The entire article is a hilarious exercise in women demanding a complete lack of accountability for their actions. There’s also
Today, Taylor Swift is routinely judged for “getting through a lot of men”. Swift, surely the western hemisphere’s most hardcore serial monogamist, is living proof that any woman can be slut-shamed for any reason at any time.
A “serial monogamist” is well hilariously oxymoronic, but another sad societal attempt at gaslighting men into compliance.
Is it a misogynistic throwback to the higher demands placed on female virtue?
You can’t even go five seconds without a feminist calling responsibility “misogynistic”.
"Is there such a thing for a woman as a post-slut-shamed life? Or are they doomed to stay forever struggling in the quicksand of their hyper-public humiliation? A case of once slut-shamed, forever slut-shamed. Like a virus you just can’t shake off."
Good? Maybe people should know if you're a stupid whore forever, so it's a huge red flag, and eventually this bullshit can self correct.
Like some kind of sexually transmitted disease? If only there was a 100% effective way to avoid those.
To your other point, the whole idea of shame is to protect others, not necessarily fix the shamed herself. This is obvious to everyone, even whores pretending to not understand what's happening.
"Is there such a thing for a woman as a post-slut-shamed life? Or are they doomed to stay forever struggling in the quicksand of their hyper-public humiliation? A case of once slut-shamed, forever slut-shamed. Like a virus you just can’t shake off."
Probably, but not without a massive reformation in how women work at a fundamental level.
For the most part the single biggest barrier to women's actions are: other women.
All those fashion magazines, makeup tutorials, popular trends, and more are under social pressure from other women far, far more than from men. Sure the basic endgame is what a man thinks of things but the process that curates the journey is heavily influenced by women instead.
So if the FOTM [flavour of the month] is massive fake nails? Expect to see a lot of women wearing fake nails, no matter how cumbersome they will be on a constant basic. Subdermal piercings which can sometimes migrate the wrong way? Shoot me up, Mx Piercer dxde, because of course pointless social scoring from talking the talk is equally important as walking the walk, no matter how functionally retarded the footwear will be.
Women get told to sleep around, by other women, and then realise down the line how much of a misstep that was. Depending on how much scrutiny there is it could very well be possible to check back on the individuals that were advocating for these things and see just how much of their own advice was being taken. Did the leading woman follow her own actions and sleep with all the men she said she would? Or did she play a long con game of sullying the reputation of her competition and now gets to pick and choose from all the men looking for someone who doesn't have a body count in the double digits?
Long nails were a wealth symbol: They showcased that you were so rich, you didn't need to work in such a way that your nails grinded down. Or in less charitable terms, meant you were so inept at life, so useless at everything, such a pampered princess that you never had to lift a finger to even wipe your own ass.
Its like they never heard the old "build a thousand bridges, fuck one goat" joke made at men's expense. Sex is one of those things where we hold it against someone forever. A guy who fucks a goat once, or even another guy, its forever held to that task. Even he himself will hold it to him.
Its the same with fucking lots of guys, or fucking a black guy even. It'll be your fate forever.
That's why mindless fucking is a frowned upon thing. We all know this will happen, and we slut shame to tell bitches not to do it. But they still do then whine when it happens.
I'm still amazed how a good chunk of women view virgins with disgust.
There was a video clip of Vtubers I stumbled across the other day, where one of the men casually admitted to being a virgin.
You could literally hear the disappointment in one of the woman's voice. It was startling. She got mocked for it and tried to backpedal, but it was definitely a lesson to take away.
I'm still amazed how a good chunk of women view virgins with disgust.
I'm not. Women get told to berate $CurrentThing and then go on to do exactly that because they have been told that's how they should behave. By other women. What will get left out a lot of the time are the consequences that can follow as said behaviour is described in a way that makes it come across as infallible, and that way of thinking will continue up until, and even after, the at times physical consequences of their actions coming at them face first.
Women are far more "conservative" in terms of following the hivemind and bowing to social pressure [from other women] than when it comes to men who are far more frequently pioneers, for better or worse as such endeavors can end poorly however "no risk, no reward" still motivates plenty of men to try. Women however rarely, if ever, back the wildcard options because of "the risks" other women will bring up, despite those risks often leading to a women standing out from the crowd and actually attracting the attention of a guy. However that's what the hivemind wants to avoid in the first place because women's biggest competitor is always other women so they will tear down each other every way possible, overtly, covertly, physically, socially, whatever means is at hand.
Additionally it will also be extremely hypocritical at times since "my body, my choice" stops when a man employs it. Guy doesn't want to fuck? Must be an incel, or virgin, or alt-right Drumpf supporting stair-muffin mover that simultaneously lives in his mother's basement and attic.
So berating virgins gets done because other women say to do it. But then this is also the same group that complains when it turns out all their Tinder hookups are the same 5 guys because the overinflated sense of self makes them easy pickings for the 8/9/10s they have been told to go for as anyone else is below their attention.
The females of various species view a male that has had sex as "veted" by another female ( who didn't get killed or birth degenerate offspring ) and thus proper breeding material.
Males have no incentive to adopt such standart for females, and they don't. They have other standarts, such as those rising the likelyhood the children will be from them.
It's because it signifies a lack of boldness, assertiveness, accomplishment and risk taking. For men, sex is also considered a skill, which requires experience to perfect. It's even mentioned in The Decameron from Boccacio in 1350.
Having said that, it's frequently mentioned that the women all committed infidelity and most were insatiable.
Pretty much, it also means all your calls for 'I expect standards if we are to date' will be met on deaf ears and you'll be lucky if the guy you date doesn't treat you like he's a pimp.
You are on record online of being a cheating hoe that sleeps around frequently and engages in degenerate behaviour. Your rehabilitation would require an ankle monitor and requirement to wear conservative clothes for the rest of your life if men were to believe you actually want a legitimate relationship.
Someone should rewrite this article, but replace women with murderers of women and see how it goes.
Is murder-shaming having a retro-moment? Or is it rather that, for the murderers, it never really goes away? Ted Bundy, the self-declared “patient zero of losing my reputation online”, has been in conversation with the Washington Post communist, Taylor Lorenz.
What is it about murder-shaming that makes it an international bloodsport, even today? Is it a misandrist throwback to the higher demands placed on male sacrifice? A double standard hardwired into the system? Certainly, any murderesses involved seem generally judged less harshly. It’s usually men who carry the stigma, like branding on cattle.
Monica Lewinsky and Rebecca Loos both conducted affairs with married men. They weren't just 'condemned' by men. They were 'condemned' by everyone, including women. She categorizes their condemnation as 'slut shaming', but in reality they were both homewreckers.
What is it about slut-shaming that makes it an international bloodsport, even today? Is it a misogynistic throwback to the higher demands placed on female virtue? A double standard hardwired into the system? Certainly, any men involved seem generally judged less harshly. It’s usually women who carry the stigma, like branding on cattle. Feminists lashed out at Lewinsky, furious at the undermining of the Clinton presidency. Loos was taunted by Sharon Osbourne on a celebrity version of The X Factor (“Try doing tomorrow’s performance with your knickers on…”). Then again, in different ways, to varying degrees, slut-shaming has long been an unofficial branch of the entertainment industry.
She was taunted because Loos is only famous for being a homewrecker. Similarly, Lewinsky is only famous for being a homewrecker. Of course, that doesn't excuse the men in question, but it takes two to party.
Disappearing might be high on her list of worries given Killary's history of sudden accidents happening to various people. Would it be that surprising if the speaking circuit tour is some kind of pro-feminist penance that must be done lest an "accident" befall yet another random person with absolutely no information on Killary, no-no Candlejack what are you doing here, I paid the latest Bill bill, you promised I would be spared, I have 9 cats and 5 unopened boxes of wine still at home that all need my special brand of attention, please don't take me away yet, I have so much to liv-
Here's a radical thought: What is Killary is specifically keeping Lewinski alive only to perpertually hold it over Bill's head?
Once Lewinski is dead, Killary can't complain to Bill about it any longer. Problem solved. But if she is kept alive...well...that complaint can be forever brought up whenever Bill and Killary argue...
The entire article is a hilarious exercise in women demanding a complete lack of accountability for their actions. There’s also
A “serial monogamist” is well hilariously oxymoronic, but another sad societal attempt at gaslighting men into compliance.
You can’t even go five seconds without a feminist calling responsibility “misogynistic”.
Being monogamous with 100 dudes in three years isn't the virtue they think it is.
"Serial dickslayer" means exactly the same thing, they should use that instead
"And she shall be known as Thot Dadisues, The Serial Dickslayer!"
"Is there such a thing for a woman as a post-slut-shamed life? Or are they doomed to stay forever struggling in the quicksand of their hyper-public humiliation? A case of once slut-shamed, forever slut-shamed. Like a virus you just can’t shake off."
Good? Maybe people should know if you're a stupid whore forever, so it's a huge red flag, and eventually this bullshit can self correct.
Like some kind of sexually transmitted disease? If only there was a 100% effective way to avoid those.
To your other point, the whole idea of shame is to protect others, not necessarily fix the shamed herself. This is obvious to everyone, even whores pretending to not understand what's happening.
Probably, but not without a massive reformation in how women work at a fundamental level.
For the most part the single biggest barrier to women's actions are: other women.
All those fashion magazines, makeup tutorials, popular trends, and more are under social pressure from other women far, far more than from men. Sure the basic endgame is what a man thinks of things but the process that curates the journey is heavily influenced by women instead.
So if the FOTM [flavour of the month] is massive fake nails? Expect to see a lot of women wearing fake nails, no matter how cumbersome they will be on a constant basic. Subdermal piercings which can sometimes migrate the wrong way? Shoot me up, Mx Piercer dxde, because of course pointless social scoring from talking the talk is equally important as walking the walk, no matter how functionally retarded the footwear will be.
Women get told to sleep around, by other women, and then realise down the line how much of a misstep that was. Depending on how much scrutiny there is it could very well be possible to check back on the individuals that were advocating for these things and see just how much of their own advice was being taken. Did the leading woman follow her own actions and sleep with all the men she said she would? Or did she play a long con game of sullying the reputation of her competition and now gets to pick and choose from all the men looking for someone who doesn't have a body count in the double digits?
PS. Long nails are disgusting.
Long nails were a wealth symbol: They showcased that you were so rich, you didn't need to work in such a way that your nails grinded down. Or in less charitable terms, meant you were so inept at life, so useless at everything, such a pampered princess that you never had to lift a finger to even wipe your own ass.
So was being fat, both are disgusting.
I honestly believe no woman should take advice from another woman.
Yes they are.
So is the new trend: Fake Eyelashes. Gross.
Those are not new but seem to be more frequent and more excessive.
Its like they never heard the old "build a thousand bridges, fuck one goat" joke made at men's expense. Sex is one of those things where we hold it against someone forever. A guy who fucks a goat once, or even another guy, its forever held to that task. Even he himself will hold it to him.
Its the same with fucking lots of guys, or fucking a black guy even. It'll be your fate forever.
That's why mindless fucking is a frowned upon thing. We all know this will happen, and we slut shame to tell bitches not to do it. But they still do then whine when it happens.
So you're saying I need to fuck a thousand goats, then build the best bridge ever? 🦞🤔
Yes. Building the bridge after to "get over it" works. Only works with bridges though. And nukes. But don't do nukes.
Fuck a thousand nukes, you say? 🤔
that's how glowing ones are made!
I'm still amazed how a good chunk of women view virgins with disgust.
There was a video clip of Vtubers I stumbled across the other day, where one of the men casually admitted to being a virgin.
You could literally hear the disappointment in one of the woman's voice. It was startling. She got mocked for it and tried to backpedal, but it was definitely a lesson to take away.
I'm not. Women get told to berate $CurrentThing and then go on to do exactly that because they have been told that's how they should behave. By other women. What will get left out a lot of the time are the consequences that can follow as said behaviour is described in a way that makes it come across as infallible, and that way of thinking will continue up until, and even after, the at times physical consequences of their actions coming at them face first.
Women are far more "conservative" in terms of following the hivemind and bowing to social pressure [from other women] than when it comes to men who are far more frequently pioneers, for better or worse as such endeavors can end poorly however "no risk, no reward" still motivates plenty of men to try. Women however rarely, if ever, back the wildcard options because of "the risks" other women will bring up, despite those risks often leading to a women standing out from the crowd and actually attracting the attention of a guy. However that's what the hivemind wants to avoid in the first place because women's biggest competitor is always other women so they will tear down each other every way possible, overtly, covertly, physically, socially, whatever means is at hand.
Additionally it will also be extremely hypocritical at times since "my body, my choice" stops when a man employs it. Guy doesn't want to fuck? Must be an incel, or virgin, or alt-right Drumpf supporting stair-muffin mover that simultaneously lives in his mother's basement and attic.
So berating virgins gets done because other women say to do it. But then this is also the same group that complains when it turns out all their Tinder hookups are the same 5 guys because the overinflated sense of self makes them easy pickings for the 8/9/10s they have been told to go for as anyone else is below their attention.
The females of various species view a male that has had sex as "veted" by another female ( who didn't get killed or birth degenerate offspring ) and thus proper breeding material.
Males have no incentive to adopt such standart for females, and they don't. They have other standarts, such as those rising the likelyhood the children will be from them.
It's because it signifies a lack of boldness, assertiveness, accomplishment and risk taking. For men, sex is also considered a skill, which requires experience to perfect. It's even mentioned in The Decameron from Boccacio in 1350.
Having said that, it's frequently mentioned that the women all committed infidelity and most were insatiable.
I mean, dont be sluts then
Pretty much, it also means all your calls for 'I expect standards if we are to date' will be met on deaf ears and you'll be lucky if the guy you date doesn't treat you like he's a pimp.
You are on record online of being a cheating hoe that sleeps around frequently and engages in degenerate behaviour. Your rehabilitation would require an ankle monitor and requirement to wear conservative clothes for the rest of your life if men were to believe you actually want a legitimate relationship.
They are making such a complicated answer to a question that is flawed. There is a much simple question with a more simple answer:
Should you have sex with multiple people? No.
If only our cities could be powered on feminist whinging. We could build elevators to saturn
Unironically yes.
Lesson here is, don't be a whore. Only Christ himself can wipe that stain away.
No he can't, but he can forgive you for being stained.
Someone should rewrite this article, but replace women with murderers of women and see how it goes.
Monica Lewinsky and Rebecca Loos both conducted affairs with married men. They weren't just 'condemned' by men. They were 'condemned' by everyone, including women. She categorizes their condemnation as 'slut shaming', but in reality they were both homewreckers.
She was taunted because Loos is only famous for being a homewrecker. Similarly, Lewinsky is only famous for being a homewrecker. Of course, that doesn't excuse the men in question, but it takes two to party.
1-Don't be a whore.
2- If you broke rule no.1, stop being a whore.
More social pressure reigning in women's excesses and immoral behavior is a good thing.
tl;dr
Taylor Swift is a homosexual, her 'boyfriends' are homosexuals too.
Guys are supposed to be aggressive.. girls are supposed to be virtuous and resist.
A guy can die anytime, thus need to plant their seeds.
She has a pretty special perspective on Bill Clinton, looking up at him while on her knees.
She was the VP's role model it seems.
Disappearing might be high on her list of worries given Killary's history of sudden accidents happening to various people. Would it be that surprising if the speaking circuit tour is some kind of pro-feminist penance that must be done lest an "accident" befall yet another random person with absolutely no information on Killary, no-no Candlejack what are you doing here, I paid the latest Bill bill, you promised I would be spared, I have 9 cats and 5 unopened boxes of wine still at home that all need my special brand of attention, please don't take me away yet, I have so much to liv-
Here's a radical thought: What is Killary is specifically keeping Lewinski alive only to perpertually hold it over Bill's head?
Once Lewinski is dead, Killary can't complain to Bill about it any longer. Problem solved. But if she is kept alive...well...that complaint can be forever brought up whenever Bill and Killary argue...