Lefty not realizing the comic says trans are violent criminals
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (62)
sorted by:
It's obviously a girl. They always dress like UWU boys, with shit like bowties and emo fashion with flipped hair.
Just like the men LARPing as women go absolutely outrageous with slutty clothes, insane caked-on makeup, etc. There’s a weird dynamic going on where they dress how their real sex generally wants the other sex to look: men want super-sluts, women want cleanly dressed fancy-boys. It’s such a fucking giveaway that there isn’t really an opposite-sex brain in their “wrongly” sexed body. Even their put-on personalities are utter parodies of the other sex, because not being that sex means you can never really grasp what it’s like to be that sex. Everything trannies do to LARP is limited to the extent to which gender traits can be observed from outside, they never quite make it realistically because they aren’t privy to those inner, subtle, unspoken things that truly make males male and females female.
I think one of the biggest tells is their stress responses. FTMs tend to cry and MTFs tend to get angry, which of course is in line with their true natures.
Very true! It is also funny, isn’t it, how if you ever hear of a trans physically attacking someone, it’s always a “woman.” It’s honestly my one actual fear re: these people, that one will take advantage of the female privilege of being allowed to hit whoever they want and end up killing someone in a “female vs female” fight.
Women (and lesbians in particular) made their own bed by supporting the woke pecking order when they were on top. I'm more worried about men getting hit on by fags in dresses. It's just one more reason to carry I suppose.
Eh… the politically active ones in the left did that. I would still be annoyed if, say, Tomi Lahren got attacked by a tranny, or my wife, who like me thinks trannies are just unusually deranged fags in skirts.
It also has a button that literally says "uke." You know, the bottom in yaoi speak.
Something only a girl with an unhealthy obsession with gay sex would know (and those unfortunate enough to have known them) and use.
Yeah, I wouldn't be shocked if this was what some terminally online chick imagined femboys to be like.
Not necessarily. They've added so much to the "trans" label that this doesn't have to be "MtF" or "FtM," especially since they answer "yes." It could easily be a man who doesn't want to be "masculine" (then don't, but doesn't mean you have to be a retard about it), but didn't go full "I'm a whaman." People who claim to not have a gender/sex are even more low effort than trannies.
I disagree. It shows they ae retarded.
It's also a pseud meme to begin with. It's conflating the logical "or" with the semantic "or", but they're not the same. It's not a logical operation, it's a request for more information. But le very smart redditor types think that because they took Intro to Visual Basic then they're cool programmers and can make jokes that only fellow hackers would get.
Plus, even if it was a logical or, answering "yes" doesn't fucking mean both are true.
As an actual programmer, I hate that trope like you wouldn't believe.
I do programming too. What do you mean by "logical" or, and "semantic" or. That's all the same operation to me.
"Yes" isn't a valid answer to any "or" question, even if you intend it to mean both parts of the disjunction are true. It's just a poorly worded, reductive, colloquialism to say that you're picking all of the above; but it's grammatically incorrect.
Speaking of which...
Fuck it. Next time I'm asking: "Are you a male Xor female?"
The logical "or" you're familiar with. But in speech, "or" isn't used that way. The closest programming analogy to how it's used in speech would be a return statement. In this case, "return gender". Because we're not asking for a yes or no answer, we're asking for more information.
I guess a better way to put it would have been conditional or. People use that in real life too. "If we're out of eggs or they're on sale, buy eggs". That would return "true", but which condition is satisfied is irrelevant.
Yeah, it took me a while, (and a separate comment) but I see what you're saying.
You're talking about the "logical" OR as an inclusive disjunction where each element can be true, such that the statement is true if one is true. "Yes, I am a Man or Woman", which could be logically accepted to be "I am Man not Woman", "I am Woman not Man", and "I am Man and I am Woman"; which doesn't make sense because the statement is already and implicitly an exclusive disjunction where a "Yes" is impossible because it must be one or the other.
I get the point you're making, but be careful with it. You don't want to give the pedophiles more fodder for their gender nonsense. It's still binary. That's why programmers use Boolean variables such as isFemale when they create objects that sex is relevant to.
Just because it's a return doesn't make it not binary. However, when returning gender, you'd generally want to either convert it to a string or return it as an enum so it's easier to understand than "0", because the reader doesn't necessarily know if 0 is male or female. I just didn't want to write all that.
The first one is using the Mathematician's Yes. Technically, you can answer yes to "Are you a boy or a girl?" and be correct. Of course, doing so is admitting that you fall under the binary one way or the other, so they really just played themselves.
The "or" we use in English often translates into XOR in math/logic. So "boy or girl" becomes "boy XOR girl", which is just a tautology since it's always going to be one or the other but never both.
You can answer "yes" to it only if you are already working within Gender Theory, which is an issue all by itself.
What? There are only two options, and answering yes is just saying "Yes, I am Male or Female."
"Yes" is only possible under Gender Theory, as in to refer to both. The question presumes an exclusive distinction. You are either male or female. Saying "yes" dismisses the presumption in the first place.
The problem people in this discussion are having is that English isn't as precise as math and logic. XOR is usually the math/logic equivalent of the English "or". "boy XOR girl" is always going to be true since it's always one or the other and never both.
Yeah I kinda got that, took me a minute to parse.
I know this is a fringe-minority exception, but...
I personally know someone with XX male syndrome. He's one of my best friends.
People with genetic disorders like this deserve our actual sympathy. It's not their fault.
That being said, yes, in over 99.99% of cases, it IS that cut-and-dry.
But that means they are still male (or at most intersex)
IDK. I think in 'legitimate' cases like this where the common biological markers that we associate with one sex or another are messed up, we should be willing to have the conversation and possibly give ground there.
From what I understand, people in that situation (intersex etc.) have very little in common with the trans of today--they were actually forced into their situation. They were given no choice, they didn't ask to be in that situation.
In cases like those, I actually feel a lot of empathy for them. I look at that, and I can't help but think how utterly awful it would be to live like that.
You think that, but find me a straight man who actually wants a SUB2000.
HEY! I'M PROBABLY STRAIGHT!
This actually perfectly exemplified my experience with leftists. It's almost without fault in its representation, in fact.
They never answer a direct question with a direct response. It's always some kind of joke, misdirection or feigned misunderstanding. You can ask the same direct question a myriad of different ways, but you'll never get a direct answer because a direct answer would show just how vacuous their beliefs truly are.
Leftist ideology requires a veritable tower of babel of newspeak to justify their ever shifting belief system. Because the content of their beliefs aren't what they're arguing for. They're arguing for their control over you. Because they think they're better than you, in spite of all the evidence to the contrary.
No way bigot, it’s just that it’s not their job to expend the emotional labor to educate you. …something something, chud.
Remember in What is a Woman, where not a single person would answer Matt Walsh's question, lol?
The gun's in the wrong place to be trans, should be near the head...
You guys have it wrong. That's where the bullet will be found.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Removed: I think you were aiming for a joke here, but there's a fine line between "41%" and "ought to be 41%". "Should" and what it implies is the issue here.
Dom, are you seriously enforcing preddit bullshit speech restrictions here? You can't be serious.
There is a problem with cheering people to kill themselves. I also don't allow users to tell each other to kill themselves. Some base decorum (and glowie avoidance) is necessary.
Why are you defending trannies?
Faggit, uh, finds a way.
What are you a tranny or something? Because I just told you I don't allow users to tell each other to kill themselves.
Just don't be so crazy, vitriolic, and edgy to demand people kill themselves.
Was implying that usually with leftists trans with guns it's either joining the 41% or accidentally joining due to gross incompetency with it.
Yes, I can see that. I'll approve the post with that context made clear.
And also that they're completely retarded due to that horrible holster method that's pointing the weapon directly at its crotch.
Though how convenient that the trannies believe they're entitled to bear arms and use them to subtly threaten people who won't play under their delusions, but want them restricted for those who want, need, and outright use them for self-defense against violent criminals.
I believe that's called a "pre-op"
Bottom surgery on a budget.
For all the hate Boomer Cuckservatives get, there's just as many Zoomer Cuckservatives more than willing to fall all over themselves and blurt out some nonsense about 'eVerYone shOuLD BE ArMeD' when the topic of armed gays comes up.
Yeah, no, I'm not going to celebrate people whom want me dead talking about kitting up.
...granted, that could be just reddit.
If it's not actually loaded, it's not tooo big a deal. Given how anal some leftists are about safety, the person in question may actually follow that guideline and be ok.
My dad's actually mentioned that as a way to sneak a gun past security or places with a pat down. Most people aren't going to check your crotch, lol.
Invest in rope.
Comic is retarded. However permitted concealed carry holders have extremely low criminality rates.
However severe mental illness precludes gun ownership.
So an insane person that has a gun. Great
Still waiting for someone to draw a realistic trans person in a comic.
I can only assume the punchline is that he became trans after he accidentally blew his own junk off, due to poor trigger discipline.
Violent criminals that have sex with cats.
And children.
Unsure and ready to shoot someone about it.
That sounds like a completely normal person alright.
*Criminally unhinged.
Creeper town.
Mentally ill people that can't answer even the most basic questions, and who unfortunately have access to firearms. That's what I get from this.