You left out the most essential thing. We are much harder to "replace" because we are armed to the teeth. Europe wouldn't be nearly as brazen about replacing their population if the spineless cucks hadn't all decided to disarm themselves.
That is indeed very useful, and I also plan on arming myself very well when I get over there, but the last 50 years has thrown into question the value of guns as a political deterrent as such.
Americans have always been very well armed, but the speed of demographic change since 1965 has been lightning quick, and guns don't seem to have done much, if anything, to resist that.
I think that the vast space in America has done a lot to hide the change from most people, and perhaps if it had been more densely populated, like Europe, it would have been obvious enough that they wouldn't have been able to do it quietly like they did.
There may come a time when guns play their part in righting the wrongs that have been done to America, but looking at the broad brushstrokes of metapolitics, I don't think the presence or absence of an armed populace has much to do with whether or not demographics change one way or the other.
No, but America didn't have Australia's interstate COVID checkpoints and concentration camps, so I think the net effect of guns isn't anywhere near zero, even though I agree with your gun-fudd retards point.
They are brazenly doing it here in the USA. If you don't have the will to fight, all the weapons in the world won't do you any good. We have ceded the pen to our enemies, and as you've no doubt heard, the pen is mightier than the sword.
You left out the most essential thing. We are much harder to "replace" because we are armed to the teeth. Europe wouldn't be nearly as brazen about replacing their population if the spineless cucks hadn't all decided to disarm themselves.
That is indeed very useful, and I also plan on arming myself very well when I get over there, but the last 50 years has thrown into question the value of guns as a political deterrent as such.
Americans have always been very well armed, but the speed of demographic change since 1965 has been lightning quick, and guns don't seem to have done much, if anything, to resist that.
I think that the vast space in America has done a lot to hide the change from most people, and perhaps if it had been more densely populated, like Europe, it would have been obvious enough that they wouldn't have been able to do it quietly like they did.
There may come a time when guns play their part in righting the wrongs that have been done to America, but looking at the broad brushstrokes of metapolitics, I don't think the presence or absence of an armed populace has much to do with whether or not demographics change one way or the other.
No, but America didn't have Australia's interstate COVID checkpoints and concentration camps, so I think the net effect of guns isn't anywhere near zero, even though I agree with your gun-fudd retards point.
They are brazenly doing it here in the USA. If you don't have the will to fight, all the weapons in the world won't do you any good. We have ceded the pen to our enemies, and as you've no doubt heard, the pen is mightier than the sword.