the internet too.
Wildly, unfortunately, correct. But then we have to worry about Family court.
You achieve this by effectively making them property again.
Women were literally never property at any time in Western history. That's feminist nonsense.
Doesn't that include something as minor as anxiety? Someone with anxiety isn't a national security threat
It's a national security threat due to the scope of the problem. Same thing with sexlessness.
How do you suppose anxiety is a threat to national security?
How do you suppose sexlessness is a threat to national security?