From Wikipedia in Spanish:
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gringo
"MexicoIn Mexico, since the late 19th century, the use of "gringo" has been restricted to the American, often, but not always, in a derogatory or displeasure way. The term is mentioned in its sense of incomprehensible language from the 19th century (1789) and until the 1830s, but also to indicate to foreign troops, at first, coming from Spain in the second half of the nineteenth century.[15] A text published in Mexico, but written by a Spanish, denigrates a Sonoran Mexican for speaking "gringo," in reference to the indigenous language. After the War with the United States, gringo begins to be used for the citizens of that country, with expressions such as "Cringo American" or simply "gringo," witnessed as of popular use in Tepetitlán in 1849.[17] Since then, and given the permanent contact between the two countries, gringo went on to designate exclusively the American[35] and became the most widely used gentleman in the country after Mexican.[15]"
Mexico is far from as homogeneous as you make it out to be.
The cartels, for all the harm they do in the USA, tend to be protective of foreigners, as they bring money into the country. They've been known to make examples of unorganized criminals who kidnap or steal from visitors.
They do generally hate gringos however. That's OK, I am no gringo. I am of a latin culture, extremely compatible with the Mexican way of life. I am also fluent in Spanish, which instantly disqualifies me as a gringo.
They're not anti-white, they consider themselves white, as opposed to the tribes of indigenous. They despise GRINGOS, which are English speakers. That's normal too, given how incompatible the Anglo-Saxon culture is with the Latin ones.
In most circumstances I'd say yes but I'm really going to Mexico in order to integrate into their society, along with my wife. The fewer homies there are around me, the better.
The worst thing to do is create a neighborhood that lends itself too well as a target for reprisals if things get expensive over there.
Plus, I'm going to a place where there are extremely few if any people from up North, so you have to be fluent. And if you're fluent, you might as well pick any place that fits what you look for. My target area is far from the ocean, for example.
10,000% agree. Endure or leave, those are the two options. Or maybe form a friends-only (white) community somewhere in the vast uninhabited territories up North, but personally I am too old and sick for that.
So it's emigration for me.
That's where I've lived pretty much all my life, in French unlike the disgusting Anglos who live here and refuse to learn the language.
I'm leaving. Mexico, here I come! I have a month-long stay planned for this summer in my target area, and if that works out well, I sell the house, move, and with those funds, buy two houses in a privada, rent one, keep it for family and friends once in a while, and yeah, life without communism or invasion.
It is VERY MUCH happening!
My "woo" is how the laws of thermodynamics remain fully respected and how somebody can become obese without overeating once.
It is an oversimplification. If your body prioritizes the maintenance of fatty tissue from the 201th calorie you eat each day, and eating less than 200 means death, how do you lose it?
CAN YOU DO ARITHMETIC? Or are you holding on for dear life to the CIA's brainwashing?
Listen, I used to believe the same BS you do. I also used to have a spectacular physique as a bodybuilder. I kept wondering why fatties didn't fix themselves.
And then I got health issues and now I'm a fatty.
Your demented beliefs would have you assume that from being a high level athlete, I have become lazy for no reason, and also that I went from dietary perfection, to gorging on shit food all day, just to look at the mirror and see a revolting fatty.
What can I tell you? YOU ARE WRONG.
True and false. This is a humongous oversimplification.<
Although CICO was the rule, it is now the exception. What changed? Most people became unhealthy, and in imperfectly healthy people, that "rule" ceases to apply. Here's how:
Anybody with gut disbiosis, leaky gut, gluten intolerance, IBS, or SIBO (small intestine bacterial overgrowth) - to name only those - has a problem with the CREATION of toxins from the very food that one eats - even the purest of organic/natural/free range/pasture-raised/grassfed/you name it - foods.
These toxins eventually overwhelm the liver, who can't process them. Then the body has no choice: either 1) let the poisons destroy the vital organs, or 2) accumulate said poisons for later processing. There's only one place to store toxins where they won't damage vital organs: fatty tissue.
Obviously #2 is preferrable, so the priority assigned to the maintenance of fatty tissue goes from "excess calories once every little maintenance and repair detail is taken care of" to "X calories immediately after beating the heart, exchanging oxygen and running the most critical processes of the vital organs".
Say you need 200 calories for beating the heart, exchanging oxygen and running the most critical processes of the vital organs. Then in that second equation, the 201th calorie goes to fat. Checkmate healthy weight.
Are we learning yet.
REMEMBER: The CIA's mission is to ensure that EVERYTHING PEOPLE BELIEVE IS FALSE.
It's much much more subtle than that. Take sucralose for example, a beautiful and fantastic zero-calorie sweetener that can help you lose weight.
Amirite?
Except its consumption will change the gut microbiome, eventually resulting in disbiosis, leaky gut, gluten intolerance, IBS, and SIBO.
Each of these conditions results in the CREATION of toxins from the very food that one eats - even the purest of organic/natural/free range/pasture-raised/grassfed/you name it - foods.
These toxins eventually overwhelm the liver, who can't process them. Then the body has no choice: either 1) let the poisons destroy the vital organs, or 2) accumulate said poisons for later processing. There's only one place to store toxins where they won't damage vital organs: fatty tissue.
Obviously #2 is preferrable, so the priority assigned to the maintenance of fatty tissue goes from "excess calories once every little maintenance and repair detail is taken care of" to "X calories immediately after beating the heart, exchanging oxygen and running the most critical processes of the vital organs".
Say you need 200 calories for beating the heart, exchanging oxygen and running the most critical processes of the vital organs. Then in that second equation, the 201th calorie goes to fat. Checkmate healthy weight.
I don't. It all depends what you need. There are many nice spots in Mexico. I am fluent in Spanish, so that's a major hurdle I don't have that many do.
I would recommend looking at crime stats and which states to avoid, there are quite a few, and among those that remain, which one(s) have what you need: the climate you want, services, etc.
For example, there are cities and towns where there are a lot of English-speaking expats, even full "privadas" (gated neighborhoods that aren't necessarily expensive to live in) of American & Canadian expats, with full services in English nearby.
I have very limited mobility, so that's another factor that somebody else wouldn't have. My choice isn't going to be anybody else's choice and frankly, I don't want to mention the area on here or anywhere else, because I don't want expats near me.
The reason is that in some places, expats come with their money and bid up prices, out-competing Mexicans on their own territory, on top of changing the local cuisine ("That's too spicy, tone it down or we're not coming back!") and having signs and menus in English, thereby driving up resentment. In Mexico city for example, they have graffitis that say "GRINGO GO HOME". Yup.
But there are many places with limited but extant expat populations which may suit you well. On top of that, quite a few conservative Americans who fled the USA from the Biden terror regime are looking to get back, opening up nice housing possibilities in expat neighborhoods, if you don't speak the language.
So anyway, I suggest that among your criteria you may have a relatively small expat population and not a place where they've basically made life unlivable for Mexicans.
And yeah, Uruguay is fairly white, it's gotta be on the globalists' hit list.
As a Québécois living on the outskirts of Montréal, I have been studying this matter intensely for a good bit.
In the end we had two main options: Uruguay or Mexico. We ended up choosing Mexico because it is so much closer, and we know we like it there.
We're going on an exploratory trip soon to make sure we are comfortable with our area of choice, and then we come back, sell everything, and move with the clothes on our backs and a piece of luggage or two each.
We run a small publishing business, all we'll need is a nice Xerox printer and we're up and running again.
Soon, it won't matter. Do we believe Trump thinks the USA can be competitive with China thanks to tariffs? If so, they need to be in the thousands of percent.
NO.
Heard about the Stargate initiative, where they'll put up $ 500 billion for AI R&D? Yeah, that's the future USA manufacturing base. ROBOTS can compete with China.
I think you, as well as many many others, confuse authoritarianism with fascism.
Rome was fascist. The USA was founded as a fascist state.
Fascism is a word that has been 1984'd so hard over the last 80 years, it's fucking insane.
Who else thinks Israhell is about to get nuked?