I love the implication that emotional stability is something external that society and the government has the power and duty to provide. Everything wrong with letting women vote is pretty much summed up by that alone.
Women are stuck in the extreme External Loci of Control mindset, so to their self-serving mind it absolutely is. Nothing is their fault, everything that happens is the world acting upon them and thereby the world needs to be fixed.
Even their flaws are someone else's fault. She is crazy because her ex was "abusive." She is poor because "gender gap." Etc.
implication that emotional stability is something external that society and the government has the power and duty to provide.
I see no implication of that. It's all under personal definition of success. 24% of men consider being spiritually grounded as part of success; that's not an externality that should be offered by government either.
I love the implication that emotional stability is something external that society and the government has the power and duty to provide. Everything wrong with letting women vote is pretty much summed up by that alone.
Women are stuck in the extreme External Loci of Control mindset, so to their self-serving mind it absolutely is. Nothing is their fault, everything that happens is the world acting upon them and thereby the world needs to be fixed.
Even their flaws are someone else's fault. She is crazy because her ex was "abusive." She is poor because "gender gap." Etc.
I see no implication of that. It's all under personal definition of success. 24% of men consider being spiritually grounded as part of success; that's not an externality that should be offered by government either.
That isn't implied here at all lol.
All it asks is what the personal definition of success is. It doesn't say anything about whether a government should provide that