AI generated nudes of Taylor Swift circulate online
(archive.is)
Comments (49)
sorted by:
People have been shopping heads onto nudes forever
Yeah but for some reason Swift is literally capable of shaping political and cultural discourse based on every inane thing she says.
Taylor Swift is an innovation of social media marketing. Whoever plotted out her native advertising and algorithmic targeting was very successful. I'm not even being sarcastic... there is no reason a chick who has been a household name since Obama's first term enjoyed an organic 10x boost in reach all of a sudden.
That much was obvious to anyone when she went from a slowly fading star to suddenly being THE FACE of every gossip mag and the entire NFL, with literally every single aspect of media posting about her being there and her relationship.
Which is another reason why I'm absolutely certain she is being used to manipulate the masses during an election year.
She was famously apolitical for a long time. That changed when she told her whore fans to vote Democrat in the 2018 midterms. I'm sure some of it is the regime rewarding her for that.
It was 100% astroturfed. I saw this first hand in my immediate circle. Several women, whose relative intelligence I had previously respected, became retarded teenage fangirls overnight.
These are women I have known for decades, who had never betrayed even the slightest interest in Swift until the very recent “organic zeitgeist”. Suddenly they needed to fly across the country just to see the only Taylor Swift shows for which they could score (massively overpriced) tickets.
These are not rich women who should be spending thousands on one concert night - and they never had before now. So this was a phenomenon that could not be explained by some hidden love of Swift’s music. The only explanation that fits is social contagion.
It’s a depressing realization. The elites can manufacture insane behavior on an industrial scale because our society is now dominated by the women and feminized men who prefer comfortable consensus over freedom or critical thinking.
That would be her dad, who is a marketing exec with a couple of the big labels. Notice how quickly she went from 0 to everywhere to begin with?
They have, but AI can "blend" it all together so it looks real. It takes things to the next level. Deepfakes are an extreme example of this.
You can do it much easier with basically no artistic or technical skill now, you don't have to be able to use Photoshop at all.
inb4 the retard chorus calls for AI to be locked down so it can only be used for approved purposes. The day when any 16 year old coomer can generate custom porn starring whoever he wants isn't far off.
It’s already locked down and frightening- the largest AI models are completely controlled by microsoft and google.
Literally the most abusive and indoctrinated companies in existence.
I dunno, there's a couple rogue models out there that I've gotten to say "nigger". That stranglehold won't last forever.
I think that point was already passed several months ago. The only thing that will change is quality and how accessible the tech is, and probably soon video instead of stills.
This is absolutely a planted controversy to get people on board with banning AI. Like, they have been failing in every way to turn people against it and the ability for people to use it against the Powers that Be are way too wide to be this widely available.
So they will use this modern day Messiah level figure to cry about it, influencing her massive flock of girls (who will then influence the men in thier life) to turn on it and giving a lot more popular support to curbing AI.
From my understanding, the shackling and corporatization of AI (specifically ChatGPT) is making them dumber.
Only the versions available to us will be constrained. If not by literal forced retardation, then by legal means.
The only reason why they haven't made it completely illegal is because the backlash is still a little too strong. Like the random times they try to arrest people for memes and such, which is always them testing the waters for legislating even being allowed to mock them.
Why would anyone want to see a 30 something beanpole naked?
Compare to the average 30-something woman in North America. It's bleak out here.
Last three words not required. While I will mock footfags until the day I die and beyond because I'm going to leave notes, they probably still aren't as bad as pitfags, or worse: elbowfags, who want to fuck someone's arm when it's being held close to another body part 💪🏻
Good point, but it's a pretty common "fetish" (not even sure you'd call it that) to get excited seeing normal or normally non-lewd girls get naked. Especially famous women. It's why sites collecting movie clips from Hollywood sex scenes are popular, despite hardcore porn being available. The porn stars are nobodies.
Once the technology has become more accessible, I bet it will be common for young guys to make porn with their classmates and teachers. Not even girls they have a crush on, just random girls at their school. Kind of a creepy thought actually.
What makes you sure it was AI? Because it gave her an ass instead of an extended lower back lol
AI is notorious for adding extra fingers. That was one of the obvious giveaways when pregnancy photos of Big Mike started floating around the internet last September.
Lol. So it literally took until the advent of AI-generated images for there to be "evidence" that Mike is a woman with pregnant pictures of "her". None existed beforehand. The more I hear about the Obamas, the more it seems like Joan Rivers was right.
Yeah it was pretty funny. Other than the extra fingers the pics were clearly Big Mike in his 50s. Even if he was a woman he would have been decades past menopause.
The finger thing isn't very reliable anymore, newer models are better at them.
Im going to take a swing and say they're real, and this is just a convenient cover. Not that I have any idea, but that outcome would be funnier and so that's the one I endorse.
The ones I saw were a red body painted Taylor getting fucked in the stands at a Chiefs game and getting railed by Oscar the Grouch in an alley full of trash so I'm thinking probably not real on this one.
See, before I was joking, but now I want to believe. The truth is out there.
Yeah I knew that one was fake as soon as I saw that the "Taylor" in the pic actually had an ass
The article used the term "cartoonish". I haven't seen it myself, but if they're not lying it was an obvious fake.
Uhm, yeah, at least a year now. Natalie Portman, Emma Watson, you name it, lol, seems like they're starting with the women they know will bitch loudest.
Is someone new to the Internet and hasn't read Rule 34?
Taylor Swift isn't even that hot. She has A cups and no ass. Her face is like a 7 at best. Why do people want to rub one out to her?
I've had a coworker who was a fast food cashier who is hotter than she is.
Coomers gonna coom, but it's possible whoever generated them had a different motivation. There's all kinds of mischief that can be made with AI. Or maybe the other posters are right and this is a planted controversy to create a pretext for the regime to control AI.
What if Taylor Swift herself has been AI-generated this whole time?
Ew.
picsoritdidnthappen
Please no.
my child you mustn't avert your eyes from the truth. endeavor to gaze upon that which is unholy, that you may recognize it.
...So?
Where are they?
Alright, who's got the link?
This is probably a good thing™.
Women will no longer be able to sell nudes of themselves and degrade themselves in that manner. Though they'll probably find a new way to degrade themselves.