They don't even need to. They just selectively enforce laws (triage) and pretty soon it gets out among the criminal element that cops don't hassle you for attacking Whites.
Revolutions only start when those in charge make living under the current conditions untenable. Basically life has to be so shitty that you're willing to risk getting killed or going to jail for the rest of your life on the mere chance that things get better.
Sounds like the police in England are working overtime to get everyone to that where they feel that way.
Generations of people raised with the belief that violence is always the wrong approach are making it harder to reach that point, not to mention having nearly half of the population openly supporting the tyranny. However, this is certainly an interesting social experiment to see how far they need to push to reach the breaking point of a majority of people.
Reminds me of when Ceausescu executed the wrong guy for a serial killer, and then proceeded to bury the evidence of the serial killers ongoing rampage for like 5 years until he ceased.
The UK is the Stanfield prison experiment. The behaviour of these cops is basic bottom-tier power tripping. Go for the easy marks and the easy publicity, not the solutions to the real problems.
It's also a result of not having a Constitution as ironclad as the US' is that is composed mostly of negative rights. That's why we had to make a fucking Constitution, because we knew the government would try to do shit like this.
There's no "The government SHALL NOT" in their own laws, and their parliament can easily change what is in their "constitution" to do whatever the fuck they want, and their threshold is lower than ours.
I don't think any other country in the WORLD has a Constitution that puts chains on the government from abusing its power. Yes, we know, the current administration is doing that, but just imagine, our government would become as bad as the UK, German, or French governments if we DIDN'T have those chains in place.
I will never relocate to a country outside the US because we are a unique nation that actually has a document that limits government from expanding at a rapid pace and adamantly protects free speech. Having to interact with people from various countries I've learned many people in other countries really don't have the kind of protections that we have despite being "first world".
Repeating how much of a joke the UK police are that won't be long before they steal candy from babies because the baby was scared of the stranger who happens to not be White like parents..
Looting from the people and places you have conquered is a bit different from stealing from your own populace, though both are theft in one form or another.
I might be getting confused with another European country but I think it was Britain where some amateur archaeologist finds something like gold coins, jewelry etc but when they go to announce what they find they have it seized from them and only get a placard next to it in a museum, no monetary reward or the option to sell it to a private collector.
I mean, when I can call the British empire 'the most infamous international drug cartel and grandiose thieves as they'd display what they stolen' and that isn't leftist hyperbole but historical fact, they have a point to shoot at the redcoats...
Though credit where credit is due, they did have a style about it since a lot of those former colonies VOLUNTARILY joined the commonwealth after, like inviting the guy that robbed you to Sunday lunch.
The largest landowner in the world currently is King Charles III of England. How much land does the Royal Family own? He and the British Royal Family own more than 6,600,000,000 acres of land around the world. They technically own many territories around the globe, amounting to 1/6 of the surface of the planet. The family owns land in the United Kingdom, Canada, and beyond.
Second on the list is the Catholic Church. Their 177 million acres are located throughout the world and include churches, schools, and farms. They also own many religious landmarks like the Scala Sancta and the Apostolic Palace as well as farmland.
In third are the Inuit people of Nunavut in Canada. According to the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement Act of 1993, the government of Canada and the government of the Northwest Territories granted the Inuit people ownership of a separate territory called Nunavut, which is about 87 million acres in size. It was (and still is) the largest land claim settlement in the history of Canada.
So stop bitching at white people about stolen artifacts, and address the owners, the royal family and the church.
Seesh.
Im tired of being told I need to feel guilty for my ancestors, when my ancestors never owned slaves or killed/exploited people for their shit.
Its a book scan so the letters are garbled a bit but it is free.
A child of God at his worst, hath no true, or real evil upon him, but only the appearance, or outside of the same. A wicked man at his best, hath nothing but that which seemeth to be good, and is (indeed) evil.
That the soule of a childe of God is safe, in the worst estate he can be in, in this life; but a wicked mans soule is in most danger when his estate is at best.
These were some big ideas for the 1600's. This was when the church was the sole messenger of god and interpreting gods will on your own was considered blasphemy.
What about Daniel Wing who wasnt a quaker himself, but refused to persecute them.
In Bowden’s History of the Society of Friends in America, it is mentioned that “two English Friends, named Christopher Holden and John Copeland came to Sandwhich on the 20th of the 6th month” of 1657[31] and there they found friends of toleration and resisters of an oppressive law in Daniel Wing, the son of John Wing and Deborah Bachiler, and grandson of Stephen Bachiler. Daniel Wing and his brother Stephen Wing and others resisted an oppressive law in the town of Sandwhich which publicly punished men and women by whipping, for “meetings at private houses, for encouraging others in holding meetings, for entertaining the preachers and for the unworthy speeches”. By 1658, Daniel Wing, with others who acted with him, became active converts and there were 18 families who recorded their names in the documents of the society. Writers of 1658-1660 said “We have two strong places in this land, the one at Newport and the other at Sandwhich; almost the whole town of Sandwhich is adhering towards them” and the records of the Monthly Meetings of Friends show that the Sandwhich Monthly Meeting was the first established in America.[32]
What about asa wing who spent his life advocating for the end of slavery and was even part of the underground rail road.
For more than 10 years, until his death in 1854, Wing opened his Mexico(in new york state) home to slaves trying to escape bondage through the Underground Railroad.
As Wing grew increasingly ill, he kept a diary at his bedside. "There's so little that's in writing, " Dix said. "But his diary is more than what we have for a lot of people." He wrote about the families and lone fugitives he hid in his one-story, colonial-style home at 3392 State Route 69.
One such family was the Thompsons, a couple with five daughters who were escaping to Canada. They arrived at Wing's home on Christmas Eve 1850. After two weeks of searching for a trusted boat captain, the family was taken across Lake Ontario, but it is believed they drowned before they reached freedom, said Mexico historian Bonnie Shumway.
Shortly afterward, on March 8, 1854, Wing died of unknown causes. Frederick Douglass, a former slave and well-known abolitionist who was a close friend, delivered the eulogy at his funeral.
"He poured out his life for the perishing slave, pleading for him with an eloquence and earnestness which could scarcely have been more direct, pathetic and touching, had his own wife and children been on the auction block, " Douglass said at the time of Wing's death.
This is what our leaders want me to be ashamed of?
I guess we should just be authoritarian like china or india with their caste system.
Nope I better not be proud of anything, thats fucking white pride.
400 years of freedom in my blood, and I feel it.
Its killing me living in a crown country shit hole like canada. Literally, they refuse to give me medical help.
takes a certain kinda stupid to let yourself get so demoralized by the enemy you start talking like them, doesn't it?
go have some tea. then, if you're White, consider just how many more braincells you have than a muzzie, and how many you could drop if you put your mind to it.
Scrolling her twatter feed makes me think this is a thirst trap account. If you're inclined to simp after a randomly selected picture just be careful, Brits.
In the past 2 weeks I started seeing this term "thirst" trap or post. Genuine question, what is this?
New terms come out monthly now. Can't even keep up.
In this case it's probably more of a LEO honeypot. I suspect it isn't a 19 year old hottie that's answering all the affection seeking sympathizers that are feverishly DMing the account.
More likely a bored constable that's making a list and checking it twice.
The term "thirst trap" has been around for a while, and I'd venture to guess it emerged during the social media boom. It's a general term for photos that are revealing and/or provocative. The implication is that these photos bait "thirsty", some sort of zoomer phrase meaning "horny", men into commenting on them.
BTW, part of the reason why zoomers and gen alpha are becoming retarded is that a lot of terms zoomers use are copy-pasta'd from black slang/eubonics/African-American Vernacular English (it's a retarded academic and politically correct term to mean nigga language).
What happens is that blacks on Twiter/TikTok use a bunch of words as slang to mean certain mundane shit since they even type in eubonics, a lot of which that has been around in their "community" for years, if not decades, but easily impressionable and smoothbrained zoomers/gen alpha kids pick it up. It used to be Twitter, but now with the current generation it's from TikTok, then it goes from TikTok, filters back to Twitter, then spreads to other platforms. I fucking hate it as well.
There's a bunch of words you probably have heard being used purely because of this.
Netflix and chill - Inviting someone over/going to someone's place to eventually have sex with them
Thirsty - desperate for sex
Rizz - Charisma/having a swagger that makes the other party want to be with you
let them cook - Don't interrupt them while they're doing a good/smart/awesome thing.
cooked - They're done for, finished. No longer relevant to the conversation and/or lost their groove.
vibing - Literally just "chilling". Or they find something they're listening to pleasant to have playing.
Take note, full blown eubonics is near fucking impossible to understand when in written form. But a lot of the more easier to "understand" concepts, like what I wrote above, ended up being adopted by non-basketball-American zoomers and gen alphas.
The next generation are literally getting fucking dumber because they're listening to what black people are saying for slang. It's scary as hell.
If you see a young account with tits on the profile (attractive looking white girl) and they appear to look like they're in the instagram/onlyfans whore age and they're spouting based points, be mindful that it may be a catfish.
Unless they've done actual streams or there's some recording of their face IRL through some video content made (i.e. like Lauren Chen before the glowies got to her) and that they have a LONG history of posting based stuff, don't engage.
There's some "based" women out there but some of them are kinda ex-leftist types who still hold a lot of views that the manosphere and a lot of traditional conservative types would find undesirable, so they still have that mentality that it's perfectly ok to exploit their sexuality to get clicks/views. If titties scare you and/or you're a tradcon/white ethnonationalist type who wants women to not be whores online and be stay at home moms, these type of women may piss you off.
Some of the younger women that the Daily Wire hires are like that. They're not slutting it up but you know a bunch of thirsty younger right wing guys are signing up just because it's a semi-pretty face on the screen.
The problem now is that the current group that has organized to fight the left is composed of a bunch of groups with agendas that conflict with each other. The leftist ideology is so destructive and fucked up that all these moderate and right wing groups that would normally be bickering with each other have formed a loose coalition to stop them.
So that's how you end up running into shit like thirst traps and actual grifters who "use" the loose alliance of ideological allies to milk money/profit from it. If the culture war ever calms down, at some point the separate groups will probably split up and start bickering with each other again.
It's funny you say that because the US sanctions other countries at the drop of a hat, usually with some "human rights" justification, but they won't do anything about this. Imagine that.
These regimes will become increasingly authoritarian as the problems with their policies become more and more obvious.
Antifa are jackboots they unleash to target people like the woman in the OP in cases when the government is too shackled to do it.
They don't even need to. They just selectively enforce laws (triage) and pretty soon it gets out among the criminal element that cops don't hassle you for attacking Whites.
Revolutions only start when those in charge make living under the current conditions untenable. Basically life has to be so shitty that you're willing to risk getting killed or going to jail for the rest of your life on the mere chance that things get better.
Sounds like the police in England are working overtime to get everyone to that where they feel that way.
Generations of people raised with the belief that violence is always the wrong approach are making it harder to reach that point, not to mention having nearly half of the population openly supporting the tyranny. However, this is certainly an interesting social experiment to see how far they need to push to reach the breaking point of a majority of people.
I guarantee if the speech police started going door to door in the US people would just let them.
Some won't though, and that scares them just enough to keep them at bay.
The Second Amendment defends the First.
At least people are stubborn about letting the government take them away.
After those "right wing extremists" get blown up with drones and the panicking sheep demand further authoritarianism from Washington, then what?
Then you're at a different bridge to cross.
These regimes bitch so much about Russia but why do they keep copying what Russia and China do?
Reminds me of when Ceausescu executed the wrong guy for a serial killer, and then proceeded to bury the evidence of the serial killers ongoing rampage for like 5 years until he ceased.
Makes you wonder if Brits are starting to realize why the gentry class in the colonies starting shooting red coats...
The UK is the Stanfield prison experiment. The behaviour of these cops is basic bottom-tier power tripping. Go for the easy marks and the easy publicity, not the solutions to the real problems.
It's also a result of not having a Constitution as ironclad as the US' is that is composed mostly of negative rights. That's why we had to make a fucking Constitution, because we knew the government would try to do shit like this.
There's no "The government SHALL NOT" in their own laws, and their parliament can easily change what is in their "constitution" to do whatever the fuck they want, and their threshold is lower than ours.
I don't think any other country in the WORLD has a Constitution that puts chains on the government from abusing its power. Yes, we know, the current administration is doing that, but just imagine, our government would become as bad as the UK, German, or French governments if we DIDN'T have those chains in place.
I will never relocate to a country outside the US because we are a unique nation that actually has a document that limits government from expanding at a rapid pace and adamantly protects free speech. Having to interact with people from various countries I've learned many people in other countries really don't have the kind of protections that we have despite being "first world".
That's not how you spell "Australia"
Repeating how much of a joke the UK police are that won't be long before they steal candy from babies because the baby was scared of the stranger who happens to not be White like parents..
They took a sword? How is legal for them to steal shit?
They didn't give her a receipt, so not.
Without the receipt she can't even get the sword back. They'll stand there and tell her they don't have it.
Even if she had committed a murder, they'd have to give her a receipt.
They literally just broke into her house, threatened her, and stole her shit.
Stares at you intensely while pointing at the British museum...
They have precedent..
Looting from the people and places you have conquered is a bit different from stealing from your own populace, though both are theft in one form or another.
Some of the stuff in the museums wasn't JUST looted off the natives in other countries...
Alright. Would you please provide a specific example of an artifact or an incident that further illustrates your point?
I might be getting confused with another European country but I think it was Britain where some amateur archaeologist finds something like gold coins, jewelry etc but when they go to announce what they find they have it seized from them and only get a placard next to it in a museum, no monetary reward or the option to sell it to a private collector.
That does seem a bit fucked, and it does show precedent if it is the British museums acting in this way.
I appreciate the love for Britain that the British have.
But there's a reason why people shot at you.
I mean, when I can call the British empire 'the most infamous international drug cartel and grandiose thieves as they'd display what they stolen' and that isn't leftist hyperbole but historical fact, they have a point to shoot at the redcoats...
Though credit where credit is due, they did have a style about it since a lot of those former colonies VOLUNTARILY joined the commonwealth after, like inviting the guy that robbed you to Sunday lunch.
They were the best of a bad system. Even from countries that shouldn't be bad, like Netherlands, France, and Portugal, the atrocities are shocking.
Portugal laughing in genocides
French system resulted in the Vietnam war
Spain...well their shit just getting stolen by 'privateers' and then got bodied by America, less bad than South American rulers though
Overall, Brits weren't the worst, I'd say the worst thing they did was not federalise the empire so that de colonisation never happened.
They have plenty of massacres under their belt that makes them bad.
Frances conquest and occupation of Algeria was appalling.
TFW you suspend the execution of several SS commanders just so they can teach you how to do the things in the name of oppressing Algeria
I wouldnt confuse the royal family with the average citizen either.
The royal family is the largest land owner on the planet.
Followed by the catholic church apparently.
https://www.madisontrust.com/information-center/visualizations/worlds-largest-landowners/
So stop bitching at white people about stolen artifacts, and address the owners, the royal family and the church.
Seesh.
Im tired of being told I need to feel guilty for my ancestors, when my ancestors never owned slaves or killed/exploited people for their shit.
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/A15580.0001.001?view=toc
Its a book scan so the letters are garbled a bit but it is free.
These were some big ideas for the 1600's. This was when the church was the sole messenger of god and interpreting gods will on your own was considered blasphemy.
What about Daniel Wing who wasnt a quaker himself, but refused to persecute them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Quakers
What about asa wing who spent his life advocating for the end of slavery and was even part of the underground rail road.
This is what our leaders want me to be ashamed of?
I guess we should just be authoritarian like china or india with their caste system.
Nope I better not be proud of anything, thats fucking white pride.
400 years of freedom in my blood, and I feel it.
Its killing me living in a crown country shit hole like canada. Literally, they refuse to give me medical help.
Nowhere did I say you have to be ASHAMED for the items the British ancestors...aquired over the years
I'm just saying, the British have a history of Locating and Obtaining Objects of Tradition.
Qualified Immunity and Civil Asset Forfeiture would have entered the chat, but they're too busy laughing,
Civil Asset Forfeiture would require a charge against the sword.
They didn't give her a receipt, so there's not document trail that they took it.
It's no different from pocketing money.
Those sound like American excuses to steal private property which undermines the 4th.
Who's going to stop them?
They're not knife about it either.
Looks like she didn't have a loisense to say dem fings, gov.
But seriously, this is what they'll do rather than go after the actual crime. That's pathetic.
The UK is lost....
Do you understand how history works and that time keeps moving forward?
We are not looking at a 'Game Over' screen pal.
Yes but the future is brown and Muslim. That’s a game over screen if there ever was one.
takes a certain kinda stupid to let yourself get so demoralized by the enemy you start talking like them, doesn't it?
go have some tea. then, if you're White, consider just how many more braincells you have than a muzzie, and how many you could drop if you put your mind to it.
Scrolling her twatter feed makes me think this is a thirst trap account. If you're inclined to simp after a randomly selected picture just be careful, Brits.
In the past 2 weeks I started seeing this term "thirst" trap or post. Genuine question, what is this? New terms come out monthly now. Can't even keep up.
I've seen that term years ago. I even used it here.
https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction2/p/17t1MdqIGz/the-gateway-pundit-enlists-briti/c
It is trying to either farm engagement or promote an agenda by use of sex appeal.
In this case it's probably more of a LEO honeypot. I suspect it isn't a 19 year old hottie that's answering all the affection seeking sympathizers that are feverishly DMing the account.
More likely a bored constable that's making a list and checking it twice.
Honey pots are indeed another use.
I think is old foogies call them "Honeypots"
The term "thirst trap" has been around for a while, and I'd venture to guess it emerged during the social media boom. It's a general term for photos that are revealing and/or provocative. The implication is that these photos bait "thirsty", some sort of zoomer phrase meaning "horny", men into commenting on them.
BTW, part of the reason why zoomers and gen alpha are becoming retarded is that a lot of terms zoomers use are copy-pasta'd from black slang/eubonics/African-American Vernacular English (it's a retarded academic and politically correct term to mean nigga language).
What happens is that blacks on Twiter/TikTok use a bunch of words as slang to mean certain mundane shit since they even type in eubonics, a lot of which that has been around in their "community" for years, if not decades, but easily impressionable and smoothbrained zoomers/gen alpha kids pick it up. It used to be Twitter, but now with the current generation it's from TikTok, then it goes from TikTok, filters back to Twitter, then spreads to other platforms. I fucking hate it as well.
There's a bunch of words you probably have heard being used purely because of this.
Netflix and chill - Inviting someone over/going to someone's place to eventually have sex with them
Thirsty - desperate for sex
Rizz - Charisma/having a swagger that makes the other party want to be with you
let them cook - Don't interrupt them while they're doing a good/smart/awesome thing.
cooked - They're done for, finished. No longer relevant to the conversation and/or lost their groove.
vibing - Literally just "chilling". Or they find something they're listening to pleasant to have playing.
Take note, full blown eubonics is near fucking impossible to understand when in written form. But a lot of the more easier to "understand" concepts, like what I wrote above, ended up being adopted by non-basketball-American zoomers and gen alphas.
The next generation are literally getting fucking dumber because they're listening to what black people are saying for slang. It's scary as hell.
If you see a young account with tits on the profile (attractive looking white girl) and they appear to look like they're in the instagram/onlyfans whore age and they're spouting based points, be mindful that it may be a catfish.
Unless they've done actual streams or there's some recording of their face IRL through some video content made (i.e. like Lauren Chen before the glowies got to her) and that they have a LONG history of posting based stuff, don't engage.
There's some "based" women out there but some of them are kinda ex-leftist types who still hold a lot of views that the manosphere and a lot of traditional conservative types would find undesirable, so they still have that mentality that it's perfectly ok to exploit their sexuality to get clicks/views. If titties scare you and/or you're a tradcon/white ethnonationalist type who wants women to not be whores online and be stay at home moms, these type of women may piss you off.
Some of the younger women that the Daily Wire hires are like that. They're not slutting it up but you know a bunch of thirsty younger right wing guys are signing up just because it's a semi-pretty face on the screen.
The problem now is that the current group that has organized to fight the left is composed of a bunch of groups with agendas that conflict with each other. The leftist ideology is so destructive and fucked up that all these moderate and right wing groups that would normally be bickering with each other have formed a loose coalition to stop them.
So that's how you end up running into shit like thirst traps and actual grifters who "use" the loose alliance of ideological allies to milk money/profit from it. If the culture war ever calms down, at some point the separate groups will probably split up and start bickering with each other again.
Maybe the UK should have just let Germany roll over them during WWII.
They would still be under the boot, but at least they would be pajeet and nigger free.
England is so gay.
I can already envision little Timmy pool clenching his teeth and paraphrasing Orwell when he learns about this.
People type with their fingers, not their tongues, faggot Brit pigs.
like pottery, the UK's lack of respect for the right to keep and bear arms inevitably lead to the UK's lack of respect for the right to free speech.
These are the children of the weaklings to cowardly to fight the communists.
We need to boycott the UK more than boycott Russia.
It's funny you say that because the US sanctions other countries at the drop of a hat, usually with some "human rights" justification, but they won't do anything about this. Imagine that.
Wow, it's like reddit. LOL.
Liberals: freedom is the most important. Progressives: freedom is not important.
They literally broke into her house, threatened her, and stole her shit.
I get why one of the LotusEaters' hosts was worried this was a police impersonation & a home invasion.
It's because it is a home invasion.
England was never free and never will be. It's why you fucking retards are supposed to legally immigrate to the USA and help us protect liberty here
I honestly wasn't aware the Brits had rights.
all creatures on this Earth have rights. the Redcoats just don't respect them.