"Give women the vote", they said... "What harm could it do", they said
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
Comments (42)
sorted by:
"Educated".
Yeah that really does need scare quotes.
More like indoctrinated. I'd love to see how many of those that were "educated" were in STEM.
Or women who actually went into STEM after graduating, as opposed to just using it as a piece of paper to open doors.
It's something I've noted a time or two; a women who gets an engineering degree and then instantly uses it to pivot into a managerial role, as opposed to actually making shit. Makes me wonder.
Considering how often this happens for both women and men, I barely consider engineering to be STEM anymore. If it's the degree of choice to essentially game the system, it can't be that much of a hurdle anymore. It's definitely not a social "science" or anything like that, but it's not in the same category as things like the Sciences, Technology and Mathematics that make up the rest of STEM.
Things vs. people orientation?
But obviously, you can't then turn around and blame 'patriarchy' if you then earn less. If you work fewer hours, I think that's a very good choice (because we work to live and do not live to work), but it makes sense that you earn less than people who work longer hours.
Indoctrinated.
The moment I saw that in the headline, I knew this had to be said.
I'd even say the rise of single white females is directly correlated to women being allowed to vote. They vote for all these social programs in droves so they can replace men with daddy government.
There’s also the fact we haven’t had an actual male president since Eisenhower thanks to women voters.
Why Eisenhower?
The last wartime general turned president. Also the last respected general to run for president.
The televised presidential debates. Kennedy won the female vote entirely off physical appearance on television. Studies showed that everyone who listened to the debates versus watched say Nixon won and Vice versa.
The last president to warn about the globohomo complex.
That is a meme. And this is the first time when I've seen any claim about the reaction of 'the female vote'.
the Nixon radio victory emerged in only a single poll conducted by Sindlinger and Company. Considering other polling data reveals Sindlinger’s finding is likely the result of a Republican bias in the sample and not a mass defection of Democrats swayed by Nixon’s substantive arguments. Voters found Kennedy ahead on substance as well as style. Considering the full historical context of the election, there is little evidence that television worked to the advantage of Kennedy and the disadvantage of Nixon, nor even much evidence that Kennedy was considered more attractive. We find no evidence that the first debate was decisive; we find it dubious that the debates overall produced a 2-million vote swing for Kennedy; we find it implausible that the first debate can be linked in any meaningful way to the outcome of the election. We find it more meaningful that Nixon turned a 5-to-3 Republican disadvantage into a razor-thin contest and that he largely did so using television during the final two weeks of the contest. The 1960 election should not be read as a triumph of style over substance.
Kennedy successfully resisted their plans for Operation Northwoods, or so it is said, and defied their demands during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Imagine reading only the abstract of a liberal narrative 😂😂😂😂
Maybe read your own source first and not just the abstract 😂😂😂
Kennedy also pandered immediately to women and vastly expanded globo homo, to include the early work on Johnson’s “great new society”
How exactly is that a 'liberal narrative'?
Can make a difference, or did make a difference? College students from 2005 are not the folks who actually voted in 1960, you know, but those who are probably heavily influenced by the Camelot myth and have an unduly favorable view of JFK.
Wasn't that originally intended to decrease dependency on the government, rather than what Johnson turned it into?
In any case, trying to recast Kennedy as some sort of modern-day right-winger or left-winger is a fool's errand.
This passed by 362-9
Something that is pretty universally supported is not exactly 'pandering'.
The urge to open "blue markets" by enfranchising new voters and then buying their votes is the critical flaw of democracy. Unless you hard-code voting limits it will always be corrupted eventually.
Notice we are running into the absurd final form of this policy by simply enfranchising the entire world. In the future "voting" will just be clickfarms in india and whoever pays the most Pajeets wins.
Bitter childless catladies are like incels. They go insane and want to burn down the whole world.
The rise of feminism would not have been enough to destroy conservatism without the help of mass immigration. Electoral maps of white America are still a slam dunk for conservatism despite the input of single white woke women. Any map that includes non-whites immediately turns 100% democrat. So the calculus is pretty obvious. Any efforts to curtail the destructive influence of feminism are pointless so long as the borders remain open.
It's because of a purposely useless GOP political class that the borders remain open. Partly due to feminism, but not mostly.
The term I have heard is "whoreocracy". If you promise them all the rights, none of the responsibilities and make someone else pay for it, they will vote for whatever you want.
Exactly. They also lack the ability to comprehends second and third order effects like how taxing a manufacturer or business simply gets passed along to the end consumer in the form of higher prices.
I'm gonna have to channel TheImp here and say they do comprehend, they just don't care. The ones with power will try hard to make sure all burdens are placed on men while women get the benefits. Gibsmedat.
Modern Maenads who will use the government to subjugate men to fund their hedonism.
They are married. To the government.
It's almost like every society on Earth for the entirely of human history prior to 1900 were right.
Open borders is also a consequence of this -
women aren’t concerned with migrant men.
Because the migrant men desire to kill the native men and have sex with the native women.
Completely different outcomes.
Part of the "democracy" psyop is convincing people that voting is more important than it really is. It makes everyone focus on "elections" as being the only source of change in society, so that people stop doing anything that would really make a difference, such as building resilient and principled communities that become dominant by outcompeting other communities.
Revenge of the Ho's.
just tie voting rights to being drafted and the problem will solve it self.
No it won't. Women will always weasel out of any kind of responsibility and men are hardwired to protect women so you can't say "just ignore their whining".
Look at what happens with women in the military now. They miraculously become pregnant by pure coincidence just when it looks like they will be deployed to show shithole.
Could make abortions mandatory then, at least if they are in the early months.
“Service guarantees citizenship! Would you like to know more?”
"I know I'm slated to deploy next month, but I just found out I'm pregnant. I'll need a year light duty and undeployable status for 18 months."
“Citizenship denied.”
Nah tie it to actually serving only. None of that mandatory shit, and no lottery odds of ever actually being made to work.
Then you would only need to infilitrate the military and do propaganda there and control who gets hired. Than you dont need voting at all if you dont have a broad mass of different opinions/views with different backgrounds.