Why does her entire argument boil down to "I didn't like they way they looked, so I blew a potentially lifelong job in the field I really wanted because ick"
And yet, the demand for everyone to change to suit the new girl who literally doesn't like you or anything about you get a free pass?
It's not the field she really wanted, she got the note about STEM gibs for women and went to see what her pussy pass would get her, but didn't like the terms and conditions for her freebie.
This is actually the biggest issue with this narrative in tech.
The kind of women this narrative attracts are often the bottom of the bucket women no one wants. In any other field either. Because she's psychologically a horror show.
The kind of women who got into it fir the money waaaay more likely to be normal prople than the kind if women who got into it for the ideology.
She insulted engineers like she was still living in the 80s. Might as well have thrown in a jab about pocket protectors and calculators too. Had she said they were creepy, white, and intimidating incels, she would have gotten more traction.
Then universities wonder why there hasn't been any advancement of research or notable engineers from their institutions as women occupy more of these spaces..
I really hope Trump gets in and does his online education policy, we need nerds out of these vultures grasp yesterday.
From what I'm remembering, Trump wants to make online education a priority to undercut both teachers unions and institutions so people can get education and certificates without being forced to endure woke indoctrination facilities.
Basically he wants to create an online education infrastructure similar to eDX that he's calling "The American Academy" which would be free for US citizens, and provide up to a bachelor's degree in education, and would have accepted credentials and credits across all public universities.
The utility is that it makes the monetary structure of funding schools with bachelor's degree student loans unsustainable. Most Americans could also get a better education with less student loan debt.
This, obviously, wouldn't replace things like law-school or med school; but it's a lethal blow to the Leftist Madrassas that are public education. The fact that they would have to compete with recorded courses from other professionals or better teachers means that even the corruption of the educational field couldn't beat it.
She just wanted to ride the cock carousel and then settle for her MRS degree. Her sexual market value is too low to go after the Chads so she thought she'd go for the Poindexters but she then realized it would cut into her tribal social value too much.
I didn't even know what she meant by that. I googled "wearing your pants backwards" and the results were 1. some modern fashion trend (definitely not among the geek crowd), 2. Kriss Kross, and 3. a ton of suspiciously promoted stories claiming Trump did or did not wear backwards trousers at some event.
Geeks get shit done, and are always friendly to anyone who can also get shit done. If you felt unwelcome, it was probably because you couldn't get shit done.
Also the idea that women have higher median IQ is false. They use IQ data taken at 10-12, when girls have a developmental advantage. Girls reach physical maturity quicker because all they need to breed is to be physically fertile, and that's all that matters in nature. The intelligence boost of hitting maturity quicker disappears by 18, when men dominate the field.
Which is a bad way to put it because it implies one is better than the other. And the end result of that is where we are now: women wanting to have their cake and eat it, too.
Being exceptional is hard. Especially in social settings. For many, it is hard to find a place where you fit in (or can just be yourself).
Women (being clustered in the center of the bell curve) have advantages in this area. They have an easier time in social environments because will never have a problem finding people they can relate to.
There is nothing wrong with being average in intelligence. It has pros and cons just like being exceptionally smart has pros and cons. Being exceptionally dumb has some advantages, too, believe it or not... though their lives are not something I want to emulate.
I really think this whole thing ends when women realize they don't want the things they claim to want. Which, if past arguments with women are any guide, will be about 2 weeks after they have burned the whole world to ashes.
Men are superior because the bottom percent basically don't exist as far as society is concerned. The average man you would interact with is better than the average women at every objectively measurable task and also most subjectively measurable tasks if the outcomes are broken down into objective criteria.
Best writers, artists, cooks, scientists, doctors, soldiers and etc are all men. Even to this day when they force women into those roles. Even a male somalians can have better potential.. yeah. A shithole country like somalia would look a magnitude better than a country ran by 100% women lol.
It's actually ridiculous because even the most beer-swilling redneck dropout has more practical skills like carpentry and mechanics than the most highly educated ivy league female anything.
men have a wider curve, women a narrower, peakier curve, which means more men will be clustered on either end of the curve
This gets repeated a lot but the actual truth is that the mean of men, for something like 'engineering ability', is greater than the mean for women, not just the variance. It is a male skill, and so men tend to be better at it. If you were talking about 'navigating complex social hierarchies', then of course the mean for women would be greater than men, because that is a feminine skill. Saying that men are women only differ in terms of the 'variance' for various 'masculine' intellectual abilities, rather than the mean, is feminist propaganda. Go on, ask a woman to read a map or navigate her way around a completely new area and see how well she goes.
In fact the whole tweet is very telling. The woman is complaining that the men in an engineering department are acting like men instead of women. The men are focusing on improving their engineering skills to rise up in the male competence hierarchy, how bizarre! And a woman not liking the engineering department because the men aren't acting like women and building some kind of ridiculous female social hierarchy? How could it be! Feminists told me that men and women are identical in every way (except men are more evil), so it can't be true.
Pussyfooting around it doesn't work. Men have to stop doing that and just say "I'm better at it than you. Yes, because I'm a man. You go and do the things you're good at and I'll do what I'm good at."
Woman is disgusted because she accidentally interacts with a non-chad. Is mortally offended and has to tell everyone about it.
Why does her entire argument boil down to "I didn't like they way they looked, so I blew a potentially lifelong job in the field I really wanted because ick"
And yet, the demand for everyone to change to suit the new girl who literally doesn't like you or anything about you get a free pass?
It's not the field she really wanted, she got the note about STEM gibs for women and went to see what her pussy pass would get her, but didn't like the terms and conditions for her freebie.
You make a valid point.
If just being a geek and liking geek things keeps people like that out, I have to step up my game.
This is actually the biggest issue with this narrative in tech.
The kind of women this narrative attracts are often the bottom of the bucket women no one wants. In any other field either. Because she's psychologically a horror show.
The kind of women who got into it fir the money waaaay more likely to be normal prople than the kind if women who got into it for the ideology.
She insulted engineers like she was still living in the 80s. Might as well have thrown in a jab about pocket protectors and calculators too. Had she said they were creepy, white, and intimidating incels, she would have gotten more traction.
Always nice to see. There are some pretty lol-worthy comments there!
This is what they talk about when they feel unsafe in your space lol
This is how psychological projection works, the person making you feel unsafe says you're making her feel unsafe.
We are the most oppressed group
Then universities wonder why there hasn't been any advancement of research or notable engineers from their institutions as women occupy more of these spaces..
I really hope Trump gets in and does his online education policy, we need nerds out of these vultures grasp yesterday.
What’s the online education policy all about? I remember when I was naive and thought math and engineering was immune to wokeness
From what I'm remembering, Trump wants to make online education a priority to undercut both teachers unions and institutions so people can get education and certificates without being forced to endure woke indoctrination facilities.
I posted it here: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17rlrR3FeH/agenda-47--the-american-academy-/c/
Basically he wants to create an online education infrastructure similar to eDX that he's calling "The American Academy" which would be free for US citizens, and provide up to a bachelor's degree in education, and would have accepted credentials and credits across all public universities.
The utility is that it makes the monetary structure of funding schools with bachelor's degree student loans unsustainable. Most Americans could also get a better education with less student loan debt.
This, obviously, wouldn't replace things like law-school or med school; but it's a lethal blow to the Leftist Madrassas that are public education. The fact that they would have to compete with recorded courses from other professionals or better teachers means that even the corruption of the educational field couldn't beat it.
Law school and Med School are next up on the ladder, but that involves a lot of tech updates in the industry itself.
Thanks!
Leftists weren't the victims growing up, they were the schoolyard bully.
Lol, she's litterally saying she wouldn't study engineering because she didn't like the socially-akward men who do engineering.
Aren't you going there to study? These men pose fewer distractions then.
Apparently, women don't go there to study.
She just wanted to ride the cock carousel and then settle for her MRS degree. Her sexual market value is too low to go after the Chads so she thought she'd go for the Poindexters but she then realized it would cut into her tribal social value too much.
I don't know any geek who wears their pants backwards
I didn't even know what she meant by that. I googled "wearing your pants backwards" and the results were 1. some modern fashion trend (definitely not among the geek crowd), 2. Kriss Kross, and 3. a ton of suspiciously promoted stories claiming Trump did or did not wear backwards trousers at some event.
Geeks get shit done, and are always friendly to anyone who can also get shit done. If you felt unwelcome, it was probably because you couldn't get shit done.
Geeks do not suffer whores.
Feminists hate autistic men more than anything
Looks like a woman with the necessary 'social skills', rofl.
... Is that a man?
She couldn't make it as a nerd or a geek? What a dweeb!
Also the idea that women have higher median IQ is false. They use IQ data taken at 10-12, when girls have a developmental advantage. Girls reach physical maturity quicker because all they need to breed is to be physically fertile, and that's all that matters in nature. The intelligence boost of hitting maturity quicker disappears by 18, when men dominate the field.
Those geeks are the ones making 95% of the advancement in the world. That bitch should go back in the kitchen.
I bet she almost joined the Marines too.
I’d rather stare at my shoes than have to look at her face.
It's like female hannibal lecter.
Men are exceptional; women are average (or as the kids say, mid).
Which is a bad way to put it because it implies one is better than the other. And the end result of that is where we are now: women wanting to have their cake and eat it, too.
Being exceptional is hard. Especially in social settings. For many, it is hard to find a place where you fit in (or can just be yourself).
Women (being clustered in the center of the bell curve) have advantages in this area. They have an easier time in social environments because will never have a problem finding people they can relate to.
There is nothing wrong with being average in intelligence. It has pros and cons just like being exceptionally smart has pros and cons. Being exceptionally dumb has some advantages, too, believe it or not... though their lives are not something I want to emulate.
I really think this whole thing ends when women realize they don't want the things they claim to want. Which, if past arguments with women are any guide, will be about 2 weeks after they have burned the whole world to ashes.
"Exceptional" includes the retards along with the geniuses, but thanks for demonstrating the apex fallacy that women employ by instinct.
Men are superior because the bottom percent basically don't exist as far as society is concerned. The average man you would interact with is better than the average women at every objectively measurable task and also most subjectively measurable tasks if the outcomes are broken down into objective criteria.
Best writers, artists, cooks, scientists, doctors, soldiers and etc are all men. Even to this day when they force women into those roles. Even a male somalians can have better potential.. yeah. A shithole country like somalia would look a magnitude better than a country ran by 100% women lol.
It's actually ridiculous because even the most beer-swilling redneck dropout has more practical skills like carpentry and mechanics than the most highly educated ivy league female anything.
This gets repeated a lot but the actual truth is that the mean of men, for something like 'engineering ability', is greater than the mean for women, not just the variance. It is a male skill, and so men tend to be better at it. If you were talking about 'navigating complex social hierarchies', then of course the mean for women would be greater than men, because that is a feminine skill. Saying that men are women only differ in terms of the 'variance' for various 'masculine' intellectual abilities, rather than the mean, is feminist propaganda. Go on, ask a woman to read a map or navigate her way around a completely new area and see how well she goes.
In fact the whole tweet is very telling. The woman is complaining that the men in an engineering department are acting like men instead of women. The men are focusing on improving their engineering skills to rise up in the male competence hierarchy, how bizarre! And a woman not liking the engineering department because the men aren't acting like women and building some kind of ridiculous female social hierarchy? How could it be! Feminists told me that men and women are identical in every way (except men are more evil), so it can't be true.
Pussyfooting around it doesn't work. Men have to stop doing that and just say "I'm better at it than you. Yes, because I'm a man. You go and do the things you're good at and I'll do what I'm good at."