The look on the woman's face at 35 seconds demonstrates why the progressive concept of "compassion" is backwards. A person that has a job, follows the law, just generally does the correct things to make society work has to put up with tweaker Peter Pantless over here. Progressives have "compassion" for the drug addled, but no compassion for people who just want to buy some fucking cough drops without running into someone out of their minds on drugs. In progressive cities kids can't use the fucking parks without seeing some zombie jacking off on the benches.
Societies should work for the people who make societies work.
It's worse than that. We are not living in an Aparthied state. It is only the worst people who are considered "vulnerable minorities". The serial killers and pedophiles are the best among us, and Mr. Rogers should be burned alive for his crimes against humanity.
If we lived in an Aparthied state, we'd still have the benefit of people like Clarence Thomas, Dave Rubin, or even 'Caitlyn' Jenner being taken seriously as major advocates for our cause. Instead they are enemies deserving of death like the rest of us.
It's selective compassion. Even if you wanted to care about everybody equally, you can't. Like trying to watch every youtube video there's too much suffering for any person to care about.
So your only choice is to pick and choose who and what you care about, or not care about anything in particular. And of course when you're running a society the only choice is the latter.
I mean it's sad at the end that the guy posting this is stuck in SF, but the right thing isn't to give him pity bucks but to expect him to solve his own problems.
Yup. The fentanyl "crisis" doesn't come close to things I give a shit about. If it starts making it's way into legit medication or the food supply I'll start paying attention. Some druggie overdosing and being removed from society sounds like a net gain to me
Having grown up in a shitty neighborhood, where anything left out would get stolen for drug money, I absolutely loathe addicts. They can't just ruin their own lives, but they have to fuck with others to keep their addiction going. Addicts will lie, steal, rob or even kill, and it's all just to get another hit of whatever drug they worship.
That just makes this news article from 2 days ago even sadder. Because the obvious solution to that guy (and all the other ones like him) is to crack down on social media drug sales. Sure.
You have a guy walking (or, rather, staggering because he's so blitzed out of his mind he can barely walk) around Walgreens with his butt exposed, stealing (I think) oreos and then flopping on the sidewalk half-naked to eat them. You have legislators saying they want narcan freely available in all schools to combat the rampant overdosing. What does it take for you to admit that your policies have horribly failed?
Start giving all the druggies free rides and drop them off in politician's driveways.
It would suck for their neighbors. But it sucks for people living in the neighborhoods being written off as collateral damage for the greater good of advancing "progressive" ideology too.
This needs to be cut into a 30 second ad and broadcast everywhere Governor "hair do" Newsom goes on his "building his national profile" tour. I'd throw a bit of money at a crowdfund to make it happen.
He was mayor of SF and started the slide down this slippery slope and has done nothing but encourage it as governor.
The look on the woman's face at 35 seconds demonstrates why the progressive concept of "compassion" is backwards. A person that has a job, follows the law, just generally does the correct things to make society work has to put up with tweaker Peter Pantless over here. Progressives have "compassion" for the drug addled, but no compassion for people who just want to buy some fucking cough drops without running into someone out of their minds on drugs. In progressive cities kids can't use the fucking parks without seeing some zombie jacking off on the benches.
Societies should work for the people who make societies work.
Or at the very least the majority of citizens. We're way too obsessed with minority interests.
It's worse than that. We are not living in an Aparthied state. It is only the worst people who are considered "vulnerable minorities". The serial killers and pedophiles are the best among us, and Mr. Rogers should be burned alive for his crimes against humanity.
If we lived in an Aparthied state, we'd still have the benefit of people like Clarence Thomas, Dave Rubin, or even 'Caitlyn' Jenner being taken seriously as major advocates for our cause. Instead they are enemies deserving of death like the rest of us.
It's selective compassion. Even if you wanted to care about everybody equally, you can't. Like trying to watch every youtube video there's too much suffering for any person to care about.
So your only choice is to pick and choose who and what you care about, or not care about anything in particular. And of course when you're running a society the only choice is the latter.
I mean it's sad at the end that the guy posting this is stuck in SF, but the right thing isn't to give him pity bucks but to expect him to solve his own problems.
That's because the Left sees her as the petty bourgouis who are inherently morally inferior and deserving of death.
If she wanted to buy some cough drops, she should have put a gun in her mouth and killed herself like she deserves.
This is the starting point of every Leftist narrative.
I have even less compassion for drug users. Those drugs are paid for in blood.
Yup. The fentanyl "crisis" doesn't come close to things I give a shit about. If it starts making it's way into legit medication or the food supply I'll start paying attention. Some druggie overdosing and being removed from society sounds like a net gain to me
Absolutely.
Legalize all drugs, make them available OTC to everyone 21+, no advertising or marketing (pot included).
Increase penalties for public intoxication: 5-year minimum, 20 year max, depending on nature of PI: public masturbators qualify for the max.
20-to-life for diverting legal drugs to those too young to buy OTC or selling on black market.
What, penalties not high enough? I don't mind a revision upwards.
Everyone's beef about dope is related to the antisocial public behavior of users. Why should anyone give a shit about what one gets up to in private?
Having grown up in a shitty neighborhood, where anything left out would get stolen for drug money, I absolutely loathe addicts. They can't just ruin their own lives, but they have to fuck with others to keep their addiction going. Addicts will lie, steal, rob or even kill, and it's all just to get another hit of whatever drug they worship.
Spellcheck, motherfucker.
Then again... 🤔
That mind looks pretty loose.
Not as loose as those pants
Can anyone sync this up to the tune of "Footloose"?
Outrageous. Saint Floyd is spinning in his grave.
Now hold on, George Floyd has been drug free for almost three years now.
Shoutout to Amy Winehouse for almost 12 years of sobriety.
Every society on the planet has mentally ill people in it.
But only the Democrats put them on a giant billboard for the world to see, hand them all the drugs they want, and cede the streets to them.
Another product of Democratic party rule. A bullet to the brain would be a mercy for that creature.
That just makes this news article from 2 days ago even sadder. Because the obvious solution to that guy (and all the other ones like him) is to crack down on social media drug sales. Sure.
You have a guy walking (or, rather, staggering because he's so blitzed out of his mind he can barely walk) around Walgreens with his butt exposed, stealing (I think) oreos and then flopping on the sidewalk half-naked to eat them. You have legislators saying they want narcan freely available in all schools to combat the rampant overdosing. What does it take for you to admit that your policies have horribly failed?
Start giving all the druggies free rides and drop them off in politician's driveways.
It would suck for their neighbors. But it sucks for people living in the neighborhoods being written off as collateral damage for the greater good of advancing "progressive" ideology too.
Drugs have no moral agency.
What a fucking grift. Sell your furniture, buy a one-way bus ticket. You can be out of this shit in a week.
Acceleration works
Now we know what Jack Dorsey was up to when CEO of twitter
The best batch of street fentanyl would just kill everyone who uses it and rid society of these zombie leeches.
Fentanyl and some sort of deleriant. Fentanyl ODs nod off then stop breathing and die--opiate OD. That sort of agitation is not an effect of Fentanyl.
That asshole in the Twat thread begging for relocation money is one for the books.
This needs to be cut into a 30 second ad and broadcast everywhere Governor "hair do" Newsom goes on his "building his national profile" tour. I'd throw a bit of money at a crowdfund to make it happen.
He was mayor of SF and started the slide down this slippery slope and has done nothing but encourage it as governor.