I don't suggest this lightly, because I know from personal experience how difficult it is to uproot and move your whole life elsewhere, but you should give serious thought to leaving. I made that decision due to a variety of factors in the UK that are conspiring to push me out. If I lived in Canada, I would have even less hesitation. If you have children or family that rely on you, I know that is a burdensome prospect, so I wouldn't blame you for deciding not to.
It seems to me that we--talking broadly about dissidents here--stand a better chance at resisting whatever they have in mind for us if we're at least broadly in the same geographic area. I don't believe the US is in any better of a demographic state in the long run, but it is easier there to do two essential things:
Become self-sufficient and detach from the system at large as much as you can.
Earn a decent salary that's not monstrously overtaxed and buy a house in which to raise a family.
Just those two things alone make it a better place for me at least. The housing situation in the UK is complete madness for young families, but from what I've heard about Canada, it's even worse over there.
Detaching from society won't help. They won't leave us alone. Detaching only makes you more isolated and vulnerable. Forming communities of like minded people is the only answer.
The issue in the USA is people have enough money and their guns to go hide away somewhere and pretend like this won't affect them. South African whites were the same, and now their farmers and being killed off one by one. The only place with a future for whites there is orania and other ethnic enclaves.
I'm not suggesting we all go off-grid in our own little compounds because then we'd all just get Ruby Ridge'd separately. I'm suggesting we detach from the system together, and form parallel societies. That's why I'm saying we should all be geographically close to each other.
Ah gotcha. You said you're in the UK? I often think of repatriating to Europe because of heritage. I can't stand how american values are deracinated. We have short roots to our race, and people are quick to miscegenation here.
Idk I just want my kids to grow up in a European world among their own kind. The amerimutt meme is real and most US whites have already given up their identity in favor of making money and using immigrant labor. Idk maybe things are just as bad in Europe but I have to imagine people have a bit more connection to their heritage there.
I think this is possibly a 'grass is always greener' situation. In my experience, it is Americans who are much more aware of the racial question because they have had to deal with it for hundreds of years. It's difficult for me to overstate just how oblivious your average middle class English person is to the displacement that is going on around them. And no, most of them are not more connected to their heritage, because they subsist on a steady diet of imported American trash culture. For someone who can see the writing on the wall, it feels incredibly isolating.
It breaks my heart to see my local city, which is over 1500 years old, become browner every year. I have no such preconceptions about America, and because it's a much younger country, the damage doesn't hurt me as much, you know? I can face it more practically. More is possible to shore yourself up against it. Maybe that's a personal failing of mine.
I do think it is essential for Americans to visit Europe, however, and understand where they came from. So many Americans don't seem to understand that the US is, for all intents and purposes, a European country, built upon European ideals by European people, just on a different continent. That was something my wife, who is American, has come to realise by living here for a few years. It will enable her to go back to America and understand it more holistically.
You left out the most essential thing. We are much harder to "replace" because we are armed to the teeth. Europe wouldn't be nearly as brazen about replacing their population if the spineless cucks hadn't all decided to disarm themselves.
That is indeed very useful, and I also plan on arming myself very well when I get over there, but the last 50 years has thrown into question the value of guns as a political deterrent as such.
Americans have always been very well armed, but the speed of demographic change since 1965 has been lightning quick, and guns don't seem to have done much, if anything, to resist that.
I think that the vast space in America has done a lot to hide the change from most people, and perhaps if it had been more densely populated, like Europe, it would have been obvious enough that they wouldn't have been able to do it quietly like they did.
There may come a time when guns play their part in righting the wrongs that have been done to America, but looking at the broad brushstrokes of metapolitics, I don't think the presence or absence of an armed populace has much to do with whether or not demographics change one way or the other.
No, but America didn't have Australia's interstate COVID checkpoints and concentration camps, so I think the net effect of guns isn't anywhere near zero, even though I agree with your gun-fudd retards point.
They are brazenly doing it here in the USA. If you don't have the will to fight, all the weapons in the world won't do you any good. We have ceded the pen to our enemies, and as you've no doubt heard, the pen is mightier than the sword.
I haven't moved yet, but I am in the process of leaving for the US. It's not just political reasons which are pushing me to move; I also have various financial and family opportunities over there which I could never have here.
Well I figured that was pretty much implied. It's not by my own choice that I am still here, still waiting on my visa to be processed. 1 year and counting so far!
I don't suggest this lightly, because I know from personal experience how difficult it is to uproot and move your whole life elsewhere, but you should give serious thought to leaving. I made that decision due to a variety of factors in the UK that are conspiring to push me out. If I lived in Canada, I would have even less hesitation. If you have children or family that rely on you, I know that is a burdensome prospect, so I wouldn't blame you for deciding not to.
It seems to me that we--talking broadly about dissidents here--stand a better chance at resisting whatever they have in mind for us if we're at least broadly in the same geographic area. I don't believe the US is in any better of a demographic state in the long run, but it is easier there to do two essential things:
Just those two things alone make it a better place for me at least. The housing situation in the UK is complete madness for young families, but from what I've heard about Canada, it's even worse over there.
Detaching from society won't help. They won't leave us alone. Detaching only makes you more isolated and vulnerable. Forming communities of like minded people is the only answer.
The issue in the USA is people have enough money and their guns to go hide away somewhere and pretend like this won't affect them. South African whites were the same, and now their farmers and being killed off one by one. The only place with a future for whites there is orania and other ethnic enclaves.
Perhaps I didn't clarify what I meant.
I'm not suggesting we all go off-grid in our own little compounds because then we'd all just get Ruby Ridge'd separately. I'm suggesting we detach from the system together, and form parallel societies. That's why I'm saying we should all be geographically close to each other.
Ah gotcha. You said you're in the UK? I often think of repatriating to Europe because of heritage. I can't stand how american values are deracinated. We have short roots to our race, and people are quick to miscegenation here.
Idk I just want my kids to grow up in a European world among their own kind. The amerimutt meme is real and most US whites have already given up their identity in favor of making money and using immigrant labor. Idk maybe things are just as bad in Europe but I have to imagine people have a bit more connection to their heritage there.
I think this is possibly a 'grass is always greener' situation. In my experience, it is Americans who are much more aware of the racial question because they have had to deal with it for hundreds of years. It's difficult for me to overstate just how oblivious your average middle class English person is to the displacement that is going on around them. And no, most of them are not more connected to their heritage, because they subsist on a steady diet of imported American trash culture. For someone who can see the writing on the wall, it feels incredibly isolating.
It breaks my heart to see my local city, which is over 1500 years old, become browner every year. I have no such preconceptions about America, and because it's a much younger country, the damage doesn't hurt me as much, you know? I can face it more practically. More is possible to shore yourself up against it. Maybe that's a personal failing of mine.
I do think it is essential for Americans to visit Europe, however, and understand where they came from. So many Americans don't seem to understand that the US is, for all intents and purposes, a European country, built upon European ideals by European people, just on a different continent. That was something my wife, who is American, has come to realise by living here for a few years. It will enable her to go back to America and understand it more holistically.
I hear good things about Hungary. Poland seems to have potential, too. There would be a language barrier, though.
People love to hold up Orania as an example, but it's a farming community of less than 3k Whites surrounded by 40-50 million prawns.
Sounds like winning odds if the whites understand the game.
You left out the most essential thing. We are much harder to "replace" because we are armed to the teeth. Europe wouldn't be nearly as brazen about replacing their population if the spineless cucks hadn't all decided to disarm themselves.
That is indeed very useful, and I also plan on arming myself very well when I get over there, but the last 50 years has thrown into question the value of guns as a political deterrent as such.
Americans have always been very well armed, but the speed of demographic change since 1965 has been lightning quick, and guns don't seem to have done much, if anything, to resist that.
I think that the vast space in America has done a lot to hide the change from most people, and perhaps if it had been more densely populated, like Europe, it would have been obvious enough that they wouldn't have been able to do it quietly like they did.
There may come a time when guns play their part in righting the wrongs that have been done to America, but looking at the broad brushstrokes of metapolitics, I don't think the presence or absence of an armed populace has much to do with whether or not demographics change one way or the other.
No, but America didn't have Australia's interstate COVID checkpoints and concentration camps, so I think the net effect of guns isn't anywhere near zero, even though I agree with your gun-fudd retards point.
They are brazenly doing it here in the USA. If you don't have the will to fight, all the weapons in the world won't do you any good. We have ceded the pen to our enemies, and as you've no doubt heard, the pen is mightier than the sword.
Which country did you move to?
I haven't moved yet, but I am in the process of leaving for the US. It's not just political reasons which are pushing me to move; I also have various financial and family opportunities over there which I could never have here.
And join a group that loves you like NOVA
What's NOVA?
Well I figured that was pretty much implied. It's not by my own choice that I am still here, still waiting on my visa to be processed. 1 year and counting so far!