It’s bad everywhere in the west, but Canada is something else entirely. You were importing 200k people a year until about 2020, and then the number spiked to 1.2 million annually during covid. For a nation of only 40 million, that’s 3% of your total population added per year, nearly all of them culturally incompatible and economically disruptive. Current Canadian immigration is simply suicidal and insane. You guys should have overthrown your government in 2021.
Like Britain and most of Australia along with the worst of the EU countries (looking at you Germany) they've been cucked and brainwashed into ethnic suicide.
Toxic metals in injections, formaldehyde, fluoride in drinking water especially makes people particularly compliant and obedient, and of course the mass media.
Because you use life like imagery and audio non stop porting in front of peoples faces starting from literally the first days of their lives.
You have talking heads that give people the illusion of a person talking to them, building familiarity and friendliness. Heard of celebrity crushes? Ever had a crush on a media character? Ever got your heart racing watching a scary movie? Human brains might understand they are watching a screen on a cognitive level but the flashing imagery and sounds also speak to lower parts of the brain and subconscious forming ideas and even building pseudo relationships with what they see on screens.
Its true. America is sliding hard but in terms of sheer replacement Canada is depressing. My last trip there felt so wrong. I rarely saw whites, it was just filled with se asians, jeets, and sand people. They all fight against each other too. Going to the store in Canada was uncomfortable because they are always yelling at each other like its Cairo or whatever. Its so disgusting.
Nope, voted back into power again. Because the people here would rather commit cultural suicide than admit rightists are correct.
The boomers have had their brain fried by constant propaganda and are beyond salvation. Nothing will change until everyone born before 1970 is dead and buried. At least, in Quebec.
The Anglo countries have no right wing. The "conservatives" vote to conserve the policies that got us here. The "progressives" vote for new policies to make it worse.
Imagine being sold out every year and still voting republican for instance? I confronted my father with that fact and he just got angry. I asked him what the GOP has done for white america, their voter base?
He used to say blacks were dumb for voting for the democrats that don't ever do anything for black people. Whites are the equivalent for republicans. This pattern is repeated in every western country.
So they'll win a few more elections before there's enough jeets to form a bobs and vagine party and replace all the short-sighted politicians that brought them there.
I don't suggest this lightly, because I know from personal experience how difficult it is to uproot and move your whole life elsewhere, but you should give serious thought to leaving. I made that decision due to a variety of factors in the UK that are conspiring to push me out. If I lived in Canada, I would have even less hesitation. If you have children or family that rely on you, I know that is a burdensome prospect, so I wouldn't blame you for deciding not to.
It seems to me that we--talking broadly about dissidents here--stand a better chance at resisting whatever they have in mind for us if we're at least broadly in the same geographic area. I don't believe the US is in any better of a demographic state in the long run, but it is easier there to do two essential things:
Become self-sufficient and detach from the system at large as much as you can.
Earn a decent salary that's not monstrously overtaxed and buy a house in which to raise a family.
Just those two things alone make it a better place for me at least. The housing situation in the UK is complete madness for young families, but from what I've heard about Canada, it's even worse over there.
Detaching from society won't help. They won't leave us alone. Detaching only makes you more isolated and vulnerable. Forming communities of like minded people is the only answer.
The issue in the USA is people have enough money and their guns to go hide away somewhere and pretend like this won't affect them. South African whites were the same, and now their farmers and being killed off one by one. The only place with a future for whites there is orania and other ethnic enclaves.
I'm not suggesting we all go off-grid in our own little compounds because then we'd all just get Ruby Ridge'd separately. I'm suggesting we detach from the system together, and form parallel societies. That's why I'm saying we should all be geographically close to each other.
Ah gotcha. You said you're in the UK? I often think of repatriating to Europe because of heritage. I can't stand how american values are deracinated. We have short roots to our race, and people are quick to miscegenation here.
Idk I just want my kids to grow up in a European world among their own kind. The amerimutt meme is real and most US whites have already given up their identity in favor of making money and using immigrant labor. Idk maybe things are just as bad in Europe but I have to imagine people have a bit more connection to their heritage there.
I think this is possibly a 'grass is always greener' situation. In my experience, it is Americans who are much more aware of the racial question because they have had to deal with it for hundreds of years. It's difficult for me to overstate just how oblivious your average middle class English person is to the displacement that is going on around them. And no, most of them are not more connected to their heritage, because they subsist on a steady diet of imported American trash culture. For someone who can see the writing on the wall, it feels incredibly isolating.
It breaks my heart to see my local city, which is over 1500 years old, become browner every year. I have no such preconceptions about America, and because it's a much younger country, the damage doesn't hurt me as much, you know? I can face it more practically. More is possible to shore yourself up against it. Maybe that's a personal failing of mine.
I do think it is essential for Americans to visit Europe, however, and understand where they came from. So many Americans don't seem to understand that the US is, for all intents and purposes, a European country, built upon European ideals by European people, just on a different continent. That was something my wife, who is American, has come to realise by living here for a few years. It will enable her to go back to America and understand it more holistically.
I do think euros are waking up to the racial issue. Its always easy to ignore reality when its far away but for so long euros have lectured the USA on its backwardness which is really just euros not understanding having to deal with a massive amount of blacks. Now that muds are invading europe, you all get to experience the fun of unusable public transport and overwhelmed public resources.
I'm hoping euros can at least remember their countries as they were and push back, because most Americans have been slowly walking down this path of Africanizing because we are wealthy enough to avoid using public resources and just hide away.
Either way, whites are going to have to group up and have some standards. Because none of us Europeans (I'm also including us white Americans) wants to live like these imports. We have standards and expectations that are incompatible with what we are importing.
Cheers from across the pond, brother. I just want to clarify I have no hate towards euros. I get tired of seeing all the infighting and Americans acting like we are smarter or something than euros and vice versa. Whites need to understand our shared heritage.
You too, man, I completely agree. Whites are a global minority under attack from all quarters. We cannot afford infighting at this critical juncture. Our enemies will certainly not discriminate.
You left out the most essential thing. We are much harder to "replace" because we are armed to the teeth. Europe wouldn't be nearly as brazen about replacing their population if the spineless cucks hadn't all decided to disarm themselves.
That is indeed very useful, and I also plan on arming myself very well when I get over there, but the last 50 years has thrown into question the value of guns as a political deterrent as such.
Americans have always been very well armed, but the speed of demographic change since 1965 has been lightning quick, and guns don't seem to have done much, if anything, to resist that.
I think that the vast space in America has done a lot to hide the change from most people, and perhaps if it had been more densely populated, like Europe, it would have been obvious enough that they wouldn't have been able to do it quietly like they did.
There may come a time when guns play their part in righting the wrongs that have been done to America, but looking at the broad brushstrokes of metapolitics, I don't think the presence or absence of an armed populace has much to do with whether or not demographics change one way or the other.
No, but America didn't have Australia's interstate COVID checkpoints and concentration camps, so I think the net effect of guns isn't anywhere near zero, even though I agree with your gun-fudd retards point.
They are brazenly doing it here in the USA. If you don't have the will to fight, all the weapons in the world won't do you any good. We have ceded the pen to our enemies, and as you've no doubt heard, the pen is mightier than the sword.
I haven't moved yet, but I am in the process of leaving for the US. It's not just political reasons which are pushing me to move; I also have various financial and family opportunities over there which I could never have here.
Well I figured that was pretty much implied. It's not by my own choice that I am still here, still waiting on my visa to be processed. 1 year and counting so far!
I mentioned before but Indians are the perfect tool for destroying national identity.
They are not violent so it is harder to be against them and they tend to be obedient to those above them. There is enough of them to destroy the entire west with no issue.
As an idea, they make 63% of Canada's population each year. The number of kids in 2 years is enough to make Canada in to India.
Indians are violent. Muggings, petty assaults, and sexual assaults increase exponentially with more indians, and that's without mentioning the even more common problems of property theft and car theft. On top of that, there's some retarded punjabi separatist movement and they get violent with other indians (and vice versa).
They are less violent then Africans or Muslims. I assume they have their own issues but they are unimpressive physically and tend to be fearful, you can look a bit menacing at 2 or 3 Indians and you can see fear.
Indians have their own muslim minority, so once you import enough you'll start to see raghead jeets and dothead jeets fighting each other in the streets.
The first immigration law passed after the 19th amendment was the Johnson-Reed Act of 1924. It was quite based and probably the last good major immigration law that we passed. Emmanuelle Cellar crusaded for over 40 years to undo it.
The difference being that women are required for your people, culture, and nation to survive. You need to procreate if you want to continue existing, and you need women if you want to procreate. So whatever challenges women pose to your society are inescapable. You can complain about women, but you can’t avoid them.
You don’t, however, need a hostile foreign elite to control your media, academia, judiciary, entertainment, finance, banking, government, etc. A hyper wealthy and influential ethnic minority, agitating as a distinct political and cultural bloc against the dominant ethnic majority, is not a prerequisite for the continued existence of your nation.
So even if women are the greater problem, they are a problem you must tolerate and endeavour to solve. You cannot move away from women. You cannot deport women. So while feminism certainly qualifies as a major head of the identity politics hydra, it’s not in the same category as race/ethnicity.
We are bringing in major cities worth of people annually. And I know the government is retarded, but that's unsustainably horrible for the country.
Even if every single one of them is a decent person, it's too much, too fast. And they either know it and don't care, or know it and want more. And I'm not sure which is worse.
They view whiteness as metaphysically evil. So if you have a predominantly white family or friend group - as most white people do - then you are literally evil. Never mind that every other race is allowed and even encouraged to maintain racially homogenous spaces.
Insofar as white peoples are included in any space, there seems to be a maximum percentage of whites allowed before the things become “too evil”. And tolerance of whites certainly seems to hinge on their value as tax cattle rather than any notion of inclusion.
Leftists in the 90s frequently joked about places being too white. They would be at a birthday party for a white child and say “haha this place looks like a Klan rally”, nudge nudge wink wink. Turns out most of them weren’t joking. They truly hated you and your kind. They were masking their hatred with irony, and now they’ve dropped the irony.
India's population is something like 1.46bn meaning they could export a literal million jeets to every country on earth and still have a viable population
With the notable exceptions of South Africa and Ukraine, white refugees aren’t really a thing. “Refugees” are mostly economic migrants traveling from shithole countries to prosperous ones in order to partake in gibs. The refugee label has been bastardized and weaponized to facilitate genocidal invasion of prosperous white countries by infinity shitworlders.
It’s all about manipulating people with word spells. Traditionally, your nation was “xenophobic” if you permitted zero immigration. Now, you are “xenophobic” if you don’t enthusiastically support replacement-level immigration.
Throughout all of recorded history, no white population has ever held majority support for mass immigration because every instance of it was objectively bad for native whites. Most rational people don’t want to pay more for housing, receive less for labor, and watch their culture and people be replaced by foreigners.
Incidentally, members of a certain white-passing demographic have always encouraged and facilitated mass immigration of non-whites into white nations. It is appropriate and accurate to view this behavior as a direct attack on white peoples, cultures, and nations.
When it gets down to it -- talking trade balances here -- once we've brain-drained all our technology into other countries, once things have evened out, they're making cars in Bolivia and microwave ovens in Tadzhikistan and selling them here -- once our edge in natural resources has been made irrelevant by giant Hong Kong ships and dirigibles that can ship North Dakota all the way to New Zealand for a nickel -- once the Invisible Hand has taken all those historical inequities and smeared them out into a broad global layer of what a Pakistani brickmaker would consider to be prosperity -- y'know what? There's only four things we do better than anyone else:
Literally every aspect of standard of living has decreased from the importation of non-western immigrants into western nations. Exactly zero things have been enriched or improved from it.
Immigration has always been a euphemism for invasion. No native white population has ever approved of or benefited from mass immigration. It is always bad, and it is always forced upon you by your rulers.
The only time mass immigration is beneficial to the local population is when quality people migrate to a shithole country. This is “colonialism”, and it is now universally condemned. So immigration, in practice, is a one-way pipeline of shitty people into prosperous white nations, and the results are consistently terrible for those white nations.
Remember, there's nothing in physical terms that would make a solution difficult. The problem is the mental terms. A majority of white people, incredibly, still don't think this is a big problem.
The longer this gets shoved in our face, I have exponentially more contempt for everyone who counts themselves a part of the "ruling class." At this point they all know exactly what's going on.
No amount of voting will save you, the west is too far gone to fix with voting. We either organize and make the people doing this to us feel so uncomfortable they stop, or we lose. There are no other options. Your government representatives all have names and addresses, organize large groups and remind these fucks from public property how you and your fellow citizens feel about what they’re doing to the country. They need to know the masses aren’t happy, that they need to change their behaviors and put our interests first, otherwise they will face angry mobs every time they leave their home’s…..fill their daily lives with anxiety, because right now, they disrespect you knowing you won’t do anything back, so there’s no reason not to sell out their countrymen for a nice bribe or whatever, fear can change that dynamic.
Now its too late. Even with legit elections, they will outvote you because the system encourages them to vote, vote a certain way, and vote for their own.
10,000% agree. Endure or leave, those are the two options. Or maybe form a friends-only (white) community somewhere in the vast uninhabited territories up North, but personally I am too old and sick for that.
Mexico. I am no gringo, and am fluent in Spanish on top of that, so I won't have any trouble with the locals, they are more likely the embrace me as a long lost cousin than anything else.
Unscrupulous assholes are always making money. Globalist control and destruction of white peoples, cultures, and nations are the primary driving motivations for the great replacement.
Why do they get so much free stuff immediately? Like save the freebies at least until they get citizenship status. Which takes years in most countries.
The free stuff is why they are there. They are opportunist economic migrants responding rationally to powerful incentives. The “democratically elected” government and their complicit NGOs are the ones deliberately incentivizing the replacement of the problematic native white constituency. It’s all about hatred of whites and the desire for permanent globalist control.
My brother lives in Scarborough, Ontario and his son is the only white kid in his grade 1 class. About 70 percent Muslim. The rest is mixed. Pretty big demographic shift in just a few decades
That's where I've lived pretty much all my life, in French unlike the disgusting Anglos who live here and refuse to learn the language.
I'm leaving. Mexico, here I come! I have a month-long stay planned for this summer in my target area, and if that works out well, I sell the house, move, and with those funds, buy two houses in a privada, rent one, keep it for family and friends once in a while, and yeah, life without communism or invasion.
Mexico is far from as homogeneous as you make it out to be.
The cartels, for all the harm they do in the USA, tend to be protective of foreigners, as they bring money into the country. They've been known to make examples of unorganized criminals who kidnap or steal from visitors.
They do generally hate gringos however. That's OK, I am no gringo. I am of a latin culture, extremely compatible with the Mexican way of life. I am also fluent in Spanish, which instantly disqualifies me as a gringo.
They're not anti-white, they consider themselves white, as opposed to the tribes of indigenous. They despise GRINGOS, which are English speakers. That's normal too, given how incompatible the Anglo-Saxon culture is with the Latin ones.
You're a French Canadian bro, you're definitely a gringo to them. White Mexicans are not common and white people are generally assumed to be foreign.
Mexico is far from homogenous but the same diatribes against whites are amped up there and you see a massive resurgence of native pride through things like nauhatl and aztec/mexica culture.
"MexicoIn Mexico, since the late 19th century, the use of "gringo" has been restricted to the American, often, but not always, in a derogatory or displeasure way. The term is mentioned in its sense of incomprehensible language from the 19th century (1789) and until the 1830s, but also to indicate to foreign troops, at first, coming from Spain in the second half of the nineteenth century.[15] A text published in Mexico, but written by a Spanish, denigrates a Sonoran Mexican for speaking "gringo," in reference to the indigenous language. After the War with the United States, gringo begins to be used for the citizens of that country, with expressions such as "Cringo American" or simply "gringo," witnessed as of popular use in Tepetitlán in 1849.[17] Since then, and given the permanent contact between the two countries, gringo went on to designate exclusively the American[35] and became the most widely used gentleman in the country after Mexican.[15]"
In most circumstances I'd say yes but I'm really going to Mexico in order to integrate into their society, along with my wife. The fewer homies there are around me, the better.
The worst thing to do is create a neighborhood that lends itself too well as a target for reprisals if things get expensive over there.
Plus, I'm going to a place where there are extremely few if any people from up North, so you have to be fluent. And if you're fluent, you might as well pick any place that fits what you look for. My target area is far from the ocean, for example.
It’s bad everywhere in the west, but Canada is something else entirely. You were importing 200k people a year until about 2020, and then the number spiked to 1.2 million annually during covid. For a nation of only 40 million, that’s 3% of your total population added per year, nearly all of them culturally incompatible and economically disruptive. Current Canadian immigration is simply suicidal and insane. You guys should have overthrown your government in 2021.
Like Britain and most of Australia along with the worst of the EU countries (looking at you Germany) they've been cucked and brainwashed into ethnic suicide.
How is a society brainwashed into committing suicide?
They are societies of midwits. Smart enough to adopt a complex belief system. Not smart enough to see the flaws in it.
The world is overpopulated. So don't have kids
But the economy needs a constantly growing population. So import people.
Toxic metals in injections, formaldehyde, fluoride in drinking water especially makes people particularly compliant and obedient, and of course the mass media.
'At least we weren't racist,' said the field of gravestones.
"Yes you were" say the horde of savages vandalizing them.
Because you use life like imagery and audio non stop porting in front of peoples faces starting from literally the first days of their lives.
You have talking heads that give people the illusion of a person talking to them, building familiarity and friendliness. Heard of celebrity crushes? Ever had a crush on a media character? Ever got your heart racing watching a scary movie? Human brains might understand they are watching a screen on a cognitive level but the flashing imagery and sounds also speak to lower parts of the brain and subconscious forming ideas and even building pseudo relationships with what they see on screens.
It essentially all stems from land acknowledgements, stripping Canadians of any national pride.
Its true. America is sliding hard but in terms of sheer replacement Canada is depressing. My last trip there felt so wrong. I rarely saw whites, it was just filled with se asians, jeets, and sand people. They all fight against each other too. Going to the store in Canada was uncomfortable because they are always yelling at each other like its Cairo or whatever. Its so disgusting.
Nope, voted back into power again. Because the people here would rather commit cultural suicide than admit rightists are correct.
The boomers have had their brain fried by constant propaganda and are beyond salvation. Nothing will change until everyone born before 1970 is dead and buried. At least, in Quebec.
It assures leftiest rule and that is all that matter to globalists.
The Anglo countries have no right wing. The "conservatives" vote to conserve the policies that got us here. The "progressives" vote for new policies to make it worse.
Imagine being sold out every year and still voting republican for instance? I confronted my father with that fact and he just got angry. I asked him what the GOP has done for white america, their voter base?
He used to say blacks were dumb for voting for the democrats that don't ever do anything for black people. Whites are the equivalent for republicans. This pattern is repeated in every western country.
Yes they are. Government always reflects the people. Lazy, ignorant people will allow a bad king, bad democracy, or bad aristocracy.
What else can you do in a 2 party system where voting for 3rd won’t ever make a meaningful difference?
So they'll win a few more elections before there's enough jeets to form a bobs and vagine party and replace all the short-sighted politicians that brought them there.
Just reduce it to 3 days and let tourists become citizens. Because why not
I don't suggest this lightly, because I know from personal experience how difficult it is to uproot and move your whole life elsewhere, but you should give serious thought to leaving. I made that decision due to a variety of factors in the UK that are conspiring to push me out. If I lived in Canada, I would have even less hesitation. If you have children or family that rely on you, I know that is a burdensome prospect, so I wouldn't blame you for deciding not to.
It seems to me that we--talking broadly about dissidents here--stand a better chance at resisting whatever they have in mind for us if we're at least broadly in the same geographic area. I don't believe the US is in any better of a demographic state in the long run, but it is easier there to do two essential things:
Just those two things alone make it a better place for me at least. The housing situation in the UK is complete madness for young families, but from what I've heard about Canada, it's even worse over there.
Detaching from society won't help. They won't leave us alone. Detaching only makes you more isolated and vulnerable. Forming communities of like minded people is the only answer.
The issue in the USA is people have enough money and their guns to go hide away somewhere and pretend like this won't affect them. South African whites were the same, and now their farmers and being killed off one by one. The only place with a future for whites there is orania and other ethnic enclaves.
Perhaps I didn't clarify what I meant.
I'm not suggesting we all go off-grid in our own little compounds because then we'd all just get Ruby Ridge'd separately. I'm suggesting we detach from the system together, and form parallel societies. That's why I'm saying we should all be geographically close to each other.
Ah gotcha. You said you're in the UK? I often think of repatriating to Europe because of heritage. I can't stand how american values are deracinated. We have short roots to our race, and people are quick to miscegenation here.
Idk I just want my kids to grow up in a European world among their own kind. The amerimutt meme is real and most US whites have already given up their identity in favor of making money and using immigrant labor. Idk maybe things are just as bad in Europe but I have to imagine people have a bit more connection to their heritage there.
I think this is possibly a 'grass is always greener' situation. In my experience, it is Americans who are much more aware of the racial question because they have had to deal with it for hundreds of years. It's difficult for me to overstate just how oblivious your average middle class English person is to the displacement that is going on around them. And no, most of them are not more connected to their heritage, because they subsist on a steady diet of imported American trash culture. For someone who can see the writing on the wall, it feels incredibly isolating.
It breaks my heart to see my local city, which is over 1500 years old, become browner every year. I have no such preconceptions about America, and because it's a much younger country, the damage doesn't hurt me as much, you know? I can face it more practically. More is possible to shore yourself up against it. Maybe that's a personal failing of mine.
I do think it is essential for Americans to visit Europe, however, and understand where they came from. So many Americans don't seem to understand that the US is, for all intents and purposes, a European country, built upon European ideals by European people, just on a different continent. That was something my wife, who is American, has come to realise by living here for a few years. It will enable her to go back to America and understand it more holistically.
I do think euros are waking up to the racial issue. Its always easy to ignore reality when its far away but for so long euros have lectured the USA on its backwardness which is really just euros not understanding having to deal with a massive amount of blacks. Now that muds are invading europe, you all get to experience the fun of unusable public transport and overwhelmed public resources.
I'm hoping euros can at least remember their countries as they were and push back, because most Americans have been slowly walking down this path of Africanizing because we are wealthy enough to avoid using public resources and just hide away.
Either way, whites are going to have to group up and have some standards. Because none of us Europeans (I'm also including us white Americans) wants to live like these imports. We have standards and expectations that are incompatible with what we are importing.
Cheers from across the pond, brother. I just want to clarify I have no hate towards euros. I get tired of seeing all the infighting and Americans acting like we are smarter or something than euros and vice versa. Whites need to understand our shared heritage.
You too, man, I completely agree. Whites are a global minority under attack from all quarters. We cannot afford infighting at this critical juncture. Our enemies will certainly not discriminate.
I hear good things about Hungary. Poland seems to have potential, too. There would be a language barrier, though.
People love to hold up Orania as an example, but it's a farming community of less than 3k Whites surrounded by 40-50 million prawns.
Sounds like winning odds if the whites understand the game.
You left out the most essential thing. We are much harder to "replace" because we are armed to the teeth. Europe wouldn't be nearly as brazen about replacing their population if the spineless cucks hadn't all decided to disarm themselves.
That is indeed very useful, and I also plan on arming myself very well when I get over there, but the last 50 years has thrown into question the value of guns as a political deterrent as such.
Americans have always been very well armed, but the speed of demographic change since 1965 has been lightning quick, and guns don't seem to have done much, if anything, to resist that.
I think that the vast space in America has done a lot to hide the change from most people, and perhaps if it had been more densely populated, like Europe, it would have been obvious enough that they wouldn't have been able to do it quietly like they did.
There may come a time when guns play their part in righting the wrongs that have been done to America, but looking at the broad brushstrokes of metapolitics, I don't think the presence or absence of an armed populace has much to do with whether or not demographics change one way or the other.
No, but America didn't have Australia's interstate COVID checkpoints and concentration camps, so I think the net effect of guns isn't anywhere near zero, even though I agree with your gun-fudd retards point.
They are brazenly doing it here in the USA. If you don't have the will to fight, all the weapons in the world won't do you any good. We have ceded the pen to our enemies, and as you've no doubt heard, the pen is mightier than the sword.
Which country did you move to?
I haven't moved yet, but I am in the process of leaving for the US. It's not just political reasons which are pushing me to move; I also have various financial and family opportunities over there which I could never have here.
And join a group that loves you like NOVA
What's NOVA?
Well I figured that was pretty much implied. It's not by my own choice that I am still here, still waiting on my visa to be processed. 1 year and counting so far!
they're everywhere, like bugs.
Rats
Had a family member travel the deserted North Superior coast.
They told me every town was overrun with jeets no matter where or how small.
Went through the UP in Michigan and the towns were filled with newly arrives jeets. Jeets love to run hotels and stores and stuff.
That's really too bad.
White people & teens working retail jobs in the UP is one of my favorite things about it.
Remember India can settle 2 million Indians in EVERY country and still have over 1 billion in India.
I mentioned before but Indians are the perfect tool for destroying national identity.
They are not violent so it is harder to be against them and they tend to be obedient to those above them. There is enough of them to destroy the entire west with no issue.
As an idea, they make 63% of Canada's population each year. The number of kids in 2 years is enough to make Canada in to India.
Indians are violent. Muggings, petty assaults, and sexual assaults increase exponentially with more indians, and that's without mentioning the even more common problems of property theft and car theft. On top of that, there's some retarded punjabi separatist movement and they get violent with other indians (and vice versa).
They are less violent then Africans or Muslims. I assume they have their own issues but they are unimpressive physically and tend to be fearful, you can look a bit menacing at 2 or 3 Indians and you can see fear.
Indians have their own muslim minority, so once you import enough you'll start to see raghead jeets and dothead jeets fighting each other in the streets.
Canada doesn't have our self defense laws. On paper maybe but we see how that plays out.
That's why they roam in packs to do their raping.
I agree there. They are dangerous in larger groups.
Doubt.
You talk about white replacement all the time but you've never met an Indian?
Where did I say that? They aren't fearful tho ime. Instead i found they are usually aggressive and entitled. Kinda like a brown kike tbh.
Two different situations. One is arguing, the other is a chance of violence.
Good for (((landlords))) and anyone who wants lifers at low wage service jobs
He's probably one of Smiggie's accounts.
It absolutely was. Passed women voting and prohibition while all the White men were being slow walked back to the USA from WWI.
The first immigration law passed after the 19th amendment was the Johnson-Reed Act of 1924. It was quite based and probably the last good major immigration law that we passed. Emmanuelle Cellar crusaded for over 40 years to undo it.
The difference being that women are required for your people, culture, and nation to survive. You need to procreate if you want to continue existing, and you need women if you want to procreate. So whatever challenges women pose to your society are inescapable. You can complain about women, but you can’t avoid them.
You don’t, however, need a hostile foreign elite to control your media, academia, judiciary, entertainment, finance, banking, government, etc. A hyper wealthy and influential ethnic minority, agitating as a distinct political and cultural bloc against the dominant ethnic majority, is not a prerequisite for the continued existence of your nation.
So even if women are the greater problem, they are a problem you must tolerate and endeavour to solve. You cannot move away from women. You cannot deport women. So while feminism certainly qualifies as a major head of the identity politics hydra, it’s not in the same category as race/ethnicity.
It's pretty bad here.
We are bringing in major cities worth of people annually. And I know the government is retarded, but that's unsustainably horrible for the country.
Even if every single one of them is a decent person, it's too much, too fast. And they either know it and don't care, or know it and want more. And I'm not sure which is worse.
They view whiteness as metaphysically evil. So if you have a predominantly white family or friend group - as most white people do - then you are literally evil. Never mind that every other race is allowed and even encouraged to maintain racially homogenous spaces.
Insofar as white peoples are included in any space, there seems to be a maximum percentage of whites allowed before the things become “too evil”. And tolerance of whites certainly seems to hinge on their value as tax cattle rather than any notion of inclusion.
Leftists in the 90s frequently joked about places being too white. They would be at a birthday party for a white child and say “haha this place looks like a Klan rally”, nudge nudge wink wink. Turns out most of them weren’t joking. They truly hated you and your kind. They were masking their hatred with irony, and now they’ve dropped the irony.
India's population is something like 1.46bn meaning they could export a literal million jeets to every country on earth and still have a viable population
That is an approximation, the actual numbers are probably higher
How is this not called genocide?
There are no countries accepting white refugees
With the notable exceptions of South Africa and Ukraine, white refugees aren’t really a thing. “Refugees” are mostly economic migrants traveling from shithole countries to prosperous ones in order to partake in gibs. The refugee label has been bastardized and weaponized to facilitate genocidal invasion of prosperous white countries by infinity shitworlders.
It’s all about manipulating people with word spells. Traditionally, your nation was “xenophobic” if you permitted zero immigration. Now, you are “xenophobic” if you don’t enthusiastically support replacement-level immigration.
Throughout all of recorded history, no white population has ever held majority support for mass immigration because every instance of it was objectively bad for native whites. Most rational people don’t want to pay more for housing, receive less for labor, and watch their culture and people be replaced by foreigners.
Incidentally, members of a certain white-passing demographic have always encouraged and facilitated mass immigration of non-whites into white nations. It is appropriate and accurate to view this behavior as a direct attack on white peoples, cultures, and nations.
Lebanese refugees weren’t really a thing.
Until they let in too many muslims and the christians got genocided
The public were never asked
Because the press that labels these things are working for the ones doing the genocide.
Think of it this way: In less than a decade, it won't be 10%, it'll only be 5%, because they'll already have overpopulated the city that much by then.
When it gets down to it -- talking trade balances here -- once we've brain-drained all our technology into other countries, once things have evened out, they're making cars in Bolivia and microwave ovens in Tadzhikistan and selling them here -- once our edge in natural resources has been made irrelevant by giant Hong Kong ships and dirigibles that can ship North Dakota all the way to New Zealand for a nickel -- once the Invisible Hand has taken all those historical inequities and smeared them out into a broad global layer of what a Pakistani brickmaker would consider to be prosperity -- y'know what? There's only four things we do better than anyone else:
Well, one out of four ain't bad.
Lol at people downvoting this
Literally every aspect of standard of living has decreased from the importation of non-western immigrants into western nations. Exactly zero things have been enriched or improved from it.
Immigration has always been a euphemism for invasion. No native white population has ever approved of or benefited from mass immigration. It is always bad, and it is always forced upon you by your rulers.
The only time mass immigration is beneficial to the local population is when quality people migrate to a shithole country. This is “colonialism”, and it is now universally condemned. So immigration, in practice, is a one-way pipeline of shitty people into prosperous white nations, and the results are consistently terrible for those white nations.
Lots of individuals have gotten rich. That's why you have so many race traitors that have no problem selling out poor or lower class whites.
Remember, there's nothing in physical terms that would make a solution difficult. The problem is the mental terms. A majority of white people, incredibly, still don't think this is a big problem.
The longer this gets shoved in our face, I have exponentially more contempt for everyone who counts themselves a part of the "ruling class." At this point they all know exactly what's going on.
The romans were also an aristocratic race. Rich people don't like doing work so we outsource more and more until we aren't rich and have to do work.
See, this is why Canada today is a danger to the free world. It must be annexed into the 51st state and the jeets forcibly deported back.
No amount of voting will save you, the west is too far gone to fix with voting. We either organize and make the people doing this to us feel so uncomfortable they stop, or we lose. There are no other options. Your government representatives all have names and addresses, organize large groups and remind these fucks from public property how you and your fellow citizens feel about what they’re doing to the country. They need to know the masses aren’t happy, that they need to change their behaviors and put our interests first, otherwise they will face angry mobs every time they leave their home’s…..fill their daily lives with anxiety, because right now, they disrespect you knowing you won’t do anything back, so there’s no reason not to sell out their countrymen for a nice bribe or whatever, fear can change that dynamic.
They're slowly boiling the Montreal frogs with BO.
Now its too late. Even with legit elections, they will outvote you because the system encourages them to vote, vote a certain way, and vote for their own.
10,000% agree. Endure or leave, those are the two options. Or maybe form a friends-only (white) community somewhere in the vast uninhabited territories up North, but personally I am too old and sick for that.
So it's emigration for me.
To where? East europe? East asia?
Mexico. I am no gringo, and am fluent in Spanish on top of that, so I won't have any trouble with the locals, they are more likely the embrace me as a long lost cousin than anything else.
Seems mexicans are better than jeets lol.
Yes they are. At least they're Catholic like us, on top of being from a latin culture like us as well, contrary to the Anglo Saxon.
Canada is a test run. Going swimmingly depending how you look at it.
Ever hated the Quebecois so much you overpowered them by Indians?
Hello Bonjour Namaste
Do any of them even have building skills or will they need to import Mexicans to do all the building of the new infrastructure?
Unscrupulous assholes are always making money. Globalist control and destruction of white peoples, cultures, and nations are the primary driving motivations for the great replacement.
At least the Germans can say they were forced into this state.
You can bet the guy you are talking to hates the Germans the most.
Why do they get so much free stuff immediately? Like save the freebies at least until they get citizenship status. Which takes years in most countries.
Make them pay bills before that
The free stuff is why they are there. They are opportunist economic migrants responding rationally to powerful incentives. The “democratically elected” government and their complicit NGOs are the ones deliberately incentivizing the replacement of the problematic native white constituency. It’s all about hatred of whites and the desire for permanent globalist control.
My brother lives in Scarborough, Ontario and his son is the only white kid in his grade 1 class. About 70 percent Muslim. The rest is mixed. Pretty big demographic shift in just a few decades
If you haven't left that shithole by now, you get what you deserve
That's where I've lived pretty much all my life, in French unlike the disgusting Anglos who live here and refuse to learn the language.
I'm leaving. Mexico, here I come! I have a month-long stay planned for this summer in my target area, and if that works out well, I sell the house, move, and with those funds, buy two houses in a privada, rent one, keep it for family and friends once in a while, and yeah, life without communism or invasion.
Mexico is full of rampant anti white anti European sentiments and run by a kike bitch with cartel ties. Watch your back.
Mexico is far from as homogeneous as you make it out to be.
The cartels, for all the harm they do in the USA, tend to be protective of foreigners, as they bring money into the country. They've been known to make examples of unorganized criminals who kidnap or steal from visitors.
They do generally hate gringos however. That's OK, I am no gringo. I am of a latin culture, extremely compatible with the Mexican way of life. I am also fluent in Spanish, which instantly disqualifies me as a gringo.
They're not anti-white, they consider themselves white, as opposed to the tribes of indigenous. They despise GRINGOS, which are English speakers. That's normal too, given how incompatible the Anglo-Saxon culture is with the Latin ones.
You're a French Canadian bro, you're definitely a gringo to them. White Mexicans are not common and white people are generally assumed to be foreign.
Mexico is far from homogenous but the same diatribes against whites are amped up there and you see a massive resurgence of native pride through things like nauhatl and aztec/mexica culture.
From Wikipedia in Spanish:
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gringo
"MexicoIn Mexico, since the late 19th century, the use of "gringo" has been restricted to the American, often, but not always, in a derogatory or displeasure way. The term is mentioned in its sense of incomprehensible language from the 19th century (1789) and until the 1830s, but also to indicate to foreign troops, at first, coming from Spain in the second half of the nineteenth century.[15] A text published in Mexico, but written by a Spanish, denigrates a Sonoran Mexican for speaking "gringo," in reference to the indigenous language. After the War with the United States, gringo begins to be used for the citizens of that country, with expressions such as "Cringo American" or simply "gringo," witnessed as of popular use in Tepetitlán in 1849.[17] Since then, and given the permanent contact between the two countries, gringo went on to designate exclusively the American[35] and became the most widely used gentleman in the country after Mexican.[15]"
In most circumstances I'd say yes but I'm really going to Mexico in order to integrate into their society, along with my wife. The fewer homies there are around me, the better.
The worst thing to do is create a neighborhood that lends itself too well as a target for reprisals if things get expensive over there.
Plus, I'm going to a place where there are extremely few if any people from up North, so you have to be fluent. And if you're fluent, you might as well pick any place that fits what you look for. My target area is far from the ocean, for example.
Makes perfect sense. Are you of French descent like me?