This faggot has an OBE. An "order of the british empire." He accepted the position of a knight.
He apparently has no understanding of what a knight is, what chivalry is, and why he served none of it.
I mean, fine, don't give your kid an inheritance, but then you need to throw your fake faggot knight award back too. Or, are you telling me you EARNED your obe?
What's that camera angle? Let's ensure that my three chins are all perfectly visible? Hospital bed?
Now, hear me out, I can understand that you wouldn't give money to your son because children from established wealth often come out spoiled and rotten. That does not seem to be the reasoning here. It's the "fairness" argument. You wouldn't refuse to feed your son because other children don't have food (aided and abetted by your own government, I might add). So why deny him this? To get attention from online idiots?
The spoiled thing is a retarded cope propaganda. Spoiled is an attitude of entitlement and has nothing to do with your parents wealth
Now you can be out of touch and unprepared for hardship, but that's just a function of WHEN you experience hardship first, and being out of touch is being ignorant, you can beat that out of somebody.
Parents having wealth is literally the primary reason why many people don't experience those hardships until its too late for them to adjust without extreme consequences.
You don't need wealth to spoil a child like that, but having wealth makes it very easy for lackluster parents to do so without intending to.
If my parents did that I would make absolutely sure that they spend their last years in the shittiest, dirtiest retirement home staffed with jeets and blacks and I'd tell the staff my parents were racist.
Just to be fair to the heccin POC that might need a room in the nice retirement homes.
And this is what decades of leftist indoctrination get you. He has no concept at all of what a family is or means because society tells him that he's just having sex and overpopulating the earth.
Honestly at least he is not being hypocritical. Horrible father but he is true to his belief.
My sister in law is championing equality and how everyone needs to have the same chances while also saying she does not care about the house market being to high for young people because she can afford buying one for her son. This was part of the same discussion but she does not see any issue in it, also she hates Musk but can't articulate why.
I've noticed that older people in the middle and upper class are motivated by their cohort peers think, and have the FUD (fear uncertainty doubt) sections of the brain react to gossip + headlines. Most inheritance that is passed down is done so without incident and excitement.
One of my unpopular opinions is that well-off parents shouldn't be making teenagers and young adults work crummy jobs at McDonald's, Amazon, etc for access to tuition and other allowances. I even think it's artificial even to make them work a low-skill service or blue collar industry job at a local firm, but at least there's more room for growth, learning to negotiate, and pick up on red flags of bad employers. But really, it's obnoxious when a spoiled brat works a low status job, serves in military infantry (or worse, brags about non-combat roles), etc and grows an inflated ego instead of humility.
Working-class has plenty of idiots, sumbags, and what far-leftists termed scabs; not some ideal to accessorize your kids around. If a parent doesn't want a nepobaby, they need to put some effort into teaching their kid how to carve their own path and instill some virtue during the process. Lots of them have trouble confronting that 90% of society is fake and gay.
I think if you look into this, a lot of times when you hear about rich people giving their money to charity the "charity" is just a tax shelter. It's a scam to protect the estate from the government. I used to work for a large family investment firm and these people majorly obsess over death taxes and descendants pissing away the family fortune. It's really all they care about.
The kids get a trust fund or benefit payment or something, they just don't get full control of the principal (so they can't spend it all).
It really is a perfect example of Current Year politics and media--the mega rich wall off their money and turn it into self-perpetuating power sources while also patting themselves on the back for how "selfless" they are.
The term in those circles is "Shirtless to shirtless in three generations." One guy makes all the money, his kids maintain it but fail to achieve more, then the grandkids squander it all.
If his son is an absolute loser who is banking on inheritance instead of contributing to society, then thats totally understandable. But if his son is trying, and struggling, then this guy is a piece of shit.
Maybe the British government should follow up and instead of financing healthcare and schools for privileged British people they should it give all to my country because we are poorer and some people are dark skinned, we do not give a fuck about Britain but if you want to give it to us it sounds like a good idea to me.
I mean that would be a big help to your son he could’ve stipulated a percentage goes to charity and the rest goes to charity if he wanted to do so. Ridiculous
'You get nothing from me, son. Don't want to be unfair to all the rapists- I mean, migrants we've imported. You'll understand in time, I'm sure. Now, tell me again why you're driving us so close to Rajesh & Mohammad's Retirement/Funeral Home.'
Extending his logic further, shouldn't he give away his money right now? He got lucky being born into his situation. Why should he enjoy the fruits of that while others starve?
This might be peak boomer. Like, there is an effective way to do this, even if the goal is still ultimately evil. Set up a trust for a local scholarship and make your son the first, honorary recipient, anything that you are sure would directly benefit people you can see.
But, no, I'm going to leave it in my will (I won't deprive myself) and I'm going to blindly hand it over to a third party and wash my hands of it.
The world cannot be fair, cannot be equal. There is someone, right now, dying in absolute agony. Limbs ripped apart, internals made external, melting from the inside out, some manner of horrific death is happening this very second to someone, somewhere. And that can't be aided, can't be helped. So the only way we'd be equal, is if we were ALL dying in such horrific manners, immediately.
I do not want such equality. I much prefer to acknowledge the tragedy of inequality as a tragedy of circumstance. "I wouldn't wish this pain upon my worst enemy" is a common enough phrase uttered, acknowledging that those people in the pain itself don't want their life situation to become the equality standard.
Anyone who DOES want the worst of the worst of the world to be standard, to want universal equality, should volunteer to go first. No matter what atrocity they commit upon their own person, someone, somewhere, has it worse, because the communist fool still retains the ability to inflict it upon themselves, when some have less than that.
Ah yes, the 2 most retarded demographics combined . British and Boomer.
Women rank higher than either of those.
British boomer woman. Checkmate.
I'm sure the charity's CEO appreciates the bump to his Key Performance Indicators. He might even get to buy a fourth Jaguar with his annual bonus!
Proverbs 13:22
Well, acktuhlee muh AFAB reverend told me that this means something else because, like, everyone is my real family.
This faggot has an OBE. An "order of the british empire." He accepted the position of a knight.
He apparently has no understanding of what a knight is, what chivalry is, and why he served none of it.
I mean, fine, don't give your kid an inheritance, but then you need to throw your fake faggot knight award back too. Or, are you telling me you EARNED your obe?
kek.
Restore the British Monarchy:
Depose Charles, and install Jeremy Clarkson.
What's that camera angle? Let's ensure that my three chins are all perfectly visible? Hospital bed?
Now, hear me out, I can understand that you wouldn't give money to your son because children from established wealth often come out spoiled and rotten. That does not seem to be the reasoning here. It's the "fairness" argument. You wouldn't refuse to feed your son because other children don't have food (aided and abetted by your own government, I might add). So why deny him this? To get attention from online idiots?
He's speaking to a priestess of his religion, a black woman. This is his penance to her
The spoiled thing is a retarded cope propaganda. Spoiled is an attitude of entitlement and has nothing to do with your parents wealth
Now you can be out of touch and unprepared for hardship, but that's just a function of WHEN you experience hardship first, and being out of touch is being ignorant, you can beat that out of somebody.
Being spoiled you cant beat out.
Parents having wealth is literally the primary reason why many people don't experience those hardships until its too late for them to adjust without extreme consequences.
You don't need wealth to spoil a child like that, but having wealth makes it very easy for lackluster parents to do so without intending to.
It's the same camera angle he uses to surprise people on Omegle when he switches the direction of the camera and shows the other person his dick.
If my parents did that I would make absolutely sure that they spend their last years in the shittiest, dirtiest retirement home staffed with jeets and blacks and I'd tell the staff my parents were racist.
Just to be fair to the heccin POC that might need a room in the nice retirement homes.
I can't blame you. It's a form of betrayal when your parents leave you nothing assuming you didn't betray them first.
And this is what decades of leftist indoctrination get you. He has no concept at all of what a family is or means because society tells him that he's just having sex and overpopulating the earth.
Brains on leftism
Honestly at least he is not being hypocritical. Horrible father but he is true to his belief.
My sister in law is championing equality and how everyone needs to have the same chances while also saying she does not care about the house market being to high for young people because she can afford buying one for her son. This was part of the same discussion but she does not see any issue in it, also she hates Musk but can't articulate why.
What a faggot jew simping nigworshipping refugees welcome come meet my mulatoo grandkid boomer cuck fucking faggot
I've noticed that older people in the middle and upper class are motivated by their cohort peers think, and have the FUD (fear uncertainty doubt) sections of the brain react to gossip + headlines. Most inheritance that is passed down is done so without incident and excitement.
One of my unpopular opinions is that well-off parents shouldn't be making teenagers and young adults work crummy jobs at McDonald's, Amazon, etc for access to tuition and other allowances. I even think it's artificial even to make them work a low-skill service or blue collar industry job at a local firm, but at least there's more room for growth, learning to negotiate, and pick up on red flags of bad employers. But really, it's obnoxious when a spoiled brat works a low status job, serves in military infantry (or worse, brags about non-combat roles), etc and grows an inflated ego instead of humility.
Working-class has plenty of idiots, sumbags, and what far-leftists termed scabs; not some ideal to accessorize your kids around. If a parent doesn't want a nepobaby, they need to put some effort into teaching their kid how to carve their own path and instill some virtue during the process. Lots of them have trouble confronting that 90% of society is fake and gay.
I think if you look into this, a lot of times when you hear about rich people giving their money to charity the "charity" is just a tax shelter. It's a scam to protect the estate from the government. I used to work for a large family investment firm and these people majorly obsess over death taxes and descendants pissing away the family fortune. It's really all they care about.
The kids get a trust fund or benefit payment or something, they just don't get full control of the principal (so they can't spend it all).
It really is a perfect example of Current Year politics and media--the mega rich wall off their money and turn it into self-perpetuating power sources while also patting themselves on the back for how "selfless" they are.
In your opinion, how many wealthy parents sort of hate their own kids like this guy clearly does?
It's based on how they spend the family money.
Increase the principal -> good son
Piss it away on stupid shit -> horrible son
The term in those circles is "Shirtless to shirtless in three generations." One guy makes all the money, his kids maintain it but fail to achieve more, then the grandkids squander it all.
You're not wrong, it would be a good way to get around any sort of inheritance tax.
That does make a lot of sense.
If his son is an absolute loser who is banking on inheritance instead of contributing to society, then thats totally understandable. But if his son is trying, and struggling, then this guy is a piece of shit.
Maybe the British government should follow up and instead of financing healthcare and schools for privileged British people they should it give all to my country because we are poorer and some people are dark skinned, we do not give a fuck about Britain but if you want to give it to us it sounds like a good idea to me.
White people.. goodness lol.
The interviewer looks like the fucking cryptkeeper and the other guy sounds full of shit.
That's a guy trying to buy his way into heaven, he feels guilty for the people he screwed over to get his money.
I mean that would be a big help to your son he could’ve stipulated a percentage goes to charity and the rest goes to charity if he wanted to do so. Ridiculous
'You get nothing from me, son. Don't want to be unfair to all the rapists- I mean, migrants we've imported. You'll understand in time, I'm sure. Now, tell me again why you're driving us so close to Rajesh & Mohammad's Retirement/Funeral Home.'
This is what many Boomers are doing. And not just British either.
The only reason this makes sense is because you're ultra-rich and you don't want your kids to get spoiled with the inheritance.
Dude, this Tony Hawks lame brah!
That very thing happened to my step kids earlier this year. He left a little over a million dollar estate to a dog rescue organization... All of it.
Their dad fucked them in life and fucked them in death
Extending his logic further, shouldn't he give away his money right now? He got lucky being born into his situation. Why should he enjoy the fruits of that while others starve?
This might be peak boomer. Like, there is an effective way to do this, even if the goal is still ultimately evil. Set up a trust for a local scholarship and make your son the first, honorary recipient, anything that you are sure would directly benefit people you can see.
But, no, I'm going to leave it in my will (I won't deprive myself) and I'm going to blindly hand it over to a third party and wash my hands of it.
The world cannot be fair, cannot be equal. There is someone, right now, dying in absolute agony. Limbs ripped apart, internals made external, melting from the inside out, some manner of horrific death is happening this very second to someone, somewhere. And that can't be aided, can't be helped. So the only way we'd be equal, is if we were ALL dying in such horrific manners, immediately.
I do not want such equality. I much prefer to acknowledge the tragedy of inequality as a tragedy of circumstance. "I wouldn't wish this pain upon my worst enemy" is a common enough phrase uttered, acknowledging that those people in the pain itself don't want their life situation to become the equality standard.
Anyone who DOES want the worst of the worst of the world to be standard, to want universal equality, should volunteer to go first. No matter what atrocity they commit upon their own person, someone, somewhere, has it worse, because the communist fool still retains the ability to inflict it upon themselves, when some have less than that.
Wait, you guys are getting inheritance?
Man, talk about a bad name. It's like Popsi or other generic fake versions of better stuff.
I'm sure Tony Hawk will give good stuff to his kids.